Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: BMW Could Supply V8s to Jaguar Land Rover

    Sign in to follow this  

      BMW's V8 + Jaguar Land Rover Vehicles = Possible Future

    Luxury automakers are finding it difficult to make the business case for building V8 engines. Stricter fuel economy and emission standards, along with sales of V8 powered models dropping have them wondering if they should continue work on developing new variants.

     

    Take for example Jaguar Land Rover. The current V8 in naturally-aspirated and Supercharged forms has been with us for 20 years. While the company has been trying its best to keep the engine up to date, the thirsty nature and possibility of it not meeting future emission standards has the future of V8 up in the air.

     

    But Automobile reports that a deal is currently being worked out by JLR and BMW for the German automaker to supply V8 engines to the British. The possible engine is a new 4.0L twin-turbo V8 that promises to be more powerful, fuel efficient, and lighter than the current V8s on offer from either automaker.

     

    Why is BMW making a possible deal with JLR? Most likely it comes down making a stronger business case as to why they should go forward with developing a new V8 engine.

     

    Source: Automobile

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I suspect only a few auto makers will still be making V8 or V10 or V12 engines in the next 4 years. Everyone else will either buy their engine from these big bad boys or go to small turbo / variable supercharged engines or EV / Hybrids.

     

    The world be changing, :P

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This touches on why I truly believe that GM should just stick with its LT series engines and kill the intro of the TTV8s it has upcoming

     

    But SMK says you have to have TTV8 to play in the luxury segment. You have to copy what the Germans do to be a true player. Without having the same engines as the Germans, you are not a true player.

     

    :deathwatch:

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You need a twin turbo V12 to be a luxury/sports car maker of the highest level.  Turbo/super charged V8 to be in the luxury game.  However EV's are going to infiltrate that space, and then it will just be an argument of 500+ hp with no noise and that will be a new form of luxury.  After 2020, EV luxury is going to become more and more common.  

     

    I do think it makes sense Jaguar/LR and BMW team up on a V8.  Most Jaguars have a supercharged V6, only the R models have a V8 and they can't sell that many of those.  Likewise with Land Rover, pretty much just the Range Rover uses the V8, and that has a base V6 also.  Over at BMW you have the 7-series and M vehicles. Combined they probably produce less than 100,000 V8s worldwide per year and shrinking, so might as well co-develop one.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This touches on why I truly believe that GM should just stick with its LT series engines and kill the intro of the TTV8s it has upcoming

    You could argue the Corvette better off with a twin turbo DOHC V8 though, and Cadillac could use one for sure.   If there is a mid-engine Corvette (which should be a mid-engine Cadillac supercar) a high revving DOHC unit would be better there too.  It is possible by 2025 the the Silverado, Sierra, Yukon, Suburban all have a V6 as their big engine, the Camaro SS will be a V6 by then, probably the only V8 Camaro will be a ZL1.  I don't think GM will have a V8 for sale for less than $60-70,000 come 2025.  CAFE just won't allow that.  So if they keep the LT series, it is for Corvette and big Cadillacs, plus it wouldn't parts share with their DOHC V6.  It probably makes more economic sense to have a 4 liter V8 sharing a block with the 2 liter 4 or 3 liter V6.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    (1)You need a twin turbo V12 to be a luxury/sports car maker of the highest level.  Turbo/super charged V8 to be in the luxury game.  (2)However EV's are going to infiltrate that space, and then it will just be an argument of 500+ hp with no noise and that will be a new form of luxury.  After 2020, EV luxury is going to become more and more common.  

     

     

    Your top statement simply is no longer true.. Ironically U prove me right with your second one. The new name of the game in luxury seems to be EV. I think this is obviously due to the smooth, quiet and clean characteristics of that tech vs the Combustible Engine. Until the range of those engines, not to mention infrastructure is capable of allowing for zilch range anxiety.. not to mention time wasted waiting for a charge.. Cadillac, via Voltec might be the best positioned to soldier onward into that battle. Voltech should be employed thru-out their line-up, but the EV proposition should be one of powerful and lagless capabilities. The Full system horsepower is 449HP and  5.4 seconds. to 60 is strong.. but going directly after Tesla's higher HP and 2.9 second runs wopuld kill any debate of a need for V12s which typically aren't utilized so much for speed, but smoothness. EV nullifies that need

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This touches on why I truly believe that GM should just stick with its LT series engines and kill the intro of the TTV8s it has upcoming

    You could argue the Corvette better off with a twin turbo DOHC V8 though, and Cadillac could use one for sure.   If there is a mid-engine Corvette (which should be a mid-engine Cadillac supercar) a high revving DOHC unit would be better there too.  It is possible by 2025 the the Silverado, Sierra, Yukon, Suburban all have a V6 as their big engine, the Camaro SS will be a V6 by then, probably the only V8 Camaro will be a ZL1.  I don't think GM will have a V8 for sale for less than $60-70,000 come 2025.  CAFE just won't allow that.  So if they keep the LT series, it is for Corvette and big Cadillacs, plus it wouldn't parts share with their DOHC V6.  It probably makes more economic sense to have a 4 liter V8 sharing a block with the 2 liter 4 or 3 liter V6.  

     

     

     

     

    OK.. I can give U this for 2025, or 9 years away. But what I speak of is 2016.. RIGHT THE f@#k NOW.. when the entire Cadillac range would benefit from an engine that we all kno will not only fit in their cars, but have all the tech and capability of anything that Germany has to offer. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Exotic cars have V12s, there will always be a place for that sound among the supercars. Luxo barges like Rolls and Bentley could easily go EV.

    The LT series V8 is good now, but I wouldn't put much money into developing a replacement for them since the next generation Silverado will probably have V6 power. A twin turbo V8 would be good for high end cars the next 10 years, then around 2025 maybe even Corvette is a electric car and that need for a V8 goes away.

    The Corvette engine could be useful in the CTS V-sport or CT6. I would like to Cadillac have its own V8, but since they don't have one better to use the Corvette engine than have no V8 at all.

    Edited by smk4565

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There's still a 50 mpg target for CAFE.

     

     

    I just don't think anything beyond a V8 will even be viable AT ALL in passenger cars.

     

    I think Daimler will make a fully electric Mercedes-Maybach. They may even position it as a top trim, or do they combine Maybach and AMG sub models? Yeah, that one!!! That one!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There was talk from within Mercedes of an AMG hybrid around 2020, possibly every AMG model being a hybrid at some point.  There is also rumor of a 1,300 hp hybrid hyper car that weighs under 3,000 lbs under development, but Mercedes denies it.  AMG feels that their customers want a V8 and they want that noise, so I think that will have to stay in play there, but for the regular cars, I could see the plug-ins taking over by 2020.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The perception problem with Jag using BMW engines (if anyone actually cares about Jag) is that they are competitors

     

    I don't think any further explanation is necessary.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Audi, Jaguar, and BMW all use the same transmission though.  I don't know if it matters to Jaguar buyers if the engine comes from BMW, there used to be a Range Rover with a BMW V8 in it in the early 2000s.  The exterior styling, interiors and infotainment systems are way different on a BMW and Jaguar.   If you want exclusive engine and transmission in a luxury car though, there is only one place to look.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would suspect they care about proprietary transmissions as much as they do about cylinder count.

     

    But some DO see it as 'admitting defeat' on the engineering front.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BMW consumers don't, but Jag can hardly afford to keep the lights on in dealerships across the U.S..

    Some early reports are really panning the F_Pace, saying it's not very compelling at its price/ has too much cheapness.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The F-Pace is priced on the low side, and it's kind of a tweener. Too big to be a GLC/X3 size but too small to be a GLE or X5 size.

     

    I've been around the new Jaguars a lot. To bring the price at a competitive point and provide the standard 5 years comprehensive warranty, I think they pulled quite a bit of money out of the interiors. Shame, they drive really astoundingly well, and are lightweight cars now.

     

    I have no issue with this, BMW engines are probably more reliable, and there's even some exotics like Pagani that delegate the engineering of their engines to someone else, and heck the Ford GT, also an exotic prestige carrier has a lot of work subcontracted out to MultiMatic.

     

    It's they only way. I recently heard that FordMoCo and Jaguar LandRover would cooperate over battery technology and suppliers.

     

     

    Marchionne wasn't wrong with his principles over why it was so necessary and beneficial when he begged for other automakers to help Fiat save some coin, expect the problem is no one wants Fiat to save some coin, because NO ONE WANTS FIAT!

     

    But Jaguar/LandRover are worth saving, I think. I hope they don't cheapen out the XJ. There's some rumours that the neXtJ...(get it? hurr hurr!!! I made a laugh) will be kinda like the Cadillac CT6, it'll be just like a LWB XF with some cosmetic changes and the same downmarket, unworthy of true flagship status interior. But that's just a rumour.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Pagani gets their engines from Mercedes-AMG of course.   Aston Martin will get them from there too.  But those brands are far lower volume than Jaguar.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When it comes to performance pedigree in terms of raw numbers, the German car maker engines deliver, and are usually underrated.

     

    Now, we live in a world where an Indian automaker invests in its British heritage brand and is now about to seal the deal for collaboration with a German rival.

     

    GLOBALIZATION!!! TECHNOLOGY!

     

    10255695.jpg

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      BMW is studying ways to give its performance M-Division special models not based on any current or former BMW.   BMW has already apparently decided which class of car the models will be in, but will not reveal details on it just yet.  Multiple concepts are being studied. 
      The comments came from Markus Flasch, BMW's head of in-house tuning.  Further up for debate is whether the models would be internal combustion or electric or a blend of both. Whichever form they take, the M cars would "fit our character.... a combination of precision, agility, and luxury", though they would not necessarily be positioned above the M8.
      Having standalone models would help BMW's M-Division better compete with Mercedes-Benz AMG

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      BMW is studying ways to give its performance M-Division special models not based on any current or former BMW.   BMW has already apparently decided which class of car the models will be in, but will not reveal details on it just yet.  Multiple concepts are being studied. 
      The comments came from Markus Flasch, BMW's head of in-house tuning.  Further up for debate is whether the models would be internal combustion or electric or a blend of both. Whichever form they take, the M cars would "fit our character.... a combination of precision, agility, and luxury", though they would not necessarily be positioned above the M8.
      Having standalone models would help BMW's M-Division better compete with Mercedes-Benz AMG
    • By Drew Dowdell
      At FCA, amid the backdrop of a proposed merger and its subsequent collapse,  a lawsuit has been filed by Reid Bigland, head of the RAM brand and CEO of FCA Canada alleging that FCA has retaliated against Bigland for cooperating in a Federal prob of FCA's sales reporting process. 
      Bigland joined Chrysler in 2006 and in turn took over the reigns of Alfa Romeo, Maserati, and Dodge, eventually serving as CEO of FCA Canada.  The lawsuit filed Wednesday accuses FCA of retaliation for not taking the fall for the sales reporting prob.  Bigland claims his compensation has fallen by more than 90% and that the sales reporting process under scrutiny was one that he inherited. 
      The probe of FCA's sales reporting started after two dealerships in Illinois filed a lawsuit alleging they were offered cash in return for reporting falsely inflated sales numbers. From that lawsuit, FCA was forced to recount and re-report its previous sales reports.  The Security and Exchange Commission continued its investigation and Bigland cooperated. 
      Bigland's position is that the sales reporting methods existed well before he assumed his roles, and he did nothing to change the reporting process already in place.  Bigland claims that the SEC tried to settle with some admission of wrong-doing by the company and Bigland. Bigland declined to admit wrong doing and later sent a letter detailing the sales reporting practices to the SEC.
      Bigland sold his shares in the company in 2018 and he claims that FCA is withholding bonuses to pay for SEC fines if and when they come. 
      For FCA's part they say via Detroit News:
      We'll have more information as it comes out. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      At FCA, amid the backdrop of a proposed merger and its subsequent collapse,  a lawsuit has been filed by Reid Bigland, head of the RAM brand and CEO of FCA Canada alleging that FCA has retaliated against Bigland for cooperating in a Federal prob of FCA's sales reporting process. 
      Bigland joined Chrysler in 2006 and in turn took over the reigns of Alfa Romeo, Maserati, and Dodge, eventually serving as CEO of FCA Canada.  The lawsuit filed Wednesday accuses FCA of retaliation for not taking the fall for the sales reporting prob.  Bigland claims his compensation has fallen by more than 90% and that the sales reporting process under scrutiny was one that he inherited. 
      The probe of FCA's sales reporting started after two dealerships in Illinois filed a lawsuit alleging they were offered cash in return for reporting falsely inflated sales numbers. From that lawsuit, FCA was forced to recount and re-report its previous sales reports.  The Security and Exchange Commission continued its investigation and Bigland cooperated. 
      Bigland's position is that the sales reporting methods existed well before he assumed his roles, and he did nothing to change the reporting process already in place.  Bigland claims that the SEC tried to settle with some admission of wrong-doing by the company and Bigland. Bigland declined to admit wrong doing and later sent a letter detailing the sales reporting practices to the SEC.
      Bigland sold his shares in the company in 2018 and he claims that FCA is withholding bonuses to pay for SEC fines if and when they come. 
      For FCA's part they say via Detroit News:
      We'll have more information as it comes out. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Quarterly:
      Ford Motor Company - Not reported
      General Motors Co. - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported
      FCA has announced that beginning October 2019, they will be reporting sales quarterly
      Monthly:
      Audi of America -  Down 2.2% for the month, Down 7.3% for the year
      BMW of North America -  Down 3.1% for the month, Down 2.3% for the year
      FCA US LLC -  Up 2% for the month, Down 3% for the year
      Genesis Motor America - Not Reported
      Honda Motor Co. -  Down 4.9% for the month,  Flat 0.0% for the year
      Hyundai Motor America -  Up 1.8% for the month, Up 1.74% for the year
      Infiniti USA - Down 10.4% for the month, Down 13.4% for the year
      Jaguar Land Rover North America - Down 1.2% for the month, Up 7.3% for the year
      Kia Motors America - Up 1.0% for the month, Up 4.7% for the year
      Mazda North American Operations - Down 16.0%  for the month, Down 15.5% for the year
      Mercedes-Benz USA - Down 0.5% for the month, Down 8.6% for the year
      Mitsubishi Motors North America -  Down 21.5% for the month, Up 4.6% for the year
      Nissan Group - Up 0.1% for the month, Down 6.6% for the year
      Porsche Cars North America Inc. -  Up 0.1% for the month, Up 2.1% for the year
      Subaru of America, Inc. - Up 6.4% for the month, Up 5.7% for the year
      Toyota Motor North America - Up 3.2% for the month, Down 3.1% for the year
      Volkswagen of America -  Up 14% for the month, Up 6.2% for the year
      Volvo Cars of North America, LLC - Up 4.5% for the month, Up 12.7% for the year

      Brands (Quarterly):
      Buick -  Not Reported
      Cadillac -  Not Reported
      Chevrolet - Not Reported
      GMC - Not Reported
      Ford - Not Reported
      Lincoln - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported

      Brands (Monthly):
      Acura - Up 5.7% - 13,547 MTD / 61,619 YTD
      Alfa Romeo - Down 34% - 1,572 MTD / 7,442 YTD
      Audi - Down 2.2% 18,892 MTD / 82,031 YTD
      BMW - Up 1.7% - 27,109 MTD / 124,813 YTD
      Chrysler - Down 26% - 10,903 MTD / 51,481 YTD
      Dodge - Up 3% - 47,759 MTD / 204,546 YTD
      Fiat - Down 29% - 1,025 MTD / 4,170 YTD
      Genesis - Not reported
      Honda - Down 5.9% - 131,985 MTD / 579,475 YTD
      Hyundai - Up 1.8% - 66,121 MTD / 269,126 YTD
      Infiniti - Down 10.4% - 10,413 MTD / 53,219 YTD
      Jaguar - Down 14.6% - 2,021 MTD
      Jeep - Down 7% - 90,326 MTD / 379,455 YTD
      Kia - Up 1.0% - 60,062 MTD / 248,043 YTD
      Land Rover -  Up 3.3% 7,337 MTD
      Lexus - Down 3.4% - 24,537 MTD  / 112,688 YTD
      Mazda - Down 16% - 25,192 MTD / 115,727 YTD
      Mercedes-Benz - Up 0.4% 27,080 MTD / 121,200 YTD
      Mercedes-Benz Vans - Down 7.7% - 2,862 MTD / 13,020 YTD
      MINI - Down 33.2% - 2,822 MTD / 14,348 YTD
      Mitsubishi - Down 21.5% - 9,750 MTD / 58,780 YTD
      Nissan - Up 1.1% - 121,570 MTD / 540,313 YTD
      Porsche - Up 0.1% - 5,010 MTD / 25,052 YTD
      Ram Trucks - Up 29% - 67,117 MTD / 257,941 YTD
      Smart - Down 3.6% - 106 MTD / 422 YTD
      Subaru - Up 6.4% - 63,972 MTD / 278,014 YTD
      Toyota - Up 4.1% - 197,637 MTD / 837,068 YTD
      Volkswagen - Up 14% - 35,702 MTD / 152,883 YTD
      Volvo - Up 4.5% - 9,338 MTD / 37,754 YTD

      View full article
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. CRAZY C
      CRAZY C
      (35 years old)
    2. Ergoman
      Ergoman
      (67 years old)
    3. tmp
      tmp
      (112 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...