• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Opel Reveals A New 1.6L Turbo


    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    October 10, 2012

    Opel has revealed a new 1.6L turbocharged four-cylinder that will be part of a new engine family coming out within the next few years. The 1.6L engine uses an aluminum block and spark ignition direct injection (SIDI). Opel says the new engine improves fuel efficiency by 13%.

    In standard form, the 1.6L Eco Turbo produces 168 HP and 206 lb-ft of torque. In the Performance Turbo model, power is upped to 197 HP and 221 lb-ft of torque.

    The new 1.6L turbo will be appearing first in the new Cascada cabriolet in 2013, with other models following thereafter.

    There is no word if this new engine will be coming over to the U.S., but when asked ,officials said it's “under consideration”.

    Source: Autoweek

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    0


      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    Encore and Verano need that, and optional for the Cruze. Then Buick at least has some separation from Chevy, rather than having the same powertrain.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would guess that any vehicle that is Opel based would be first in line to get it. So in the US that means Encore, Verano, and Regal.... though I believe Regal to be least likely to get it in the current generation.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I generally don't favor turbocharged setup with much higher torque figures than hp numbers. There is only one conclusion you can draw from such figures, and that is that the turbocharger is undersized and over boosted.

    Let me explain... 206 lb-ft is 206 hp at 5252rpm. What that means is that the power peak arrives at some engine speed lower that. Assuming a flat torque plateau the power peak is probably around 4300 rpm. You can also get 168 hp if you boost the engine to say a mere 160 lb-ft but carry it to 5500 rpm. Generally speaking the effective mass air flow in both power peak instances are about the same and generally speaking the same turbine/compressor pairing would be used in both. The only reason the engine is not about 220 hp @ 5500 rpm is because the selected turbo is too small and runs out of airflow capacity above about 168 hp.

    There are two reasons why taking an engine with a very small turbo to relatively high boost at lower rpms then having to back off quite early (in the 4000s) to avoid overspeeding the turbo is not ideal. First of all, a 168hp @ 5500 rpm / 160 lb-ft @ 1500~5500 rpm engine is far more linear and enjoyable to drive. Turbolag getting to 160 lb-ft will be significantly less than getting to 206 lb-ft, also the engine won't feel like it's running short of breath early in the mid-4000s. A 168 hp @ 4300 rpm / 206 lb-ft @ 2300~4300 engine feels like a diesel!

    The second reason is one of efficiency. A significant factor affecting fuel economy is the compression ratio of the engine. This is because the compression ratio in an Otto cycle is it's expansion ratio and a larger expansion ratio extracts more energy from each ounce of fuel burned. If you take an engine to about 100 lb-ft / liter you can have a 10.5~11.0:1 compression with direct injection with a boost pressure of about 10~11 psi. If you want to take the engine to about 130 lb-ft / liter you need about 18 psi of boost which means your compression (even with DI) needs to go down to about 9.0~9.3:1. That in and of itself is worth about 10% mpg (3~4 mpg) in a small engine in a small car.

    Small turbo, high torque, low hp is the worst of both worlds. It has the increased lag and reduced economy of an engine with a larger turbo and about 130 hp/liter, while not having the power and performance.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I generally don't favor turbocharged setup with much higher torque figures than hp numbers. There is only one conclusion you can draw from such figures, and that is that the turbocharger is undersized and over boosted.

    Let me explain... 206 lb-ft is 206 hp at 5252rpm. What that means is that the power peak arrives at some engine speed lower that. Assuming a flat torque plateau the power peak is probably around 4300 rpm. You can also get 168 hp if you boost the engine to say a mere 160 lb-ft but carry it to 5500 rpm. Generally speaking the effective mass air flow in both power peak instances are about the same and generally speaking the same turbine/compressor pairing would be used in both. The only reason the engine is not about 220 hp @ 5500 rpm is because the selected turbo is too small and runs out of airflow capacity above about 168 hp.

    There are two reasons why taking an engine with a very small turbo to relatively high boost at lower rpms then having to back off quite early (in the 4000s) to avoid overspeeding the turbo is not ideal. First of all, a 168hp @ 5500 rpm / 160 lb-ft @ 1500~5500 rpm engine is far more linear and enjoyable to drive. Turbolag getting to 160 lb-ft will be significantly less than getting to 206 lb-ft, also the engine won't feel like it's running short of breath early in the mid-4000s. A 168 hp @ 4300 rpm / 206 lb-ft @ 2300~4300 engine feels like a diesel!

    The second reason is one of efficiency. A significant factor affecting fuel economy is the compression ratio of the engine. This is because the compression ratio in an Otto cycle is it's expansion ratio and a larger expansion ratio extracts more energy from each ounce of fuel burned. If you take an engine to about 100 lb-ft / liter you can have a 10.5~11.0:1 compression with direct injection with a boost pressure of about 10~11 psi. If you want to take the engine to about 130 lb-ft / liter you need about 18 psi of boost which means your compression (even with DI) needs to go down to about 9.0~9.3:1. That in and of itself is worth about 10% mpg (3~4 mpg) in a small engine in a small car.

    Small turbo, high torque, low hp is the worst of both worlds. It has the increased lag and reduced economy of an engine with a larger turbo and about 130 hp/liter, while not having the power and performance.

    First off, can you please correct this sentence since it makes no sense at the start of your 2nd paragraph. "What that means is that the power peak arrives at some engine speed lower that."

    Second, your first statement would seem to imply that if they have an undersized turbo and over boosted, then you would have early death of the turbo charger. Is that what you are implying?

    So then if we go with your line of thought, the performance version at 197hp and 221lb-ft of torque would be a bigger turbo charger, but still undersized and over boosted and this would lead one to think that GM is planning on having these things die by 100,000 miles.

    With GM working so hard to change a persons mind, I have a hard time believing they would do this.

    The pictures and info on these links is pretty cool. Looks like a nice little engine.

    http://gmauthority.com/blog/2012/05/opel-announces-all-new-1-6l-turbo-engine-range/

    http://gmauthority.com/blog/2012/08/genera-motors-commences-4-cylinder-powertrain-renewal-with-1-6l-turbo-ecotec/

    Exciting is according to this web site, this engine will have dual rails so it can also run CNG! :D

    http://green.autoblog.com/2008/05/15/gm-launches-two-new-turbocharged-engines/

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    First off, can you please correct this sentence since it makes no sense at the start of your 2nd paragraph. "What that means is that the power peak arrives at some engine speed lower that."

    Second, your first statement would seem to imply that if they have an undersized turbo and over boosted, then you would have early death of the turbo charger. Is that what you are implying?

    So then if we go with your line of thought, the performance version at 197hp and 221lb-ft of torque would be a bigger turbo charger, but still undersized and over boosted and this would lead one to think that GM is planning on having these things die by 100,000 miles.

    With GM working so hard to change a persons mind, I have a hard time believing they would do this.

    Actually, that is exactly what I meant. If you any engine is making 206 lb-ft of maximum torque but only 168 hp, the power peak will have to be pretty low in rev range. Horsepower (by definition) = torque x rpm / 5252. If you are making 206 hp at 5252 rpm, you maximum horsepower would be 206 hp @ 5252 rpm. Given that the engine makes "only" 168 hp, it means that torque had fallen off significantly before 5252 rpm. With a flat torque curve -- like most turbo engines have -- 206 lb-ft @ 4300 rpm = 168hp at 4300 rpm. At any rpm above that torque MUST fall off faster than rpm rises otherwise the HP figure will exceed 168hp. At 6000 rpm for instance, torque must have fallen to no more than 147 hp. Otherwise hp will exceed 168 hp.

    Now, when I say the turbo is "undersized" I don't mean that it is being overworked and runs ]at damaging speeds shortening it's life. What I meant was simply that the turbo is incapable sustaining maximum boost all the way to the engine's redline. We generally call this an "undersized" setup, whereas a turbo which is capable of sustaining maximum boost beyond the engine's redline or a higher boost than stock is considered "oversized"

    This is also the reason why torque on must start falling off from 206 lb-ft no later than 4300 rpm. Because beyond that speed, one of two things (or both) must be happening. Either the turbo is exceeding its maximum rated rpm or it is falling of the compressor's efficiency map, and the ECU must progressive reduce boost above that engine speed so the turbo doesn't become short lived or make more heat than it does pressure which does nothing to get you more power. If this is not the case the engine would continue to make it's maximum torque (which collerates roughly with maximum boost) to a higher rpm and generate a higher hp figure than 168hp.

    Personally, I favor designs which have slightly lower torque than hp. This allows lower boost, higher compression which translates to both better fuel efficiency and a more responsive, more linear, engine. Examples of these will be the ATS 2.0T's 270hp / 262 lb-ft (LTG) engine or the Nissan GT-R's 520hp / 451 lb-ft (VR38DETT) engine.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    The 197 hp version of the engine should replace the 2.5 in the ATS.

    Personally, I'd favor a detuned 2.0L DI turbo for the ATS rated at about 210hp.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    Loading...



  • Popular Stories

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Usually, we don't report on wagons in our spying reports because there are no chances they are coming to the U.S. But with the recent rumors of the next-generation Buick Regal possibly getting a wagon variant. we tend to pay attention. Which brings us nicely to a set of spy photos of the 2017 Opel/Vauxhall Insignia Sports Tourer.
      Compared to the current Sports Tourer, the new one shown in these pictures looks to be slightly longer and wider. Up front, the nose looks to be more upright and there are new headlights. Opel has attached body panels behind the c-pillar to try and disguise the slope of the roof and window shape. 
      How does this connect to the Buick Regal? As we reported a couple of weeks ago in the rumorpile, Buick is possibly getting a version of the Insignia Sports Tourer. Wearing the Tourx nameplate, the wagon would get an increase in ride height, body cladding, and all-wheel drive. 
      Opel and Vauxhall are expected to reveal the new Insignia and Insignia Sports Tourer sometime next year. Hopefully then, we'll learn whether or not Buick will get the Sports Tourer or not.
      Source: Autoblog, Carscoops

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Usually, we don't report on wagons in our spying reports because there are no chances they are coming to the U.S. But with the recent rumors of the next-generation Buick Regal possibly getting a wagon variant. we tend to pay attention. Which brings us nicely to a set of spy photos of the 2017 Opel/Vauxhall Insignia Sports Tourer.
      Compared to the current Sports Tourer, the new one shown in these pictures looks to be slightly longer and wider. Up front, the nose looks to be more upright and there are new headlights. Opel has attached body panels behind the c-pillar to try and disguise the slope of the roof and window shape. 
      How does this connect to the Buick Regal? As we reported a couple of weeks ago in the rumorpile, Buick is possibly getting a version of the Insignia Sports Tourer. Wearing the Tourx nameplate, the wagon would get an increase in ride height, body cladding, and all-wheel drive. 
      Opel and Vauxhall are expected to reveal the new Insignia and Insignia Sports Tourer sometime next year. Hopefully then, we'll learn whether or not Buick will get the Sports Tourer or not.
      Source: Autoblog, Carscoops
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Previous Page Next Page Ahead of the 2016 Paris Motor Show, Opel gave an early look at a new variant of their Opel Karl city-car called the Karl Rocks.
      The Karl Rocks, gains the looks of a small SUV with a raise in ride height by 18mm (0.7 inches), added perimeter body cladding, integrated skid pads, and functional roof rails.  The interior is largely carryover from the standard Karl except for a new seat fabric exclusive to the Rocks.
      Mechanically, the Karl Rocks maintains the same powertrain as a standard Karl, with a 1.0 liter 3-cylinder which produce 75 hp. Transmissions are either a 5-speed manual, or a 5-speed EasyTronic (a single clutch 5-speed manual transmission that has automatic gear shifting) that gives the functionality of an automatic transmission without as much additional cost.  No all-wheel drive is available.
      Three entertainment systems are available, a base radio, and two versions of Opel's Intellilink. Both Intellilink options feature Android Auto and Apple CarPlay
      The Opel Karl Rocks goes on sale in Europe later this year.  Could there be a Chevrolet Spark version in the works? If the trademark filing for the Chevrolet Spark Activ is any indicator, we think yes. 
      Source: Opel Media
      Press Release on Page 2
       
      The New KARL ROCKS: SUV-Makeover for Opel’s Entry Level Model
       
      ·         SUV-inspired: Raised ride height and rugged body parts for the urban jungle
      ·         Extrovert: The wild Opel KARL with expressive exterior is perfect fit for individualists
      ·         Connected: Opel OnStar and Radio R 4.0 IntelliLink available
      ·         In the spotlight: KARL ROCKS to celebrate world premiere at Paris Motor Show
       
       
      Rüsselsheim.  Are you looking for a small car that has the stylish looks and upmarket features of a much bigger and often much pricier vehicle? Or are you looking for a mini car that can handle the daily challenges of the urban jungle while simultaneously dazzling onlookers with its trendy SUV look and feel? If this is the case, the new Opel KARL ROCKS should appeal to you.
       
      The new car, which is set to celebrate its world premiere at the Paris Motor Show (Booth 501 in Hall 5-2; October 1-16), bears a strong resemblance to a true SUV and shares many virtues connected with this vehicle class such as an elevated seating position that enables better visibility and easier access to the cabin or an outstanding connectivity offer. Furthermore, the new Opel KARL ROCKS maintains the unquestionable practicality of the Opel KARL with five doors, five seats, compact dimensions and a maximum trunk space over 1,000 liters up to the roof making it the ideal vehicle for a broad audience of city dwellers. Like KARL, the rocking version will thus be big on everything – except size and price.
       
      Clever design tweaks set the KARL ROCKS, available for order from the end of the year, apart from most of its A-segment rivals and in fact also from its tamer sibling. The functional silver roof rails, rugged front and rear bumpers with integrated skid pads (the former also including fog light), front and rear wheelhouse moldings and unique 15-inch bi-color look alloy wheels blend in perfectly with typical Opel design cues such as the Opel blade that sweeps dynamically up towards the rear. Combined with the sloping roofline this creates a dynamic, sporty appearance that links the KARL ROCKS to the KARL while simultaneously giving it a distinct rugged look.
       
      The car’s off-road character and outgoing personality are further emphasized by an 18-mm increase in ride height enabling better visibility in dense urban traffic or when admiring the view while cruising along country roads. The raised ride height also brings further advantages with it – KARL ROCKS can also venture off tarmacked roads and negotiate uneven surfaces better. Furthermore, the 18-mm increase facilitates ingress and egress.
       
      The outdoor atmosphere created by the exterior design continues on the inside of the car with the unique “Favo” fabric upholstery for the seats. The design is reminiscent of honeycomb and exclusively available for the KARL ROCKS. Elsewhere, front door sill plates and the high gloss frame for the standard Radio R 300 or the optional Radio R 4.0 IntelliLink system, which brings the world of smartphones to the KARL ROCKS via Apple CarPlay or Android Auto and enables navigation via Apple Maps or Google Maps, add to the new level of sophistication. Alternatively, Navi 4.0 IntelliLink offers an integrated navigation system. The connectivity offering of the KARL ROCKS is rounded off by the availability of Opel’s personal connectivity and service assistant Opel OnStar, making it and its tamer sibling the best connected mini cars on the market.
       
      However, KARL ROCKS has much more to offer than its enticing looks and stylish interior – it is also just a practical as the Opel KARL. Five doors guarantee easy access to the front and rear seats while the five seats ensure that even families can enjoy Opel’s stylish mini car with SUV flair. And when needed, the rear seats, with a standard 40/60 folding split, can be folded down completely giving the KARL ROCKS an impressive total trunk space of 1,013 liters up to the roof.
       
      Furthermore, Opel’s wild child comes with all of the safety and comfort features available in the regular KARL. City mode reduces steering effort at the push of a button (from Enjoy), greatly facilitating maneuvering in heavy city traffic. Park Assist is also available and assists the driver during parking by issuing an acoustic warning as the car approaches obstacles when reversing. Cruise control with speed limiter regulates driving speeds, which is extremely helpful in complicated urban traffic and in residential areas with a 30 km/h speed limit.
      Previous Page Next Page
      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)