Jump to content
Create New...
  • đźš— Your People Are Here. Get In.

    The internet is full of car content. This is the community.

    Cheers & Gears has been bringing enthusiasts together since 2001. Join the conversation, show off your garage, and find your people.

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Ram Trucks Tired Of Being Number Three, Reconsiders Production In Mexico

      On second thought, maybe we'll keep building trucks in Mexico

    Earlier this year, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles announced that it would be moving production of the next-generation Ram HD trucks from Saltillo, Mexico to the Warren Truck Plant in Michigan. This was due to the U.S. Government threatening steep tariffs on Mexican-made vehicles. Saltillo would continue producing global commercial vehicles. But with a new Free Trade Agreement between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico; FCA is having second thoughts about moving production.

    CEO Mike Manley told Reuters that he wants Ram Trucks to move out of third place with truck sales.

    “We need to get ourselves into second” place. Frankly, I don’t care which of the two I take share from,” he said.

    Thus, he is reconsidering the decision made by his predecessor and keep some Ram HD production in Mexico.

    “With a combination of Warren and Mexico building what we call the classic truck, we have enough production to increase output next year if it’s required. In my opinion it will be required. We are gaining share. Obviously I am looking for that to continue, but it’s an incredibly competitive segment,” said Manley.

    The new agreement between the two countries calls for no import cap, so long as the vehicle meets a certain amount of content from various countries.

    Source: Reuters


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    May the Truck wars escallate. Seems this is well founded as a story on the Alliance of automobile manufactures finds the following:

    https://autoalliance.org/economy/consumer-choice/

    To Quote:

    "In 2017, Americans continued to favor light trucks (SUVs, vans and pickups). Nationwide, 65% of total new vehicle sales were light trucks, compared to 35% for new cars. In 47 states more than half of new vehicle sales were light trucks.

    Auto buyers shopping for new vehicles now have more energy-efficient vehicles to choose from than ever. More than 490 models on sale today achieve high mileage (30+ MPG highway), including 43 hybrids, 19 plug-in hybrids, and 30 electric vehicles. And, traditional gasoline engines are getting increasingly fuel efficient as a result of new technologies."

    Great charts to see how it breaks down by state and they have it broken out auto type too.

    Seems Washington state is #1 in Hybrid auto sales and #3 in EVs.

    image.png

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can have 10 factories, people have to want to buy a Ram over a Ford or Chevy/GMC.  Now if Mexico allows them to build the truck cheaper (although GM builds trucks there too) and they can undercut on price, maybe they win sales.  But at that point, why not lobby to get the chicken tax removed and have these made in China and have $20,000 Ram trucks to undercut the F150 by $10,000.  Then you'll see Ram rise up the sales chart.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Then you'll see Ram rise up the sales chart.

    Ram sales have risen every year since the economy cratered in '09 and they moved 177K.
    500,000 were sold in 2017. You've already seen Ram 'rising up the sales chart'.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    Just wait for the next recession to possibly knock RAM into fourth place.  There is a reason that Ford is #1 and GM is #2.

    So your saying Toyota will replace Ram as #3 in NA?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    So your saying Toyota will replace Ram as #3 in NA?

    Not Toyota, but GMC.  GMC's annual sales are very close to Ram.  (I'm not lumping Chevy and GMC together). 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    Not Toyota, but GMC.  GMC's annual sales are very close to Ram.  (I'm not lumping Chevy and GMC together). 

    Oh damn, I never even thought of that. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    The original article isn't clear on whether they are lumping Chevy and GMC together or not.

     

    Truck Sales.PNG

    The Tundra is closer to catching the Sierra than the Sierra is to the Ram. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

     

    Truck Sales.PNG

    The Tundra is closer to catching the Sierra than the Sierra is to the Ram. 

    That chart will be interesting to see in a year after the new generation of GMs and Rams have been on sale for a while..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Toyota should be much more competitive than they are in full size trucks.  With their resources they should be able to spend away and bury Ram, just like their car line has put FCA and Ford's car lines out of business.  It is embarrassing how old the Tacoma and Tundra are, when those 2 should have all new versions every 6 years with hybrids and best in class quality, reliability and fuel economy.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Toyota should be much more competitive than they are in full size trucks.  With their resources they should be able to spend away and bury Ram, just like their car line has put FCA and Ford's car lines out of business.  It is embarrassing how old the Tacoma and Tundra are, when those 2 should have all new versions every 6 years with hybrids and best in class quality, reliability and fuel economy.

    Truck buyers, real ones, are too smart to let Toyota tick any further upward.  They are some of the last remaining loyal American vehicle buyers, and for that, this country could learn a lesson or two.  Buy American!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Truck buyers, real ones, are too smart to let Toyota tick any further upward.  They are some of the last remaining loyal American vehicle buyers, and for that, this country could learn a lesson or two.  Buy American!

    The problem is is that car buyers have had little loyalty to the domestics since the 1980s.  CA most of all have bought into buying Japanese for nearly 40 years now; the rest of the USA followed suit about 10-15 years later depending on location.  It is even worse with luxury vehicles.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Truck buyers, real ones, are too smart to let Toyota tick any further upward.  They are some of the last remaining loyal American vehicle buyers, and for that, this country could learn a lesson or two.  Buy American!

    So if Toyota made a truck better, more capable, more reliable than the F150, and the Tundra which is made in the USA, then American truck buyers would rather buy an inferior truck?   Or buy a Mexican made Ram who's profits go to Italy?  

    The Tundra is the most dated, least competitive truck in the full size pick up segment.  Which is really inexcusable for a company that has the most money and resource.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tundra's story has nothing to do with, for example; how old it's frame is. It's not the 'now', it's that toyota has been constantly trying (I assume) to reach not only competitive grade, but to entice buyers of other brands, but just keeps failing. It basically sells to toyota loyalists, I believe, and not many of them. We've heard excuse after excuse, but the bottom line can only be either of 2 things; 1. toyotoa doesn't care/spend enough, or (more likely) 2. they just don't get it.

    As far as 'best in class reliability & quality'- those days are over for the brand.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Toyota should be much more competitive than they are in full size trucks.  With their resources they should be able to spend away and bury Ram, just like their car line has put FCA and Ford's car lines out of business.  It is embarrassing how old the Tacoma and Tundra are, when those 2 should have all new versions every 6 years with hybrids and best in class quality, reliability and fuel economy.

    I am surprised they aren't more competitive than they are. I don't think they could ever get a foothold to bury any of the D3 though. Even if they made the best product, hands down, it would still be 4th place, imo. It would sell better but I just can't see a Japanese truck maker taking any of the D3 down. 

    8 hours ago, balthazar said:

    As far as 'best in class reliability & quality'- those days are over for the brand.

    People still believe it though. That's all that really matters. I talk to people looking at vehicles all the time who aren't enthusiasts at all and Toyota and Honda are always on the top of their lists without even knowing vehicle names. 

    My brother bought a CR-V last weekend because his wife's family had good luck with Hondas in the past. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Toyota basically put the Detroit 3’s sedan business out of business and they did that with 30 years of dedication to the Camry and whether it was product or branding or whatever, the Camry is the sedan champion.  If they had that focus on the Tundra I think they could have the 3rd best selling full size truck easily.  The Tacoma was the #1 selling mid size truck for a while and maybe still is and that thing is way dated too.

    Finger of Shame to Toyota for not making those trucks better.  FCA doesn’t have excess money to make a new Charger/300 so they have to let those dated products stick around.  Toytota has the money, they have $30 or 40 billion in cash, a huge revenue stream, huge profits, etc

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

    I would assume given the market shift to CUVs, SUVs and trucks away from sedans Toyota will invest more in new trucks and SUVs.  

    Toyota might, but it will probably be a lot harder now. . . . unless they put the focus on the Tacoma rather than the Tundra.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Independent Automotive Journalism

    25 years of honest automotive coverage — because someone has to do it.

    Cheers & Gears has never been filtered by manufacturer relationships or driven by algorithm. Just real people, real opinions, and a genuine love of cars. Subscribers keep the lights on and get an ad-light experience starting at $2.25/month.*

    View subscription options

    *A small number of ads feature member-exclusive coupon deals and will still appear.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • USC grad and I believe a SoCal upbringing.  USC was once not that hard to get into.  I'm not commenting on her intellectual abilities (she's not a rocket scientist, that's for sure), just the statistics.  Admission percentages for freshmen at the best public universities in America have dropped like a lead balloon.  I don't know if I'd want to go to a school where Mossimo* and Lori Loughlin* had to swindle the system to get their daughters in.  It's also in a somewhat dangerous neighborhood. What it does is beg the question as to who and what she is thinking about when she's got her thighs wrapped around his waist.  I'm just calling a spade a spade.   * I just did a wiki on them. They got divorced last year.
    • She looks like a fake plastic surgery disaster bimbo...no substance there. Just a wannabe Kardashian...
    • What I was really going to say: Just based on what is being fed to me on my phone and the photos they pose for, it doesn't look like Jeff Bezos is too happy with this trophy wife he bagged.  Once you study her more, it looks like most of her existence is about being a poseur.  I'm not so sure I like her.
    • $45k for an appliance FWD CUV w/ a 4cyl in white w/ a gray interior is pretty depressing to imagine.   My Jeep was in that price range 12 years ago, much nicer design inside and out and well equipped w/ a V6 and AWD...and with inflation, the equivalent spec to that on a 2025 is about $53k..same engine and transmission, AWD, same color scheme, trim level and options.  My sister's '23 Chevy Equinox LT was $34k out the door new at the end of 2022.  She got $15k in trade on her 2015 Trax and paid cash for the difference. 
    • Just for "fun," I priced a GMC Acadia base model (Elevation) with only front wheel drive. I am surprised that most of the colors are extra charge.  That's not good.  I selected the standard Summit White. Interior colors are either black or gray. I selected gray. I didn't bother to add any flooring or cargo packages.  You can always think about those later. Most of the power gizmos on the car come standard. The MSRP with freight was $45,595! Are they even discounting them at the dealer level? How much?  Is GM giving any incentives?  I'm guessing that the 2.5 L4 is the same one that we've known for years but has a turbo bolted onto it.  It comes with an 8-speed automatic transmission. The landscape sure is different on so many levels.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search