Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Ram Trucks Tired Of Being Number Three, Reconsiders Production In Mexico

      On second thought, maybe we'll keep building trucks in Mexico

    Earlier this year, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles announced that it would be moving production of the next-generation Ram HD trucks from Saltillo, Mexico to the Warren Truck Plant in Michigan. This was due to the U.S. Government threatening steep tariffs on Mexican-made vehicles. Saltillo would continue producing global commercial vehicles. But with a new Free Trade Agreement between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico; FCA is having second thoughts about moving production.

    CEO Mike Manley told Reuters that he wants Ram Trucks to move out of third place with truck sales.

    “We need to get ourselves into second” place. Frankly, I don’t care which of the two I take share from,” he said.

    Thus, he is reconsidering the decision made by his predecessor and keep some Ram HD production in Mexico.

    “With a combination of Warren and Mexico building what we call the classic truck, we have enough production to increase output next year if it’s required. In my opinion it will be required. We are gaining share. Obviously I am looking for that to continue, but it’s an incredibly competitive segment,” said Manley.

    The new agreement between the two countries calls for no import cap, so long as the vehicle meets a certain amount of content from various countries.

    Source: Reuters

    • Agree 1
    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt

    May the Truck wars escallate. Seems this is well founded as a story on the Alliance of automobile manufactures finds the following:

    https://autoalliance.org/economy/consumer-choice/

    To Quote:

    "In 2017, Americans continued to favor light trucks (SUVs, vans and pickups). Nationwide, 65% of total new vehicle sales were light trucks, compared to 35% for new cars. In 47 states more than half of new vehicle sales were light trucks.

    Auto buyers shopping for new vehicles now have more energy-efficient vehicles to choose from than ever. More than 490 models on sale today achieve high mileage (30+ MPG highway), including 43 hybrids, 19 plug-in hybrids, and 30 electric vehicles. And, traditional gasoline engines are getting increasingly fuel efficient as a result of new technologies."

    Great charts to see how it breaks down by state and they have it broken out auto type too.

    Seems Washington state is #1 in Hybrid auto sales and #3 in EVs.

    image.png

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565

    You can have 10 factories, people have to want to buy a Ram over a Ford or Chevy/GMC.  Now if Mexico allows them to build the truck cheaper (although GM builds trucks there too) and they can undercut on price, maybe they win sales.  But at that point, why not lobby to get the chicken tax removed and have these made in China and have $20,000 Ram trucks to undercut the F150 by $10,000.  Then you'll see Ram rise up the sales chart.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    balthazar
    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Then you'll see Ram rise up the sales chart.

    Ram sales have risen every year since the economy cratered in '09 and they moved 177K.
    500,000 were sold in 2017. You've already seen Ram 'rising up the sales chart'.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt
    10 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    Just wait for the next recession to possibly knock RAM into fourth place.  There is a reason that Ford is #1 and GM is #2.

    So your saying Toyota will replace Ram as #3 in NA?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41
    23 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    Not Toyota, but GMC.  GMC's annual sales are very close to Ram.  (I'm not lumping Chevy and GMC together). 

    Oh damn, I never even thought of that. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41
    8 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    The original article isn't clear on whether they are lumping Chevy and GMC together or not.

     

    Truck Sales.PNG

    The Tundra is closer to catching the Sierra than the Sierra is to the Ram. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall
    9 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

     

    Truck Sales.PNG

    The Tundra is closer to catching the Sierra than the Sierra is to the Ram. 

    That chart will be interesting to see in a year after the new generation of GMs and Rams have been on sale for a while..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565

    Toyota should be much more competitive than they are in full size trucks.  With their resources they should be able to spend away and bury Ram, just like their car line has put FCA and Ford's car lines out of business.  It is embarrassing how old the Tacoma and Tundra are, when those 2 should have all new versions every 6 years with hybrids and best in class quality, reliability and fuel economy.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ocnblu
    6 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Toyota should be much more competitive than they are in full size trucks.  With their resources they should be able to spend away and bury Ram, just like their car line has put FCA and Ford's car lines out of business.  It is embarrassing how old the Tacoma and Tundra are, when those 2 should have all new versions every 6 years with hybrids and best in class quality, reliability and fuel economy.

    Truck buyers, real ones, are too smart to let Toyota tick any further upward.  They are some of the last remaining loyal American vehicle buyers, and for that, this country could learn a lesson or two.  Buy American!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    riviera74
    2 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Truck buyers, real ones, are too smart to let Toyota tick any further upward.  They are some of the last remaining loyal American vehicle buyers, and for that, this country could learn a lesson or two.  Buy American!

    The problem is is that car buyers have had little loyalty to the domestics since the 1980s.  CA most of all have bought into buying Japanese for nearly 40 years now; the rest of the USA followed suit about 10-15 years later depending on location.  It is even worse with luxury vehicles.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565
    2 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Truck buyers, real ones, are too smart to let Toyota tick any further upward.  They are some of the last remaining loyal American vehicle buyers, and for that, this country could learn a lesson or two.  Buy American!

    So if Toyota made a truck better, more capable, more reliable than the F150, and the Tundra which is made in the USA, then American truck buyers would rather buy an inferior truck?   Or buy a Mexican made Ram who's profits go to Italy?  

    The Tundra is the most dated, least competitive truck in the full size pick up segment.  Which is really inexcusable for a company that has the most money and resource.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    balthazar

    Tundra's story has nothing to do with, for example; how old it's frame is. It's not the 'now', it's that toyota has been constantly trying (I assume) to reach not only competitive grade, but to entice buyers of other brands, but just keeps failing. It basically sells to toyota loyalists, I believe, and not many of them. We've heard excuse after excuse, but the bottom line can only be either of 2 things; 1. toyotoa doesn't care/spend enough, or (more likely) 2. they just don't get it.

    As far as 'best in class reliability & quality'- those days are over for the brand.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41
    13 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Toyota should be much more competitive than they are in full size trucks.  With their resources they should be able to spend away and bury Ram, just like their car line has put FCA and Ford's car lines out of business.  It is embarrassing how old the Tacoma and Tundra are, when those 2 should have all new versions every 6 years with hybrids and best in class quality, reliability and fuel economy.

    I am surprised they aren't more competitive than they are. I don't think they could ever get a foothold to bury any of the D3 though. Even if they made the best product, hands down, it would still be 4th place, imo. It would sell better but I just can't see a Japanese truck maker taking any of the D3 down. 

    8 hours ago, balthazar said:

    As far as 'best in class reliability & quality'- those days are over for the brand.

    People still believe it though. That's all that really matters. I talk to people looking at vehicles all the time who aren't enthusiasts at all and Toyota and Honda are always on the top of their lists without even knowing vehicle names. 

    My brother bought a CR-V last weekend because his wife's family had good luck with Hondas in the past. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565

    Toyota basically put the Detroit 3’s sedan business out of business and they did that with 30 years of dedication to the Camry and whether it was product or branding or whatever, the Camry is the sedan champion.  If they had that focus on the Tundra I think they could have the 3rd best selling full size truck easily.  The Tacoma was the #1 selling mid size truck for a while and maybe still is and that thing is way dated too.

    Finger of Shame to Toyota for not making those trucks better.  FCA doesn’t have excess money to make a new Charger/300 so they have to let those dated products stick around.  Toytota has the money, they have $30 or 40 billion in cash, a huge revenue stream, huge profits, etc

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    riviera74
    6 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

    I would assume given the market shift to CUVs, SUVs and trucks away from sedans Toyota will invest more in new trucks and SUVs.  

    Toyota might, but it will probably be a lot harder now. . . . unless they put the focus on the Tacoma rather than the Tundra.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×



  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • G. David Felt
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      This is too funny and I HOPE HOPE HOPE Amazon moves forward with this as all the auto's on Amazon for sale will have a TRUMP TARIFF line that shows how much TARIFF tax they will pay. Trump’s ‘Pottery Barn rule’ problem
    • trinacriabob
      New Toyota Prius HEV LE model - 3 days of motoring

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      I don’t know if this vehicle, a Toyota Prius Hybrid HEV, represented an upgrade.  It’s just what I was assigned as a mid-size rented vehicle for 3 days.  I had a general idea that this vehicle was recently refreshed and that it looked a lot better.  As I got closer to it and got into it, I was able to get a better look.  The new Prius looks a lot better than I recall a Prius ever looking.  It looks sleek, sporty, and even sort of low-slung.  Interesting exterior features show that they made this a priority.  The front lights and fascia are thin and understated, working well with the more unified exterior.  The rear fascia is definitely Prius’s own and it gives the car some interesting, angled vantage points.  They even incorporated gullwing handles into the sedan’s rear doors and, having once had these in the last rendition of the W-body Buick Regal coupe, I like their look and just plain using them. Its low-slung aspect can present a slight demerit.  The windshield and profile of the front doors is very raked and, as a person of average height, I had to duck a little more than usual to enter the car.  Similarly, the rear backlite borders on almost being horizontal.  This does give the rear storage area a little more usable height. Inside, the front pillars’ rake is mitigated by fixed renditions of what used to be vent windows in older cars.  However, they still seem to block an instinctive sight line compared to more upright vehicles like the current Camry and Corolla.  Inside, the feeling is more cockpit-like.  Similarly, the rear view has the thicker pillars and flatter backlite that require more proactive work – looking over the shoulder attentively and using the amber traffic monitoring warnings in the outside mirrors.  A complementary feature is the chime that assisted lane changes. The Prius has a 4-cylinder engine that seems to spend more time in EV mode than did the hybrid Camry.  That means good fuel economy and, over 3 days, I only added 6 gallons for between 200 and 300 miles of motoring.  In terms of power, handling, and roadability, the Prius gets mixed comments from me.  It does have agility when the pedal is pressed and it moves from eco to power mode.  It also eases upward to higher than anticipated highway speeds if not paying attention!  The transmission is a CVT with a “faux” first gear and it works well.  The Prius has a more noticeable wheezing sound when in reverse gear, which actually advises those inside the car and near it.  However, when pushed, the powertrain gets buzzy, as in noisy.  But at steady speed, any engine noise is not that noticeable.  The vehicle’s handling, smoothness, and quietness vary.  Handling is always nimble and, even at highway speeds, it maneuvers adeptly.  The ride is mostly smooth.  However, noise control could use some improvement.  Some of that can come from the tires they equip the car with, fitted with aluminum wheels that hearken to the ones on Tesla products.  That said, it’s hard to tell if the drone is tire thum or wind.  However, if you prioritize handling among these, I was surprised to see how well the Prius handles … on the highway, on city streets, and even in tight parking spaces, where 3-point attempts are rarely necessary. The cockpit is unusual and very different from yesterday’s Priuses, which I’ve only seen and never driven or been a passenger in one.  I remember how the first model had an oval main instrument pod set up on the cowl in the middle of the dashboard but angled toward the driver.  Today’s Prius has thin and smaller pods, almost set on ledges that seem to staircase down as the cowl approaches the driver.  The main panel looks like a small tablet that is set quite far from the steering wheel.  Depending on how the wheel is titled, there could be some visibility issues seeing all the information.  This required adjusting the wheel and the seating height.  Also, the front seat can be very far from the pedals.  So, while the door is low, taller drivers might like this potential distance.  The infotainment center sits slightly forward of the main instrument screen and is conventionally placed atop the center stack.  Thankfully, it continues with touch operation as opposed to being operated via a remote dial.  Most functions are the ones you’ve known for a while, so setting things up doesn’t take long.  I did struggle a little with the Android Auto, even though the Bluetooth pairing was quick.  Note that, while the Camry has USB-C ports, the Prius does not.  Further down on the center stack, the climate control is easy to work with (not the 3-dial type that so many exports and even domestics have) and the A/C blows colder a little quicker than in the last Camry I drove.  The console deck is about the right height and its overall dimensions, including the box, are generous.  The compactness of the shift lever is sort of fun … think of a small underpowered low-cost EV Corvette! When going into gear, it’s not about moving the selector linearly.  A quick jog to the left and up toward the instrument panel is for reverse while that same quick jog followed by a rearward move puts the vehicle in drive.  It doesn’t take long to get used to this.  Also, the park feature is easy to work with.  Just push in P when stopped and, whether in reserve or drive, the gear selector goes to park.  The only thing is that it is not forgiving when shifting the lever … your foot must be firmly on the brake, so no slipshod maneuvers.  The seating is comfortable and the buckets seem a little high, but this offers support from top to bottom.  The same is true in the rear of the cabin and the headrests do intrude with an already thicker rear sail panel / C-pillar.  Legroom in the rear also seems good and the length of the vehicle allows for that.  Space is sensibly distributed in the 3 volumes from front to back. I always thought a Prius would have something daunting or different about it.  Its look is different in that it lost its first-gen look that looked like an upright Nissan Versa of 2016 … sort of like the runt of the litter that is on the run because it has been kicked in the rump.  This Prius looks planted.  Upon pushing the prominent and easy to use “power” button on the dash, there will be no noise and the dash will literally tell you when it, and you, are “ready” to go. It's a smaller but roomy vehicle where the price isn’t a bargain, but not that steep in today’s terms.  I find there are a few things that I wasn’t crazy about – the height, the main instrument pod sitting in the distance, and not the best noises suppression – but I liked most other things about it.  With so many Priuses going the long haul, this one will probably do the same … and look a lot more presentable while doing it. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING  
    • trinacriabob
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      I'm laughing.   There are always reasons why things are "discounted." With me, it's DFW and Austin that give me heartburn.  San Antonio, too, even though I don't know it as well.  I just don't like the look of the DFW area, whether natural or built.  I don't like Austin for being the governmental engine of a big red place next to a massive university with over 50,000 students that is a big blue place.  I'm more of a moderate and don't want extremes in either element.  I also don't like the "way cool" leanings in Austin. Houston has its negatives, but I'd take it for nearby Galveston, and water in general, the extensive pinewoods, the dark red brick homes, an attractive downtown, and for being America's most ethnically diverse city that has always rolled with that spirit.  There is no "you shouldn't be here" factor.  IIR, I've heard of a saying about Madrid that goes, 'When you're in Madrid, you're from Madrid.'  Having lived in various places, I pay attention to those subleties.
    • G. David Felt
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Very cool to see This Hyundai Ioniq 5 Owner Managed 413,991 Miles In Under Four Years, With One Big Catch
    • G. David Felt
      Tariff Tuesday - Big Trouble in Little Crossovers

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Removing tariffs that idiot47 caused so much pain with for getting nothing in return show how stupid a person can be in not understanding true business and how to negotiate.  A real man with Business sense would have put together a package of tariffs to present to China to address specific areas that are an imbalance not just attack everything and see what falls out. As such, incompetence in not understanding the long road map to building greatness shows how foolish the current administration is and now they are going to sign an exception list for the auto industry. Destroy good trading partners just to cause Chaos! Never a sound business strategy. Trump to Sign Order Later Tuesday Easing Auto Tariff Impact

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search