Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Tesla Announces $35,000 Model 3 Now Available; Closing Most Retail Locations

      After a long wait, the standard Model 3 is now available.

    Tesla announced that beginning today, the standard version of the Model 3 with a base price of $35,000 is available for order.  The base Model 3 has a top speed of 130 mph and a 0-60 time for 5.6 seconds. Additionally, Tesla will be introducing a Model 3 Standard Range Plus with 240 miles of range, top speed of 140mph, 0-60 of 5.3 seconds, and some interior upgrades for $37,000 before incentives.  Tesla claims that these upgrades give customers 9% more range for 6% more money.

    Existing Model 3 drivers will be receiving firmware updates that will increase the range of the Long Range rear-wheel drive Model 3 to 325 miles and the Model 3 Performance top speed to 162 mph.  The firmware update for all Model 3 cars will give an approximate 5% power increase. 

    In the same announcement, Tesla revealed that they will be closing most of their retail locations with the exception of a few high traffic outlets and moving to an online-only sales model.  Customers buying a Model 3 will now be able to try the car for 7 days or 1,000 miles and return it for free.  Tesla claims that this will ease customer concerns about being able to test drive the vehicle before purchase.  By moving to an online-only system, Telsa claims that it will be able to reduce prices 6% on average. 

    Tesla is moving to a Same-Day and in some locations Same-Hour service system where Tesla comes to the driver rather than the traditional method of vehicle service. Tesla is also guaranteeing everywhere in every country they sell in.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Just now, regfootball said:

    this will become the litmus test to see if muhrican consumers are willing to skip the dealer.

    And to see if muhricans that are not Tesla fanatics to adopt EVs...

    Tesla fans will and did pony up for the top trimmed Model 3. Waited and waited and waited for it to arrive. All kinds of quality problems and Tesla fans  bought the Model 3...

    Now that the 35 000 dollar one has finally arrived, of course there will be more Tesla fanatics buying it...

    But now, we will see for realz how many EV buying muhricans there really are. 

    EV haterz had all kinds of excuses using the Bolt sales as evidence that there are no EV buyes in 'muhrica. 

    EV defenders say that the Bolt is just not a real competitor to the Model 3 and is just a compromised vehicle...and that the Bolt is just not the right tyoe and sized EV...

    Well, the 35 000 dollar Model 3 is upon us. 

    The Model Y soon will be open to reservations...

    NOW is the time to see if the future really is with EVs...

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    Took exactly 3 entire years from the unveiling to having the $35K version available. Model 3 is due for a refresh next year and the bulk of it's pre-orderers haven't even gotten their first car yet.

    I don't want to hear another mention ever again that GM is slow to produce an unveiled production-intended vehicle.

    I don't know what you are talking about...I am still waiting for the gorgeous concept cars of the 50s and sixties to make it into production.

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Me too- it's were all my windfall billions will go; building semi-production '50s concepts.

    I wonder if Tesla will EVER have enough money to afford building a concept vehicle.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Now that this is here, it will be interesting to see how many of my coworkers who are Apple faithful to the core and talked about if they could not have an iCar, they would buy a Tesla once the $35K version was ready actually buy.

    I can now say where is your Tesla? 🤔

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Me too- it's were all my windfall billions will go; building semi-production '50s concepts.

    I wonder if Tesla will EVER have enough money to afford building a concept vehicle.

    I still wonder if Tesla will survive...

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, balthazar said:

     

    I don't want to hear another mention ever again that GM is slow to produce an unveiled production-intended vehicle.

    Like the mythical mid engined Corvette...

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When was the ME vette originally announced for production again?
    There's a difference between toying with a concept behind closed doors, and making a public official announcement it's going into production. 99.99999% of consumers have no idea of the long ME corvette proposals going back to '73.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, balthazar said:

    When was the ME vette originally announced for production again? 

    2 years ago? 5 years ago?  i don't know...seems like they've been talking about the upcoming C8 for years... (I still think they are going to cancel it before it's ever shown). 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    When was the ME vette originally announced for production again?
    There's a difference between toying with a concept behind closed doors, and making a public official announcement it's going into production. 99.99999% of consumers have no idea of the long ME corvette proposals going back to '73.

    So True, I honestly have no idea how long GM has had rumors and talked about a mid engine corvette, but it seems to me to have been since the 70's or 80's. So if 1973 was the start, then WOW, talk about a freakin long Gestation period. 🤷‍♂️

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Model 3 was unveiled March 2016. The first deliveries were July 2017. 

    Ford is even worse with their whole GT500, Ranger, and Bronco situations. 

    The C8 has been spotted testing in September 2018 and it supposedly a 2020? 

    Edited by ccap41
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    I've NOT seen any official announcement / stage unveiling from Chevrolet yet. Drew?

    Nothing official of when they will unveil the mid engine corvette, but Mark has confirmed the product is real, just not when.

    http://gmauthority.com/blog/2018/08/mark-reuss-publicly-acknowledges-mid-engine-c8-corvette/

    I HONESTLY think this closing of stores and reduction of having people to work with will HURT not Help Tesla.

    While I am not a fan of their style, I personally think they are all very ugly and the Polestar 2 is far better looking than the Tesla 3, being one that HAS to check for leg and head room, I will NEVER be an online order person. 

    GIVE ME my dealership where I can stop, look, ask questions, go home and sleep on it and then come back to finalize what I want.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So lets see out of curiosity if bare bones Model 3 makes financial sense.  (Specially for you  @balthazar :) )

    Model 3 has converted fuel economy of 128 mpg city/ 117 mpg highway (supposedly equivalent kWh to mpg)

    Lets take bare bones Honda Accord, it will be about $10-12k cheaper than Tesla and it has fuel economy of 30 mpg city/ 38 mpg highway

    Tesla of course is RWD and much faster than Accord but lets say for the average consumer it doesn't matter

    Lets take average for Tesla 120 mpg and average for Honda  35 mpg.

    At average of $3 per gallon driving 12000 miles a year will cost $300 in Tesla and $1029 in Accord.  So the difference is $729 per year and it will take almost 14 years to make up the price difference.  Considering Tesla requires less maintenance (no oil changes, transmission, less brake wear out) it might go down to 10 years optimistically.

    So on paper it doesn't make financial sense compared to base common sedan.

    Personally though, I think I would rather drive base Model 3 than Accord. 

    Edited by ykX
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, ykX said:

    So lets see out of curiosity if bare bones Model 3 makes financial sense.  (Specially for you  @balthazar :) )

    Model 3 has converted fuel economy of 128 mpg city/ 117 mpg highway (supposedly equivalent kWh to mpg)

    Lets take bare bones Honda Accord, it will be about $10-12k cheaper than Tesla and it has fuel economy of 30 mpg city/ 38 mpg highway

    Tesla of course is RWD and much faster than Accord but lets say for the average consumer it doesn't matter

    Lets take average for Tesla 120 mpg and average for Honda  35 mpg.

    At average of $3 per gallon driving 12000 miles a year will cost $300 in Tesla and $1029 in Accord.  So the difference is $729 per year and it will take almost 14 years to make up the price difference.  Considering Tesla requires less maintenance (no oil changes, transmission, less brake wear out) it might go down to 10 years optimistically.

    So on paper it doesn't make financial sense compared to base common sedan.

    Personally though, I think I would rather drive base Model 3 than Accord. 

    I like the idea of the thing being charged up and ready to go every morning.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A purchase of a Model 3 is almost like a tribute to Elon Musk. Just getting a Model T was a nod to Henry Ford.

    Also I think this version availability has nothing to do with being able to actually manufacture the standard model.

    It has everything to do with the Polestar 2. That thing is going to be the first real competitor to Model 3. And it also sells online only. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    48 minutes ago, Suaviloquent said:

    A purchase of a Model 3 is almost like a tribute to Elon Musk. Just getting a Model T was a nod to Henry Ford.

    Also I think this version availability has nothing to do with being able to actually manufacture the standard model.

    It has everything to do with the Polestar 2. That thing is going to be the first real competitor to Model 3. And it also sells online only. 

    Given how nasty the F and I guys are when you buy a car at a traditional dealership, I will feel no sorrow if they go the way of the dodo bird.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, ykX said:

    So lets see out of curiosity if bare bones Model 3 makes financial sense.  (Specially for you  @balthazar :) )

    Model 3 has converted fuel economy of 128 mpg city/ 117 mpg highway (supposedly equivalent kWh to mpg)

    Lets take bare bones Honda Accord, it will be about $10-12k cheaper than Tesla and it has fuel economy of 30 mpg city/ 38 mpg highway

    Tesla of course is RWD and much faster than Accord but lets say for the average consumer it doesn't matter

    Lets take average for Tesla 120 mpg and average for Honda  35 mpg.

    At average of $3 per gallon driving 12000 miles a year will cost $300 in Tesla and $1029 in Accord.  So the difference is $729 per year and it will take almost 14 years to make up the price difference.  Considering Tesla requires less maintenance (no oil changes, transmission, less brake wear out) it might go down to 10 years optimistically.

    So on paper it doesn't make financial sense compared to base common sedan.

    Personally though, I think I would rather drive base Model 3 than Accord. 

    Car & Driver piece is stating the '$35K' is actually $36,200 with the destination charge. Not sure offhand if that's commonly tossed in with a random MSRP or not. I'm willing to forgo that addition for this discussion. However what I am NOT willing to forgo is the included tax credit. $35,000 plus $3750 is $38,750.

    On the Accord side you have oil changes (At $50 per, times 1.6 changes per year: $80, most other maintenance is minor or deferred to the 75K or 100K miles interval.
    3 reportedly costs about $200/ 10K miles in electricity, but don't forget you are also paying more tax on the purchase, more in insurance, around $1000 to upgrade your electric in the garage... these add to the bottom line too.

    And EV will never work for me for a number of reasons, but it might for my wife. I just don't see a clear cost advantage at this point. Maybe in 10 years.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So Tesla moved a solid 25,250 Model 3s in Dec. Of course, even Musk was saying 'buy now- tax credit cut coming Jan 1!'.
    Seems people did just that.

    What happened in Jan?? Sales slide 75%, to 6500 units.

    What happened in Feb?? Sales slid another 12%, to 5750 units. Now, Tesla's monthly sales volumes traditionally turn 'volatility' to 10, but this is back to May-June sales numbers, in the peak of the "production hell".

    Let me know if anyone sees an op-ed wondering ''can Tesla turn the sales slump around??' anytime in March. ;)

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Car & Driver piece is stating the '$35K' is actually $36,200 with the destination charge. Not sure offhand if that's commonly tossed in with a random MSRP or not. I'm willing to forgo that addition for this discussion. However what I am NOT willing to forgo is the included tax credit. $35,000 plus $3750 is $38,750.

    The tax will be charged on any other car as well.  Of course taxes on $25k car will be smaller than on $35k.

    I think with some decent options it still will be a $40k car.  Would I pay right now $35-40k for Tesla?  No, there are many other options at the moment that better suitable for my needs for the money.

    However, the point is in another 5 years or so the car market will start looking differently.

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Given how nasty the F and I guys are when you buy a car at a traditional dealership, I will feel no sorrow if they go the way of the dodo bird.

    I totally agree as Ford sales person is like the worst to deal with out there. So pushy, arrogant and uninformed about their products details.

    I have no problem when bad dealerships go away. But for me, I have certain needs as you know and being able to actually sit in one and test it out will always have me going to a dealership over on-line buying.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It has been spotted in very complete form out testing. 

    I thought I was being QUITE specific when I stated "official announcement of production".
    Trade/enthusiast chatter and spy shots are not official.

    Buick showed the Wildcat mid-engine concept, fully functional, in numerous settings, plus it saw a ton of press. But it was never announced it was going into production. Therefore, the 'production clock' never started. As opposed to March 2016 and the Tesla Model 3.

    Screen Shot 2019-03-01 at 6.22.49 PM.png

    • Haha 2
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    I thought I was being QUITE specific when I stated "official announcement of production".
    Trade/enthusiast chatter and spy shots are not official.

    Buick showed the Wildcat mid-engine concept, fully functional, in numerous settings, plus it saw a ton of press. But it was never announced it was going into production. Therefore, the 'production clock' never started. As opposed to March 2016 and the Tesla Model 3.

    Screen Shot 2019-03-01 at 6.22.49 PM.png

    I like this Buick Wildcat.

    I never knew this concept existed. 

    Thank-you Balthy, this is a nice Birthday present you gave me. Now I will google and learn! 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I googled and learned that the engine is a 3.8 liter Buick V6  reworked by McLaren. No surprise there.  One could clearly see its Buick's 3800 and no surprise that McLaren was the builder of the engine when one figures out that the concept was showcased in 1985. 

    What surprised me was that this concept was showcased in 1985...as a Buick mid-engined affair.  Before The Corvette Indy ME and the Oldsmobile Aerotech. Sure there was a couple of mid-engined Corvette concepts in the 1970s, Buick got into that game too ahead of Oldsmobile. Impressive. 

    Another thing that surprised me was this Buick was not a fast concept like the Aerotech was. I thought maybe that numbers would rival and beat the Buick GNX numbers. But no. Below the GNX numbers and a tad higher than the Grand National numbers making this concept pretty boring for stats comparisons...

    It was supposedly high tech inside though...

    Im glad to have read about it. Again, thanx Balthy for always giving me something new to see! 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My pleasure! Lots more out there too!

    I certainly would not say being between the GN and the GNX (quicker than the Corvette that year) is in any way "pretty boring" If you recall the 1/4 mile stats pic from '79 I posted, 1985 was just starting to come out of a terrible era for performance. And the Olds Aerotech was a performance bomb- didn't it do 200 MPH with the Quad-4? Off the charts.

    RE the Wildcat - Aerotech - ME corvette concepts... I think the Divisions were still coming off of their recently-stripped autonomy and were still able to eek out some headstrong moves like these 3.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, balthazar said:

    I thought I was being QUITE specific when I stated "official announcement of production".
    Trade/enthusiast chatter and spy shots are not official.

    Buick showed the Wildcat mid-engine concept, fully functional, in numerous settings, plus it saw a ton of press. But it was never announced it was going into production. Therefore, the 'production clock' never started. As opposed to March 2016 and the Tesla Model 3.

    Screen Shot 2019-03-01 at 6.22.49 PM.png

    Then no, it has not.  Though with the sightings that have popped up, patent drawings that have leaked, even the keyfob has been shown, I'm inclined to believe that it is coming.  Concept cars aren't typically seen out on proving grounds because they have nothing to prove. Not in the last 20 years anyway. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree that it's coming! Too much ancillary evidence, as you mentioned. Plus I've never seen as much testing for ANY of the other ME Corvette programs.
    I just hope the FE version remains alongside of it- the current car blows me away in person.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Those use cases will necessitate the purchase of something with a long range, like 300+. But even still, two hours at 11.5kW would put 50 - 70 miles of range back in the car. You might need to make one 10-minute DCFC stop if you had a really busy day, but otherwise, you could make it.
    • I can understand this, but then this is part of my daily life. With two kids with their own families and grandkids it is not uncommon for us to be out and about for the day, come home for a bit before heading out to help with the grandkids and their afterschool activities. Plus, with family that is living from both sides north and south of us, it would not be uncommon to drive 75 miles down south to deal with my wife's side of the family, see the nieces/nephews and then up north to my side to see folks and with both our parents in senior years with health issues, also moving back in forth. Course this is why Sun puts on about 15,000 miles a year on the SS. We all have different use cases.
    • That's all I'm worried about. I'm not going to spend a sht ton more money having a 19.2kW charger installed for the 1 day every 3 years I empty the battery, get home for 2 hours, and have to again drive enough that I couldn't make it back home...  
    • I could see settling on three charger rates, but definitely not one. A Bolt or Kia EV4 type vehicle simply does not need 19kW home charging.  It would be an excessive cost to retrofit a house and the number of buyers who actually use that rate would be pretty close to zero.  That would be like insisting that the Corolla has to have a 6.2 liter. It's excessive and doesn't fit the use case. Now, if we settled into 7.5kW, 11.5kW, and 19.4kW as a standard, that would probably achieve what you are proposing while still giving cost flexibility.  It would allow for entry-level EVs to get the lower cost / lower speed charger while allowing the larger vehicles or premium vehicles to have faster home charging.  For example, the EV6 could have a lower cost 7.5kW charger while the Genesis GV60 on the same platform could get the 11.5kW charger because it is a premium brand and higher cost vehicle.  Then any large EV with or near a 200kW battery could have the 19.4kW charger, but even then, unless it is a newly built house or a commercial fleet, it will still probably charge only at 11.5kW, as that's about the max that the vast majority of homes are wired to do.  Unless you're driving an EV with a 200kW battery to 10% every day, an 11.5kW charger can "fill" an EV to 80% overnight with room to spare, so most people (including me), won't want the extra expense of spending extra money just to say my EV charged faster while I slept.  Either way, it will be ready for me when I need to leave at 7 am.
    • @ccap41 @Drew Dowdell Thank you both, this is the kind of dialogue I feel the Auto buyers need to be made aware of and the various use cases in understanding as I feel most DO NOT really understand this and give into the FEAR Mongering of News Stories. While I still feel that everyone should have the same charging rate capabilities, I also understand both your points. I do feel that this will change electrical across the WORLD over time due to the need of charging.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings