• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Tesla Has An Interesting Legal Strategy On Direct Sales


    • The coffin defense?

    Tesla has been fighting tooth and nail to sell their vehicles direct to consumers in the U.S. But six states - Arizona, Connecticut, Michigan, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia - have banned direct sales. Tesla is trying to change this with a combination of new legislation, applying for dealer licenses, and other items. However, Tesla is ready to take this issue to federal court with an interesting legal argument.

     

    The Wall Street Journal reports that Tesla's legal staff has been looking into a 2013 federal appeals court ruling in New Orleans dealing with coffins. What?! The case dealt with the St. Joseph Abbey in Louisiana trying to sell monk-made coffins to help alleviate a shortage due to Hurricane Katrina. But the state had laws that restricted coffin sales to those who were licensed by the Louisiana Board of Funeral Directors. The court sided with the abbey saying they could sell the coffins without having a funeral directors license.

     

    “It is widely accepted that laws that have a protectionist motivation or effect are not proper. Tesla is committed to not being foreclosed from operating in the states it desires to operate in, and all options are on the table,” said Todd Maron, Tesla’s chief counsel.

     

    But could this argument work? Northwestern University law professor John McGinnis says it could. Using this case could shine a spotlight on how laws affect the sale of certain items such as cars.

     

    “Until now, these decisions have been in niche areas of the economy. With Tesla behind it, it would go into something as economically important as the structure of the industry for retailing cars,” said McGinnis.

     

    The timing is what intrigues us the most. Tomorrow night, Tesla will be revealing the Model 3 - their mass-market car. Reservations for this new model will also open.

     

    Source: The Wall Street Journal (Subscription Required)

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    all for it if they can push it through, but at the same time, direct sales won't be the holy grail to the consumer like everyone thinks.  A tesla is only wanting to sell direct so they can skim the profits more than a dealer can.  It's not going to reduce car prices.  The market will determine what cars sell for, which mostly for cars is based on how healthy the economy is and people's ability to get credit.  Market factors what they are, a Tesla will sell for what a Tesla is worth in relation to everything else.  Direct sales means the direct seller makes more of the money.  It also means they will look for ways to skirt dealer functions, like service, etc.

     

    This is good from a legal aspect.  It just isn't going to do anything besides centralize the owner of the retail functions of car companies even more.

     

    I for one would like for car dealers to choose to be open sunday in my state if they want.  Having worked in car sales i can tell you everyone loved sundays off guaranteed, however, it should not be a law, it should be up to the business owners.  Same thing with liquor.......

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    +1 Reg, I totally agree that the Blue Laws from the Prohibition era need to Die. It should be the right of a business to be open 7 days a week just like it is the right of a person to shop 7 days a week. GOV needs to stay out of dictation what, when and how you can shop.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The real dirty fact is Tesla needs money badly. I just saw where it is estimated they are down to about 1 Billion in cash right now. The cost of the 3 and X model development has drained them. They are only pre selling the 3 not to generate money so they can continue to build it. 

     

    Some estimate that they could be out of cash by 2018 if they do not deliver the 3 models buy late 17 or early 18 at the price they promised last night.

     

    Their track record of on time releases have been not so good. They will be facing more and more competition and their quality issues are very unreported. If you read up on the web sites you see many of the issues the media never tell you about. They also have a web site with a delivery inspection sheet as owners have to inspect their own cars upon delivery for issues.  

     

    The fact is every car maker would love to sell direct but the old companies can not cut off the dealers they have nor can they afford to buy them out. Hence their wanting to keep with what they have. 

     

    As for car sales on Sunday? I could see it in some busy locations but many dealers would mostly not see a big gain here. If anything later service hours here have been productive and some Saturday service. But most Sundays with the NFL most dealers would not find it as busy unless they serve beer along with the big screen in the waiting room. 

     

    For the longest time I hated the Parts departments here as most closed at 5 PM and had no weekend hours. That has changed but I worry as the people I know there say they are usually dead. 

     

    I found this story very interesting. 

     

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/31/tesla-s-model-3-could-destroy-elon-musk-s-company.html?via=desktop&source=email

    Edited by hyperv6
    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not gonna bog this thread down with the specifics of product or perceptions. Just the sales channel strategies.

     

    I have strong reasons to suspect the unspoken few bright people in the car industry would slash and burn dealers if they wanted to.

     

    You look at how the dealerships exist today - they are rife with mergers an acquisitions. Automakers are beholden to them, and as any sales channel that has its own vested interests - the incumbents cannot dump them because they're the largest distribution chain. The channel innovation is a part of how businesses transform themselves. I don't understand why automakers claim they're on top of the the new stated of car access instead of ownership - such as ride sharing or car sharing services. Yet they refuse to consider direct sales. There's obvious channel conflict. Dealers would hate to see automakers sell directly. However, eventually shateholders will be barging down doors, or put management in place that are stewards of their requirements - more profits and etc.

     

    But direct sales have huge advantages. It's no secret, pocket prices are exactly what the MSRP is because there is no intermediary in the value chain that can cause price leakages. No dealer holdback, no volume incentives, no performance bonuses, none of that crap. And the inertia in the organizations is because they're too entrenched into this legacy.

     

    And the dirty secret is that every business whether for profit or not needs money badly.

     

    Those who fail to innovate - even in their "go to market aka get the product into customer hands strategy" they can leave a lot of money on the table. Yeah, sure. The Bolt will have the advantage of dealerships.

     

    But recognize this - Tesla only needs deliver half of their pre-orders, so basically let's assume they delay their shipments by another half-year to equal approximately ALL other  electric vehicle sales - which also includes the Models and X!

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is this simple. 

    Blessing added profits. 

    Curse the added responsibility of running the sales and service internally. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What are you talking about? For all we know Tesla service centres staffing needs are outsourced to contractors that have a service level agreement with Tesla.

     

    Tesla above all else is network organization. They have a lot of their value chain in-house - hence their high vertical integration, but that doesn't mean they are paralyzed by organizational complexity.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What are you talking about? For all we know Tesla service centres staffing needs are outsourced to contractors that have a service level agreement with Tesla.

     

    Tesla above all else is network organization. They have a lot of their value chain in-house - hence their high vertical integration, but that doesn't mean they are paralyzed by organizational complexity.

     

    Oh good it is bad enough to work with a Dealer franchise but even worse to work with a independent contractor that is not connected to the MFG. I can see where at times it may help but also many times where it will be much worse. 

    UPS for all their good and bad their drivers as a whole are pretty decent getting things there due to their inner organizational complexity. 

    But many other package services who use drivers who are private contractors their service can be a total nightmare most of the time. On Trac on the west coast is a real burn on shippers. While cheaper so much is late or delivered wrong. 

    Roadway Package failed miserably on the independent contractor. It is hard enough to control a franchise but even more difficult to deal with contractors. 

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The real dirty fact is Tesla needs money badly. I just saw where it is estimated they are down to about 1 Billion in cash right now. The cost of the 3 and X model development has drained them. They are only pre selling the 3 not to generate money so they can continue to build it. 

     

    Some estimate that they could be out of cash by 2018 if they do not deliver the 3 models buy late 17 or early 18 at the price they promised last night.

     

    Their track record of on time releases have been not so good. They will be facing more and more competition and their quality issues are very unreported. If you read up on the web sites you see many of the issues the media never tell you about. They also have a web site with a delivery inspection sheet as owners have to inspect their own cars upon delivery for issues.  

     

    The fact is every car maker would love to sell direct but the old companies can not cut off the dealers they have nor can they afford to buy them out. Hence their wanting to keep with what they have. 

     

    As for car sales on Sunday? I could see it in some busy locations but many dealers would mostly not see a big gain here. If anything later service hours here have been productive and some Saturday service. But most Sundays with the NFL most dealers would not find it as busy unless they serve beer along with the big screen in the waiting room. 

     

    For the longest time I hated the Parts departments here as most closed at 5 PM and had no weekend hours. That has changed but I worry as the people I know there say they are usually dead. 

     

    I found this story very interesting. 

     

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/31/tesla-s-model-3-could-destroy-elon-musk-s-company.html?via=desktop&source=email

    West coast your dealerships are open 7 days a week, service is Mon to Saturday and the parts departments are open 10am to 7pm Mon to Sat. I love that I can buy at any time and for the most part get service and parts when I need them. No need to close down on a sunday.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What are you talking about? For all we know Tesla service centres staffing needs are outsourced to contractors that have a service level agreement with Tesla.

     

    Tesla above all else is network organization. They have a lot of their value chain in-house - hence their high vertical integration, but that doesn't mean they are paralyzed by organizational complexity.

     

    Oh good it is bad enough to work with a Dealer franchise but even worse to work with a independent contractor that is not connected to the MFG. I can see where at times it may help but also many times where it will be much worse. 

    UPS for all their good and bad their drivers as a whole are pretty decent getting things there due to their inner organizational complexity. 

    But many other package services who use drivers who are private contractors their service can be a total nightmare most of the time. On Trac on the west coast is a real burn on shippers. While cheaper so much is late or delivered wrong. 

    Roadway Package failed miserably on the independent contractor. It is hard enough to control a franchise but even more difficult to deal with contractors. 

     

     

    Tesla certified repair / service centers are Pet Boys locations. Not sure who they use on the east coast but pet boys here is anything of a service level experience I would expect on a 100,000 dollar auto like the model S. I have tried them a few times and will search out a Napa or O'Reilly rather than deal with the crappy service and poor parts inventory of pet boys.

     

    I personally think Tesla will find great pain as they grow in using a cheap ass company like Pet Boys.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. blue-bowtie
      blue-bowtie
      (38 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      There is no love lost between Tesla Motors and the former director of Autopilot. Bloomberg reports that the Silicon Valley automaker has sued Sterling Anderson over allegations of stealing confidential information about Autopilot and trying to recruit Tesla employees to his new venture.
      In the court filing, Tesla says Anderson began work on an autonomous-car venture, Aurora Innovation LLC back in summer when he was head of the Autopilot project. As the director of Autopilot, Anderson would have access to Tesla's semi-autonomous tech. He would leave Tesla in December. Anderson has been collaborating with the former head of Google’s self-driving car project, Chris Urmson.
      Tesla is seeking a court order barring Anderson from "any use of Tesla’s proprietary information related to autonomous driving." Tesla is also seeking an order banning Anderson and Aurora Innovation from recruiting Tesla employees and contractors for a year after Anderson’s termination date.
      “Tesla’s meritless lawsuit reveals both a startling paranoia and an unhealthy fear of competition. This abuse of the legal system is a malicious attempt to stifle a competitor and destroy personal reputations. Aurora looks forward to disproving these false allegations in court and to building a successful self-driving business,” Aurora Innovation LLC said in a statement yesterday.
      Source: Bloomberg

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      There is no love lost between Tesla Motors and the former director of Autopilot. Bloomberg reports that the Silicon Valley automaker has sued Sterling Anderson over allegations of stealing confidential information about Autopilot and trying to recruit Tesla employees to his new venture.
      In the court filing, Tesla says Anderson began work on an autonomous-car venture, Aurora Innovation LLC back in summer when he was head of the Autopilot project. As the director of Autopilot, Anderson would have access to Tesla's semi-autonomous tech. He would leave Tesla in December. Anderson has been collaborating with the former head of Google’s self-driving car project, Chris Urmson.
      Tesla is seeking a court order barring Anderson from "any use of Tesla’s proprietary information related to autonomous driving." Tesla is also seeking an order banning Anderson and Aurora Innovation from recruiting Tesla employees and contractors for a year after Anderson’s termination date.
      “Tesla’s meritless lawsuit reveals both a startling paranoia and an unhealthy fear of competition. This abuse of the legal system is a malicious attempt to stifle a competitor and destroy personal reputations. Aurora looks forward to disproving these false allegations in court and to building a successful self-driving business,” Aurora Innovation LLC said in a statement yesterday.
      Source: Bloomberg
    • By William Maley
      Last May, Joshua Brown was killed in a crash when his Tesla Model S in Autopilot collided with a tractor-trailer. After an investigation that took over half of a year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released their findings today. 
      In a report, NHTSA said they didn't find any evidence of defects with the Autopilot system. The agency also stated that they would not ask Tesla to perform a recall on models equipped with Autopilot.
      In a statement, Tesla said "the safety of our customers comes first, and we appreciate the thoroughness of NHTSA’s report and its conclusion."
       
      NHTSA's report revealed that neither Autopilot nor Brown applied the brakes to prevent or lessen the impact of the crash. However, NHTSA cleared the Automatic Emergency Braking system as it's “designed to avoid or mitigate rear end collisions” but that “braking for crossing path collisions, such as that present in the Florida fatal crash, are outside the expected performance capabilities of the system.” 
      Speaking of Brown, NHTSA's report said that he did not any action with steering or anything else to prevent this. The last recorded action in the vehicle was the cruise control being set to 74 mph. NHTSA notes that in their reconstruction of the crash, Brown had seven seconds to from seeing the tractor trailer to the moment of the impact, giving him possible chance to take some sort of action.
      This brings up a very serious concern of how much confidence owners give the Autopilot system. Despite Tesla having statements such as that Autopilot “is an assist feature that requires you to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times," and that "you need to maintain control and responsibility for your vehicle” while using it," various videos showing Model Ss narrowly avoiding crashes have caused people to think that Autopilot was fully autonomous - which it isn't.
      “Although perhaps not as specific as it could be, Tesla has provided information about system limitations in the owner’s manuals, user interface and associated warnings/alerts, as well as a driver monitoring system that is intended to aid the driver in remaining engaged in the driving task at all times. Drivers should read all instructions and warnings provided in owner’s manuals for ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems) technologies and be aware of system limitations,” said NHTSA.
      Tesla, to its credit, has been updating Autopilot to make drivers pay attention when using it. These include increasing the warnings for a driver to intervene when needed, and turning off the system if a driver doesn't respond to repeated requests.
      Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (Report in PDF), Tesla

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Last May, Joshua Brown was killed in a crash when his Tesla Model S in Autopilot collided with a tractor-trailer. After an investigation that took over half of a year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released their findings today. 
      In a report, NHTSA said they didn't find any evidence of defects with the Autopilot system. The agency also stated that they would not ask Tesla to perform a recall on models equipped with Autopilot.
      In a statement, Tesla said "the safety of our customers comes first, and we appreciate the thoroughness of NHTSA’s report and its conclusion."
       
      NHTSA's report revealed that neither Autopilot nor Brown applied the brakes to prevent or lessen the impact of the crash. However, NHTSA cleared the Automatic Emergency Braking system as it's “designed to avoid or mitigate rear end collisions” but that “braking for crossing path collisions, such as that present in the Florida fatal crash, are outside the expected performance capabilities of the system.” 
      Speaking of Brown, NHTSA's report said that he did not any action with steering or anything else to prevent this. The last recorded action in the vehicle was the cruise control being set to 74 mph. NHTSA notes that in their reconstruction of the crash, Brown had seven seconds to from seeing the tractor trailer to the moment of the impact, giving him possible chance to take some sort of action.
      This brings up a very serious concern of how much confidence owners give the Autopilot system. Despite Tesla having statements such as that Autopilot “is an assist feature that requires you to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times," and that "you need to maintain control and responsibility for your vehicle” while using it," various videos showing Model Ss narrowly avoiding crashes have caused people to think that Autopilot was fully autonomous - which it isn't.
      “Although perhaps not as specific as it could be, Tesla has provided information about system limitations in the owner’s manuals, user interface and associated warnings/alerts, as well as a driver monitoring system that is intended to aid the driver in remaining engaged in the driving task at all times. Drivers should read all instructions and warnings provided in owner’s manuals for ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems) technologies and be aware of system limitations,” said NHTSA.
      Tesla, to its credit, has been updating Autopilot to make drivers pay attention when using it. These include increasing the warnings for a driver to intervene when needed, and turning off the system if a driver doesn't respond to repeated requests.
      Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (Report in PDF), Tesla
    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt
      Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.CheersandGears.com
       
      Tesla / Solarcity merger, Brilliant or Disaster?

      Tesla announced their intent to buy SolarCity and some screamed the sky is falling. Tesla moves forward with offering a complete home solution of Solar panels, battery bank and 220V charging for your Tesla and believes they have the future tied up in a single one stop shopping solution that beats all the other Auto OEMS.

      The merger final vote by Solarcity shareholders is scheduled for Nov 17th 2016. Yet with this deal not done yet, there are many that have divided into two camps, those that think this is brilliant such as reported by Barron's yesterday that ISS one of the largest outside analyst groups that advises shareholders on mergers gave it's blessing to what they believe is an outstanding tie up of two companies that can maximize return on investments. Barron's believes that Tesla has addressed all the concerns that allow for a successful merger of the two companies and a maximizing of complementary products.
      Barron's Story
      One CNBC story feels that this merger might even be a little late. They agree that Solarcity will provide about $1 Billion next year in revenue to the new merged company and add about $500 million in cash to the Tesla corporation over the next 3 years.
      CNBC Story
      Then you have the latest story also from CNBC where a different analyst believes this is nothing but one large mistake and that is due to what he sees as an impossible return on the investment. Yet even with that he also points out to strong supporters such as Ron Baron who ownes 1.5 million shares that see a 30 to 50 times return on the stock due to the merger. 
      CNBC Story 2
      Yet with all this,  “Playing Amish Paradise in my Tesla,” Musk shared with his 5.8 million Twitter followers on Sunday we have the man himself seeing a much simpler life for us all in the new EV world.
       
      So what is your thoughts on this whole merger and the new EV world Musk sees for us all?
       
  • Recent Status Updates

    • Drew Dowdell

      I have one co-worker who has been a thorn in my side for the past 6 months.... but I have to admit that when I need something done that is in his area of expertise, he goes after it like an angry rabid chihuahua and gets it done.
      · 0 replies
    • Drew Dowdell

      Me: I'll take "Shopping" for $800.
      Alex:"This shopping location is popular on Sundays for groups of gay couples, families with small children, and college kids with parents in tow to gather."
      · 3 replies
    • Drew Dowdell

      @gmc Sierra Denali with manufacturer plates and a never used snow plow. Wonder what's going on here.
      · 2 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)