• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Tesla Has An Interesting Legal Strategy On Direct Sales


    • The coffin defense?

    Tesla has been fighting tooth and nail to sell their vehicles direct to consumers in the U.S. But six states - Arizona, Connecticut, Michigan, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia - have banned direct sales. Tesla is trying to change this with a combination of new legislation, applying for dealer licenses, and other items. However, Tesla is ready to take this issue to federal court with an interesting legal argument.

     

    The Wall Street Journal reports that Tesla's legal staff has been looking into a 2013 federal appeals court ruling in New Orleans dealing with coffins. What?! The case dealt with the St. Joseph Abbey in Louisiana trying to sell monk-made coffins to help alleviate a shortage due to Hurricane Katrina. But the state had laws that restricted coffin sales to those who were licensed by the Louisiana Board of Funeral Directors. The court sided with the abbey saying they could sell the coffins without having a funeral directors license.

     

    “It is widely accepted that laws that have a protectionist motivation or effect are not proper. Tesla is committed to not being foreclosed from operating in the states it desires to operate in, and all options are on the table,” said Todd Maron, Tesla’s chief counsel.

     

    But could this argument work? Northwestern University law professor John McGinnis says it could. Using this case could shine a spotlight on how laws affect the sale of certain items such as cars.

     

    “Until now, these decisions have been in niche areas of the economy. With Tesla behind it, it would go into something as economically important as the structure of the industry for retailing cars,” said McGinnis.

     

    The timing is what intrigues us the most. Tomorrow night, Tesla will be revealing the Model 3 - their mass-market car. Reservations for this new model will also open.

     

    Source: The Wall Street Journal (Subscription Required)

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    all for it if they can push it through, but at the same time, direct sales won't be the holy grail to the consumer like everyone thinks.  A tesla is only wanting to sell direct so they can skim the profits more than a dealer can.  It's not going to reduce car prices.  The market will determine what cars sell for, which mostly for cars is based on how healthy the economy is and people's ability to get credit.  Market factors what they are, a Tesla will sell for what a Tesla is worth in relation to everything else.  Direct sales means the direct seller makes more of the money.  It also means they will look for ways to skirt dealer functions, like service, etc.

     

    This is good from a legal aspect.  It just isn't going to do anything besides centralize the owner of the retail functions of car companies even more.

     

    I for one would like for car dealers to choose to be open sunday in my state if they want.  Having worked in car sales i can tell you everyone loved sundays off guaranteed, however, it should not be a law, it should be up to the business owners.  Same thing with liquor.......

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    +1 Reg, I totally agree that the Blue Laws from the Prohibition era need to Die. It should be the right of a business to be open 7 days a week just like it is the right of a person to shop 7 days a week. GOV needs to stay out of dictation what, when and how you can shop.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The real dirty fact is Tesla needs money badly. I just saw where it is estimated they are down to about 1 Billion in cash right now. The cost of the 3 and X model development has drained them. They are only pre selling the 3 not to generate money so they can continue to build it. 

     

    Some estimate that they could be out of cash by 2018 if they do not deliver the 3 models buy late 17 or early 18 at the price they promised last night.

     

    Their track record of on time releases have been not so good. They will be facing more and more competition and their quality issues are very unreported. If you read up on the web sites you see many of the issues the media never tell you about. They also have a web site with a delivery inspection sheet as owners have to inspect their own cars upon delivery for issues.  

     

    The fact is every car maker would love to sell direct but the old companies can not cut off the dealers they have nor can they afford to buy them out. Hence their wanting to keep with what they have. 

     

    As for car sales on Sunday? I could see it in some busy locations but many dealers would mostly not see a big gain here. If anything later service hours here have been productive and some Saturday service. But most Sundays with the NFL most dealers would not find it as busy unless they serve beer along with the big screen in the waiting room. 

     

    For the longest time I hated the Parts departments here as most closed at 5 PM and had no weekend hours. That has changed but I worry as the people I know there say they are usually dead. 

     

    I found this story very interesting. 

     

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/31/tesla-s-model-3-could-destroy-elon-musk-s-company.html?via=desktop&source=email

    Edited by hyperv6
    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not gonna bog this thread down with the specifics of product or perceptions. Just the sales channel strategies.

     

    I have strong reasons to suspect the unspoken few bright people in the car industry would slash and burn dealers if they wanted to.

     

    You look at how the dealerships exist today - they are rife with mergers an acquisitions. Automakers are beholden to them, and as any sales channel that has its own vested interests - the incumbents cannot dump them because they're the largest distribution chain. The channel innovation is a part of how businesses transform themselves. I don't understand why automakers claim they're on top of the the new stated of car access instead of ownership - such as ride sharing or car sharing services. Yet they refuse to consider direct sales. There's obvious channel conflict. Dealers would hate to see automakers sell directly. However, eventually shateholders will be barging down doors, or put management in place that are stewards of their requirements - more profits and etc.

     

    But direct sales have huge advantages. It's no secret, pocket prices are exactly what the MSRP is because there is no intermediary in the value chain that can cause price leakages. No dealer holdback, no volume incentives, no performance bonuses, none of that crap. And the inertia in the organizations is because they're too entrenched into this legacy.

     

    And the dirty secret is that every business whether for profit or not needs money badly.

     

    Those who fail to innovate - even in their "go to market aka get the product into customer hands strategy" they can leave a lot of money on the table. Yeah, sure. The Bolt will have the advantage of dealerships.

     

    But recognize this - Tesla only needs deliver half of their pre-orders, so basically let's assume they delay their shipments by another half-year to equal approximately ALL other  electric vehicle sales - which also includes the Models and X!

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is this simple. 

    Blessing added profits. 

    Curse the added responsibility of running the sales and service internally. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What are you talking about? For all we know Tesla service centres staffing needs are outsourced to contractors that have a service level agreement with Tesla.

     

    Tesla above all else is network organization. They have a lot of their value chain in-house - hence their high vertical integration, but that doesn't mean they are paralyzed by organizational complexity.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What are you talking about? For all we know Tesla service centres staffing needs are outsourced to contractors that have a service level agreement with Tesla.

     

    Tesla above all else is network organization. They have a lot of their value chain in-house - hence their high vertical integration, but that doesn't mean they are paralyzed by organizational complexity.

     

    Oh good it is bad enough to work with a Dealer franchise but even worse to work with a independent contractor that is not connected to the MFG. I can see where at times it may help but also many times where it will be much worse. 

    UPS for all their good and bad their drivers as a whole are pretty decent getting things there due to their inner organizational complexity. 

    But many other package services who use drivers who are private contractors their service can be a total nightmare most of the time. On Trac on the west coast is a real burn on shippers. While cheaper so much is late or delivered wrong. 

    Roadway Package failed miserably on the independent contractor. It is hard enough to control a franchise but even more difficult to deal with contractors. 

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The real dirty fact is Tesla needs money badly. I just saw where it is estimated they are down to about 1 Billion in cash right now. The cost of the 3 and X model development has drained them. They are only pre selling the 3 not to generate money so they can continue to build it. 

     

    Some estimate that they could be out of cash by 2018 if they do not deliver the 3 models buy late 17 or early 18 at the price they promised last night.

     

    Their track record of on time releases have been not so good. They will be facing more and more competition and their quality issues are very unreported. If you read up on the web sites you see many of the issues the media never tell you about. They also have a web site with a delivery inspection sheet as owners have to inspect their own cars upon delivery for issues.  

     

    The fact is every car maker would love to sell direct but the old companies can not cut off the dealers they have nor can they afford to buy them out. Hence their wanting to keep with what they have. 

     

    As for car sales on Sunday? I could see it in some busy locations but many dealers would mostly not see a big gain here. If anything later service hours here have been productive and some Saturday service. But most Sundays with the NFL most dealers would not find it as busy unless they serve beer along with the big screen in the waiting room. 

     

    For the longest time I hated the Parts departments here as most closed at 5 PM and had no weekend hours. That has changed but I worry as the people I know there say they are usually dead. 

     

    I found this story very interesting. 

     

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/31/tesla-s-model-3-could-destroy-elon-musk-s-company.html?via=desktop&source=email

    West coast your dealerships are open 7 days a week, service is Mon to Saturday and the parts departments are open 10am to 7pm Mon to Sat. I love that I can buy at any time and for the most part get service and parts when I need them. No need to close down on a sunday.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What are you talking about? For all we know Tesla service centres staffing needs are outsourced to contractors that have a service level agreement with Tesla.

     

    Tesla above all else is network organization. They have a lot of their value chain in-house - hence their high vertical integration, but that doesn't mean they are paralyzed by organizational complexity.

     

    Oh good it is bad enough to work with a Dealer franchise but even worse to work with a independent contractor that is not connected to the MFG. I can see where at times it may help but also many times where it will be much worse. 

    UPS for all their good and bad their drivers as a whole are pretty decent getting things there due to their inner organizational complexity. 

    But many other package services who use drivers who are private contractors their service can be a total nightmare most of the time. On Trac on the west coast is a real burn on shippers. While cheaper so much is late or delivered wrong. 

    Roadway Package failed miserably on the independent contractor. It is hard enough to control a franchise but even more difficult to deal with contractors. 

     

     

    Tesla certified repair / service centers are Pet Boys locations. Not sure who they use on the east coast but pet boys here is anything of a service level experience I would expect on a 100,000 dollar auto like the model S. I have tried them a few times and will search out a Napa or O'Reilly rather than deal with the crappy service and poor parts inventory of pet boys.

     

    I personally think Tesla will find great pain as they grow in using a cheap ass company like Pet Boys.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. CARBIZ
      CARBIZ
      (56 years old)
    2. crash
      crash
      (29 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By dfelt
      First Video of Tesla 3
       
    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt - Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.cheersandgears.com
      Tesla Officially in Trouble, Business Insider Says!

      To quote Business Insider final comments on Tesla and the Chevy Bolt:
      "Clearly, Tesla would be in less trouble if the Chevy Bolt were a bad car. But it isn't. Teslas have always blown me away. The Bolt blew me away for different reasons. I just hope Tesla is prepared to take this into account." 
      Matthew is a Business Insider senior correspondent who covers transportation and as a fan of Tesla was excited to check out a Chevy BOLT as comparison to the Tesla. On a recent trip to california he took time to visit the closet Chevrolet Dealer to his hotel and this is what he found.
      He states that to borrow Barkley's line, "Tesla is in trouble." You have one of the world's biggest auto companies that is known for killing the electric auto stepping off the sidelines and actually committing considerable resources to building a long range EV where it can afford to lose money on it long term till the market changes. Tesla has 400,000 plus pre-orders, but is burning through cash by the billions and while the launch of the Tesla 3 is near and Tesla still has Sexy much like Apple to an iPhone. Tesla does not have the depth of customer auto experience to pull from and as the author points out, Tesla balance sheet is precarious as it is based on raising funds on a growth story. The author goes onto say that no one will cross shop a Tesla S or X with the Chevy BOLT. They will due to limited options cross shop the Tesla 3 to the Bolt.
      To pull some interesting statements from the story, the author had the following to say:
      "I found it more fun to drive than both the Tesla Model S and the Model X, but not the original Roadster, a much smaller vehicle."
      "The Bolt is plenty fast for most people."
      "GM isn't going to overwhelm Tesla with Bolt sales. I actually think the Model 3 will greatly outsell the Bolt once Tesla's car arrives. However, it's also possible that if the Model 3 is delayed or is slow to ramp up, Chevy will be preparing a mid-cycle refresh of the Bolt before Model 3 sales start to achieve some major momentum. In other words, GM will always be ahead, and the company — barring another massive financial meltdown — will never stop putting the Bolt up against the Model 3."
      BI covered the BOLT in follow stories with the next one being more of an official review that starts off with covering the auto with the following statement: "A platform, not business as usual!" 
      From ride-hailing to ride-sharing, self driving Chevy has delivered an auto for the future that gives GM options on how they build and expand their EV lineup. BI took delivery of their white Premier BOLT just before the blizzard that hit NY. Clearly a compact-crossover-hatchback look, design is what the magazine employees felt it was and is. Surprising the BI reviewers was the amount of cargo the auto can hold and how well it handled 4 people and grocery getting. BI states that GM has told them the next addition to the BOLT lineup will be a larger auto that can accommodate 5 or more people. An exceptionally well executed minimalist design that comes with an interior that feels more premium in comparison to auto's this size in the past from GM that felt clearly parts bin cheap. The review goes on to talk about how setting the front seat for a 6'4" tall driver and getting in the back with room ahead of the knees for the same size person is a nice welcome addition to such a compact auto. Heated steering wheel was welcomed by all. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto kept everyone happily connected to their phone while driving.
      The final statement to quote from the review is as follows:
      "We were impressed with the Bolt, as a car, as an electric car, and as a mobility concept. In many ways, it is GM's post-bankruptcy masterpiece, a real feather in the cap of CEO Mary Barra and her executive team, who took what the company had achieved with its ill-fated EV-1 back in the 1990s and turned it up to 11. 
      I also flat-out loved driving it. I blasted in and out of New York City twice, rocketed around the streets of Gotham, darting through traffic, and cruised along the highways of New Jersey. I also enjoyed just driving it around the quiet streets of the suburb where I live.
      The steering is quick and responsive, and the handling is sharp enough to provide the confidence you need when surfing that sweet EV torque.
      The single-pedal mode is also very cool — I dug not using the brakes at all for extended excursions in my town. After a bit of practice, you get into a kind of Zen state with it. 
      Not a single person asked me about the car, and that can be chalked up to the ho-hum design. But I didn't care. I was lovin' it. Plain and simple, the Bolt is fun."
      Here is where we have overlap between story #2 and Story #3 which covers the 7 Killer Features:
      Dual Screens- 10.2" touch screen infotainment center & an 8" drivers console display which are totally customizable. Auto's wireless charging console. BOLT App allowing you to be connected to your auto at all times. Five cameras: front, rear, side mirrors and their 360 camera. 9hr full charge time from a 240 volt charger. 25 miles per hour, faster with Level 3 DC charging. Lane Keep assist feature. Modern Seat design allowing for maximum space inside. Over all these writeups show that GM has delivered a superior auto to the Prius, Leaf, 500e, etc. The future will be bright for the BOLT as GM move the platform forward.

      BI Story #1
      BI Story #2
      BI Story #3
    • By William Maley
      Tesla will be dropping the Model S 60 and 60 D next month. According to Electrek, Tesla sent out emails to potential buyers last week letting them know that they have until April 16th to place an order for the 60. 
      The 60-kWh version of the Model S was an odd model since it was equipped with a 75kWh battery pack that was limited via software to act like a smaller battery. Tesla offered the ability to unlock the full capacity of the battery for only $9.500.
      Tesla confirmed this and explained the reason they are dropping the 60 is most buyers tend to go for the battery upgrade and they want to streamline the ordering process.
      Source: Electrek

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Tesla will be dropping the Model S 60 and 60 D next month. According to Electrek, Tesla sent out emails to potential buyers last week letting them know that they have until April 16th to place an order for the 60. 
      The 60-kWh version of the Model S was an odd model since it was equipped with a 75kWh battery pack that was limited via software to act like a smaller battery. Tesla offered the ability to unlock the full capacity of the battery for only $9.500.
      Tesla confirmed this and explained the reason they are dropping the 60 is most buyers tend to go for the battery upgrade and they want to streamline the ordering process.
      Source: Electrek
    • By William Maley
      There is no love lost between Tesla Motors and the former director of Autopilot. Bloomberg reports that the Silicon Valley automaker has sued Sterling Anderson over allegations of stealing confidential information about Autopilot and trying to recruit Tesla employees to his new venture.
      In the court filing, Tesla says Anderson began work on an autonomous-car venture, Aurora Innovation LLC back in summer when he was head of the Autopilot project. As the director of Autopilot, Anderson would have access to Tesla's semi-autonomous tech. He would leave Tesla in December. Anderson has been collaborating with the former head of Google’s self-driving car project, Chris Urmson.
      Tesla is seeking a court order barring Anderson from "any use of Tesla’s proprietary information related to autonomous driving." Tesla is also seeking an order banning Anderson and Aurora Innovation from recruiting Tesla employees and contractors for a year after Anderson’s termination date.
      “Tesla’s meritless lawsuit reveals both a startling paranoia and an unhealthy fear of competition. This abuse of the legal system is a malicious attempt to stifle a competitor and destroy personal reputations. Aurora looks forward to disproving these false allegations in court and to building a successful self-driving business,” Aurora Innovation LLC said in a statement yesterday.
      Source: Bloomberg

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)