Jump to content

1962 Chevy Nova 2dr HT WAGON


BigPontiac

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Very cool wagon. What would have really made it *click* for me, though, is if the C pillar matched the angle of the B, or even been a bit steeper.

It probably wouldn't have been cheaper to build, though. You'd have to modify the liftgate to fit.

I think it looks better with the stock Nova wagon roofline anyway. It's a very convincing piece of work. Someone who might not know all that much about cars wouldn't know that this is a one-off job and might mistake it for a factory piece.

Edited by whiteknight
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh, that is an old-skool wagon, son, it ain't got no "liftgate", it's got a proper let-down tailgate with a roll-down, frameless back window. The window regulator mechanism would need to be modified for the steeper angle, but that don't seem like a big thang.

It's beautiful work as it is, it's just that my sense of "correct" style dictates that the rearmost pillar be at a faster angle than an intermediate one. I'd still rock it though, make no mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to DMV today and I'm still unclear if this could pass inspection. All I got from the inspector was "I'd have to see the car"...they may consider it a '62 Nova or they could consider it a "composite," which is much worse. There's also a new regulation about drivetrain that went into effect 8/1/08 where the emissions counts for the year of the motor (purchased pre-8/1/08 is grandfathered...and only matters if composite). I'm trying to verify with the seller when the motor was purchased, what percentage tint the windows are and how loud the exhaust is. Not so promising so far...

Std Regs

Composite Regs

Anyone wanna guess at the tint percentage from the pics?

Also, any ideas on what kind/brand of muffler this is?

DSC00159-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

understood.

But, I can't see anyone at a DMV even realizing that this car is a phantom. It still is a '62 Nova after all.

In PA, that's all they would know.

The phatom part isn't really my concern. The TCI front and rear independent suspension set-up, Wilwood 4-wheel disc brakes and the LS1 motor could kick it into "street rod" territory. Standard inspection for an antique is includes brakes, etc (their fav fail point is cracked front brake hoses). During that process, they could decided a more in-depth inspection is necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DMV / state codes will tell them when sideviews were required- the burden of proof should not be on you. Fed mandates didn't start until '66.

Agree with Camino : body-wise it's a '62 Chevy Nova wagon. End of info stream.

Suspension-wise, upgrading should not move the car into 'street rod' territory in the least, but I have no idea the state of 'Nazi-ism' in CT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DMV / state codes will tell them when sideviews were required- the burden of proof should not be on you. Fed mandates didn't start until '66.

Agree with Camino : body-wise it's a '62 Chevy Nova wagon. End of info stream.

Suspension-wise, upgrading should not move the car into 'street rod' territory in the least, but I have no idea the state of 'Nazi-ism' in CT.

I posted the CT regs earlier on in this thread. I was all gung-ho until I saw that "composite" category and the 8/1/08 drivetrain/emissions change.

The inspector I talked told me it would have to meet code for 1962 and matter of factly stated a 62 had to have a side mirror when I specifically asked. I'd like to validate that somehow...

"The plan" assuming no snags occur to derail the purchase process, is to walk in and run it through inspection as a '62 Wagon and see what happens. I've also lined up borrowing my friend's car trailer in the event this plan fails and I need to tweak things to pass inspection. It's pretty stock looking, so I'm hoping to get lucky...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>"I'd like to validate that somehow..."<<

Print this out:

http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/main.php?g2...ageViewsIndex=1

Under 'Optional Equipment' : Backup lights, inside non-glare and outside rearview mirrors were part of the Comfort & Convenience Package on the Nova 400.

It's a Chevy : a brand-new repro sideview is practically on the shelf @ all the chain autoparts stores. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>"I'd like to validate that somehow..."<<

Print this out:

http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/main.php?g2...ageViewsIndex=1

Under 'Optional Equipment' : Backup lights, inside non-glare and outside rearview mirrors were part of the Comfort & Convenience Package on the Nova 400.

It's a Chevy : a brand-new repro sideview is practically on the shelf @ all the chain autoparts stores. :wink:

Thanks. I kind of like how clean it looks without the mirrors, but if I have to put one on it's a pretty easy fix. The back-up lights info is also useful. I may just buy a brochure on e-bay and bring it with me to inspection in the event they challenge me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We  Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...