New Sebring Spy Shots (from Autospies)

[BrewSwillis]

The rear end is kinda "out there". Chrysler is really trying to be different with the little things like badging placement. I guess they were going for a crossfire resemblence.

http://www.autospies.com/article/index.asp...7&categoryId=12

[pow]

Nice... it reminds me of the Airflite.

[w00t_man]

The "SEBRING" on the butt is off-center and jumbled up...looks like it might not be the final placement?

[4gm]

That C-pillar looks very Ion-esqe.

[the_yellow_dart]

booooring

How can they even compare that to the 300?

[CSpec]

The side looks pretty good, except for the laughably cheap greenhouse fake-out in the C-pillar. The back is sort of Avalon-esque, and the front is going to be hideous. Plus, we already know the interior is typical Chrysler (it sucks).

[Northstar]

I agree it looks a lot like the Airflite and that the C-Pillar looks cheap.

As with the other spy shots, for some reason it look considerably smaller than the competition.

[Variance]

Wow, the rear looks even more like a G35 than I could see before.

[NOS2006]

This thing is going to be gorgeous. Just uncover it, already!

[titan]

The side profile has much more character than most of the competition; notibly the Camry and Accord. The size is right, and the rear isn't half bad. The Sebring may have a fighting shot in this cutthroat midsize market. If it's successfully posititoned as the younger brother to the 300, it may be a hit.

[MyerShift]

Those C-Pillars SUCK!

I'd rather have the window outline.

Overall, this looks to be quite attractive.

[Cory Wolfe]

Um... that greenhouse is absolutely horrible... Otherwise, not bad except for the beltline which is a bit too high and the body sides being somewhat blocky. I don't see beauty, but I don't see something as ugly as the 300.

[ocnblu]

From what I can see, I like it. The high beltline they popularized with the 300 is being copied by other manufacturers. Look at the new Camry and Optima. The "Chrysler" lettering on the decklid seems redundant, because if I remember correctly, it's spelled out in the shield on the winged emblem also. I agree with the person that said the C-pillar has some ION in it, but I think here it is better executed. I'll have to see the black-out triangle on a light colored car to pass judgment, it may lose the ION echo in a lighter color. For me, I feel like this will be another Caliber. I hated it at first, but the more spy photos that come out, the more intrigued I become.

The pictures look like they were taken in a foreign country. Look at the top picture, some of the other vehicles in the picture are not available here, and the "P" sign looks euro.

Edited May 30, 2006 by ocnblu

[Bimmer325]

I feel like this will be another Caliber.  I hated it at first, but the more spy photos that come out, the more intrigued I become.

That's funny. The more I see of the Caliber, the more I hate it. Literally.

[sciguy_0504]

Not bad, not bad. I agree that the Chrysler lettering on the back has to go. The logo and model name would look much nicer without it. I can't wait to see the finished product.

[BrewSwillis]

They were going for the look of the Airflite's C-pillar:

I believe the "Chrysler" is spelled out because this is a euro spec vehicle. Just look at the size of the license plate.

[ocnblu]

Wow, that's an excellent picture of the Airflite. Very sexy looking.

[Flybrian]

The Airflite is beautiful. Its balanced, too, unlike the 300, which is all grille and not much else.

[NOS2006]

Look at that picture of the Airflite and compare its bodyline to that of the Sebring's in the spypics. There are a lot of similarities between these two.