Jump to content
Create New...

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/31/2018 in all areas

  1. M-B has arguably the most diverse brand lineup amongst all automakers...very broad w/ a models in many segments, and multiple body styles for several models. Nothing wrong with that..
    2 points
  2. Unrestored, 29K mile '59 Series 62 convertible. Asking $195,000.
    1 point
  3. I have said for years that Cadillac should leverage their history and use word names for cars and dump the alpha-numerics. Cadillac has been trying to copy BMW and Mercedes for the past 15 years and it hasn't worked, plus Cadillac basically wants you to forget they even made cars before year 2000, as if they are some new brand like Tesla. They don't even want you to remember the Catera which they made into the early 2000s, let alone products like the Eldorado or Fleetwood. I say this is all a mistake. And I bet every Cadillac fan out there wishes they had more models. Who doesn't want a CTS coupe, CTS convertible, a mid-engine Cadillac sports car, V-series SUV's, etc. And they absolutely still need an SUV between XT5 and Escalade, I think there is room for an SUV above the Escalade. Also why only 1 engine option in an XT5 and 1 in the Escalade? The GLC has 4 engine options counting the hybrid, the GLE has 4 powertrains, GLS has 3 and is rumored to get a 4th, etc A luxury brand should have choices, Chevrolet gives you more engine options in their SUVs than Cadillac does in theirs.
    1 point
  4. You're right, I doubt anybody can tell the difference between the CLA and S Class. Aren't you a Cadillac fan? And you're okay with them doing the same thing from ATS to CT6? Every automaker has come to this. MB is no exception, it's the norm.
    1 point
  5. Absolutely. And within each model they have a couple engine choices as well. As a consumer, we should at least love what they bring to the market even if you don't like the products' styling/design.
    1 point
  6. True, I think all would be fine had they kept it in the Indian market. Selling it in the US is what is irritating FCA.
    1 point
  7. Remember guys that Mahindra has a license to make it dating back to just after WW2 that and they're agreement of 2009. I haven't seen anything yet that shows me that Mahindra is in the wrong.
    1 point
  8. Yes, get new batteries for that daggone clock!
    1 point
  9. Every few days, when I randomly check a clock, it's on "11:11". Somebody's trying to tell me something... - - - - -
    1 point
  10. So the CVT is a profit move for a cheaper transmission. Sadly it will also give a bad impression since they suck. Wish GM would have not done this.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search