ccap41

I said, "I'm not doubting that." I wasn't disputing you. Nor did they on mine. What is difficult to understand about that? I already told you my personal voting has had no outside influence from my state's views, as a whole. I was just stating that my votes were irrelevant because the entirety of the state.

That would be under the corporate or foundation taxes filed, not his personal taxes.

I'm not doubting that. Sorry, I should know you aren't as familiar with my state as I am. That's my fault. What I meant is that in my state(Illinois) there was one outcome regardless of who I voted for because Chicago has been voting very strongly for the democratic parties for a very long time now, since 1992. Yes, there were literally more than one person to vote for but there was one outcome predicted years in advance. I hope this clarifies my wording error.

You know what I meant. It is democratic run and has been for the last seven elections in an overwhelming vote dominated by Chicago.

Then why did you say I only saw two parties(after mentioning voting for three parties during the most recent elections)?

I don't believe it was outgoing funds. It was the incoming funds that was the issue. It was/is a money laundering foundation for persuasive and powerful people.

My state had one choice. I knew going into the election my state would be a democratic state because of Chicago. They dominate the state's voting, obviously. Did you miss where I said I didn't just vote democratic or republican? I voted for libertarians and no party associated all on the same ballot. If anything, I'm the opposite of the problem. I read, researched what I believed in and what the candidates believed in and voted for everybody, Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, and no associated party people.

He comes across as innocent as the Clinton Foundation. I hope you don't see that as innocent either, right? Politicians are corrupt. Period. Finding the least bad is what it has come down to and obviously people will have various opinions and value different things in a candidate.

He was a dogsht candidate. I know he was. I believe he was the best of the two absolutely garbage candidates that made it there. It was terrible that we had to choose between a douche and a turd sandwich(South Park reference that is quite accurate). Personally, I believed in him more than I did Hillary. Neither of those two should have made it to that point.

Oh no. I am not that extreme at all. I lean right but I am no far right or extremist by any stretch of the imagination. Not like anybody here actually cares but prior to my voting(every time) I look up all candidates, take notes on what they believe in and what I believe in, takes my little scratch pad with me and vote with my heart/opinions. I have never blindly voted all down one side of the ballot for whichever candidates are Republican or Democrats. I'll openly admit to voting for Democrats in this past election along with libertarians and republicans. I have never, and never plan to, blindly vote without informing myself in who I am voting for. I'm sorry if that is how you want to take what I said but. for the record, I do not feel that way. I do care about my fellow citizens and I do care about the future of my country.

I do recall saying nothing of the sort about not caring about the future of the country and the citizens of said country. I'm sorry our opinions are not the same but I would appreciate it if you did not start putting words into my mouth.

That's an opinionated question you're asking for documentation for... My opinion says, it is meaningless. I, personally, see zero value in seeing one's taxes.

I've been quite satisfied for the last couple years. No worries on my end.

But, it doesn't. Sorry, bud.

I'd love to pilot a vehicle with one of these advanced systems. I'd just like to see what they're like.

Again, that doesn't mean sh!t to me and I don't understand why that matters to others. But here we are, and it does matter to others. ??‍♂️

And that is your opinion. Luckily, we are each allowed our own in these two beautiful countries. ✌️

And none of that makes any logical sense to me. It all sounds like petty excuses to be upset with somebody. Pick on other crap he has done or said. No matter what anybody says here, you will never be able to convince me that seeing ones' filed taxes is of importance.

There is zero importance in how much he earned a year. Anybody continuing to bring it up is just digging for reasons to not like somebody. There are dozens or hundreds of other reasons to get on his ass, knowing how much he makes shouldn't be one of them.

Oh boy.. MuSt ReLeAsE TaxEs, because that's something that legitimately matters to people. I can't find a rate at which we are borrowing/incurring interest debt with them. Do you have this? If China's debt is growing at a faster rate, did we owe Japan more just a few years ago?

So show me the "many". I'll admit to being wrong. One billionaire has cash on hand, although it isn't actual cash.

So why are you comparing the lone billionaire with legitimate cash on hand to Trump and, likely, the rest of the billionaires?

The Bill Gates ratio of $100B net worth to $4B in cash makes way more sense. If Trump had that same ratio his $3.1B estimated net worth would yield him about $124M in cash. So if you're adding in the firm's value(which seems odd one's net worth wouldn't be included), what are Trump's properties valued at? Warren Buffet is on another level. There is no doubt about that. The man knows what he is doing and he knows how the market is flowing better than probably anybody else.

I don't think anybody has put him in the status as those billionaires. If they have, they're pretty ignorant. Also, his net worth is $83.46B and yet he has $109B in cash on hand? Is it me or are those numbers alone not matching up?

Isn't that how every billionaire is? Nobody has that in cash.