surreal1272

That is exactly what I'm referring to as well. It serves no function whatsoever and creates an even worse blind spot.

I think it is the rear pillar that really kills it for me. That stupid trend needs to stop.

The older one has a far more cohesive (if not dated) look. The new one is trying to convey at least five different looks and none of them are very flattering to me.

So I saw pics of the new GMC Terrain and really wished I was blind and couldn't see that. Absolutely hideous amalgamation of bad design ideas on the outside.

Understandable. I'm more of a Challenger man myself. The extra room is a plus for me (and it sits just like my old Magnum which is a huge plus).

Camaro-8737 Mustang-8063 Sorry. I couldn't resist. Seriously, this perfectly illustrates what was talked about yesterday regarding across the board sales struggles and why it will continue. Looks like everyone took a hit last month.

Rising prices+rising debt+stagnant wages=our current automotive climate.

No doubt. Bureaucracy sucks at every corporate job. It's not an easy job and you constantly have to play all sides to make it work. It is a thankless job from what I understand because of the corporate climate these days.

Hope he was not responsible for that product or the ad lol.

Random funny for the day (and somewhere, someone in an marketing department is banging their head against a brick wall)!

Very sharp ride CP. One of the most underrated cars ever made. Congrats.

@ccap41-Did I say something untrue? Seems to me you did the exact same thing as you are accusing dfelt of doing yet...

Very interesting concept. Hope you will see this through but I certainly understand the need to just shut it all down.

Or "Rolls eyes" or "Damn right, I'm trolling!"

Congrats. Very nice!

I noticed that too. Very interesting for them to go that route.

Yeah you did but this has gone on long enough. What have we learned from the Venezuela crisis? Soicalism bad Capitalism good or so I hear.

Well you couldn't be more wrong on how that happened. Olds was going on about hockey and after that you interject with some remark about liberals on a car thread. I said politics had jack to do with the subject of the thread and you replied with "but hockey is", hence my hockey and politics hint. You tried to call me for putting you on notice and not Olds. My response was deleted to obvious reasons.

I'll leave you with a hint. Hockey and politics.

Drew is right but you know full well what I'm talking about so there really is no reason to be coy about it.

Yet you got mad at me last week for not going after Olds on another thread while I criticized your post. How is that not also crying like a perpetual child? You have done the same thing when I criticize Ford but not GM (which is not true btw). Anyway, this has veered way off the subject and maybe needs a thread of its own.

I've said what I needed to say on it and this is taking the subject of the thread to far off course.

@hyperv6--Remember. You brought up capitalism as the reason for this country's early success while clearly ignoring or just dismissing how it got there, hence my initial reply to you. What is f@#ked in this country is when you ignore certain parts of history to suit an agenda as you have done here (with the support of others who have a selective memory of how this country was built).

See ya' No offense but it just seems like you are more concerned with being right and lording over everyone with your vast knowledge than actually listening to what others are saying.