Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    55,743

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    514

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. Drew Dowdell
    Exactly. My only issue with the Encore these days is the size, but it's not the vehicle's fault that our needs have changed since we bought it. For us, it is a fine commuter, we both work in the downtown Pittsburgh now, so on days that I go into the office instead of working from home, we often drive. It's also still pleasant for long haul drives when it is just the two of us. We'll be taking it to DC on Saturday. The issue we're running into is that as his parents get older, they are less willing to drive on their own for the long trip to DC to visit his sister, so they're riding along with us. It's a bit snug for 4 adults plus luggage. That's where the comfort cruiser SUV comes in.
  2. Drew Dowdell
    Because I'm not insane.
  3. Drew Dowdell
    I don't have a lot of sympathy for him. I picked the 1.4t Encore that has a lot less power. It's still fine in city. We've been fine with it for 70,000 miles.
  4. Drew Dowdell
    I have an issue with you saying that GM forced the 1.5t on you when there were 2.0ts on the lot. You chose the 2.0t because you didn't want to pay more. You also could have gotten a V6 Impala. You have multiple choices for better performance without leaving the Chevy lot.
  5. Drew Dowdell
    Because, as I said earlier, it depends on engine architecture. The 2.0t is a variation on the 2.5 engine block. It is much larger than the engine architecture the 1.5t uses. They ate two completely different engine families. This is a GM specific thing based on about a decade of corporate development. GM is not going to produce two different but similarly powered 2.0t engines. It's just not economically feasible. Could they build a 2.0T on the smaller engine family? Probably. Will they? Probably not. A performance 1.8t though... As for a Cruze SS, the regular Cruze isn't selling very well, so why make an SS version? Building cars is multi-dimensional there is never one sole reason for doing or not doing something.
  6. Drew Dowdell
    No niche left uncovered
  7. Drew Dowdell
  8. Drew Dowdell
    Not when they sit in them. The C-Class definitely feels roomier. The CLA is nearly unusable for more than 2 people.
  9. Drew Dowdell
    Probably not
  10. Drew Dowdell
    Again, you're looking at it from the consumer's point of view. Look at it from a manufacturer's point of view. A 1.5T would cost the same to build as a 2.0T assuming technologies are the same. (DI, VVT, Turbo, etc). There is not going to be some huge amount of price difference for that. Manufacturers (not just automobiles) often offer options that have a perceived value to a product while actually adding little or no cost to the underlying product. A good half of the consumer market is built that way.
  11. Drew Dowdell
    E Classes have the advantage of also being high volume taxies. The reason why Chevy puts the 1.5t in instead of the 2.0t has to do with engine architecture. The 2.0t is on the same block as the 2.5 which won't fit. It's a shame you can't ever see in more than one dimension at a time.
  12. Drew Dowdell
    You're only looking at customer price, not manufacturing cost. I'm not looking at the customer end at all, only the manufacturer end. A1.5t costs the same to manufacture as a 2.0t does. They're both turbo direct injection 4 cylinders with VVT. There is 1.25 cubic centimeters of displacement per cylinder difference between them. There is no advanced engineering difference. Mercedes gets to charge more for the higher output, sure, but it doesn't cost them more to build it. Mercedes is selling cars that are technologically the same (aside from rear suspension) as the Cruze for $10k more. AWD is an option that further increases the price. The rest is low cost fluff that Mercedes adds to get the fake Gucci crowd to buy it. This whole debate started because @Dfelt wondered why MB was chasing this segment. I was pointing out how MB was making a huge profit on it by selling the lowest common denominator to status seekers.
  13. Drew Dowdell
    Again, no. The costly stuff is largely the same. What better tech does the base $33,6k CLA that a $23k Cruze LT doesn't?
  14. Drew Dowdell
    It's the same one.
  15. Drew Dowdell
    That may be true in the US, but we're fast becoming a secondary market to China. Just because a particular car sells poorly here doesn't mean it does in China. Buick sells more Regals in China than they sell of all Buicks in the US.
  16. Drew Dowdell
    Didn't it have magnetic ride control?
  17. Drew Dowdell
    Yeah, that there is the Silverado look I don't like. Try this one.
  18. Drew Dowdell
    Think cost to build rather than MSRP. Does Cruze 1.5t with direct injection cost any more to build than an MB 2.0t with direct injection? Largely no. Unless there is some weird technology in an engine, that type of engine with the same technology will cost roughly the same regardless of who is building it and regardless of it's performance (baring ultra performance models). A compact FWD platform will cost roughly the same regardless of who is building it. There is nothing particularly special about the CLA. The only difference might be suspension complexity, but there is certainly not a $10k advantage there. So for what it costs Mercedes to build a CLA versus what it costs Chevy to build a Cruze, they're going to be pretty darn close.
  19. Drew Dowdell
    I can go either way on chrome in a vehicle. It really depends on the vehicle in question. I like the Escalade's looks and think it's amount of Chrome is fine. I think the Denali is a bit over the top, but I'd still drive it. I do not like the 2017 Silverado's chrome at all, I think it is gaudy, I only like the Silverado in Z71 trim where most (all?) of the chrome is converted to body color. I'm not a big fan of the '17 Sierra's chrome, it's not gaudy, it's just not attractive. In this truck, I prefer the All-Terrain model which blacks out the grill and uses a body color surround. I don't mind the chrome on any of the F-150 models. My favorite F-150 is the King Ranch, but any of them suit me in styling. The Ram I definitely prefer with body-color trim. I think the big blingy Limited is over the top and tacky from the exterior, though I really like the interior. The chrome on the regular old Big Horn is fine though.
  20. Drew Dowdell
    @dfelt, you beat me to it! I even had a C&G Holiday card made.
  21. Drew Dowdell
    pfffft... who cares about that when there are quarterly profits to consider?!
  22. Drew Dowdell
    Focus and Cruze sell for $10k less than a CLA... there's a lot of room for profit there for something that is mechanically no different.
  23. Drew Dowdell
    The original Insight could only hold 2 people and a small overnight bag. That comparison is irrelevant.
  24. Drew Dowdell
  25. Drew Dowdell
    Are you kidding? Mercedes is selling a glorified Focus for $30k... why wouldn't they sell that?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search