Hey there Speedy:
Appropriate nickname since these cars like to "coast" at 120mph.
The car is nice the photography even better. I too am a sucker
for interesting shots, low/high angle & macro shots. I've always
prefered the 1992-97 body style but the more rounded smoother
1998-04 is not exactly bad looking either.
The 98-04 has better looking more modern headlights but more
importantly the lower front fascia does not sag & or break if
you look at it wrong.
I had (still have but not registered) 1997 STS & as a Chevy
salesman I sold a gently used 1999 STS in silver to my G/Fs
grandmother. All her life she wanted a Caddy but drove
Plymouths, Chevrolets & after the B-body died, Panthers.
She loves her STS... it's got like 78K on it.
The crazy part is that even though she always wanted a Caddy
the car she learned to drive on, a 1930s Packard 3-on-the-tree
is probably worth more today than 2 new STSs.
Oh & the guy who traded in her STS, he bought a electric blue Z06!
WORD TO THE WISE:
Never, ever, EVER pour anything other than Mobil1 synthetic, or at least
an equivelant synthetic into that front valvecover. These cars were
designed to run Mobil 1, they left the factory with Mobil 1 and if you do
switch to regular oil for even one oil change intreval it will result in
disaster sooner or later. The guy who had my STS before me did that
and f***ed the car up royally. I'm at the point where I hate it cause it's
FWD but even if it was not for that the car is a mess... it burns/leaks
about a quart of oil every 100-150 miles. No joke.