Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    2020 Nissan Frontier Gains An Updated Powertrain

      ..It's whats under the skin that counts..


    Nissan isn't quite ready to show off the next-generation Frontier, but they have decided to drop the new engine and transmission destined for the new model into the outgoing Frontier.

    Revealed on the eve of the Chicago Auto Show yesterday, the new 3.8L V6 produces 310 horsepower and 281 pound-feet of torque - an increase of 49 hp over the outgoing 4.0L V6, but torque remains the same. This is paired with a nine-speed automatic that is similar to the one used in the recently refreshed Titan. The introduction of this new powertain does mean the base 2.5L four-cylinder and manual transmission have been dropped for 2020.

    Why is Nissan releasing this new powertrain in a model that is destined to be replaced in a year's time? Most likely Nissan sees it as a way to get some real-world mileage before being dropped into the next-generation Frontier.

    Nissan is also giving all 2020 Frontiers push-button start, power windows and locks; and tilt-telescoping steering wheel. 

    Source: Nissan
    Press Release is on Page 2


    2020 Nissan Frontier debuts with ‘heart of the next-generation Frontier’

    • All-new 3.8-liter direct injection V6 engine, 9-speed transmission help set the stage for all-new truck to come next year

    CHICAGO – As one successful era ends, another is just beginning in the heart of the 2020 Nissan Frontier.

    At a media reception tonight, Nissan revealed the 2020 Frontier which features an all-new, powerful 3.8-liter direct injection V6 engine and all-new 9-speed automatic transmission – both of which will be key elements in the next-generation, all-new Frontier coming soon.

    The 2020 Frontier, which marks the last model year of the current generation, will feature best-in-class horsepower1 while also providing improved fuel economy and emissions performance. It will go on sale in spring 2020.

    Helping celebrate the transition to the next-generation Frontier was Brian Murphy and his 2007 Frontier, which just last week crossed the 1 million mile mark – a true testament to the durability and reliability of the Nissan Frontier.

    "The 2020 Frontier lays the groundwork for the exciting, next-generation Frontier – an all-new pickup truck slated to arrive soon," said Tiago Castro, director, Commercial Vehicle Business Unit, Nissan North America, Inc. "While looking ahead, we're also celebrating our strong heritage – including the innovations, versatility and reliability of past models, such as the 2007 Frontier that Chicago resident Brian Murphy has driven for more than one million miles."

    2020 Nissan Frontier
    The 2020 Frontier, with its standard 3.8-liter V6 and 9-speed automatic transmission, focuses on the needs and demands of truck owners in the U.S. Nissan's all-new engine is using 93 percent new or redesigned parts, and the powerplant underwent extensive testing in North America. The engine will be assembled at Nissan's advanced engine facility in Decherd, Tenn., next to the full-size TITAN pickup's 5.6-liter Endurance® V8.

    Along with the 49-horsepower improvement over the previous Frontier V6, fuel economy is expected to increase2. Also contributing to the 2020 Frontier's improved acceleration and fuel economy is the all-new 9-speed automatic transmission designed to maximize powertrain efficiency and provide an enhanced acceleration feel.

    "From its roots tracing back more than 60 years, to the current model, Frontier has had a lasting impact on the compact and mid-size truck segments in North America. As Nissan transitions to the next chapter, we celebrate both a proud past and a bright future with the heart of the next Frontier," added Castro.

    The "Million-Mile" 2007 Frontier
    Chicagoland delivery man Brian Murphy bought his two-wheel-drive, 4-cylinder 5-speed manual Frontier King Cab pickup in June 2007 with one goal: to put 1 million miles on it3. The red Frontier passed the million-mile mark on January 27, 2020.

    According to Murphy, the original clutch lasted 801,000 miles, the timing chain was replaced as a preventative measure at 700,000 miles, and the radiator and alternator lasted about 450,000 miles each. Even the driver's seat lasted a half-million miles but has also been replaced. 

    To celebrate Murphy's incredible accomplishment and loyalty, Nissan announced it would give Murphy a new Frontier once the 2020 model begins production later this year. 

    "I never imagined I'd be given a new truck, especially since my Frontier is still running strong. It will be a real treat to have an efficient V6 engine, but I guess I'll have to find another way to exercise now that I'll have an automatic transmission and power windows," said Murphy. 

    For regular maintenance, the truck has been serviced at M'Lady Nissan in Crystal Lake, Illinois, the same dealership where Murphy purchased the vehicle new in June 2007. Murphy insists on doing his own oil changes every 10,000 miles.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The new 3.8 liter V6 is less powerful than the Nissan 3.7 liter V6 that made 328 hp 10 years ago.  

    The one that's not in a truck? 

    Truck engines are always tuned down and designed more for hard work and reliability. 

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It could use more torque, because truck, but isn't 281 still more than the other N/A V6's? 

    Tacoma 3.5: 265tq

    Gladiator 3.6: 260tq

    GM 3.6: 275tq

    As it turns out, yes. Yes, it is more than the others in its field. 

    The only competitor that ousts it is the 2.3 with 310tq but much less horsepower at 270. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Me thinks this engine will get the real world testing that Nissan wants and then in the new Frontier, it will have a considerable bump in power and torque.

    Still hate DOHC engines that have more HP than Torque.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    The new 3.8 liter V6 is less powerful than the Nissan 3.7 liter V6 that made 328 hp 10 years ago.  

    HP in trucks is not something to max.... who's gonna race the thing making it turn above 6500rpm?

    edit, it's not an SS, or Cyclone type truck

    Edited by loki
    added edit
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, loki said:

    HP in trucks is not something to max.... who's gonna race the thing making it turn above 6500rpm?

    edit, it's not an SS, or Cyclone type truck

    Or in Nissan terms, not a NISMO, GT-R or SE-R spec....just a basic pickup, torque counts for hauling stuff...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is what you get from a barely hanging on NIMOCO, a brand new 3.8L V6 that only has an additional 2 hp and 6 lb.-ft. than GM's class competitive 5 yr. old 3.6L V6. Basically identical output from a larger displacement NA V6. I had this SAE cert'd. (traditionally a lower output rating but more accurate) 308hp/275 lb.-ft. 3.6L LGZ truck version in a '17 Colorado 4x4 Z71, it's a strong high-output engine for it's size and proves it here. Nissan better hope they can sell more new Frontier's than this old one to compete with the class leading GM twins and Taco to try to help pull them out of their company wide abysmal sales numbers.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 2/6/2020 at 5:49 PM, Robert Hall said:

    Or in Nissan terms, not a NISMO, GT-R or SE-R spec....just a basic pickup, torque counts for hauling stuff...

    As does reliability, these will be hauling drywall and lumber for more than they will be hauling ass. 

    On 2/6/2020 at 9:36 PM, USA-1 said:

    This is what you get from a barely hanging on NIMOCO, a brand new 3.8L V6 that only has an additional 2 hp and 6 lb.-ft. than GM's class competitive 5 yr. old 3.6L V6. Basically identical output from a larger displacement NA V6. I had this SAE cert'd. (traditionally a lower output rating but more accurate) 308hp/275 lb.-ft. 3.6L LGZ truck version in a '17 Colorado 4x4 Z71, it's a strong high-output engine for it's size and proves it here. Nissan better hope they can sell more new Frontier's than this old one to compete with the class leading GM twins and Taco to try to help pull them out of their company wide abysmal sales numbers.

    I really like the Colorado as an off road truck. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/29/2020 at 5:39 AM, A Horse With No Name said:

    As does reliability, these will be hauling drywall and lumber for more than they will be hauling ass. 

    I really like the Colorado as an off road truck. 

    It's a great truck all around. Not as smooth of a ride as my Silvy (both Z71 Off-Road pkg.), but solid little truck.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 11/3/2020 at 7:02 PM, USA-1 said:

    It's a great truck all around. Not as smooth of a ride as my Silvy (both Z71 Off-Road pkg.), but solid little truck.

    For a guy like me who lives in a city and parks in parking garages, it is the berries to drive a midsize truck. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    For a guy like me who lives in a city and parks in parking garages, it is the berries to drive a midsize truck. 

    For sure, my Colorado was easier to navigate in parking lots and DT parking garages, but being 6'3" the midsize Colorado just doesn't have the room that I like and was used to with the fullsize Silverado and the seats don't have near as many adjustments in the Colo that the Silvy does even in the TOTL Z71 pkg. I feel back to normal with a fullsize pickup and it still fits in my garage at home :D👍🏼 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

    For sure, my Colorado was easier to navigate in parking lots and DT parking garages, but being 6'3" the midsize Colorado just doesn't have the room that I like and was used to with the fullsize Silverado and the seats don't have near as many adjustments in the Colo that the Silvy does even in the TOTL Z71 pkg. I feel back to normal with a fullsize pickup and it still fits in my garage at home :D👍🏼 

    I really would love a full size truck at some point. The styling on the new Silverado is really growing on me.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Those use cases will necessitate the purchase of something with a long range, like 300+. But even still, two hours at 11.5kW would put 50 - 70 miles of range back in the car. You might need to make one 10-minute DCFC stop if you had a really busy day, but otherwise, you could make it.
    • I can understand this, but then this is part of my daily life. With two kids with their own families and grandkids it is not uncommon for us to be out and about for the day, come home for a bit before heading out to help with the grandkids and their afterschool activities. Plus, with family that is living from both sides north and south of us, it would not be uncommon to drive 75 miles down south to deal with my wife's side of the family, see the nieces/nephews and then up north to my side to see folks and with both our parents in senior years with health issues, also moving back in forth. Course this is why Sun puts on about 15,000 miles a year on the SS. We all have different use cases.
    • That's all I'm worried about. I'm not going to spend a sht ton more money having a 19.2kW charger installed for the 1 day every 3 years I empty the battery, get home for 2 hours, and have to again drive enough that I couldn't make it back home...  
    • I could see settling on three charger rates, but definitely not one. A Bolt or Kia EV4 type vehicle simply does not need 19kW home charging.  It would be an excessive cost to retrofit a house and the number of buyers who actually use that rate would be pretty close to zero.  That would be like insisting that the Corolla has to have a 6.2 liter. It's excessive and doesn't fit the use case. Now, if we settled into 7.5kW, 11.5kW, and 19.4kW as a standard, that would probably achieve what you are proposing while still giving cost flexibility.  It would allow for entry-level EVs to get the lower cost / lower speed charger while allowing the larger vehicles or premium vehicles to have faster home charging.  For example, the EV6 could have a lower cost 7.5kW charger while the Genesis GV60 on the same platform could get the 11.5kW charger because it is a premium brand and higher cost vehicle.  Then any large EV with or near a 200kW battery could have the 19.4kW charger, but even then, unless it is a newly built house or a commercial fleet, it will still probably charge only at 11.5kW, as that's about the max that the vast majority of homes are wired to do.  Unless you're driving an EV with a 200kW battery to 10% every day, an 11.5kW charger can "fill" an EV to 80% overnight with room to spare, so most people (including me), won't want the extra expense of spending extra money just to say my EV charged faster while I slept.  Either way, it will be ready for me when I need to leave at 7 am.
    • @ccap41 @Drew Dowdell Thank you both, this is the kind of dialogue I feel the Auto buyers need to be made aware of and the various use cases in understanding as I feel most DO NOT really understand this and give into the FEAR Mongering of News Stories. While I still feel that everyone should have the same charging rate capabilities, I also understand both your points. I do feel that this will change electrical across the WORLD over time due to the need of charging.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings