Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Spying: 2018 Buick Regal

      We get our first glimpse at the next Regal

    We have been waiting to get our first look at the next-generation Buick Regal since spy shots of Opel Insignia first surfaced back in August. Well today, Motor Authority got their hands on the first spy shots of the next Regal.

     

    Much like the Insignia spy shots, the Regal mule is heavily camouflaged. But there is on detail that we can pull from the pictures. It looks like Buick is sticking with the sedan design. The Insignia spy shots revealed a fastback roof that was similar to the Audi A7.

     

    The Regal is expected to use the E2XX platform that currently underpins the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu.

     

    It is expected that Opel will reveal the Insignia at the Paris Motor Show in October. The Regal will follow shortly thereafter.

     

    Source: Motor Authority


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I'd bet 100 dollars to a donut that if they made a Crossover Coupe based on E2XX or D2xX that it would outsell the Regal 2 to 1 or more.  

     

    I can't see the Regal moving any worthwhile volume to even continue with the product.  People spending $30-35k will just buy a crossover, and car enthusiasts like myself that hate crossovers wouldn't buy a Buick.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Given that the Malibu comes with an 8-speed auto and 2.0T, I'm curious what this leaves for Buick besides AWD and a variable suspension. Buick's manual transmission take rate was far too low to continue offering. Will we see a Regal GS re-imagined as a meaningful AWD sport sedan and 300+ horsepower? The brand does seem to be lacking a meaningful halo car for generating brand interest and showroom appeal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Buick needs styling to bring customers in, not some halo car that tramples over Cadillac. And Buick has styling now in spades. Easily the Enclave is their halo vehicle already.

     

    Remember, the original branding strategy of GM was to have distinct brands for the life stage and wealth of the customer. 

     

    I do not equate Buick as a brand that needs some sexy coupe that won't sell at this time. The brand needs more new crossovers and the 2-3 new sedans being marketed, they need the meat. And the styling of a RWD car can easily be duplicated onto a FWD vehicle, as shown by the new Volvo S90 and Mazda 6, and to a lesser extent, Lincoln Continental.

     

    The Regal GS is already pitted against faux sport sedans like the CLA and Volvo S60, and against the former it's no contest and against the latter there are a lot of similarities.

     

    The brand interest is there CP. and the brand interest these days is all about crossovers. The coupe days are kinda over for too many companies. Boomers with bad backs and increasing upward economic mobility of women and a renewed focus on practicality but without a dowdy minivan form equates to future crossovers continuing to outpace sedans.

     

    I do not want Buick to get a re-skinned Cadillac. The brand's most profitable models, the Enclave, Encore and Lacrosse are all based off of their non-premium company platforms, which allows for a lot of luxury features to be delivered in a stylish and competitive package.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I read CP's post and I was like...DAMN RIGHT, CP!!!

    Bring on the Avista 4 door coupe!!!!

     

    Then I read Suave's post. and I was like...DAMNED RIGHT Suave!

    The Avista is not needed!

     

    But then I was like...Hey! Wait a minute! Didnt I just contradict myself???!!!

     

    So...right now, Im one confused hombre.

     

     

    Then I got the little light bulb working...

    Buick actually needs both.

     

    They need a flashy car. Because flashy cars always have somebody talk about the brand...whether it sells or not is not important. Flash gets you noticed. Its good to be noticed because you dont want to fall by the way side.

    But Buick also needs to vehicles that people actually buy and want to buy, because after all, what good does the flash do, get talked about, but have no desirable yet feasible and ATTAINABLE cars in the showroom for people to actually buy? 

     

    SUVs/CUVs sell at this point in time.

    But everybody gots those in their showrooms.

    How does a brand distinguish these bland appliances from the next guy?

     

    BMW calls them SAVs, but they also have all sorts of other flashy cars in the show room that garner desirability which in turn garners the plebeian SUV called SAV desirable...

     

    How does Buick do that?

    Yes, by having a pretty face does not do any harm, but, Hyundai and Lincoln and Audi and everybody else also have SUVs with pretty mugs...

     

    There comes a time when Buick's pretty face does get lost in the crowd...

     

    So...a flashy car that instills lust in the brand helps people get their lazy asses in the Buick showroom. And if the right product is there for people to buy when they see the flashy car in person, they drive off in a brand new shiny Buick just the same, even if it aint the flashy car but the plebeian appliance SUV with that has the pretty face!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Really, I just think that having a halo car is not as effective as it used to be. Having that one pricy product that is RWD, low-slung, no space is just isomorphic. 

     

    You need a real stunner. You need more than even COTY. You need something that makes every brand scramble to copy you. That is the halo car. A disruptor, a latent need deliverer...the kind of vehicle that makes people say, "why didn't they think of that sooner? It's brilliant!" It doesn't have to be a coupe or sedan. It just has to capture, captivate, and create the need for that kind of proposition made by that kind of product.

     

    Cadillac's halo is still the Escalade.

     

    And Buick, I'd rather some guy who wants a nicer Buick to exist, aka has the big bucks, to just go to the Cadillac showroom. and be happier that he/she didn't have to wait... Instead of GM really wasting money to get the same customer. 

     

    Even Avista 4 door will have a lot of resistance inside GM. It's not about what the brand is about. It's about how well a product fits with that strategy. It is so much easier and more effective for Buick just to have modern, stylish products. I'm no armchair product planner - but I think Buick is already doing real well or as well as they can. In global markets like China - the Buick so well known already.

     

    Avista styling on an existing name plate makes perfect sense. Make the Regal look a lot like the Avista, except perhaps overhangs and dash to axle, you're already there. Buyers don't care which wheels are driven, heck they probably think all AWD systems are the same, because they all boast superior traction and performance. 

     

    People gobble up Enclaves and Encores, and want even more. They don't need a halo car that meets the traditional definition of a low-slung, future defining product. In any case, the Enclave performed the same role when it came out 6-7 years ago. It wasn't a sporty car - but it previewed into the future, and at a the time was almost unrivaled anywhere.

     

    Halo cars are myth, because sometimes they fail, they flop and no value is created. And Buick to deliver a halo car that is special, will obviously have to be better than some Cadillacs. Other carmakers also don't need to chase for sporty and coupe-like, because once everyone does that - obviously the people who need headroom and space in a sedan will go elsewhere.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And now...Im back in being one confused hombre again.

    But not really, because...

     

    Point very well understood, Suave. And Im swinging back to your side of the fence.

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I read CP's post and I was like...DAMN RIGHT, CP!!!

    Bring on the Avista 4 door coupe!!!!

     

    Then I read Suave's post. and I was like...DAMNED RIGHT Suave!

    The Avista is not needed!

     

    But then I was like...Hey! Wait a minute! Didnt I just contradict myself???!!!

     

    So...right now, Im one confused hombre.

     

     

    Then I got the little light bulb working...

    Buick actually needs both.

     

    They need a flashy car. Because flashy cars always have somebody talk about the brand...whether it sells or not is not important. Flash gets you noticed. Its good to be noticed because you dont want to fall by the way side.

    But Buick also needs to vehicles that people actually buy and want to buy, because after all, what good does the flash do, get talked about, but have no desirable yet feasible and ATTAINABLE cars in the showroom for people to actually buy? 

     

    SUVs/CUVs sell at this point in time.

    But everybody gots those in their showrooms.

    How does a brand distinguish these bland appliances from the next guy?

     

    BMW calls them SAVs, but they also have all sorts of other flashy cars in the show room that garner desirability which in turn garners the plebeian SUV called SAV desirable...

     

    How does Buick do that?

    Yes, by having a pretty face does not do any harm, but, Hyundai and Lincoln and Audi and everybody else also have SUVs with pretty mugs...

     

    There comes a time when Buick's pretty face does get lost in the crowd...

     

    So...a flashy car that instills lust in the brand helps people get their lazy asses in the Buick showroom. And if the right product is there for people to buy when they see the flashy car in person, they drive off in a brand new shiny Buick just the same, even if it aint the flashy car but the plebeian appliance SUV with that has the pretty face!

     

    There is a limit to how flashy you can go.

     

    Buick is above all, still known for being very comfortable.

     

    I don't want Buick to chase after any brand. So many companies think they can be better if they emulate other company's success. Of course if this was the 60s, then I'd reverse my words and say hell yes make a RWD barge like they used to. 

     

    Blindly chasing sales and segments is not good. However, there is a time and place for halo vehicles. If say, Cadillac was the level of Bentley in prestige, and Buick was the level of Cadillac as it is today... would you not expect to just see the Cadillac of today reskinned as Buicks. 

     

    Then the Avista would be almost what we consider the El Miraj concept, expect the El Miraj would be in production, and an Alpha coupe like the Camaro would be nowhere near as prestigious, and therefore would never overlap the Omega coupe.

     

    Some kinds of overlap are perfectly reasonable. Buick based off platforms shared by Chevy is perfectly acceptable, because by large, the new Chevy cars drive pretty awesome as it is. 

     

    What they needs is the meat. And that's what they're doing. They should only get the Avista if they know for sure that the product delivers different things from any comparable Cadillac. Which is hard for me to believe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It doesn't matter, the car serves a place in the Buick lineup.  They are going to make this car for Europe anyways, so its ready made to add to the lineup here.

     

    Especially since the new LaCrosse is no longer sexy looking.....its back to staid cars for the biggest Buick, and in this case it has plenty of Chinese + old Hyundai charisma.  Not that that is bad, the new LaCrosse will still sell.

     

    Buick is littering their lineup to be a collection of inconsistent looking product from the world bag.  Again, not really too bad a thing.  Just keep the quality up, keep them comfortable and keep the retail experience upper class.  One big reason Buick and GMC exist is so people who like GM are not forced to slum in the Chevy show room.

     

    But SOMETHING in the Buick lineup has to be a little lively, while still being comfortable, and so even if this only sold 30,000 a year its the defacto Buick performance sedan.  A sprinkle of Euro in the Buick showroom to offset all those China vibes alone is well worth it.

     

    No way the car is anything besides a fancier version of the new Malibu.  And that may be a good thing.  Those clamoring for the Avista.  Give it up.  With the new LaCrosse, Regal, and Verano in the showrooms, and with the need for more crossovers, the brand can't support a 4 door coupe like the Avista.  Especially if its on the small Camaro chassis.  No way you can make a case for that niche car when the Regal fills the niche in the US and makes its sales volume in Europe.

     

    And then Buick's own crossovers will kill it too.

     

    I do prefer the shape of the lift back here, too bad it won't get here.  Maybe the wagon will.

     

    I know its heavily disguised but between this and the projected renderings out there, I don't expect it to be too flashy.  But maybe tasteful enough and with a nice enough interior to stand apart from the other Buicks and the Malibu, it will make that 30,000 unit mark if they keep the price in check.

     

    This the car they should put a 2.0 diesel in.

    Edited by regfootball
    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just looks like a generic midsize sedan covered in crap.  Anyways not expecting too much, this isn't a very interesting segment.   I'd be shocked if anything close to the Avista gets produced, it's much better looking than A&S Cadillacs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I read CP's post and I was like...DAMN RIGHT, CP!!!

    Bring on the Avista 4 door coupe!!!!

     

    Then I read Suave's post. and I was like...DAMNED RIGHT Suave!

    The Avista is not needed!

     

    But then I was like...Hey! Wait a minute! Didnt I just contradict myself???!!!

     

    So...right now, Im one confused hombre.

     

     

    Then I got the little light bulb working...

    Buick actually needs both.

     

    They need a flashy car. Because flashy cars always have somebody talk about the brand...whether it sells or not is not important. Flash gets you noticed. Its good to be noticed because you dont want to fall by the way side.

    But Buick also needs to vehicles that people actually buy and want to buy, because after all, what good does the flash do, get talked about, but have no desirable yet feasible and ATTAINABLE cars in the showroom for people to actually buy? 

     

    SUVs/CUVs sell at this point in time.

    But everybody gots those in their showrooms.

    How does a brand distinguish these bland appliances from the next guy?

     

    BMW calls them SAVs, but they also have all sorts of other flashy cars in the show room that garner desirability which in turn garners the plebeian SUV called SAV desirable...

     

    How does Buick do that?

    Yes, by having a pretty face does not do any harm, but, Hyundai and Lincoln and Audi and everybody else also have SUVs with pretty mugs...

     

    There comes a time when Buick's pretty face does get lost in the crowd...

     

    So...a flashy car that instills lust in the brand helps people get their lazy asses in the Buick showroom. And if the right product is there for people to buy when they see the flashy car in person, they drive off in a brand new shiny Buick just the same, even if it aint the flashy car but the plebeian appliance SUV with that has the pretty face!

     

    There is a limit to how flashy you can go.

     

    Buick is above all, still known for being very comfortable.

     

    I don't want Buick to chase after any brand. So many companies think they can be better if they emulate other company's success. Of course if this was the 60s, then I'd reverse my words and say hell yes make a RWD barge like they used to. 

     

    Blindly chasing sales and segments is not good. However, there is a time and place for halo vehicles. If say, Cadillac was the level of Bentley in prestige, and Buick was the level of Cadillac as it is today... would you not expect to just see the Cadillac of today reskinned as Buicks. 

     

    Then the Avista would be almost what we consider the El Miraj concept, expect the El Miraj would be in production, and an Alpha coupe like the Camaro would be nowhere near as prestigious, and therefore would never overlap the Omega coupe.

     

    Some kinds of overlap are perfectly reasonable. Buick based off platforms shared by Chevy is perfectly acceptable, because by large, the new Chevy cars drive pretty awesome as it is. 

     

    What they needs is the meat. And that's what they're doing. They should only get the Avista if they know for sure that the product delivers different things from any comparable Cadillac. Which is hard for me to believe.

     

     

    I didn't say anything about reskinning a Cadillac or using the Avista. I'm opposed to the Avista.

     

    I wondered if they would turn the Regal GS into a real AWD sport sedan like Volvo or Audi offers. We already know the car is on the E2XX platform, which means FWD/AWD. I'm just saying Buick could break their self-imposed glass ceiling and create a better vehicle with the equipment at their disposal. Torque vectoring AWD, active suspension, and a 300+ horsepower engine would be quite potent. I'd like to see turbo V6s back in the Buick brand.

     

    The refreshed 2014-2016 Regal GS is about 50 horsepower short of something far more special, why did they sit on their hands to the point that Ford took the obvious formula Buick was already staring at and will soon build a 325 horsepower AWD Fusion in the same price range?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I saw the Lacrosse today and I expect this to be a cheaper smaller version. I was surprised as I am not a Lacrosse fan but it really is a nice car.

    I would look for AWD and better trim.

    I would suspect a Turbo 2.0 will be more common in this model and better magnetic suspension.

    GM needs about only 25 more HP as most of these cars will have to walk it back in the near future to hit the MPG marks or raise the price to limit volumes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    I read CP's post and I was like...DAMN RIGHT, CP!!!

    Bring on the Avista 4 door coupe!!!!

     

    Then I read Suave's post. and I was like...DAMNED RIGHT Suave!

    The Avista is not needed!

     

    But then I was like...Hey! Wait a minute! Didnt I just contradict myself???!!!

     

    So...right now, Im one confused hombre.

     

     

    Then I got the little light bulb working...

    Buick actually needs both.

     

    They need a flashy car. Because flashy cars always have somebody talk about the brand...whether it sells or not is not important. Flash gets you noticed. Its good to be noticed because you dont want to fall by the way side.

    But Buick also needs to vehicles that people actually buy and want to buy, because after all, what good does the flash do, get talked about, but have no desirable yet feasible and ATTAINABLE cars in the showroom for people to actually buy? 

     

    SUVs/CUVs sell at this point in time.

    But everybody gots those in their showrooms.

    How does a brand distinguish these bland appliances from the next guy?

     

    BMW calls them SAVs, but they also have all sorts of other flashy cars in the show room that garner desirability which in turn garners the plebeian SUV called SAV desirable...

     

    How does Buick do that?

    Yes, by having a pretty face does not do any harm, but, Hyundai and Lincoln and Audi and everybody else also have SUVs with pretty mugs...

     

    There comes a time when Buick's pretty face does get lost in the crowd...

     

    So...a flashy car that instills lust in the brand helps people get their lazy asses in the Buick showroom. And if the right product is there for people to buy when they see the flashy car in person, they drive off in a brand new shiny Buick just the same, even if it aint the flashy car but the plebeian appliance SUV with that has the pretty face!

     

    There is a limit to how flashy you can go.

     

    Buick is above all, still known for being very comfortable.

     

    I don't want Buick to chase after any brand. So many companies think they can be better if they emulate other company's success. Of course if this was the 60s, then I'd reverse my words and say hell yes make a RWD barge like they used to. 

     

    Blindly chasing sales and segments is not good. However, there is a time and place for halo vehicles. If say, Cadillac was the level of Bentley in prestige, and Buick was the level of Cadillac as it is today... would you not expect to just see the Cadillac of today reskinned as Buicks. 

     

    Then the Avista would be almost what we consider the El Miraj concept, expect the El Miraj would be in production, and an Alpha coupe like the Camaro would be nowhere near as prestigious, and therefore would never overlap the Omega coupe.

     

    Some kinds of overlap are perfectly reasonable. Buick based off platforms shared by Chevy is perfectly acceptable, because by large, the new Chevy cars drive pretty awesome as it is. 

     

    What they needs is the meat. And that's what they're doing. They should only get the Avista if they know for sure that the product delivers different things from any comparable Cadillac. Which is hard for me to believe.

     

     

    I didn't say anything about reskinning a Cadillac or using the Avista. I'm opposed to the Avista.

     

    I wondered if they would turn the Regal GS into a real AWD sport sedan like Volvo or Audi offers. We already know the car is on the E2XX platform, which means FWD/AWD. I'm just saying Buick could break their self-imposed glass ceiling and create a better vehicle with the equipment at their disposal. Torque vectoring AWD, active suspension, and a 300+ horsepower engine would be quite potent. I'd like to see turbo V6s back in the Buick brand.

     

    The refreshed 2014-2016 Regal GS is about 50 horsepower short of something far more special, why did they sit on their hands to the point that Ford took the obvious formula Buick was already staring at and will soon build a 325 horsepower AWD Fusion in the same price range?

     

    the current Regal AWD actually fared pretty well for itself vs. the Germans etc. in a not too far back comparo test on Motor Trend.com, i think they gave it high marks.

     

    It was only like 10 years ago, a 260hp motor was the bomb, now we expect 300, 325, 350.........

     

    if you google '2017 opel insignia' and then tab to images, you see some of the common renderings out there.

     

    I'm disappointed the new Regal is being delayed so much.  The Malibu is out already, get this thing in the hopper NOW too.

    I saw the Lacrosse today and I expect this to be a cheaper smaller version. I was surprised as I am not a Lacrosse fan but it really is a nice car.

    I would look for AWD and better trim.

    I would suspect a Turbo 2.0 will be more common in this model and better magnetic suspension.

    GM needs about only 25 more HP as most of these cars will have to walk it back in the near future to hit the MPG marks or raise the price to limit volumes.

    did you mistake it for a 2007 Hyundai?lol

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not at all as it was a very nice looking car. It was Impala size but had much more upgraded details.

    As for a Hyundai No mistaking anything from GM for that mess. Looked at an Optima and for the same price the new Bu has it beat.

    The New Buick convertible was nice but kinda felt as old as it really is. Nice details but the dash looked like it was 5 years or more old. Which it is.

    The new Regal can not come soon enough.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think they could make a 2.0T and AWD standard in the Regal for $27k and it will still be a slow seller.  People buying a sport sedan aren't shopping for a Buick.  They'd be better off just taking the Lacrosse dashboard, putting it in the Regal and setting the suspension to mush mode, and hoping that they can convince Lexus/Toyota buyers to spend $29k on a Regal rather than $39k on an ES350.  

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's hard to tell with all the camo, but I'm not thrilled with what I think it looks like.

    Let them uncover it. I was not impressed with the Lacrosse till I saw it in person. It is much better in person.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I`m not sure if it`s been made clear, but this is just going to be a different trimmed version of the Insignia.

     

    Good on GM to do so, but the Malibu is a global car as well. And the two cars IMO will be closer in this generation than the one before.

     

    Because the low-end is reaching higher, and the top-end cars are going lower. At some point there will be a lot of overlap.

     

    The new Malibu is dynamic looking and feeling too. 

     

    And yes, the Buicks of today, if based on Alpha platforms and Omega, would be perfect substitutes for Cadillacs as long as Cadillac was a ultra-luxury brand not really focused on the hard-core performance, but just absolute luxury and presence.

     

    The new Regal needs presence. Every midsize sedan has already gone the European design route for sedan shapes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I’ve been busy, and it’s a few days late, but here is what will probably be the penultimate edition of “Cheers and Jeers.”  Next year will be the 25th edition, and that seems to be the right time to put this to rest or for someone else to carry on with it.  Cheers! For the first time in the history of the United States, a convicted felon was sworn into office as President, and he wasted no time on his priorities of revenge, retribution, illegal immigration, dirty energy, and gutting DEI policies and subsidized healthcare, and generally making people sicker.  With tariffs used to punish perceived enemies and the longest federal government shutdown in history, chaos and economic uncertainty reigned.  The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, was a bust, with either miniscule savings or net cost increases.  Worldwide turmoil continued with wars in the Middle East between Israel and the Palestinians, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict continued. In the beginning of the year, the Palisades fire in the Los Angeles area destroyed nearly 7,000 structures, and resulted in 12 deaths and damage in the $100 billion range.  Towards the end of the year, the horrifying Wang Fuk Court fire in a Hong Kong apartment complex killed 161 people.  2025 will not be the warmest year on record, but the second or third warmest, as the El Niño conditions that contributed to the record heat in 2024 was not replicated for 2025. Prominent passings included actors Robert Redford, Malcolm-Jamal Warner, Diane Keaton, and Gene Hackman, director Rob Reiner, and musicians Ozzy Osbourne, Roberta Flack, and Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys.  Other passings included conservative political activist Charlie Kirk, former Vice President Dick Cheney, Pope Francis, fashion designer Giorgio Armani, primatologist Jane Goodall, wrestler Hulk Hogan, and boxer and kitchen appliance spokesperson George Foreman. In automotive news, the $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit expired at the end of September, and fines for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards were eliminated.  Against the EV headwinds, automakers made significant adjustments to their future product portfolios by substantially scaling back EVs and investing instead on hybrids and range extenders.  Tariffs resulted in some production being shifted to the U.S., and some prices were raised, but manufacturers for the most part absorbed the tariffs and will take major earnings hits.  Stellantis brought back the Hemi V8 to the RAM pickup, due to popular demand, after the Hurricane inline-six that had replaced it a couple of years ago did not catch on.  The Hemi will also be brought back to the Dodge Charger. With great fanfare, Tesla debuted robotaxi service with safety drivers in downtown Austin, Texas in June.  There were at least eight reported crashes over the next 6 months, even with the safety drivers.  Lucid is busy getting their midsize EV offerings ready to market, and Rivian likewise with the more affordable R2 model.  Toyota repositioned the Century model into an ultra luxury brand above Lexus to be sold in select Lexus dealerships. Jaguar fired their lead designer, Gerry McGovern, one year after their bold Type 00 concept reveal and heavily criticized rebranding effort.  In December, Mercedes-Benz announced that their Chief Design Officer, Gordon Wagener, is leaving the company the following month after 28 years with the company. In a rare instance of the Chinese government taking the lead on a vehicle safety issue, with some occupants unable to exit Teslas and Xiaomis on fire, backup mechanical mechanisms will be mandatory for electronic interior or exterior door handles in 2027 and 2028 in the Chinese market.  With globalization, that will likely lead to changes to EVs sold elsewhere. Vehicles canceled prior to the New Year include the Acura TLX and ZDX, Cadillac XT4 and XT6, Chevrolet Malibu, Ford Escape and related Lincoln Corsair, Infiniti QX50 and QX55, Kia Soul, Lexus RC, Nissan Versa, Porsche Boxster and Cayman, Subaru Legacy, and the Volvo S60 and S90.  The Ford F-150 Lightning made it to the 2026 model year but is already out of production for good as a fully electric pickup. There were several concept vehicles in 2025, but none was particularly notable. New vehicle introductions were sparse.  Against that backdrop, here’s the 24th annual edition of Cheers and Jeers for the best and worst things automotive in 2025: Cheers to BMW for the Best New EV with the iX3 for providing class-leading technology and a reset to BMW styling.  The “Neue Klasse” design dials back a lot of the excessive surface excitement of recent years. Honorable mention to GM for bringing back the Chevrolet Bolt with more modern technology, faster charging, and an affordable price in a familiar package.  The vehicle will be a limited edition offering, but it was also revealed that there will be a family of Bolts, without further elaboration. Jeers to the Tesla Board for Worst Corporate Governance for failing to rein in Elon Musk, who seems to be doing a good job of making people not want to buy Teslas, and for providing an absurdly excessive pay package.  Tesla is losing the carbon credits paid for by other manufacturers, who have previously provided billions of dollars of revenue, and future profitability is uncertain.  With an aging lineup and the spectacularly unsuccessful Cybertruck, Tesla is betting it all on autonomy. Jeers to Mercedes-Benz for the Worst Luxury Vehicle Interiors with their focus on massive screens rather than cohesive style, material quality, or build quality.  Mercedes-Benz has become a shadow of its former self when they used to be “Engineered like no other car in the world.” Cheers to Kia for Best Non-SUV Introduction with the K4 hatchback, which makes the compact K4 much more attractive and functional than the awkwardly styled sedan.  Kia is on a roll with record-breaking sales the last three years. Honorable mention goes to Honda for the Prelude in the near-dead sports coupe market.  The new Prelude has not been embraced by performance enthusiasts, but the Prelude was never about all-out performance.  The Prelude is being marketed to middle aged to older buyers wanting to relive the glory of their youth.  Jeers to the Honda dealers who have been tacking on $15k market adjustments. Cheers to Cadillac for the Best Luxury EV Lineup with the Optiq, Lyriq, Vistiq, and Escalade IQ.  Cadillac has been successful reinventing itself.  The lineup is far from perfect, with charging speeds that are not class-leading and excessive heft, but the vehicles are proof that a legacy automaker can be successful in the EV realm, at least until Chinese EVs are unleashed on American soil. Cheers and Jeers for the Best and Worst Rebadge Job with the Nissan Rogue Plug-In Hybrid.  Mitsubishi has only about 300 dealerships in the U.S, compared to Nissan with about three and a half times as many.  The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is a decent 7-passenger SUV with about 7,000 sales in the U.S. every year.  Nissan is broke and desperate for fresh product to fill gaps in its lineup.  The Outlander is based on the Nissan Rogue, but Nissan chose to take the cost-effective move of making only minor trim changes to the Outlander PHEV to turn it into a Nissan.  It will serve its purpose. Jeers to the Federal Government for the Most Regressive Sustainability Move by attempting to pull back National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) funds and removing EV chargers from federal government facilities in their all-out quest to promote the consumption of petroleum.  As the rest of the world electrifies their fleets, the long-term competitiveness of the American automakers will be diminished. Wishing everyone a safe, healthy, and prosperous New Year.
    • I was just about to give up because the Discovery and Range Rover was nowhere NEAR close to that. The only thing that kept me going was you said you tried Ford.  FoMoCo still owned LandRover then I think.  Or I kinda knew that the lesser Land Rovers were still Ford platforms along with Volvo.  So I said to myself, because you sleuthed Fords, maybe just maybe I should just go with what the storyline says the vehicle is a Rover of some kind along with your intuition of it being a FoMoCo family vehicle and I stuck to it and it paid off.  If it wasnt Land Rover, I would have gone to Volvo next. 
    • Thank you!  At least it was the right brand. 
    • Easy peasy. I started with Range Rover and like you...negative. But then I went down the Land Rover family from the 2015s. I did Discovery and said yikes...not even close. But I pressed on.  I got to this: And then I said...woah...that is close...so I then decided to continue on sleuthing with Land Rover and went further down the years  at around the 2010 mark And then I got this and said: BINGO!!! https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/163-2010-land-rover-lr2-photo-gallery/photos LR2  from the 2010 era:
    • Hey guys, see if you can figure this one out. Cannonically this is supposed to be to be a Range Rover in the story. It’s clearly not a Range Rover.   I looked at Pathfinder, Armada, some Fords and can’t figure out what it is. Should be something circa 2015 or earlier. The hazard button is in an odd place right under the screen and it looks like it has a speaker above the screen. There’s also clearly a CD player.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search