• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Cadillac Answers The "How Can We Get You Into An ELR" Question


    • What would it take to get you into a Cadillac ELR?


    When Cadillac announced the pricing for the new ELR would start around $75,995 without any incentives added on, a lot people wondered how Cadillac was going move these off dealers. Well, the luxury brand has two different ways of tacking that.

    The first is for those who decide to purchase an ELR outright. If you happen to be an 'early' buyer, General Motors will throw in a 240-volt home fast charger with professional instillation free of charge. GM doesn't say how long this offer will last in the press release unfortunately.

    The second are for those who plan to lease. Cadillac is planning to offer a 39-month lease for $699 a month for the ELR. There are some caveats for this offer though. The fine print says to qualify for this lease you either have to be a current owner or lessees of any 1999 or newer GM vehicles and then be ready to pony up $5,999 for a down payment. Now the lease is a "ultra-low-mileage" one which means that you can only travel 10,000 miles a year. Go above that and you'll get hit with a $0.25 surcharge for each mile.

    Source: Cadillac, Autoblog Green

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.comor you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    Press Release is on Page 2


    Cadillac Enhances ELR Buying Experience

    • Early adopters to receive complimentary home charger and installation

    DETROIT – Cadillac is offering a complimentary 240-volt home charging station and installation to early buyers of the all-new 2014 ELR electrified luxury coupe.

    "The ELR's blend of leading technology with provocative design and fun-to-drive performance is set to bring new buyers to Cadillac and to electrification itself," said Uwe Ellinghaus, chief marketing officer, Global Cadillac. "Professional installation of the fastest home-charging unit is a natural way to mark the introduction of ELR to the luxury market."

    Cadillac is offering the ELR on an ultra-low-mileage, 39-month lease for qualified lessees at $699 per month with $5,999 due at signing after all offers.

    The Cadillac ELR offers a convergence of luxury, electrification and sporty driving in a premium coupe with dynamic design and an award-winning range-extended electric powertrain capable of 340 miles of total range.

    As with all Cadillac models, the ELR comes standard with Cadillac Shield, a comprehensive suite of owner benefits including Remote Vehicle Diagnostics, a Premium Care Maintenance program and 24/7 roadside assistance. ELR also comes with an extended battery and propulsion warranty of eight years or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first, and a four-year or 50,000-mile, whichever comes first, bumper-to-bumper limited warranty.

    Specially trained and certified dealers nationwide sell and service the 2014 ELR. Backing up the dealership experience, prospective customers and buyers of the ELR can take advantage of their own ELR Concierge Representative. Trained in white-glove customer care, the Concierge Representative is an additional point of contact for information on battery care, home charging, service scheduling, news and updates by calling 1-855-INFO-ELR (1-855-463-6357).

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    So if we own more than one GM auto that is a 99 or newer does that mean we get additional discount on the down payment?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can't. The is no justification that a more luxuriously appointed Volt is going to fetch $36K more over the already over priced Volt.

    Remember, the Volt was supposed to be a $30K Hybrid that came in $10K over the original price target. Without subsidies, a $40K Volt does not make any economic sense simply because the $20K premium over other comparably equipped Deltas (eg. Cruze) is enough to buy 188,500 miles worth of gasoline @ $3.50/gallon. The Volt is neither fast nor particularly long legged on battery power (40 miles). The ELR is no much better except perhaps for looking a little sleeker and having a nicer interior. $35K for that and a Caddy badge!?!! No fly a kite! If I am interested in saving money fuel expenses I won't buy a Volt much less an ELR. If I am a Global Warming koolaid drinker or I want green creds with my liberal friends, $76K is pretty darn close to the Tesla Model S and that has a lot more cool factor, green factor and it is actually fast!

    Really, a $76K Delta? At the very minimum they should have put a 270hp LTG engine in there and give it twice the battery capacity. Perhaps not even then.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can't. The is no justification that a more luxuriously appointed Volt is going to fetch $36K more over the already over priced Volt.

    There is a justification if the Volt is sold at a heavy loss...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To be totally honest, I was and am very luke warm about the Volt. It was supposed to be revolutionary, it is anything but. Sure it is a plug-in but it didn't have enough electric range to cover daily driving for many people without kicking on the ICE -- you need about 60~80 miles for that. As a hybrid it's efficiency is bottom of the barrel. As a matter of fact, it's not any better than a Cruze on it's ICE.

    I see the ELR as a missed opportunity. Instead of restyling and poshing up the Volt, GM could have aimed higher and bring out an alternative to the parallel/plug-in formula to challenge the Prius at it's own game and win. It's really not that hard to beat the Prius in the MPG game -- especially when you have a $76K budget to play with. Heck, you can easily do it with $50K.

    This formula is guaranteed to both out-run and out-mile the Prius:-

    • New "modified" version of the new Opel 1.6L CDTi Turbodiesel engine as the ICE
    • The engine "modification" adds 2-stage cam switching VVL which enables the engine to shut down ALL cylinders when triggered
    • New "modified" version of the 6T45 6-speed automatic and call it the Electramatic 6E45
    • The transmission "modification" replaces the torque converter with an electric motor (40hp@1000~4000 rpm, 210lb-ft@0~1000 rpm)
    • Battery consists of two of the Volt's nine modules with 32 cells each and a total capacity of 3.6 kWH, or which 3.0 kWH is actually used
    • Without a torque converter, the engine cannot and does not ever idle; power from standstill is always electric.
    • Once under 600 rpm or when pure electric propulsion is prescribed, all valves on the ICE close and the engine freewheels.
    • When decelerating, the ICE again shuts off all valves allow for full regenerative braking from the motor-generator
    • Once underway, power is electric or diesel or both with the total not exceeding amounting to 176bhp@4000 rpm/232 lb-ft@1000rpm
    • The battery (when fully charged) as enough juice for 8 miles of pure electric driving.
    • As the engine doesn't ever idle, the A/C compressor is electrically driven
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can't. The is no justification that a more luxuriously appointed Volt is going to fetch $36K more over the already over priced Volt.

    There is a justification if the Volt is sold at a heavy loss...

    Then own up to it, stop selling it and call the "green" experiment a misstep. @ $76K you better have a 60kWh battery, a 160~200 mile range and do 0-60 in under 6 secs -- because that's what a Tesla Model S will do (Tesla's internal range estimates albeit being a little optimistic). That, or perhaps a 30kWh batter an 80~100 mile range, an on-board ICE generator in series and a big enough electric motor for under 7 secs to 60 performance. Because that is what's gonna fetch $76K.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can't. The is no justification that a more luxuriously appointed Volt is going to fetch $36K more over the already over priced Volt.

    There is a justification if the Volt is sold at a heavy loss...

    Then own up to it, stop selling it and call the "green" experiment a misstep.

    Or try and have it (and the ELR as well) as an greenimage booster for a company known for full-size SUVs... Which is the role the Volt+ELR play IMHO... They're PR machines first and foremost.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can't. The is no justification that a more luxuriously appointed Volt is going to fetch $36K more over the already over priced Volt.

    There is a justification if the Volt is sold at a heavy loss...

    Then own up to it, stop selling it and call the "green" experiment a misstep.

    Or try and have it (and the ELR as well) as an greenimage booster for a company known for full-size SUVs... Which is the role the Volt+ELR play IMHO... They're PR machines first and foremost.

    Just do a pure electric then! Drop the ICE, power split device, secondary motor, etc. Quadruple the battery capacity. Should get you a 64 kWh car with a range exceeding the Tesla Model S's "160~200 miles"... probably about ~240 miles or more or less one full tank of gas -- simply based on the merit that this is a lighter and smaller car. Lithium batteries are about $600/kWh, so 64 kWh should be about $38,400. That's definitely within budget even when you don't count the cost savings from dropping the ICE and power-split transmission. There is also plenty of room under the hood for the additional batteries with the ICE and tranny gone. Probably 1/4 the entire battery can go there, another 1/4 in the tunnel and the remaining under the rear seats and where the gas tank was.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with all these statements, the ELR isn't worth the price. What makes the ELR $30,000 better than an ATS coupe? And at $75-80k we are at a loaded Corvette or Jaguar F-type or Porsche Cayman, etc, some serious sports cars. And if you want to be green go buy an electric car.

    The ELR looks good other than the front overhang, but I feel like they wasted the sheet metal on a glorified Volt, when it could have been used on an Alpha chassis with a turbo 4 or a V6. Cadillac could have had a real sports car to compete with the Audi TT, the SLK, Alfa Romeo 4c and cars like that. Imagine ELR looks with a 320 HP V6 and rear drive for $55k.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Do not count Cadillac out of using this car in more ways than one. I could see it show up with a real engine still.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Do not count Cadillac out of using this car in more ways than one. I could see it show up with a real engine still.

    It's a Delta! Look, drop the Voltec drive train, stick the 272hp 2.0T (LTG) engine in there and sell it for $40K.

    Or, do something revolutionary with it -- like a Diesel-Electric Hybrid that beats the Prius and sell it for $50K.

    Whatever it is, do something other than trying to sell it as a $76K Volt with a Caddy crest and leather upholstery.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, to be fair... the ELR interior is far and away above the Volt's. Not $30,000 away... but calling it a Volt with leather is a bit too reductionist. It does have one of the best interiors in a Cadillac today, rivaled only by the high end CTS.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    COMPLETELY insane pricing.

    I swear this company is going back to its old ways

    that screwed them up in the first place. Good luck

    selling this vehicle.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Cimarron had a better interior and better suspension than the Cavalier also. Doesn't mean it was worth the price or a good idea to build it.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's another joke within the release... except it's not funny and potentially a big money loser.

    GM is leasing these things for $699/month for 39 months. A Lease is basically based on the depreciation of the car + a little profit for the dealer. $699 for 39 months means that they are assuming that the depreciation of the ELR is going to be less than $27,261 over 3 year and 3 months. Are they freaking insane? I mean who wants a 3~4 year old ELR for $50K? That's a 64% value retention -- right up there with the residual value kings like a Lexus ES or Toyota Camry. According to Edmunds, a Volt 2011 Volt only kept 52% of it's as new value. And, they believe that a $76K ELR will retain 64%. They'll be lucky if it keeps 40% of it's value. Remember there are no subsidies in the used plug-in market.

    BTW, anyone looking at the ELR will also be looking at the BMW i3 -- another plug-in with a range extending piston engine. That goes for $45K (before incentives and subsidies). GM is expecting a 3~4 year old ELR to resell for MORE THAN THE BRAND NEW BMW i3!?!! I don't know what they are smoking, but it must be pretty darn strong stuff!

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I assume styling is big part of the equation, though..GM is thinking they can charge a premium for the dramatic styling. The i3 is a hideous econobox in comparison....

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Cimarron had a better interior and better suspension than the Cavalier also. Doesn't mean it was worth the price or a good idea to build it.

    I believe I said that it wasn't worth a $30k price increase in my post..... but the ELR is also NOT a "Volt with Leather"

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yet you have morons who over pay for Bavarian garbage. I am amazed as I saw my first 1 series bmw and what a joke.

    I like the ELR, great style and very nice interior, but it should be a $50K version. I hope they do lease/sell them all but I suspect we will see them sitting on the lots and then cleared out and like the last 2 door sports car I liked from caddy based on the corvette, it will go away. GM does need to get more realistic with their products.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 2005 EquinoxLS
      2005 EquinoxLS
      (41 years old)
    2. Shaula
      Shaula
      (36 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Big November Gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac Keep GM the Fastest Growing Automaker
      November U.S. retail market share highest since 2009 Year to Date U.S. Retail Share up 0.5 Percentage Points November Commercial sales were highest since 2008 DETROIT — General Motors (NYSE: GM) sold 197,609 vehicles in November to individual or “retail” customers in the U.S., up 8 percent from last year. Based on initial estimates, GM once again outperformed all full-line manufacturers, led by strong retail sales gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac. GM’s November retail sales performance drove GM’s U.S. retail share to its highest November level since 2009.
      Based on initial estimates, GM’s retail market share jumped 0.3 percentage points in November to 16.8 percent.  GM has gained retail market share in 17 of the past 20 months.
      GM’s four U.S. brands posted strong retail sales results in November compared to last year.
      Chevrolet — up 5 percent for its best November since 2004 Buick — up 22 percent for its best November since 2003 GMC — up 9 percent for its best November since 2001 Cadillac — up 17 percent for its best November since 2013 GM’s total U.S. sales in November were 252,644 vehicles, up more than 10 percent from last year.   All four brands outperformed the industry in November with Buick, Cadillac and GMC posting double-digit gains.
      “GM’s November performance reflects the continued strength of our U.S. business.  We gained profitable retail share, commercial and small business deliveries were strong and we commanded the industry’s best average transaction prices,” said Kurt McNeil, GM’s vice president of U.S. Sales Operations. “We are ahead of plan selling down our 2016 model year inventory and we expect to close out December with more retail share growth. GM is heading into 2017 in a position of strength with the planned launch of key new products, like the all-new Chevrolet Equinox, into the heart of the market.” 
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average and ahead of last November. 

      Through the first 11 months of the year, GM’s U.S. retail sales were up nearly 2 percent compared to last year. GM gained 0.5 percentage points of U.S. retail market share during that timeframe, the largest retail share gain of any full-line automaker. Year to date, Chevrolet U.S. retail sales are up nearly 3 percent and the brand’s retail share has grown 0.5 percentage points to 11.1 percent. Chevrolet continues to be the U.S. industry’s fastest-growing brand.
      Year to date, Buick retail deliveries have grown more than 5 percent and Buick has gained 0.1 percentage points of retail share.
      GM continues to benefit from a strong U.S. economy and strong retail demand for its products.
      “All economic indicators show significantly improved optimism about the U.S. economy including consumer and business sentiment, which continue to drive a very healthy U.S. auto industry,” said Mustafa Mohatarem, GM’s chief economist. “We believe the U.S. auto industry is well-positioned for sales to continue at or near record levels into 2017.”
      November 2016 Retail Sales and Business Highlights vs. November 2015 (except as noted)

      Chevrolet
      Malibu and Volt were up 24 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Silverado and Colorado were up 5 percent and 39 percent, respectively. Suburban, Tahoe, Equinox and Trax were up 6 percent, 12 percent, 7 percent and 47 percent, respectively. Malibu had its best November since 1997. Silverado had its best November since 2003. Colorado had its best November since 2004. Trax, Volt and Equinox had their best November ever. Tahoe and Suburban had their best November since 2007. 17th straight month of year over year gains for Chevrolet full-size utilities. GMC
      Sierra and Canyon were up 14 percent and 43 percent, respectively. Acadia, Yukon and Yukon XL were up 4 percent, 22 percent and 19 percent, respectively. Brand ATP was at $43,887, the highest November on record. Highest November ever for Denali penetration, at 27.8 percent. Best November ever for Canyon and ninth month of year over year increases. Yukon and Yukon XL had their best November since 2007. Buick
      Regal and Encore were up 41 percent and 35 percent, respectively. 68 percent of sales were crossovers. Best year to date retail performance since 2005. Cadillac
      Escalade was up 24 percent and had its best month of the year. Escalade had its best November since 2007. XT5 had its best month since launch with sales up 12 percent over last month and up 27 percent over the SRX last November, the vehicle it replaced. Year to date ATP was $53,690, the highest ever in Cadillac history Average Transaction Prices (ATP)/Incentives (based on JD Power PIN estimates)
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average. In November, GM’s incentive spending as a percent of ATP was 13.7 percent, above the industry average of 12.4 percent. However, year to date, GM’s incentive spending was 11.7 percent, slightly above the industry average of 11.4 percent and well below the incentive spending of its domestic competitors and many of its global competitors. Fleet and Commercial
      Automotive Fleet magazine named Malibu “Fleet Car of the Year”. GM Fleet sales were up 19 percent versus last November. Fleet sales were 22 percent of GM’s sales for the month. Commercial deliveries were up 11 percent for the month and it was the best November Commercial sales since 2008. Malibu Commercial deliveries were up 170 percent versus last November. Small Business deliveries were up 15 percent for the month versus last November, driven by large vans, which were up 93 percent and large pickups, which were up 16 percent versus last November. Federal government sales were up 9 percent versus last November. Rental sales were up 27 percent versus last November but are down 25 percent CYTD, according to plan. GM’s outlook on its daily rental sales mix remains in the 11 percent range of total U.S. sales for 2016 and daily rental sales for the year are expected to be down about 75,000 vehicles. Industry Sales
      GM estimates that the seasonally adjusted annual selling rate (SAAR) for light vehicles in November was approximately 17.9 million units. On a calendar year-to-date basis, GM estimates the light-vehicle SAAR was 17.5 million units.
    • By William Maley
      It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.
      The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.
      Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.
      "Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.
      Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.
      Source: IMSA

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.
      The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.
      Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.
      "Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.
      Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.
      Source: IMSA
    • By ccap41
      " It's a golden autumn morning in rural upstate New York. Backpacked kids wait by mailboxes for the school bus. I'm driving through pockets of valley mist to New York state's most famous racing circuit, to witness the shakedown testing of a race car so top-secret, it's still wrapped in camouflage.
      After a 14-year absence, Cadillac is readying its return to endurance racing. The last time the American automaker competed in top-level prototype racing was 2002, when the ill-fated Northstar LMP finished 9th at Le Mans. Audi's dominant R8 prototype notched its third consecutive victory at the Circuit de la Sarthe that year.
      Wayne Taylor and Max Angelelli were co-drivers in that final Cadillac attempt at Le Mans. They'll both be at the track today. Taylor, 60, has graduated from the driver's seat to run Wayne Taylor Racing, the principal team partner in Cadillac's new motorsports endeavor; Angelelli, 49, shares co-driving duties with Taylor's sons Ricky, 26, and Jordan, 24.
      All four will be responsible for the imminent future of Cadillac endurance racing, in a program that tasks itself with making top-level sports car racing engaging and relatable again. I'm here to learn if Cadillac, and the series itself, can cut it.
      The camouflaged Caddy you see here is officially known as the DPi-V.R. It's built to IMSA's new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) formula, to compete in the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship starting in 2017.
      Think of DPi as an effort to make top-level prototype racing a little more interesting, and relatable, for casual race fans. The cars share a chassis with the LMP2 prototypes that compete in the FIA World Endurance Championship and the 24 Hours of Le Mans, built by one of four approved constructors—Dallara, Onroak Automotive, ORECA or Riley/Multimatic. ..."
      http://www.roadandtrack.com/motorsports/news/a31697/cadillac-dpi-v-r-exclusive-photos/
       




    • By William Maley
      In light of the fatal crash involving a Tesla Model S and Autopilot back in May, automakers are reconsidering their plans for rolling out their autonomous technologies. General Motors was planning to introduce Super Cruise on the Cadillac CT6 sometime next year. But in light of Tesla crash, GM is rethinking their plans.
      “We aren’t putting a specific date on it,” said GM CEO Mary Barra at a cybersecurity conference.
      Officials told The Detroit Bureau later on that the feature would still appear next year. This would be corroborated by a Cadillac spokesman to Motor Trend.
      “Right now, the plan continues to be that we will introduce [super Cruise] in the Cadillac CT6 in calendar year 2017,” said Cadillac spokesman Donny Nordlicht.
      “We want to make sure it is safe for our customers to use and we’ll launch it when we’re confident in the technology,” Nordlicht said. “Our engineers have been testing and validating the technology for the past several years to make sure all of our systems are focused on providing the customer among the most intuitive and safe solutions. We’re not driven by a deadline, we’re driven to make the system customer-friendly and safe so the exact month of introduction cannot be announced at this time.”
      Insiders at GM believe that Super Cruise should be able to avoid some of the problems that plague Tesla's Autopilot. Like Autopilot, Super Cruise blends information from radar and cameras. But Super Cruise will also use a high-definition map that provides more details than what you can get on a current navigation system. This map will help the system determine where the vehicle is and whether it is safe to engage the system. There is also a retina detection system that monitors the driver and will switch off Super Cruise if it detects if the driver isn't paying attention.
      Source: The Detroit Bureau, Motor Trend

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)