Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    GM Inline-6 Diesel Rated

      .... GM takes the light-duty diesel power crown.

    The GMC Build and Price tool has let the details slip on the power ratings of the upcoming inline-6 diesel due to be released in the Sierra and Silverado in a few weeks.  The 3.0 liter turbo diesel will produce 277 hp at 3,750 rpm and 460 lb-ft at a mere 1,500 rpm. The only transmission choice will be the 10-speed automatic. These numbers are SAE certified and verified by GM. The diesel motor will be available on LT and above trims on the Chevy and on all GMC trims except the base.

    These numbers make the GM six more powerful than Ford's V6 Powerstroke diesel which runs at 250 hp and 440 lb-ft of torque.  The New Ram 1500 still hasn't gotten a diesel unit, but it will probably be the same rating as the 260 hp and 442 lb-ft of torque in the Jeep Gladiator.

    One area still unknown on the GM unit is fuel economy. The Ford F-150 Powerstroke is EPA estimated for 30 mpg highway/25 combined/22 city. 

    The GM diesels 1500 trucks will be at dealerships this summer. 



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    The price being the same as the 6.2 is HUGE. i think that lone will help get sales moving on this. The premium Ford and Ram charge is outrageous.

    I priced the cheapest F150 with their 3.0 and it's 47k. The cheapest 4WD + Super Crew cab is 53k. Insane. 

    Edited by ccap41
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    35 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    If GM can build a great I6 diesel, then why can't (or won't) GM build a great gas I6?  Cadillac/Camaro/Corvette(?) could use one.

    They should make an I-6 gas in a final death blow to the 3.6 V6.  Anything front drive can get enough power from a 4-cylinder especially with electric boost as an option.  So if 6 cylinder is only in rear drive then it should be inline. 

    Side note, they should put the in-line 6 in the Tahoe also.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Why confused @balthazar.

    7 main bearings > 4 main bearings, plus less vibration from imbalance = better longevity everything else being equal.

    The increased number of bearings are necessary due to increased crankshaft length/ torsional stresses.
    V6 doesn't have room for more than 4, but doesn't need more either.

    I'm not sure an empirical study has been made studying your claim, would be interesting. Probably too many factors to isolate one cause (oiling, engine speed, start/stop cycles, etc).

    BTW- there have been 4 main bearing I6s in the past, wonder how they stack up to a V6 for longevity (4 = 4).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I had that same 300 in my '94 F-150 - tough beast. But part & parcel of that longevity is the fact that motor was like what- 25 years old? All the bugs were long ago worked out of it, and the era it was gestated in was on the tail end of over-building motors.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, balthazar said:

    I had that same 300 in my '94 F-150 - tough beast. But part & parcel of that longevity is the fact that motor was like what- 25 years old? All the bugs were long ago worked out of it, and the era it was gestated in was on the tail end of over-building motors.

    Still... even in BMW and Benz and even the Atlas I6... the motors long outlasted the vehicles they were in. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah- some indeed did. The MoPar 225 was one of the 'unkillable' I6s, but it came out in 1961.
    The old, decidedly unstressed Stovebolt 6 from Chevy was another- lasted forever, built for decades.
    But the Pontiac I6 was no longer lasting than their V8 (another very long-lasting 'plant).

    I'm not convinced cylinder arrangement is the leading cause of longevity- too many other factors.
    I have no data to contribute RE foreign I6s in this arena, tho.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Well they start about 3k less than an XT5 and 7k less than an RX.  41,5 vs 44,2 & 48,5 for 2WD versions (Jeep/Caddy/Lexus) 43,5 vs 47,6 & 50 for 4WD/AWD Yeah, a vehicle can be optioned to the gills and be priced way higher.  Plus, a 4Xe is PRICEY. Those start at 60k. I assume they're well equipped but it's still a lot. 
    • I would say that there is the side of it would be nice if it was all GM, but I totally get taking a complete solution from one of the leading current providers and offering it. Costco offers Solar solutions too, I see no reason not to take advantage of what is already available and tie it into your managed electrical meter. Sunrun Residential Solar Systems  | Costco   Very cool comparisons: Sunrun Vs. SunPower: Compare Solar (2023 Guide) - EcoWatch Sunrun vs. SunPower: Which Company Should You Choose? (marketwatch.com) Seems these are the top two Solar companies and are both pretty good depending on what you want to tie into.
    • My son was actually looking at the Grand Cherokee 4XE which he test drove and I got to check out with him and we both were left in a Meh state. Was not wow this is great, but was not this is terrible either, just Meh. So he is continuing to look around. I know some have love the current GC 4XE hybrid or regular ICE, but so many options now and I have no idea what way he will go. Going to be interesting.
    • A new Grand Cherokee, if well equipped, car reach $100K brand new.
    • It needs to come here to North America.  I understand why Ford pulled the plug on sedans here in 2018, but all crossovers all the time is rather tedious.  They might even pull some market share from Toyota/Honda and Hyundai/KIA if they bring the new Taurus here.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

This is the Call To Action(CTA)

  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search