Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Hyundai and Kia Admit Overstating Fuel Mileage Claims, Compensate Onwers

    Sign in to follow this  

    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    November 2, 2012

    Unless you have been living under a rock for the past few years or so, you have most likely seen the ads from Hyundai touting they sell more vehicles that get 40 MPG on the highway than any other automaker in the U.S. Well, those ads are done as Hyundai and Kia admitted to overstating the estimated fuel economy posted on window stickers of about 900,000 vehicles sold since late 2010.

    This announcement comes in part from an EPA investigation which couldn't replicate fuel mileages Hyundai and Kia had claimed on window stickers. The investigation found out that 41% of vehicles sold by the two automakers are affected.

    "Consumers rely on the window sticker to help make informed choices about the cars they buy," said Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA's Office of Air and Radiation.

    The EPA says their investigation is on going could seek to impose civil penalties on the two companies.

    Hyundai Motor America President and CEO John Krafcik explained to The Detroit News the problem was due to a flaw due to changes in its fuel economy tests starting in the 2010 model year.

    "We've identified the source of the discrepancies between our prior testing method and the EPA's recommended approach," said Krafcik.

    All told, 35% of 2011-2013 Hyundai and Kia models sold through October will see a reduction in fuel economy. Of that 35%,

    • 580,000 vehicles will see a drop of around 1 MPG
    • 240,000 vehicles will see a drop of around 2 MPG
    • 80,000 vehicles will see a drop of around 3 to 4 MPG

    Hyundai and Kia are working on new window stickers that will be applied to their vehicles starting today. Also, Hyundai and Kia will reimburse owners for the lower gas mileage on the affected vehicles. Dealers will look at the odometer and calculate how much an owner might have saved if the car achieved the promised gas mileage. From there, Hyundai and Kia will add 15 percent to the dollar total and send out debit cards to owners. The two companies will continue to reimburse customers for as long as they own the vehicles.

    To find out if your Hyundai or Kia vehicle is effected, you can visit either HyundaiMPGInfo.com or KiaMPGInfo.com.

    Source: The Detroit News

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    Press Releases is on Page 2

    Hyundai Vehicles Effected on Page 3

    Kia Vehicles Effected on Page 4


    Hyundai/Kia to Correct Overstated MPG Claims as Result of EPA Investigation

    WASHINGTON - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today announced that Hyundai Motor America and Kia Motors America will lower their fuel economy (mpg) estimates for the majority of their model year 2012 and 2013 models after EPA testing found discrepancies between agency results and data submitted by the company.

    The auto companies have submitted to the EPA a plan for cars currently on dealer lots to be re-labeled with new window stickers reflecting the corrected mileage estimates. The mileage on most vehicle labels will be reduced by one to two mpg, and the largest adjustment will be six mpg highway for the Kia Soul.

    "Consumers rely on the window sticker to help make informed choices about the cars they buy,' said Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA's Office of Air and Radiation. "EPA's investigation will help protect consumers and ensure a level playing field among automakers."

    At its National Vehicle and Fuel Emission Laboratory (NVFEL) in Ann Arbor, Mich., EPA routinely tests vehicles – 150 to 200 a year, or about 15 percent of the possible vehicle configurations – to ensure that their performance matches the mileage and emissions data required to be submitted to EPA by automakers.

    This auditing helps to ensure that vehicles on the road meet tailpipe emission standards to protect public health and the environment and that all carmakers follow the same procedures for calculating mileage estimates. EPA conducts both random and targeted audits, based on factors such as consumer complaints.

    EPA had received a number of consumer complaints about Hyundai mileage estimates. Through the agency's ongoing audit program, staff experts at EPA's NVFEL observed discrepancies between results from EPA testing of a MY2012 Hyundai Elantra and information provided to EPA by Hyundai.

    The agency expanded its investigation into data for other Hyundai and Kia vehicles, leading to today's announcement.

    EPA's audit testing occasionally uncovers individual vehicles whose label values are incorrect and requires that the manufacturer re-label the vehicle. This has happened twice since 2000. This is the first time where a large number of vehicles from the same manufacturer have deviated so significantly.

    EPA and DOE are updating their joint fuel economy site, www.fueleconomy.gov, to reflect the Hyundai and Kia corrected numbers.

    For more information, please see: http://www.epa.gov/f...labelchange.htm

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    HYUNDAI AND KIA INITIATE VOLUNTARY PROGRAM TO ADJUST FUEL ECONOMY RATINGS ON SELECT VEHICLES

    Automakers' Average Fuel Economy Rating Reduced 3 Percent; Affected Vehicle Owners to be Compensated

    ORANGE COUNTY, Nov. 2 – Hyundai Motor America and Kia Motors America today announced that, following discussions with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), they are voluntarily adjusting the fuel economy ratings for approximately 900,000, or 35 percent of, 2011-13 model year vehicles sold through October 31, 2012.

    Procedural errors at the automakers' joint testing operations in Korea led to incorrect fuel economy ratings for select vehicle lines. As part of Hyundai/Kia's corrective actions, the fuel economy ratings for vehicles currently in showrooms are being voluntarily relabeled. With these changes, the 2012 Hyundai/Kia fleet fuel economy level is reduced by an average of 3 percent – from 27 to 26 MPG.

    "I sincerely apologize to all affected Hyundai and Kia customers, and I regret these errors occurred," said Dr. W. C. Yang, chief technology officer of Hyundai/Kia research and development. "Following up on the EPA's audit results, we have taken immediate action to make the necessary rating changes and process corrections."

    Both companies are putting in place a comprehensive reimbursement program for affected current and former vehicle owners to cover the additional fuel costs associated with the fuel economy rating change. Customers will receive a personalized debit card that will reimburse them for their difference in the EPA combined fuel economy rating, based on the fuel price in their area and their own actual miles driven. In addition, as an acknowledgement of the inconvenience this may cause, we will add an extra 15 percent to the reimbursement amount. Current owners will be able to refresh their debit card for as long as they own the vehicle. Prior owners of affected vehicles who have already sold their cars will also be reimbursed using the same formula. For more information about reimbursement and a complete list of eligible vehicles, customers can visit www.HyundaiMPGinfo.com and www.KiaMPGinfo.com.

    The fuel economy rating discrepancies resulted from procedural errors during a process called "coastdown" testing at the companies' joint testing operations in Korea. Coastdown testing simulates aerodynamic drag, tire rolling resistance and drivetrain frictional losses and provides the technical data used to program the test dynamometers that generate EPA fuel economy ratings. Affected vehicles and their before-and-after EPA estimates are shown in the attachment.

    Hyundai and Kia will continue to advance improvements in fuel efficiency through technology and innovation, and continue to fully support the recent rulemaking issued by EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

    "Given the importance of fuel efficiency to all of us, we're extremely sorry about these errors," said John Krafcik, president and CEO of Hyundai Motor America. "When we say to Hyundai owners, 'We've got your back,' that's an assurance we don't take lightly. We're going to make this right for everyone, and we'll be more driven than ever to ensure our vehicles deliver outstanding fuel economy."

    "As a customer-focused organization, we are fully committed to providing consumers with complete and accurate information, and deeply regret the errors were made," said Byung Mo Ahn, group president and CEO, Kia Motors America and Kia Motors Manufacturing Georgia. "Our reimbursement program is intended to ensure that all affected Kia customers quickly receive fair compensation."


    gallery_10485_485_57517.png


    gallery_10485_485_13527.png

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Perhaps the EPA should certify mileage before it gets advertised on a vehicle's window sticker? Just a thought...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's sad really, because they had to know they were lying. On thew plus side, I now have one more reasopn not to buy a Hyundai or Kia.

    Of course they knew they were lying. This is pretty blatant.

    Perhaps the EPA should certify mileage before it gets advertised on a vehicle's window sticker? Just a thought...

    Agree with all of your comments,

    People need to think twice before they buy from a company that lied so much to the public.

    The EPA should be certifiing all numbers before they go out the door to make sure it is a level playing field.

    Is the GOV ready to handle the big drop in false advertised MPG? These are not the only car companies that stretch the truth. I have yet to see most auto's really achieve the gas mileage they post on their auto's.

    I can truly say I DO NOT get the posted mileage on the stickers for my Escalade, Trailblazer SS, Durango, CTS, SRX, Hummer or Jeep.

    I change between all these auto's and enjoy driving them, but none of them deliver the fuel economy that is posted on the sticker.

    This comes down to the Flawed EPA testing rather than real world testing. The GOV mandate of gas mileage is a Joke and instead they should be focused on Advanced Fuel Products like CNG, Electric etc that cleans up the world rather than how much mileage.

    We could make a massive change in this country by having all New Diesel trucks being manaufactured only as CNG, within 3-5 years we could stop importing oil, stop funding 100% of the defense of the oil transportation since we are the only ones with navy fleets doing this and focus on our own 200 year supply of Natural gas as we push to getting other forms like electric to last for a 500-600 mile road trip and then have it charge overnight and continue on.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      MONTH OF SEPTEMBER
      YEAR-TO-DATE
      Model
      2019
      2018
      2019
      2018
      Rio
      1,722
      2,009
      19,186
      17,291
      Forte
      6,280
      6,470
      73,285
      74,888
      Optima
      7,206
      10,976
      75,666
      79,845
      Cadenza
      92
      201
      1,056
      3,951
      Stinger
      981
      1,375
      10,416
      12,999
      K900
      32
      30
      311
      260
      Soul
      5,985
      10,540
      77,627
      77,888
      Niro
      1,733
      2,889
      17,962
      22,100
      Sportage
      6,863
      7,008
      65,104
      62,272
      Sorento
      7,766
      8,955
      72,200
      85,692
      Telluride
      5,049
      N/A
      39,209
      N/A
      Sedona
      910
      1,050
      11576
      14,856
      Total
      44,619
      51,503
      463,598
      452,042
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Model Sales
      Vehicle
      Sep-19
      Sep-18
      2019 YTD
      2018 YTD
      Accent
      1,702
      2,536
      20,015
      21,820
      Elantra
      14,614
      19,923
      125,469
      148,879
      Ioniq
      1,504
      864
      14,146
      11,606
      Kona
      5,287
      4,327
      55,138
      28,465
      Nexo
      23
      0
      197
      36*
      Palisade
      3,495
      0
      13,457
      0
      Santa Fe
      8,276
      10,162
      96,319
      88,969
      Sonata
      6,029
      7,735
      68,368
      80,975
      Tucson
      10,293
      10,646
      102,861
      103,478
      Veloster
      728
      746
      10,386
      7,936
      *Includes Tucson Fuel Cell sales
      Hyundai 51,951 56,940 506,356 492,792  
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The EPA has released the fuel economy numbers for the 2020 Hyundai Venue and they look pretty darn good. Remember that the Hyundai Venue is offered with a choice of two transmissions, a 6-speed manual and a CVT. The CVT is the fuel miser with a rating of 30 mpg city, 34 mpg highway, and 32 mpg combined.  The manual clocks in at 27 mpg city, 35 mpg highway, and 30 mpg combined. The closest competitor, the Nissan Kicks does a little better at 31 mpg city, 36 mpg highway, and 33 mpg combined.  Other non-hybrid crossovers in the segment are a little bit larger and a bit more powerful, so the Venue beats them there. 
      The Venue is powered by a 1.6 liter 4-cylinder producing 121 horsepower and 113 lb.-ft of torque to the front wheels. All-wheel drive is not an option.
      You can read more about our first impressions of the 2020 Hyundai Venue here.
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The EPA has released the fuel economy numbers for the 2020 Hyundai Venue and they look pretty darn good. Remember that the Hyundai Venue is offered with a choice of two transmissions, a 6-speed manual and a CVT. The CVT is the fuel miser with a rating of 30 mpg city, 34 mpg highway, and 32 mpg combined.  The manual clocks in at 27 mpg city, 35 mpg highway, and 30 mpg combined. The closest competitor, the Nissan Kicks does a little better at 31 mpg city, 36 mpg highway, and 33 mpg combined.  Other non-hybrid crossovers in the segment are a little bit larger and a bit more powerful, so the Venue beats them there. 
      The Venue is powered by a 1.6 liter 4-cylinder producing 121 horsepower and 113 lb.-ft of torque to the front wheels. All-wheel drive is not an option.
      You can read more about our first impressions of the 2020 Hyundai Venue here.
       
    • By William Maley
      What a difference that four years make. That's the timeframe from the first Kia electric I reviewed (Soul EV) to the model seen here, the 2019 Niro EV. So much has changed in terms of battery technology and overall range that I could see myself having an electric vehicle as a primary mode of transport. There are some still some issues that make me think twice, but they are getting smaller.
      Kia avoided the trend of going crazy with the Niro EV’s design. Little touches such as blue accent trim, 17-inch alloy wheels, and closed-front grille hiding the charging port help the EV stand apart from other Niro models. Changes inside are even smaller with a new center console featuring a dial control for the drive selector. This move is very smart as many buyers really don’t want their vehicle to shout “LOOK AT ME” when driving. The electric powertrain in the Niro EV packs quite the punch - 201 horsepower and 291 pound-feet of torque. This is up 62 and 92 respectively from the Niro Hybrid I drove a few years back. Providing the electricity is a 64 kWh Lithium-Ion Polymer Battery that provides an estimated range of 239 miles. Kia says the Niro EV will hit 60 mph in under eight seconds. But I found it to be slightly quicker thanks to all of the torque being available instantly. Merging onto a freeway is where the electric powertrain does lose steam - blame a hefty curb weight of 3,854 pounds. I saw a maximum range of 208 to 210 miles throughout my week. This was due to cold temperatures ranging from low 30s to high 40s. But I was able to do a forty-mile round-trip commute for most of the week without having any range anxiety issues. Charging anxiety is a different story. If you have been reading my electric and plug-in hybrid reviews, then you’ll know that I only have access to 120V charging at home. Plugging the Niro EV after my day job meant waiting over sixteen hours for a full charge. This caused me to not want to venture out far unless I had some important errands to run as it would mean a longer time for a recharge. If I had completely depleted the battery, I would be waiting over two days for the battery to recharge. If you have a 240V charger, that time drops to 9.5 hours for a full-recharge. Finding a quick charger has gotten easier in the past year or two, but it is still a hit and miss affair. There are no quick chargers near where I live (unless I have a Tesla). It's slightly better further south where I work as there some around the area. But that introduces its own set of problems such setting aside the time to charge up the vehicle to finding if one works. I should note that I didn’t get the chance to try quick charging with the Niro EV during my week.  Handling is slightly better in the Niro EV thanks to the additional weight of the battery pack which reduces body roll. Steering is very light when turning, but will surprise you with how quick and accurate it deals with changes in direction. Ride quality is a little bit firm with some bumps and imperfections making their way inside. Where the Niro EV shines is noise isolation. During my work commute, I was surprised by how little wind and road noise came inside.  The major downside to the Niro EV is its limited availability. At the time of this writing, Kia is only selling the Niro EV is twelve states - most of them having Zero Emission Vehicle (or ZEV) programs that require automakers to sell a certain amount of electric vehicles in their lineups. Nothing is stopping you from purchasing a Niro EV in one of the states that it is available, but I’m wondering how many people will do that. Pricing for the Niro EV begins at $38,500 for the base EX model. I had the EX Premium at $44,000 which adds such goodies as an eight-inch touchscreen, premium audio system, heated and ventilated front seats; sunroof. Add in a $1,000 Launch Edition package (LED headlights, front parking sensors, and auto-dimming rear-view mirror), and my as-tested price came to $45,995. Expensive bit of kit, but the Niro EV does come with a long list of standard features including heated outside mirrors with power folding; seven-inch infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto; adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, and push-button start. Plus, the Niro EV qualifies for the full $7,500 federal tax credit which may sway some buyers when it comes time to do their taxes. The Kia Niro EV is the first electric vehicle that I could see myself living with. It drives for the most part as a normal vehicle and offers enough range for most people. The big item you need to be aware of is charging. If you decide to purchase, be sure to get a 240V charger and check to see if there are any sort of fast chargers in your area. It may mean the difference between worry-free and a large amount of anxiety. Disclaimer: Kia Provided the Niro EV, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2019
      Make: Kia
      Model: Niro EV
      Trim: EX Premium
      Engine: 356V Permanent Magnet Synchronous Electric Motor
      Driveline: Front-Wheel Drive, Lithium Ion Polymer Battery Pack
      Horsepower @ RPM: 201 @ 3,800 - 8,000
      Torque @ RPM: 291 @ 0 - 3,600
      Estimated Range: 239 Miles
      Curb Weight: 3,854 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: 
      Base Price: $44,000
      As Tested Price: $46,045 (Includes $1,045.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      Launch Edition - $1,000.00

      View full article
  • Posts

    • OEMs need to massively pull back from naming every teeny different vehicle with a different name. Especially as the industry continues to congeal into ‘every 4x4 must have an ‘X’ in the name’ nonsense.
    • It's too bad Cadillac painted them self into a corner w/ their naming..they could have used XT-odd number for regular CUVs, and XT-even number for coupe CUVs.   An XT5 based CCUV w/ a sleek fastback roofline like the CTS coupe would be cool..
    • Going out for taco Tuesday dinner earlier, saw out of the corner of my eye a black w/ white top '56 Thunderbird down the next street over as I drove past...alas, it was gone when I came home later.  I did stop and photograph this shoebox Ford 2 streets over....same house where I photographed a rusty one a few months ago...wonder if that chassis and debris are what's left of the rusty one.
    • Nice patina too Go get some!
    • Apples and Oranges...huge tractor trailer turbo Diesel that was specifically designed to haul 10's of thousands of lbs. to a 4 banger turbo Gasoline full-size pickup truck that wasn't really designed to haul anything other than it's own two axles. That's why GM makes DMax diesels for all of their trucks Colorado, 1500 and 2500/3500, 4500/5500. The 2.7T gasser is strictly offered to appease the EPA, even GM engineers know it's ridiculous.  
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Rainier
      Rainier
      (33 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...