Jump to content
Create New...
  • đź’¬ Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    China Considers Cutting EV Subsidies

      To spur innovation

    Like many countries, China offers various incentives to spur the sales of electric vehicles. But a report from Bloomberg says the Chinese government is considering reducing various subsidies beginning next year. 

    According to sources, the government is considering cutting the average incentive by more than a third from where they currently stand. Also up for consideration is incentives being eligible on models that can travel at least 200 kilometers (about 125 miles) on a single charge. Why? The government wants automakers to keep innovating by making EVs cheaper and go much further on a charge.

    “China is switching away from carrots. The government wants to ensure automakers will launch models that would be appealing to consumers hence setting subsidies contingent on minimum driving range requirements,” said Ali Izadi-Najafabadi, an analyst at Bloomberg NEF.

    In 2017, the Chinese government spent 6.64 billion yuan (about a billion dollars) on various subsidies for electric vehicles. But this year saw the government begin to cut various incentives. For example, cars that have a driving range of less than 300 kilometers (about 186 miles) saw their incentives reduced. 

    “Government policy has a huge impact over the new-energy vehicle sector and every adjustment made on the policy front over the next two years will result in tremendous changes in the industry,” Li Yixiu, sales chief for Beijing Electric Vehicle Company earlier this month.

    "We believe there isn’t a chance for carmakers to raise prices to make up for the reduction of government fundings. Instead, we have to come up with competitive new products and services to respond.”

    Source: Bloomberg

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Since China has already set dates for the end of ICE Auto's, I totally agree with cutting the free cash and let the automakers duke it out on the quality of their auto they build.

    I do like the idea of a rebate for building an EV or Hybrid auto based on how far it can travel.

    Heck, best way to spend some tax dollars would be to use the incentive to pay gas stations to install and convert over to charging stations.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Paying gas stations to install charging stations is probably NOT a good idea.  Instead of subsidies, China should ditch all oil subsidies NOW and raise oil taxes (which will raise gas prices).  I am not sure how China is actually going to reduce the number of already existing ICE cars and go fully electric without higher prices on crude oil first.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Even at $100 a barrel, nearly all types of oil extraction becomes very plausible and possibly very profitable.  $150-$200 a barrel will not be sustainable over the medium or long term because of this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Absent global strife, oil prices at $150 - $200 a barrel become a check valve because overproduction starts to kick in and there are now enough players for one to play the spoiler and overproduce at those prices to bring the prices per barrel down. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Plus when oil is that high, the black market price of oil is enough to pull Venezuela out of it’s stagflation.

     

    Pretty much oil might hit $200 a barrel but that might be lack of production associated, and don’t forget EVs are supposed to displace oil. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    43 minutes ago, Suaviloquent said:

    Plus when oil is that high, the black market price of oil is enough to pull Venezuela out of it’s stagflation.

     

    Pretty much oil might hit $200 a barrel but that might be lack of production associated, and don’t forget EVs are supposed to displace oil. 

    Until Venezuela moves on beyond Socialism, they are going to have a hard time investing and upgrading their decrepit oil sector. I honestly DO NOT see high oil prices helping out that country.

    EV's will displace oil, while consumption will continue as many products including internal and external parts on auto's are built using oil, various types of plastics, etc. Natural gas is the future fuel that will power a bulk of electrical generation for EV's. We reduce green house gas and more importantly clean up the air in the inner city areas and improve by reducing noise pollution such as the crazy illegal open pipes of motorcycles and cars built for street racing.

    Racing will especially from the street replace ICE once they realize they are harder to detect by the police due to how quiet they are and can sneak around. This is a reason I see both police and the public embracing ev auto's, the silent sneak attack.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Until Venezuela moves on beyond Socialism, they are going to have a hard time investing and upgrading their decrepit oil sector. I honestly DO NOT see high oil prices helping out that country.

    That was some especially dry sarcasm on my part.

     

    i had hoped no one would think I seriously believe Venezuela is being pulled out of it’s problems as if oil hits $200 a barrel the world will probably crumble.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, dfelt said:

    @riviera74 @Drew Dowdell Yet the story also states that consumption in Asia, especially China would absorb that increased production that would keep the oil prices high.

    Thoughts on that?

    Unless everyone is pumping at 100%, which they aren't, oil producers can increase production faster than Chinese industry can increase car sales.  Furthermore, as the price of oil goes up, indirect industry tends to slow.  The oil prices going up rapidly is one of those Series of Unfortunate Events that helped to cause the last big economic meltdown. 

    50 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Until Venezuela moves on beyond Socialism, they are going to have a hard time investing and upgrading their decrepit oil sector. I honestly DO NOT see high oil prices helping out that country.

    EV's will displace oil, while consumption will continue as many products including internal and external parts on auto's are built using oil, various types of plastics, etc. Natural gas is the future fuel that will power a bulk of electrical generation for EV's. We reduce green house gas and more importantly clean up the air in the inner city areas and improve by reducing noise pollution such as the crazy illegal open pipes of motorcycles and cars built for street racing.

    Racing will especially from the street replace ICE once they realize they are harder to detect by the police due to how quiet they are and can sneak around. This is a reason I see both police and the public embracing ev auto's, the silent sneak attack.

    Socialism isn't the issue.. corruption is. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    That was some especially dry sarcasm on my part.

     

    i had hoped no one would think I seriously believe Venezuela is being pulled out of it’s problems as if oil hits $200 a barrel the world will probably crumble.

    Got it, Yup very dry sarcasm, such a hard thing to write on a forum. I know it well. :P 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/13/2018 at 6:07 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    being a controlled economy, they can slowly increase the price of gasoline. take the profits and use them to subsidize electric charging station installations. 

    do you mean through direct taxes, indirect taxes or that their refineries are state owned?

    not that i agree with subsidizing these things, but i generally think that as wealth increases and production and tech ramps up with better and more batteries, EV's have to get more prevalent.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, loki said:

    do you mean through direct taxes, indirect taxes or that their refineries are state owned?

    not that i agree with subsidizing these things, but i generally think that as wealth increases and production and tech ramps up with better and more batteries, EV's have to get more prevalent.

    They have multiple avenues.  Since they are trying to be more economically democratic, but still with a directed economy, the way to most influence consumer spending is to charge additional tax at the pump and use that tax to build temporarily subsidized EV charging stations.   That way "The People" can vote with their wallet the next time they buy a new car. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Speaking of Lufthansa, I watched a recent video on YT about how Lufthansa is the only major carrier still with a fleet of 747s...because they do their own maintenance, have a large supply of parts, etc.  Thought that was interesting. I haven't been across the pond lately, but my sister just got back from a couple weeks in France, flew Delta from JFK to Paris and back.  Said the 767s were cramped in 'comfort' seating. 
    • I had a Nissan Sentra rental car in late August in Colorado Springs.  It was a decent drive, but unfortunately had the base screen...no nav, so I had look at my phone screen to navigate...though I knew where I was most of the time, some streets had changed in the 15 years since I was last there.  And I ended up in an area in the mountains w/ no phone service. Went up in the mountains to Woodland Park and Cripple Creek, decent enough power at 6000-7000 ft elevation. 
    • And you actually think this scenario will exist? You guys are down a fascist road. You have been on this road for a few months now. Legalities rae ignored with fascist regimes.  Besides, Trump has been impeached before. Twice I believe and nothing has changed. Trump has been indicted and nothing has happened. France convicted their former leader and is now serving jail time for lesser crimes...   Serious crimes, but less corrupt than Trump.   He will spend time in jail despite Sarkozy appealing his verdict.    You folk better fight back for your country, you guys are slowly losing it... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp98kepmj9lo Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy has been sentenced to five years in jail after being found guilty of criminal conspiracy in a case related to millions of euros of illicit funds from the late Libyan leader Col Muammar Gaddafi. The Paris criminal court acquitted him of all other charges, including passive corruption and illegal campaign financing. The ruling means he will spend time in jail even if he launches an appeal, which Sarkozy says he intends to do.  
    • Peter DeLorenzo said this: https://www.autoextremist.com/ Detroit. The negative auto industry news is starting to pick up speed. For instance, the Robert Bosch company is cutting 13,000 jobs, or close to 3 percent of its global workforce, due to a difficult market, tariffs and high costs. VW is “pausing” EV production at its German facilities due to the tariffs and drastically slowing demand in the U.S. Valmet Automotive Oyj, the Finland-based contract supplier that produces various Mercedes-Benz models, is reducing its workforce by one third due to the darkening industry outlook in Europe. U.S. tariffs on Canadian parts and autos exploded to $380 million this past July. Lucerne International Inc., an auto supplier, decided against a $50 million facility in Detroit directly due to the tariffs. And GM is expected to make major cuts to its "Factory Zero" output in October. These developments represent just the tip of the iceberg, as suppliers are upending or scrapping future plans altogether due to the capriciously unpredictable nature of the tariffs. And that isn’t even getting to the automakers themselves. Product plans are being upended or cancelled altogether, as uncertainty reigns throughout the industry. All because the current occupant of the White House is stuck with an 80s mindset on everything, and is wreaking havoc on an industry that he and his minions haven’t even the first clue of understanding.   This is best exemplified given the attitude that the Dear Leader believes he can snap his fingers and that “fixes” will be immediate and dramatically positive, even though the required transformation to supply chains, factory builds and product planning will play out in years, not months.   The industry is trying to adapt to the current “finger-snap” mindset in Washington, and it isn’t going well. Short-term solutions such as Stellantis turning back the clock and going all-in on ICE muscle machines again are just that: short-term. How long Stellantis can live with that and how far it can carry that product strategy remains to be determined, although it’s clear that for a certain faction of the car-buying population, this direction is exactly what the doctor ordered.   But let’s not forget that two of the three “domestic” (I use that term purposely, as people forget that Stellantis is a foreign-owned company) automakers spent billions on top of billions on EV research and development, battery manufacturing facilities and a plethora of products. Was all of this work wasted? Not in the least, as the lessons learned in the process will prove to be invaluable going forward. But the current reality in Washington – which equates EV development as the Devil’s Work – means that those billions spent on bringing EVs to the masses will have to be tabled, except for selective instances of appropriate products for certain segments, of course. (And no, that does not mean EV pickups, which have turned out to be a fool’s errand as they don’t – or can’t – function as real working pickup trucks.)   So, Ford, GM and Stellantis are being forced to approach the next few years with a scattershot approach, cranking out ICE vehicles to stay alive and afloat, while plotting their next move to meet whatever is coming in the future, as advanced battery development – emphasizing light weight and density – continues at a torrid pace and an actual working national charging network slowly but surely solidifies.   Let me emphasize that none of these developments will be happening in a vacuum or with any degree of certainty. As long as the current administration is allowed to conduct “business” on the whims of Dear Leader, these auto manufacturers and their suppliers will be teetering on the brink of disaster for the foreseeable future.   Vehicle prices are soaring, and the typical auto buyer will be pressed to the limit in order to afford a new (or used) vehicle. This is the ugly reality facing this industry right now.   I’ve been accused of being overly negative on the future of this industry, but frankly, I haven’t been sounding the alarm loudly enough. Suppliers are going to fall by the wayside, costing countless jobs, and the manufacturers will be forced to jettison thousands of employees too.   This is not going to end well for this industry, and for those who are unwilling to believe it I’m afraid you’re in for a very rude awakening.   The clock is ticking on the U.S. automobile industry as we know it. And the most pathetic thing is that it didn’t have to unfold this way.   But here we are.   And that’s the High-Octane Truth for this week.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search