Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Consumers Confused by Driver-Assist Technology Names

      Consumers think that with names like Co-Pilot 360, ProPilot, or Autopilot, the car should be able to drive itself.

    According to research issued by AAA, 40 percent of Americans expect driver assist systems with names like ProPilot, Co-Pilot 360, or Autopilot to give the vehicle the ability to drive itself.

    In a quote to Automotive News, Director of Automotive Engineering and Industry Relations at AAA says "Somewhere in there, you'd think a pilot is involved, but indeed no, human driving is still required."

    AAA examined 34 vehicle brands to identify the number of driver-assistance names used and found 40 different terms used to describe automated emergency braking, 20 terms for adaptive cruise control, and 19 different lane-keeping assist names. 

    At CES this year, a coalition of automakers, safety advocates, and others launched Partner for Automated Vehicle Education (PAVE). This organization is dedicated to the promotion of these technologies while simplifying the language used to describe them.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    1 minute ago, Robert Hall said:

    I can see how they would be.  After 33 years of driving, I don't need this $h! in a car. 

    I am sure people said same thing when automakers started using seat belts and air bags ...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Robert Hall said:

    I can see how they would be.  After 33 years of driving, I don't need this shit in a car. 

    I really want adaptive cruise control in my next car.  It is nearly impossible to search for on the used car aggregators like AutoTrader.com because there is such inconsistent use in the term.  

    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Robert Hall said:

    I don't use cruise control, so I'm not sure the advantage of adaptive..maybe in heavy traffic freeway driving with lots of stop and go? 

    Any situation where the speed of the traffic in front of you may be variable and below the speed you are traveling at.  When I have a car with ACC, I just set the speed to 5 or 10 over the limit and let the predominant traffic speed govern my progress. 

    1 minute ago, ykX said:

    Also, the point of this that every automaker calls these system differently.  It really is confusing.

    yes... that's the problem.  Adaptive Cruise, Active Cruise, Distronic, Intelligent Cruise Control, Sense*.... all the same thing. 

    *Sense is the name of a bigger group of options at Honda also, but the Adaptive is called Honda Sense.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I will totally agree that all the various Marketing names is a confusing Shit Storm of WTF for the average driver.

    Now the Average driver seems to have gotten dumber and dumber as we have individuals in the various state and federal gov that thinks driving is more of a right than the reality that it is a privilege earned. As such we have a growing group of DMF's that should not even be driving and this has led to the following nanny devices being forced on everyone.

    Reality, Let me have the CHOICE to disable this stuff as the computer CANNOT act as fast as the brain in reading all the various issues on the road. There could be a very valid reason for me to drift out of a lane of traffic. I DO NOT want the auto fighting me to put me back in the lane especially if I am avoiding something in the road that the computer does not read properly or understand. Last thing I need is a computer trying to force me to drive over a piece of steel that will damage my auto versus moving out of the lane a bit to avoid it.

    These nanny devices need to be optional and not forced on us just like seatbelt laws that penalize you for wearing them yet you find non on the mass transit or school buses and the double standard by the police for not wearing them, talking on a cell phone and playing with their computer. :glare:

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, dfelt said:

     

    Reality, Let me have the CHOICE to disable this stuff as the computer CANNOT act as fast as the brain in reading all the various issues on the road.

    Reality is that the computer is MUCH FASTER than the human brain.  It just these automotive systems are still far from perfection. 

    26 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    These nanny devices need to be optional and not forced on us just like seatbelt laws that penalize you for wearing them yet you find non on the mass transit or school buses and the double standard by the police for not wearing them, talking on a cell phone and playing with their computer

    School buses have seat belts nowadays.  Also, seat belts saved countless lives, so will these systems.

    Also, fatalities on the roads consistently going down compared from 50s and 60s even though there is more and more cars on the road.  Only, because cars become safer.

    US_traffic_deaths_per_VMT%2C_VMT%2C_per_capita%2C_and_total_annual_deaths.png

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, ykX said:

    Reality is that the computer is MUCH FASTER than the human brain.  It just these automotive systems are still far from perfection.   

    Given how buggy software, is I don't trust computers to completely take control of a car. I work in the software industry, there is a lot of bad code out there and bad programmers... unless systems are built to the level of reliability and quality of NASA space mission systems or airplane auto pilot systems, I wouldn't trust them.   I especially don't trust a bunch of fucking Silicon Valley millennial 'bro-grammers'...

    Edited by Robert Hall
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    Given how buggy software, is I don't trust computers to completely take control of a car. I work in the software industry, there is a lot of bad code out there and bad programmers... unless systems are built to the level of reliability and quality of NASA space mission systems or airplane auto pilot systems, I wouldn't trust them.   I especially don't trust a bunch of f@#king Silicon Valley millennial 'bro-grammers'...

    I agree in regards to buggy software. However,  as you said software is flying airplanes and rockets right now.  Eventually, the automakers will have to have same level of software reliability, because lives will depend on that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, ykX said:

    I agree in regards to buggy software. However,  as you said software is flying airplanes and rockets right now.  Eventually, the automakers will have to have same level of software reliability, because lives will depend on that.

    More than lives....once it starts saving insurance companies money..it will be there. The cost of car accidents is often astronomical given injury and suffering costs. Does not take much of a reduction for insurance companies to mandate that this stuff be installed and lobby congress for laws regarding it.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    More than lives....once it starts saving insurance companies money..it will be there. The cost of car accidents is often astronomical given injury and suffering costs. Does not take much of a reduction for insurance companies to mandate that this stuff be installed and lobby congress for laws regarding it.

    Very good point, most of the time money talks louder than lives.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @ykX

    Correct we can build computers that are faster than the Human brain. Yet working in the Enterprise Storage business with Developers daily and the amount of bugs added into software, I still want my OPTION in regards to which Nanny devices I use.

    Yes Seatbelts save lives, but it should still be OPTIONAL. Not enforced fined use. There are times NOT wearing a seatbelt can be safer than wearing it, 4x4 off road is a perfect example. 

    Not all buses have seatbelts, none of the school buses or public buses in Washington State have them and they are not mandatory. What state are you in that has seat belts on school buses?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    @ykX

     

    Yes Seatbelts save lives, but it should still be OPTIONAL. Not enforced fined use. There are times NOT wearing a seatbelt can be safer than wearing it, 4x4 off road is a perfect example. 

    Nobody is going to give you a ticket if you not wearing your seat belt off road.

    And I think it is good that it is enforced because like you said previously most people irresponsible morons, who would not put seat belts just because they are lazy or forgot.

    9 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Not all buses have seatbelts, none of the school buses or public buses in Washington State have them and they are not mandatory. What state are you in that has seat belts on school buses?

    I live in NJ, both of my kids are in school, elementary and middle, and their buses have seat belts.

    Edited by ykX
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The majority of these problems is because people don't read the Car's owner manual and salesman don't explain it correctly.  Again most consumers are the problem.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, ykX said:

    Nobody is going to give you a ticket if you not wearing your seat belt off road.

    And I think it is good that it is enforced because like you said previously most people irresponsible morons, who would not put seat belts just because they are lazy or forgot.

    I live in NJ, both of my kids are in school, elementary and middle, and their buses have seat belts.

    Here in washington, I doubt the forest rangers will bother, but they wrote the law to include on or off road, personal seatbelts must be worn at all times or else you are eligible to be fined.

    Glad to hear NJ has seat belts on the school buses, here they do not  but should I think. I would also like to see them on public buses but I doubt that will ever happen.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Here in washington, I doubt the forest rangers will bother, but they wrote the law to include on or off road, personal seatbelts must be worn at all times or else you are eligible to be fined.

    Glad to hear NJ has seat belts on the school buses, here they do not  but should I think. I would also like to see them on public buses but I doubt that will ever happen.

    In NJ seat belt law states:

    "Applies to all passengers (including the rear seat), who are at least 8 years of age or at least 57 inches tall, and each driver and front seat passenger of a passenger automobile, operated on a street or highway. All of these occupants are required to wear a properly adjusted and fastened seat belt system."

    Off road is not required

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, ykX said:

    Reality is that the computer is MUCH FASTER than the human brain.  It just these automotive systems are still far from perfection.

    Um...NO!

    First of all, a computer...computes. But its because a HUMAN made a program for the computer to compute.

    So NO! 

    A computer is NOT faster than a human brain.  A human brain designed a code for the computer to follow...

    You may be talking about artificial intelligence. And we are not there yet. People in the A.I. business say we are not far off A.I.   They say A.I. will be a thing in the next 20-50 years when computers and robots will be in our lives full with A.I. 

    But I STILL do not think autonomous driving will be a thing by then either.

    WHY?

    Because the human brain is a fantastic thing... It took us 20 000 years to get us where we are. Survival of the fittest and natural selection is the darnedest thing.  

    In a normal human, where old age has not deteriorated brain and muscles, where youth may be too foolish and not wise enough...the human eyes, the human brain, the human reflexes, the other human senses,  HUMAN INTUITION and HUMAN INSTINCT, HUMAN PERCEPTION and HUMAN EXPERIENCE all work together almost INSTANTANEOUSLY...and then there is our 20 000 year old adrenaline factor when all that that I just mentioned gets to be magnified by 1000%.   Something that computers do not do! 

    You could see this at work if you watch sports.  If you compare passed Olympic triumphs to now, or incredible sports feats. Such as speed skiing, or moguls, or boxing....or football.   When a running back is trying to squeeze through a hole, but two huge guys are blocking his way, then he sees an opening completely on the other side, shifts his body, his weight and then...ZOOM, gets through that tiny opneing that was their for a split second and he is on his way to a touchdown. 

    The way a running back processes that info.  All the while trying to receive the football from his QB. Running to the side, front, looking out for holes, looking not to get tackled, pushing away his own teamates and others trying to tackle him. Shifting his weight and his position, all the while remaining on his feet, balancing himself, sprinting all this time. Bouncing off people. Running, jumping, skipping...all this is done with his eyes, his feet, his ears(balance and actually hearing things) and his brain controls all that INSTANTLY!!!

    Or a quarter back doing the same thing as that running back. Has to make a split second decision on whether to give the football away to his running back, pass it in the air or run with it when he sees a blitz coming to him...and more often than not, the decision made was a good one as the QB does NOT get sacked, but succeeds in getting a good play done.

    An extreme skier, going down a mountain (no trails), like going down a mountain...with just his gut feeling, his athletic prowess and his ability to make a split second decision, to correct his balance, to correct direction...

    I could do hockey or baseball analogies too. The thing is, day after day, week after week, year after year, game in and game out, we see athletes do these things...

    Its remarkable how fast our brain with our muscles react to the situations that happen in front of us right this second and we make a decision right away and our bodies react to that decision without missing a beat...and we keep our balance, while we throw our balance off kilter, our brain makes the necessary adjustments to land the way we wanna land, whether we wanna land on our bum, on our feet, on our hands, and when we do land, we could bounce back and unto the next split second decision we gotta make. And we continue that cycle until our opponent has made his decisions to stop us...

    When mother nature is concerned. Sometimes mother nature gets the best of us...and we die...but sometimes we beat mother nature...as in the extreme skiing example.

    What computers may do faster than us, is actually use its computing power to solve an equation, or pump the brakes faster than we can because our leg muscles are not faster than hydraulics...but when split second decisions need to be made, and movement corrrection and reaction need to be made that instant, a trained human being is still  faster than ANY computer out there....20 000 years of evolution will do that...

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I really want adaptive cruise control in my next car.  It is nearly impossible to search for on the used car aggregators like AutoTrader.com because there is such inconsistent use in the term.  

    i still haven't tried the adaptive cruise in our van yet.  maybe once weather gets warmer and roads reliably clean i may try it.  I'm not even sure but i wonder if the van has park assist also.  But i am not super trustworthy with that.......

    ultimately i think something like Cadillac Super Cruise is where its at.  I can tell you that it would be a godsend for travel on rural interstates.....

    7 hours ago, dfelt said:

    I will totally agree that all the various Marketing names is a confusing Shit Storm of WTF for the average driver.

    Now the Average driver seems to have gotten dumber and dumber as we have individuals in the various state and federal gov that thinks driving is more of a right than the reality that it is a privilege earned. As such we have a growing group of DMF's that should not even be driving and this has led to the following nanny devices being forced on everyone.

    Reality, Let me have the CHOICE to disable this stuff as the computer CANNOT act as fast as the brain in reading all the various issues on the road. There could be a very valid reason for me to drift out of a lane of traffic. I DO NOT want the auto fighting me to put me back in the lane especially if I am avoiding something in the road that the computer does not read properly or understand. Last thing I need is a computer trying to force me to drive over a piece of steel that will damage my auto versus moving out of the lane a bit to avoid it.

    These nanny devices need to be optional and not forced on us just like seatbelt laws that penalize you for wearing them yet you find non on the mass transit or school buses and the double standard by the police for not wearing them, talking on a cell phone and playing with their computer. :glare:

    I have lane keep on both vehicles, and both are turned off 99% of the time.  I could see a benefit to it for some drivers, who drift a lot........lane keep is another one of those things i wouldn't trust in inclement weather.

    I like things like blind spot and cross path, i don't really depend on them, but they help assure me sometimes if i feel i am being too aggressive on judging depth.

    a couple items i like, rainsense wipers, and auto high beams.  super convenient, and you can shut them off it you want.  but those two aren't really autonomous driving features per se.

    the surround view camera is a sweet option to check to see if you have parked well in a parking stall.  a short look on the screen if you're out of whack and need to repark.

    Edited by regfootball
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Um...NO!

    First of all, a computer...computes. But its because a HUMAN made a program for the computer to compute.

    So NO! 

    A computer is NOT faster than a human brain.  A human brain designed a code for the computer to follow...

    Computer computes much faster than a human brain.  The fact that the program is written by a human has nothing to do with it.  Modern airplanes, helicopters and missiles  mainly  controlled by a computer which can calculate based on sensors necessary changes and do them in micro seconds.  Human can never be as fast.  Artificial intelligence is a completely different animal, computer can not make DECISIONS yet as fast or as good as human operator. 

     

    9 hours ago, regfootball said:

    i still haven't tried the adaptive cruise in our van yet.  maybe once weather gets warmer and roads reliably clean i may try it.  I'm not even sure but i wonder if the van has park assist also.  But i am not super trustworthy with that.......

    I used adaptive cruise once when my dad had a loaner loaded Mazda 6.  It actually worked really well on a highway.  You set a distance you want to follow car ahead of you and the car will slow or speed up as necessary.

    Lane assist in my experience mostly is just an annoyance. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, Guest Joe said:

    The majority of these problems is because people don't read the Car's owner manual and salesman don't explain it correctly.  Again most consumers are the problem.

    Car dealers are a huge problem...they are more worried about selling warranty's and stuff through the F and I guy than selling products. I think it is immoral to force manufacturers to be legally mandated to sell through dealer networks. 

    I could see a Tesla esque future from a dealership standpoint. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    58 minutes ago, ykX said:

    Computer computes much faster than a human brain. 

    That is what I said...

    12 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    First of all, a computer...computes.

     

    12 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    What computers may do faster than us, is actually use its computing power to solve an equation, or pump the brakes faster than we can because our leg muscles are not faster than hydraulics

     

    58 minutes ago, ykX said:

    he fact that the program is written by a human has nothing to do with it.  Modern airplanes, helicopters and missiles  mainly  controlled by a computer which can calculate based on sensors necessary changes and do them in micro seconds.

    And yes it does. Our brain is the one that has deciphered to make codes for this computing power. 

    Besides, our brain ALSO computes in microseconds.  When we play sports, you think our brain does not use math and compute this mathematical equation in front of us and makes the necessary adjustments to our muscles and reflexes?

    Read my examples on my post about sports and then process that info with the examples you gave about the military...

     

    Why we do have computers in the military though?

    Because computers DO compute faster than we do and the calculations that they make are more accurate than what humans could do. At a faster rate, and we WILL make errors in adding things up. Stupid mistakes. 

    So to eliminate the "human" factor, computers control the missiles and the like.  But make no mistake about it. We could also make those calculations. If we were in control of those devices since the missiles were invented, late 1940s. That we give us 70 years worth of experience that we humans would be able to compute on the fly.  Lots of errors in the process, but in 2019, we would have perfected our formulas to use on the fly...

    Remember, we used complex computing tools  and camera lenses to drop bombs in WW2. It was an approximation of where we wanted those bombs to fall. And because we did not want to fail in the mission, we dropped a shyte load of bombs on the targets, but we hit our targets, and the surrounding areas but we did calculate for wind friction, altitude, velocity, gravity, etc...and what we learned from WW2 went on to the codes the computers use today to calculate how the smart missiles and smart bombs would travel and lock on to their target...  

     

    58 minutes ago, ykX said:

    Human can never be as fast.

    Oh....but we are...

    In certain situations. Like sports...or racing other cars on the same track...

    We see an an  autonomous Audi  go around a track faster than a normal driver ever could. True.

    What we do NOT see however is that the track is PRE-PROGRAMMED in the Audi's computer brain...

    A VETERAN race car driver, when he KNOWS that track like the back of his hand, is JUST as fast...

    What we do NOT see is that put that autonomous Audi on that track with OTHER HUMAN driven cars, because us humans have one thing that computers will NEVER have a code for, is that we are UNPREDICTABLE...THAT is ONE of our traits of many that makes us human that separates us from the rest of the animal world...

    Put that autonomous Audi on a track with other race cars, and that Audi will probably not win...as there are too many factors to compute and that WE have not PROGRAMMED it for...yet pro race car drivers do those mathematical problems every Sunday since the 1940s in NASCAR, or just about 100 years in Daytona...

    OUR experience is the same as a computer code...  A computer code that WE INVENTED...

    58 minutes ago, ykX said:

    The fact that the program is written by a human has nothing to do with it. 

    And here it is...

    And yes it does as a computer will not perform unless its programmed to do so.   And if there is an error in code. Failure is the result.

    When we fail, we also have the capacity to correct the failure almost instantaneously.  THAT is how powerful and fast our brain acts and reacts.   

    And we do this because:

    12 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    In a normal human, where old age has not deteriorated brain and muscles, where youth may be too foolish and not wise enough...the human eyes, the human brain, the human reflexes, the other human senses,  HUMAN INTUITION and HUMAN INSTINCT, HUMAN PERCEPTION and HUMAN EXPERIENCE all work together almost INSTANTANEOUSLY...and then there is our 20 000 year old adrenaline factor when all that that I just mentioned gets to be magnified by 1000%.   Something that computers do not do! 

     

    58 minutes ago, ykX said:

    Artificial intelligence is a completely different animal, computer can not make DECISIONS yet as fast or as good as human operator. 

    And finally, you end up acknowledging what Ive said all along...

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @oldshurst442  Your example with autonomous Audi has nothing to do with active safety systems and more to do with auto pilot systems like we see on Tesla and Cadillac.   That is AI systems, and they are still not at the right level of development. 

    Also, your examples with sports are irrelevant too.  Fastest human reaction ever recorded is 120 milliseconds, which is extremely fast for a human but extremely slow for a computer.  Computers can react 100 to 1000 times faster.

    As was mentioned before, yes, there can be a mistake in a code, and those mistakes will have to be worked out.  

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, ykX said:

    Also, your examples with sports are irrelevant too.  Fastest human reaction ever recorded is 120 milliseconds, which is extremely fast for a human but extremely slow for a computer.  Computers can react 100 to 1000 times faster

    No they dont...

    desktop computers do NOT have limbs and muscles to do anything...unlike humans

    THIS is how the fastest computer/robot reacts...

     

     

    This is how a human reacts:

     

     

    Computers do NOT have reaction times. They have computing times...

    We have computing times, plus we have reaction times...

    Computers are a LONG LONG way before they become robots and their electrical wires are as thin as ours and our as compact and cleanly tucked away into their metal bodies, unlike ours that are nicely placed in and around our skeletons with our muscles.   

    Like I said, the human brain has 20 000 years of evolution behind it and our bodies are a marvel...

    No human created machine could top what our human brains could perform and how EFFICIENT our human bodies are and together how we act and react in our environment.  With a computer, it takes a HUMAN invented code to perform. 

    With humans...20 000 years of evolution is where we are at as of now...and we have FREE THINKING!!! 

    All this to say, all these safety gadgets in our cars, if we too the time to INSTRUCT proper DRIVING skills instead of wasting our energy creating electronic gadgets, we wouldnt have the need for electronic safety gadgets. 

    But then again, the human factor of errors and laziness and lack of attention will always bite us in the ass...

    But I repeat...NO COMPUTER is FASTER than we are acting and reacting...actual movement...when we travel.

    There are faster things than us in this world, sharks swimming in the water, cheetahs running in the wild,  including F16s that we invented...and there will come a time when those fighter aircraft will be a computer flying it, but not because we cannot process that speed, but because our bodies CANT WITHSTAND THE G FORCES...

    Make no mistake about it, our brains are fast enough to calculate the speeds and our reflexes WILL be up to the task to accommodate those speeds through evolution, but there is one area where evolution stops. We do have limits. Our bodies our not equipped to withstand those G Forces. Our brains willl be smashed up against our skulls, that is instant concussion.

    Our internal organs would be thrashing around in our rib cage...but our brain and muscles and our electrical highways of nerves and the like...are definitely up to the task...

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @oldshurst442

    1 hour ago, oldshurst442 said:

    desktop computers do NOT have limbs and muscles to do anything...unlike humans

    What the hell are talking about???!!   I have no access to youtube at work and frankly I have no time or patience to read your long winded responses that are way off point.  I don't need lectures from you about how hardware and software works since I happen to be an electrical engineer, and I work with both hardware and software.

    The automated braking system for example is there to warn and prevent or minimize rear end collisions.  They have been proven to eliminate or substantially reduce  rear end collisions when used appropriately.   There are other systems that more or less useful as well.  With some time, a standard will be worked out for all manufacturers, similar to what is done for seat belts, airbags, and structural integrity of the cars.   They probably soon will be crash tested to a particular standard like everything else.

    Edited by ykX
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Confusing names or not, a lot those consumers should be operating heavy machinery as it is. Autonomous driving is any oxymoron that is destined to fail in so many ways unless the basic transportation infrastructure itself is completely overhauled to accommodate it (dedicated lanes and roads for example). We can’t even have an infrastructure week much less the capability of accommodating what needs to happen to actually make this viable without utter calamity and catastrophe.  

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, ykX said:

    @oldshurst442

    What the hell are talking about???!!   I have no access to youtube at work and frankly I have no time or patience to read your long winded responses that are way off point.  I don't need lectures from you about how hardware and software works since I happen to be an electrical engineer, and I work with both hardware and software.

    The automated braking system for example is there to warn and prevent or minimize rear end collisions.  They have been proven to eliminate or substantially reduce  rear end collisions when used appropriately.   There are other systems that more or less useful as well.  With some time, a standard will be worked out for all manufacturers, similar to what is done for seat belts, airbags, and structural integrity of the cars.   They probably soon will be crash tested to a particular standard like everything else.

    Its a shame that you are en electrical engineer...

    No patience?

    yeah...

    Lets call it that...

    I

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    No they dont...

    desktop computers do NOT have limbs and muscles to do anything...unlike humans

    THIS is how the fastest computer/robot reacts...

     

     

    This is how a human reacts:

     

     

    Computers do NOT have reaction times. They have computing times...

    We have computing times, plus we have reaction times...

    Computers are a LONG LONG way before they become robots and their electrical wires are as thin as ours and our as compact and cleanly tucked away into their metal bodies, unlike ours that are nicely placed in and around our skeletons with our muscles.   

    Like I said, the human brain has 20 000 years of evolution behind it and our bodies are a marvel...

    No human created machine could top what our human brains could perform and how EFFICIENT our human bodies are and together how we act and react in our environment.  With a computer, it takes a HUMAN invented code to perform. 

    With humans...20 000 years of evolution is where we are at as of now...and we have FREE THINKING!!! 

    All this to say, all these safety gadgets in our cars, if we too the time to INSTRUCT proper DRIVING skills instead of wasting our energy creating electronic gadgets, we wouldnt have the need for electronic safety gadgets. 

    But then again, the human factor of errors and laziness and lack of attention will always bite us in the ass...

    But I repeat...NO COMPUTER is FASTER than we are acting and reacting...actual movement...when we travel.

    There are faster things than us in this world, sharks swimming in the water, cheetahs running in the wild,  including F16s that we invented...and there will come a time when those fighter aircraft will be a computer flying it, but not because we cannot process that speed, but because our bodies CANT WITHSTAND THE G FORCES...

    Make no mistake about it, our brains are fast enough to calculate the speeds and our reflexes WILL be up to the task to accommodate those speeds through evolution, but there is one area where evolution stops. We do have limits. Our bodies our not equipped to withstand those G Forces. Our brains willl be smashed up against our skulls, that is instant concussion.

    Our internal organs would be thrashing around in our rib cage...but our brain and muscles and our electrical highways of nerves and the like...are definitely up to the task...

     

    Dude...all I got to say is I was having a decent day until you bring the Cowboys in....would downvote this one if there wasn't a chance of a free meal if I visited your restaurant in Montreal.

    2 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Its a shame that you are en electrical engineer...

    No patience?

    yeah...

    Lets call it that...

    I

    Lets keep things civil boys.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Dude...all I got to say is I was having a decent day until you bring the Cowboys in....would downvote this one if there wasn't a chance of a free meal if I visited your restaurant in Montreal.

    Lets keep things civil boys.

     

    Yeah...

    Call him on it...as HE does NOT want to play nice. To learn...

    2 hours ago, ykX said:

    and frankly I have no time or patience to read your long winded responses that are way off point.  I don't need lectures from you about how hardware and software works since I happen to be an electrical engineer

    As I am JUST a humble hotdog vendor and hamburger flipper...

    HE on the other hand...HE is smarter than I and HE has NO time for me...

     

    16 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Dude...all I got to say is I was having a decent day until you bring the Cowboys in....would downvote this one

    PHOQUE the Dallas Cowboys!!!

    Look at what a HUMAN BEING was able to do....THAT is the message...I couldnt care less what the dude's uniform was...

    All I care is that dude's athletic ability and brain allowed him to do...

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All I want is a dog that does not s#!t on my hardwood floor...looks like the good gentleman from New jersey advocates technology that could provide that.

    9 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    PHOQUE the Dallas Cowboys!!!

    Look at what a HUMAN BEING was able to do....THAT is the message...I couldnt care less what the dude's uniform was...

    All I care is that dude's athletic ability and brain allowed him to do...

    All references to the Cowboys are offensive. I am triggered and need a safe space.

    13 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Food 🤤 Food

    @oldshurst442 Pictures please of your food! :drool:

    Better that pictures of his Ford....what a difference one letter can make. Don't like Fords any more than I like dogs s#!tting on my floor. And you all that 'blu was the only angry old man yelling at people to get off of his grass.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, A Horse With No Name said:

     

     I am triggered and need a safe space.

    Well...that is the ONE area where computers excel and humans fail...

    Although having emotions actually IS a wonderful thing. So...I take that back! 

     

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Well...that is the ONE area where computers excel and humans fail...

    Although having emotions actually IS a wonderful thing. So...I take that back! 

     

    Emotionless cars are a bad thing. Driving to st Louis and back over the weekend has reminded me about just exactly how bland the automotive landscape has become.

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    spelling
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Emotionless cars are a bad thing. Driving to st Louis and back over the weekend has reminded me about just exactly how bland the automotive landscape has become.

    What bland auto Emotion less scaring attacked you? 🤔

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Call him on it...as HE does NOT want to play nice. To learn...

    Dude, I am trying to explain to you and you are just rumbling random things.  It seems to me you are the one that doesn't want to listen or learn.  

     

    4 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    No they dont...

    Here is your response to everything I wrote.  I gave a number of semi scientific examples but you don't listen.  In that case why should I waste yours and mine time?

     

    38 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    As I am JUST a humble hotdog vendor and hamburger flipper...

    HE on the other hand...HE is smarter than I and HE has NO time for me...

    Nobody is claiming to be smarter than anyone.  I am just trying to say that I am familiar enough with  similar electronic hardware and software.  

    Edited by ykX
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, ykX said:

    Dude, I am trying to explain to you and you are just rumbling random things.  It seems to me you are the one that doesn't want to listen or learn.  

     

    Here is your response to everything I wrote.  I gave a number of semi scientific examples but you don't listen.  In that case why should I waste yours and mine time?

     

    Nobody is claiming to be smarter than anyone.  I am just trying to say that I am familiar enough with  similar electronic hardware and software.  

    You seemed perfectly rational and sane to me anyways,

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The question isn't how fast humans are... it's how distracted they are.  That's what the nannies are there for because most humans are too busy texting or updating facebook to have their full attention on the road.   Even the fastest human reactions won't rival computers if the human is distracted by their phone.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, ykX said:

    Dude, I am trying to explain to you and you are just rumbling random things.  It seems to me you are the one that doesn't want to listen or learn.  

     

    Here is your response to everything I wrote.  I gave a number of semi scientific examples but you don't listen.  In that case why should waste yours and mine time?

     

    Nobody is claiming to be smarter than anyone.  I am just trying to say that I am familiar enough with  similar electronic hardware and software

    Ummm...NO!

    And I GAVE YOU EXAMPLES ON REAL LIFE...and on the Random Thoughts thread (where you might not have gone to that thread, understandably so) then you would realize even more what I am trying to convey...

    software...

    Human deciphered programs for computers to follow.  And YOU yourself said:

    5 hours ago, ykX said:

    As was mentioned before, yes, there can be a mistake in a code, and those mistakes will have to be worked out.  

    Electronic hardware...

    If you thought about the human body and human brain as a machine, using our brain and central nervous system as our electronic hardware AND software, then you would realize where I am coming from. 

    All that I said is and will always BE relevant.  All that was said by ME is just COMPUTER programming. Programmed by humans using THEIR brains... 

    It does not matter what domain we are talking about.

    The point is that the human brain acts and reacts FASTER than any computer as a computer NEEDS a PROGRAM to work...

    The program that a computer has does in fact COMPUTE the mathematical codes FASTER than what we as humans can do. 

    BUT...in no way does it react faster than what WE do as humans...

    What do humans do? 

    Well...

    The very first Olympics. The shot put and the long jump and the discus throw. The human brain, 2500 plus years ago, used math to make us humans try to jump or throw farther than our other human competitor. 

    Angle of approach, speed and momentum to achieve long distance.  You know...when we jump, we rock are bodies back and forth to achieve momentum and we try to get the ideal angle to launch ourselves. 

    Well. We perfected that. Our brain perfected that. THAT was even before we created mathematical equations.

    Over the course of our existence , we deciphered mathematics and we also invented computers to...compute...

    1110010010011100101001

    1001001111000100100100

    1110001110010101001001

    1100100111000011110101

     

    A computer will calculate faster than we will ever do. But...those calculations are limited in the codes and programs we have made for the computer to compute. Different computer and robotics with different codes do different things.

    Our brains, do not process data that way. But our brains DO process math, and through our 20 000 years of evolution, use our reflexes and muscles and eye sight and our hearing to act and react in our environment.  And our athletic ability proves what we can do. And...computers if not programmed to run a simple task as simple as  running the bases in baseball, will NOT perform that task.

    If we program the computer to run the bases, then it will run them...but how will it run the bases if a computer does not have limbs?

    Oh...it will calculate how fast we humans run bases. Oh... it may even be able to hit a 150 MPH fast ball that us humans cant hit let alone throw, but, will it be able catch a ball, look where the runner is running, decide if it has to throw at 3rd, or 2nd base or make an out at first or tag the runner all the while leaping to catch the ball,  actually catching it,  landing in a position to actually throw the ball,  making the decision where to throw the ball, at an angle where the ball will get to its destination ON target...all in the a time frame of a second or two at the max?

    Because...we humans do that...

    And if you do not want to listen to that...then I cannot help you. 

     

    PS: military computer radars and lidars and the such lock unto SEVERAL targets at once  and do the necessary calculations to hit their targets FASTER than we can ever react to. True. 

    But those computers are still performing MATHEMATICAL equations PROGRAMMED by US! 

    A military computer cannot play baseball...the actual game. Not in video game format. THE actual game...

     

    If you noticed...the reference of me explaining an infield play is similar to what military radars and lidars and missile launchers do...but us humans actually do it. Our bodies and our brains do it. 

    We have perfected our brain power and our reflexes and muscles to act and react quickly. 

    US...our bodies. Our brains.

    The computer just follows codes...codes that WE programmed the computer to follow.

    So yeah...computers are NOT faster than the human brain...

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    These systems also have more "eyes" than we do. It is virtually impossible for us to be looking both fore and aft at the same time and for our brains to process each view separately.  Computers can do that... even have a 360-degree view of the car's surroundings.   

    • Agree 2
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The question isn't how fast humans are... it's how distracted they are.  That's what the nannies are there for because most humans are too busy texting or updating facebook to have their full attention on the road.   Even the fastest human reactions won't rival computers if the human is distracted by their phone.

    My daughter and I took an uber in Buffalo where the driver was on Facebook the whole trip. Daughter reported driver...uber was not happy.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    These systems also have more "eyes" than we do. It is virtually impossible for us to be looking both fore and aft at the same time and for our brains to process each view separately.  Computers can do that... even have a 360-degree view of the car's surroundings.   

    There is no need for that many "eyes" when we drive and ALL of us our FOCUSED in OUR driving...

    But even then...our reflexes are fast that we CAN correct errors in others or our own...

    But this is what "eyes" you are referring to though?

    Because we are far far away from autonomous driving...these are  compilations  of Tesla Model S autopilot failures that TESLA ALWAYS says that HUMAN drivers NEED to be ALERT to take over the driving...

     

    because when we are alert, our brains do a fantastic job of avoiding accidents. Our reflexes, our experiences and our brain power do that!

     

    THIS is what other kinds of humans do with our brain power and athletic prowess

     

    We could even...fly...well...glide... I mentioned the very first Olympics when the Ancient Greeks dreamed of flying. Hell...Wilbur and Orville never thought this would happen either just over 100 years ago, but here we are...what OUR brain power could calculate to do... 

     

    And if you are gonna skip these videos...at least watch this last one...to see how well and FAST our brains and our athletic prowess processes mathematical equations...

     

     

    You guys you try all you want to discredit me...Im GIVING VISUAL proof for god's sake! 

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Even computer eyes can get blinded... and that's what happened with the Tesla. 

    Sure.

    But...still does not change the fact that a human brain still processes the info fast enough to correct any imperfections to which Tesla says that in auto-pilot mode...a HUMAN is still required to take over the wheel if need be... 

    Computers are NOT faster than the human brain... 

    The human brain is a magnificent organ. Its capable of directing all kinds of information, controlling all the motor skills while making decisions, correct decisions and reapplying information and readjusting motor skills at a blink of an eye.  It does that with the nervous system, the eyes and the human limbs. All communicate without a lapse in time...in perfect harmony. 

    Something that computers do NOT do!  All computers do is just read code...and act according to what that code says for it to do...granted. Today's computers have billions and billions amounts of code that computers process. It still takes a helluva lot of electricity, electric motors, servers and computing power to do so...

    We, as humans...all we got is just 1 brain, 2 eyes, 2 ears, 4 limbs and a central  nervous system...producing enough electrical pulses tom power our muscles. And with the videos that I have posted both in the the Random Thoughts Thread and in this one, goes to show you you well our brain functions...WITHOUT codes and programs...\

    Our codes and our programs is our evolution...

    ITS WHAT WE DO NATURALLY!!!!

    Therefore...NO computer...so far...is as fast as we are. 

    We do not compute as fast as a computer. But we ACT AND REACT in our environment faster that it! 

    It aint hard to comprehend that!  Unless of course you guys do not want to admit Im right...

    Not the first time either...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Again, these computers are not necessarily designed to be faster. They're designed to be paying attention 100% of the time.  Even someone watching the road can be day-dreaming and not see something.  I catch myself on mental autopilot often during my commute... not the best place to be when driving. 

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Again, these computers are not necessarily designed to be faster. They're designed to be paying attention 100% of the time.  Even someone watching the road can be day-dreaming and not see something.  I catch myself on mental autopilot often during my commute... not the best place to be when driving. 

    Well...

    humans were never designed to be driving, flying...going in excess of...what?  3 mph walking and about 15 mph running in a short amount of time...

    Yet...we evolved to be doing just that. To make machines that make us go faster than the speed of sound and our brains and muscles act fast enough to control that machine.

    Or average joes to be driving their cars going 60 mph on a daily basis and we control that car. Our brains and our reflexes our eyes adapting to those speeds quite easily I might add...

    Sports and flying aircraft at the speed of sound does take a certain amount of training...I will admit. 

    But we have evolved and  our brains now does 60 mph...instead of 15mph...

    And we do it quite good...

    Image result for drifting gif

     

    I repeat...computers are NOT faster than the human brain...

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The question isn't how fast humans are... it's how distracted they are.  That's what the nannies are there for because most humans are too busy texting or updating facebook to have their full attention on the road.   Even the fastest human reactions won't rival computers if the human is distracted by their phone.

    Well...yeah...

    To which I have mentioned that in the first post....

    But...AGAIN...

    COMPUTERS are NOT faster than the human brain...

    Even the nannies react slow because all the billions and billions of codes that WE have programmed into the nanny...there is always something that does NOT compute well...

    And WE ALL have ADMITTED to it!!!

    7 hours ago, ykX said:

    yes, there can be a mistake in a code, and those mistakes will have to be worked out.  

     

    43 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Even computer eyes can get blinded... and that's what happened with the Tesla. 

    But I have shown how the human brain...*SIGH* 

    THROUGH EVOLUTION...20 000 years of evolution...our brain CORRECTS errors like these and takes the proper measures to adjust and well...we adjust...sometimes we dont and die...

    But sometimes we do alright for ourselves...

    yet another phoquing video...

    Just listen to what he says...if you wanna...because I KNOW you guys do NOT want to admit YOU are wrong...

     

     

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/28/2019 at 12:04 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    I really want adaptive cruise control in my next car.  It is nearly impossible to search for on the used car aggregators like AutoTrader.com because there is such inconsistent use in the term.  

    I agree 2000%! 1: I want it as well. 2: It really is almost impossible to narrow your vehicle search results down to ones with or without it. That's gear-grinding. 

    On 1/28/2019 at 2:53 PM, dfelt said:

    Yes Seatbelts save lives, but it should still be OPTIONAL. Not enforced fined use. There are times NOT wearing a seatbelt can be safer than wearing it, 4x4 off road is a perfect example. 

    I agree that seat belts should be optional even though I wear one 100% of the time, even moving vehicles around the driveway out of habit. I think it is ridiculous that it is a law(at least in IL) to wear a seat belt. Insurance companies probably love that. they get to charge people the same and there are less overall injuries. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Interesting another one bites the dust. Mercedes that had in 2021 said it would be an EV only company by 2030 has in their Q4 call stated they will not put an end date on ICE, and they are now aiming to have 50% of global sales as EV. Mercedes Benz ditches plan to sell only EVs by 2030 (msn.com) Mercedes-Benz Group 2023 results*: Cash generation at work | Mercedes-Benz Media
    • I will stand corrected as I see Ford CEO in Dec 15 2023 confirmed that they were moving forward with Google on the Qualcomm Android system in supporting the use of Android Auto and Apple Carplay system.  I lumped Ford in with GM as a year earlier with the Qualcomm Announcement they said they would protect the data by not using the cell phone connectivity. I guess customers have spoken and Ford has changed back to replacing Sync in all their ICE and EV autos with the use of Android Auto and Apple Carplay. That I am very happy about.  I tried to find the story I wrote about the Qualcomm Android Auto system where GM and Ford along with a few others had stated in moving to this system they would protect customers data by not allowing Android Auto / Apple Carplay and would use the software API SDK to create their own software interface.  I did a quick search across the news stories but could not find that story.  Yet THANK YOU, having found the news stories on Ford CEO in December 2023 stating they will stick with the ability to use it is GREAT and I am very happy for that as I think GM is making a BIG BIG BIG mistake. Yet it is a switch that they can flip back on. Hopefully Mary and team will get their act together and turn on the support for Android Auto and Apple Carplay.
    • Ok, so I'll say something about this video. It's mostly pros:  - nice cabin; they even did the Malibu thing with the fabric on the dash - unobtrusive touch screen in terms of its placement and sensibly placed controls  - the hideous diagonal for the cubby under the center stack is gone - much nicer treatment of the rear passenger window where it meets the C-pillar - it no longer looks like a '72 Caprice  - better side profile and rear taillights - we know the 2.5 liter 4 cylinder, assuming it stays the same Neutral: - well, with the hybrid, a CVT comes onto the scene ... if it lasts at least 200,000 miles with diligent maintenance, I can't complain  Cons: - the console height between the bucket seats is a little too high for my taste - the front grille continues on as an appliance; whether in base model form or aggressively styled sporty model form.  It can very easily be "fixed" - thicken the center cross-member where the bumper supposedly is and raise it up a little from the ground.  It's still too much - less is more.
    • Why are you grouping Ford with GM here? To the best of my knowledge, Ford has not announced abandoning CarPlay or AndroidAuto. 
    • Pure semantics (although Honda did, in fact, install their own form of the software) as the bigger point was made and confirmed by your post. GM screwed up six ways from Sunday by going their own way with the software side of things. ZERO background in it prior but "HEY! We're GM! Let's a proven tech and make it absolute hot garbage in form and execution". On a side note... Not four months ago, I caught absolute hell (although less so the last three months because well, you know 😎) for pointing out GMs screw ups, knowing all I had to do was sit back let GM speak for themselves and now here we are. I am not saying GM can't or won't figure this out but the next time a fanfic tells me "That was forty years ago GM", I am going to point to this and the host of other screw ups brought on by GM as my vindication lol. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search