Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: FCA To Convert An Idled Engine Factory Into A Grand Cherokee Plant

      Return of the Mack II

    Since 2012, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles' Mack Avenue Engine II plant in Detroit has been idled. But new reports from CNBC and The Detroit News say the factory will be retooled to build a new three-row Jeep Grand Cherokee for the 2021 model year.

    According to sources, the reopening of the plant would allow FCA to begin retooling the Jefferson North Assembly Plant - which sits across from the Mack Avenue complex. This would allow Jefferson North to start producing the next-generation two and three-row Grand Cherokee. Reopening Mack II could bring up to 400 jobs back to Detroit.

    “FCA is essentially out of capacity. They’re kind of running up against being against full capacity. This is a very different situation than what GM is dealing with,” said Jeff Schuster, an analyst with LMC Automotive to The Detroit News.

    Last month, FCA was using 92 percent of its plant capacity in North America, due to the increase in demand for trucks and utility vehicles. This is noticeably higher than General Motors (72 percent) and Ford (81 percent) according to data from LMC Automotive.

    FCA and the office of Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan declined to comment.

    An announcement about this retooling is expected to take place next week.

    Source: CNBC, The Detroit News

    Edited by William Maley

    • Upvote 2


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Yep....product is a problem at Ford and GM. Toyota, honda, Hyundai, Kia, Benz, BMW, VW, Subaru, and others also build cars in the US and are not idling plants en masse.

    Not saying all GM and Ford products are bad...just that they need to work harder at being competitive.

    Even though I am the spiritual opposite of Cmicassa here in that I love a lot of foreign cars....I will even go out on a limb for GM. The big problem at GM is the front office, not the design studio or the assembly line. Promote and market what you have GM.

    GM really does under perform in terms of quality of product and sales. They need marketing. Badly.

    End of rant.

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    6 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

     The big problem at GM is the front office, not the design studio or the assembly line. Promote and market what you have GM.

    GM really does under perform in terms of quality of product and sales. They need marketing. Badly.

     

    That is nothing new, though...GM has had these issues for decades. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    34 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    That is nothing new, though...GM has had these issues for decades. 

    ....and failed for decades to solve them. Cue Lucy, Charlie Brown, and Football.

    image.jpeg
    • Haha 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You also have to remember that GM and Ford are much larger than Chrysler ever was.  GM should call FCA and sell them an idled factory after FCA gets this one converted.

    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    5 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    You also have to remember that GM and Ford are much larger than Chrysler ever was.  GM should call FCA and sell them an idled factory after FCA gets this one converted.

    This would make a lot of financial sense.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wonder why American makes can't look at Hyundai/Kia as examples of persistence... in the car market.

     

    GM used to have an above average warranty too, wonder if that change netted in lost buyers. Only makes sense if warranty work cost more than extra sales, LOL GM...

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    I wonder why American makes can't look at Hyundai/Kia as examples of persistence... in the car market.

     

    GM used to have an above average warranty too, wonder if that change netted in lost buyers. Only makes sense if warranty work cost more than extra sales, LOL GM...

    Maybe because GM and Ford are not part of very large conglomerates, well-shielded from imports in the domestic market.  It is easy to forget that Hyundai/KIA are part of a larger Korean chaebol that can push something to the nth degree because Hyundai is SO WELL protected at home and is a larger conglomerate than GM ever was (even in the 1950s).  In Korea, Hyundai makes all sorts of consumer products that GM has not made since GM sold off Frigidaire years ago.  Some Koreans are very loyal to Hyundai or Samsung or LG back in South Korea.  Because of that (Japan has this too), it is very easy to take on risks that a smaller, less diversified corporation like GM or Ford simply do not take.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Maybe because GM and Ford are not part of very large conglomerates, well-shielded from imports in the domestic market.  It is easy to forget that Hyundai/KIA are part of a larger Korean chaebol that can push something to the nth degree because Hyundai is SO WELL protected at home and is a larger conglomerate than GM ever was (even in the 1950s).  In Korea, Hyundai makes all sorts of consumer products that GM has not made since GM sold off Frigidaire years ago.  Some Koreans are very loyal to Hyundai or Samsung or LG back in South Korea.  Because of that (Japan has this too), it is very easy to take on risks that a smaller, less diversified corporation like GM or Ford simply do not take.

    Many do not understand the Chaebol of Korea or the Keiretsu of Japan. These business groups are so tightly tied together that they have a dominance that US businesses cannot do here due to our laws. This will always make it hard for US businesses in the Asian rim.

    China has their SOEs (State-owned Enterprises) that pretty much do the same thing as the Korean or Japanese groups. These SOEs do not want to have attention on them so the business groups go by the term Qiyejituan. These are huge and equal in size to most of our Fortune 500 companies, some may even be considered Fortune 100.

    https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/the-critical-role-of-business-groups-in-china/

    Good overview if you want to learn more about them.

    • Korean = Chaebol
    • Japanese = Keiretsu
    • Chinese = Qiyejituan

     

    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    In Korea, Hyundai makes all sorts of consumer products that GM has not made since GM sold off Frigidaire years ago.

    "Since" ; OK. but GM was in a huge swath of industries over it's history, many long forgotten at this point. A lot of them are the same ones hyundai Corp is in, too.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 hours ago, balthazar said:

    "Since" ; OK. but GM was in a huge swath of industries over it's history, many long forgotten at this point. A lot of them are the same ones hyundai Corp is in, too.

    So then some will make the assumption that Hyundai will go the same path as GM, while others will say they learned from history of loosing focus and will stay a massive company.

    Families learn that wealth building is all about putting differences aside and having heads that focus on their one area to be the best and grow the over all wealth. This is something that many Americans ignore and fail to learn from why Asians have built some massive wealth.

    We do have Americans who have built massive empires and that shows in Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, but we should never stop learning from competition in other counteries too.

    Thanks for pointing out the valid history points here, you rock! :metal:

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Business is always cyclical, ALL companies plot their history via the Bell Curve. GM was there first in a personal transportation centered multi-armed conglomerate, and all others followed, learning (and some would say 'stealing') from the innovation GM pioneered.

    I do not jump on the bandwagon of saying 'GM lost focus'- they could do some things better, some things differently, but other things they are arguably the best at currently.

    Automotively, hyundai has only 3 SUVs and 5 sedans, and 0 trucks. They are behind the curve WRT current market trends here.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Business is always cyclical, ALL companies plot their history via the Bell Curve. GM was there first in a personal transportation centered multi-armed conglomerate, and all others followed, learning (and some would say 'stealing') from the innovation GM pioneered.

    I do not jump on the bandwagon of saying 'GM lost focus'- they could do some things better, some things differently, but other things they are arguably the best at currently.

    Automotively, hyundai has only 3 SUVs and 5 sedans, and 0 trucks. They are behind the curve WRT current market trends here.

    Here maybe, but elsewhere in the world Hyundai/KIA fits right in.

    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Ford is planning a dramatic change to their European lineup. Autocar reported yesterday that the automaker will be replacing the Mondeo (Fusion to us), Galaxy, and S-Max with a new "single crossover-style estate model" - think Subaru Outback.
      Not many details are known about this new model. It is expected to use Ford's C2 platform which underpins the new Fiesta and Focus. A range of gas and diesel engines will be available, along with 48V mild-hybrid system. The new wagon is expected to arrive in early 2021 in Europe. Autocar notes that this model is expected to be sold in other markets such as North America.
      While this model is quite different from three it will replace (a midsize sedan/hatchback/wagon and two vans), it is expected to outsell all of them. Last year, Ford only moved 50,000 Mondeos, 24,000 S-Maxs, and 12,000 Galaxy. Numbers according to Autocar that are too small to make any profit.
      As for the U.S., the reason is likely due to Ford to possibly keep sedan buyers in the showroom. Last July, we reported that Ford was considering doing an "Outback competitor" with the Fusion name. 
      Source: Autocar

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Ford is planning a dramatic change to their European lineup. Autocar reported yesterday that the automaker will be replacing the Mondeo (Fusion to us), Galaxy, and S-Max with a new "single crossover-style estate model" - think Subaru Outback.
      Not many details are known about this new model. It is expected to use Ford's C2 platform which underpins the new Fiesta and Focus. A range of gas and diesel engines will be available, along with 48V mild-hybrid system. The new wagon is expected to arrive in early 2021 in Europe. Autocar notes that this model is expected to be sold in other markets such as North America.
      While this model is quite different from three it will replace (a midsize sedan/hatchback/wagon and two vans), it is expected to outsell all of them. Last year, Ford only moved 50,000 Mondeos, 24,000 S-Maxs, and 12,000 Galaxy. Numbers according to Autocar that are too small to make any profit.
      As for the U.S., the reason is likely due to Ford to possibly keep sedan buyers in the showroom. Last July, we reported that Ford was considering doing an "Outback competitor" with the Fusion name. 
      Source: Autocar
    • By Drew Dowdell
      FCA Reports June 2019 U.S. Sales
       
      FCA US reports best June retail sales in 18 years; best total sales in 14 years Ram pickup trucks notch record as sales jump 56 percent to 68,098 vehicles sold Jeep® Gladiator captures an estimated 7 percent of the mid-sized truck market in its first full month in dealerships Dodge Charger posts highest June sales in 12 years FCA ends monthly sales reporting; first quarterly report to occur Oct. 1 July 2, 2019 , Auburn Hills, Mich. - FCA US LLC reported its best June in 14 years as total sales climbed 2 percent to 206,083 vehicles, driven by Ram pickup trucks which had its highest month of sales since the brand was detached from Dodge and launched as a standalone division in 2009.  

      Sales of Ram pickups for June rose 56 percent to 68,098 vehicles. For the quarter, Ram pickup truck sales finished at 179,454 vehicles.

      Jeep® Gladiator sales reached 4,231 vehicles sold, which helped the nameplate capture an estimated 7 percent of the mid-sized truck market after only one full month on dealership lots.

      The Dodge Charger also reached its highest level since 2007 with sales of 9,034 vehicles.

      Overall, June retail sales for FCA US hit the highest level in 18 years with 156,588 vehicles sold. Fleet sales totaled 49,495 vehicles and accounted for 24 percent of total sales.  

      "For the first-half of 2019, Ram has been on a tear since we made the strategic decision to enter the year with a three-truck strategy. The new Ram 1500, Ram Classic and Heavy Duty are all generating a huge response from customers and critics alike,” Head of U.S. Sales Reid Bigland said. “This is now the third month Ram pickup sales have surpassed 60,000 since December. Our dealers had a steady stream of customers all month long.”

      June results also mark the end of monthly sales reporting by FCA US LLC. The first quarterly sales report will occur on Oct. 1, covering the months of July, August and September.

      See the attached table for the breakdown of brand and nameplate sales. FCA US LLC Sales Summary June 2019
      Model
      Month Sales
      Vol %
      Change
      CYTD Sales
      Curr Yr              Pr Yr
      Vol %
      Change
      Curr Yr
      Pr Yr
      Compass
      10,976
      15,142
      -28%
      75,513
      87,510
      -14%
      Patriot
      1
      47
      -98%
      13
      549
      -98%
      Wrangler
      20,055
      23,110
      -13%
      116,985
      133,492
      -12%
      Gladiator
      4,231
      0
      New
      7,252
      0
      New
      Cherokee
      15,826
      22,433
      -29%
      97,210
      113,719
      -15%
      Grand Cherokee
      19,660
      17,724
      11%
      123,272
      109,313
      13%
      Renegade
      6,077
      8,533
      -29%
      36,036
      50,439
      -29%
      JEEP BRAND
      76,826
      86,989
      -12%
      456,281
      495,022
      -8%
      Ram P/U
      68,098
      43,542
      56%
      299,480
      233,539
      28%
      ProMaster Van
      5,937
      6,996
      -15%
      26,712
      20,362
      31%
      ProMaster City
      1,192
      1,191
      0%
      6,976
      6,440
      8%
      RAM BRAND
      75,227
      51,729
      45%
      333,168
      260,341
      28%
      200
      0
      52
      -100%
      35
      894
      -96%
      300
      2,904
      4,318
      -33%
      15,857
      24,707
      -36%
      Town & Country
      0
      0
       
      3
      5
      -40%
      Pacifica
      10,037
      9,114
      10%
      48,527
      63,024
      -23%
      CHRYSLER BRAND
      12,941
      13,484
      -4%
      64,422
      88,630
      -27%
      Dart
      0
      27
      -100%
      10
      334
      -97%
      Avenger
      0
      1
      -100%
      1
      3
      -67%
      Charger
      9,034
      6,640
      36%
      45,046
      41,406
      9%
      Challenger
      5,067
      6,822
      -26%
      28,668
      37,367
      -23%
      Viper
      3
      0
       
      5
      14
      -64%
      Journey
      6,704
      11,286
      -41%
      45,431
      52,309
      -13%
      Caravan
      12,215
      16,267
      -25%
      71,947
      86,778
      -17%
      Durango
      5,538
      5,344
      4%
      36,991
      32,722
      13%
      DODGE BRAND
      38,561
      46,387
      -17%
      228,099
      250,933
      -9%
      500
      306
      354
      -14%
      1,692
      2,262
      -25%
      500L
      90
      157
      -43%
      399
      904
      -56%
      500X
      200
      514
      -61%
      1,484
      3,225
      -54%
      Spider
      337
      401
      -16%
      1,528
      1,894
      -19%
      FIAT BRAND
      933
      1,426
      -35%
      5,103
      8,285
      -38%
      Giulia
      768
      979
      -22%
      4,346
      6,362
      -32%
      Alfa 4C
      9
      39
      -77%
      91
      134
      -32%
      Stelvio
      818
      1,231
      -34%
      4,600
      5,769
      -20%
      ALFA ROMEO
      1,595
      2,249
      -29%
      9,037
      12,265
      -26%
      FCA US LLC
      206,083
      202,264
      2%
      1,096,110
      1,115,476
      -2%
       
         
    • By William Maley
      Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has been lagging behind other automakers in terms of electrification, tending to focus more on how many more vehicles they drop the Hellcat V8 into. But that appears to be changing.
      The Detroit Bureau had the chance to speak with FCA's new global powertrain chief, Micky Bly. He said that within the next twelve to eighteen months, FCA would try to reposition itself as one of the industry’s leaders in electrification.
      “We’re not leaders now,” said Bly, “but we will be soon.”
      Bly wouldn't go into detail as to how FCA plans to do this. But we already know that a number of FCA brands have plans for hybrid and electric vehicles - including a new Fiat 500e. Sources also revealed that there is the possibility of the Hellcat V8 being teamed with a mild-hybrid setup that could add 130 pound-feet, and only add around 100 pounds to the overall curb weight. There is also the possibility of a production version of the Chrysler Portal concept, going with a full electric powertrain.
      Source: The Detroit Bureau

      View full article
  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...