Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Morgan Stanley Says GM Should Say Goodbye To Opel

    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    September 10, 2012

    Last Thursday, Morgan Stanley released a report saying GM should sell off Opel and settle it losses.

    The report says GM has lost $10 to $20 billion over the past three years to Opel. If GM keeps the brand, the report says it will cost it up to another $12 billion over the next 10 years. Closing Opel isn't a good option at all says the report due to the enormous costs of winding down manufacturing operations in Europe. The report goes on to say that if GM was to sell Opel, that it would cost between $7 and $13 billion dollars.

    UBS auto analyst Colin Langan told the Detroit Free Press that if GM was to sell off Opel, it could have some problems trying to find a buyer.

    "Automakers that want to grow in Europe would likely look to build capacity in lower-cost eastern Europe, rather than acquire high-cost western European facilities," Langan said.

    "We are committed to Opel and believe we can restore it to long-term profitability," GM spokesman Jim Cain told the Detroit Free Press when asked about the report.

    Source: Detroit Free Press

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    According to the Free Press article, only Daimler, BMW and VW are doing well in Europe.

    It is past time for GM (and Ford) to shutter plants and get out of that economic pit that is Europe. Western Europe seems bent on preserving socialism at the expense of sound economics. Automakers are not charities: dump the plants and insource the engineering to the USA right now.

    Edited by riviera74
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I see a greatly reduced Opel. Best thing is to take a hybid approach to this. You need to keep a connection to your Euro Customers, but Opel would best be served by reducing down to minimal engineering to make sure product is inline with Euro requirements and taste. Manufacturing, reduce to minimal but otherwise close the over capacity plants and move to eastern Europe. GM should use their Opel distributors and build out a master dealership that can cover Cadillac, Chevy, Buick and Opel and call it good. No need to have stand alone dealers.

    I believe you can reduce Opel down to being profitable, but it will cause some bad press due to the massive closures to right the ship. They cannot continue with the bleeding they currently have.

    Time for front line dressing of the wounds and cut off the damaged/dead plants now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    snapback.pngZL-1, on 11 September 2012 - 03:08 AM, said:

    So Morgan Stanley is trying to play with GM stock, eh?... Tsk... Tsk... :AH-HA:

    Yep..I wouldn't trust them...just another corrupt Wall Street firm.

    True, this is a company trying to play the stock market like any other stock manipulating company. But they do truly hit the nail on the head. The World has way to much capacity in production and with China and India coming online with auto manufactures, the money loosing dead wood needs to be trimmed.

    Does Opel really need to be around in 10 years from now with Global names like Chevy, Buick and Cadillac?

    GM needs to only look to their old past to see that it is time to trim this label and focus all their resources on building up their strongest options. Roll the opel product into the Chevy lineup and simplify and grow their strongest brands.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    True, this is a company trying to play the stock market like any other stock manipulating company. But they do truly hit the nail on the head. The World has way to much capacity in production and with China and India coming online with auto manufactures, the money loosing dead wood needs to be trimmed.

    Does Opel really need to be around in 10 years from now with Global names like Chevy, Buick and Cadillac?

    GM needs to only look to their old past to see that it is time to trim this label and focus all their resources on building up their strongest options. Roll the opel product into the Chevy lineup and simplify and grow their strongest brands.

    Buick's not global (US; China; Israel, as far as I remember) and only outlived Pontiac because China likes the Buick badge. Replacing Opel with Buick would not net any sales gain (one also has to consider the Engineering Center in Rüselheim, as it is a damn good one). Also, calling Cadillac global is quite a stretch: Cadillac is virtually inexistant outside of the US and Canada, and Cadillac's sales in Europe are (to be kind to GM) pathetic for a brand with the kind of history/heritage Cadillac has.

    The industrial capacity issue is the issue, but I really don't understand why GM is so bad at managing that part of the business in Europe; the plants should be (99% sure they are) flexible enough to build a Cruze together with an Astra or an Aveo/Sonic together with a Corsa. If VW can manage this with its brand portfolio, why can't GM?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The industrial capacity issue is the issue, but I really don't understand why GM is so bad at managing that part of the business in Europe; the plants should be (99% sure they are) flexible enough to build a Cruze together with an Astra or an Aveo/Sonic together with a Corsa. If VW can manage this with its brand portfolio, why can't GM?

    Maybe GM's European plants are old and antiquated and they've invested enough to make them flexible? Don't know..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe GM's European plants are old and antiquated and they've invested enough to make them flexible? Don't know..

    Rüsselheim, at least, is AFAIK a USD 600 million dollar modern (close to new) plant. Zaragoza, spain is apparently regarded as being quite cost-competitive. The others, IDK anything about their flexibility or cost-effectiveness. But the key for GME (and not Adam Opel AG - GM has to start managing Adam Opel AG as part of GME one and for all) is the overcapacity, the costs associated with that overcapacity, and perhaps GM's cost/management accounting system that isn't producing good decision-making data/information.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search