Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Porsche Puts Tesla in the Crosshairs

      ...After 4 years of Mission E, we get the real thing...

    After four years of watching Porsche's Mission E concept go through the stages to production, the final product has finally arrived in the Porsche Taycan. In doing so, Porsche has its sights set directly on Telsa. 

    P19_0637_a4_rgb.jpgAt launch, the Taycan will be available only in the top trims of Taycan Turbo and Turbo S.  Being fully electric, neither of them actually has a turbo of course. Packing a 93.4 kWh battery pack in its floor, the Taycan has a lower center of gravity than a Porsche 911. The top-line Turbo S can generate up to 750 horsepower with overboost mode engage and that will get the 5,100 lb car from 0 to 60 in 2.6 seconds. The standard Turbo makes do with 670 horsepower and a 0 to 60 of 3.0 seconds. Top track speed is limited to 161 mph for both. The Taycan is AWD using a dual motor system with one motor at each axle. Unlike EVs from Tesla and Nissan, Porsche uses a two-speed transmission to gain maximum acceleration and easy highway cruising.

    The Taycan is the first production EV with an 800 volt system instead of the more common 400 volts for other electric cars. With the fastest charging available on the market, the Taycan can recharge from 5% to 80% in just 22.5 minutes under ideal conditions when connected to a 270 kW charger that will be found at all Porsche dealerships.  Home chargers will use a more common 9.6 kW charger.  Higher speed charging using Electrify America's network is available for free for the first 3 years. While EPA ratings for range have yet to be released, the Turbo is rated for 236 miles to 279 miles on the EU cycle and the Turbo S is rated for 236 miles to 256 miles on the same cycle. Assume somewhere in the mid-250s once the EPA gets their hands on one. 

    P19_0569_a4_rgb.jpgWhile the Taycan does get a traditional hydraulic braking system, Porsche says that the regenerative system can handle 90 percent of all braking. A standard adaptive air suspension is also there with Porsche Dynamic Chassis Control. 

    On the interior Porsche mounted 5 screens that surround the front occupants with tech. Up front is a 2.8 cubic foot glove box storage space, and out back is a bit more roomy 12.9 cubic foot storage. Porsche put indents into the floor for rear passengers to give more legroom. 

    The Taycan is expected to go on sales towards the end of this year.  Launch pricing is $154,660 for the Turbo and thP19_0577_a5_rgb.jpge Turbo S starts at $186,350.  Cheaper models will come later. 

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    :metal: EXCITEMENT!!! :metal:

    Tesla is going to have to really step up their game as I believe this car will be way superior than a Tesla S.

    Tesla has their Ludicrous mode. I wonder what Porsche will eventually come out with? ?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The advantage I see for the Taycan is branding and Porsche's build quality.  The disadvantage seems to be interior room.  The Model S is a spacious car.  If Porsche had to put indents in the floor for your feet just to increase legroom a bit, that tells me it's not really roomy inside. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    :metal: EXCITEMENT!!! :metal:

    Tesla is going to have to really step up their game as I believe this car will be way superior than a Tesla S.

    Tesla has their Ludicrous mode. I wonder what Porsche will eventually come out with? ?

    As it says in the article, 'overboost mode'.. 

    Interesting, but these trims start considerably higher than the Model S tops out I think...so this is playing at a higher price point..

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The advantage I see for the Taycan is branding and Porsche's build quality.  The disadvantage seems to be interior room.  The Model S is a spacious car.  If Porsche had to put indents in the floor for your feet just to increase legroom a bit, that tells me it's not really roomy inside. 

    That seems to be on par for me with the Tesla S, as I got into one and out of it, but lucky me I am flexible. I do agree with you that I wonder about that comment also on the Porsche. Tesla X is not roomy either but to me and yes I am big. Yet still excited for these auto's as this is the start of all things EV eventually.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    As it says in the article, 'overboost mode'.. 

    Interesting, but these trims start considerably higher than the Model S tops out I think...so this is playing at a higher price point..

    It's a Porsche, of course it plays at a higher price point.  However, once the base models come out, it's supposed to be in the $75k-$80k range. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    As it says in the article, 'overboost mode'.. 

    Thank you Robert, the overboost mode did not register with me when I read it the first time. Would have loved it to be Warp mode :P  

    Maybe they will offer an Infinity and Beyond mode! ?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, ccap41 said:

    Isn't this also much more expensive than a Model S along with much less range? Those are two pretty big disadvantages of the Taycan. 

    Yes, but I can see people paying a premium for the badge...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Isn't this also much more expensive than a Model S along with much less range? Those are two pretty big disadvantages of the Taycan. 

    Actually this is on par with what Tesla did when they first came out and I would be willing to bet that as Porsche gets their battery tech ramp'ed up especially in regards to solid state you will see more battery options over the next few years.

    Porsche is playing catch up, but I expect as a Premium brand they will surpass Tesla in a much shorter time frame.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, dfelt said:

    Actually this is on par with what Tesla did when they first came out and I would be willing to bet that as Porsche gets their battery tech ramp'ed up especially in regards to solid state you will see more battery options over the next few years.

    Porsche is playing catch up, but I expect as a Premium brand they will surpass Tesla in a much shorter time frame.

    I don't think they'll surpass Tesla in volume. They're not going for a volume model like the 3 and S. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Shouldn't a car 10 years newer be the most advanced tech and not behind the 10 year old car? 

    There is a size difference here.... so you can only put so much battery in a specific space. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    There is a size difference here.... so you can only put so much battery in a specific space. 

    Good point.. The Taycan is a whole 0.3in shorter and 0.1in wider. 

    Maybe they should have sacrificed the 0.3in for more range. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Good point.. The Taycan is a whole 0.3in shorter and 0.1in wider. 

    Maybe they should have sacrificed the 0.3in for more range. 

    It's also 5100lbs, while the Model S is a svelte 4950lbs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    It's also 5100lbs, while the Model S is a svelte 4950lbs.

    Even worse.. 10 years newer and it has a smaller battery, less range, and weighs more.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Even worse.. 10 years newer and it has a smaller battery, less range, and weighs more.

    Probably better built, though...high strength steel and CF instead of Tesla's glued-together cardboard , plastic and aluminum (Teslas seem poorly assembled with subpar materials).

    Edited by Robert Hall
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The battle is on now, Porsche build quality is top notch, Tesla not so much.  The multiple touch screens is cool, this interior is way better than a Tesla.  Mercedes EQ S debut next week so then there will be 3 and more will follow.  Will be interesting to see how Tesla responds to the competition.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like how the dash has a very 911 style gauge cluster.. and the use of the touch screens is better integrated than Tesla's giant screen.   Looking forward to seeing this in person along w/  the Audi etron GT.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When do price tiers go away? 
    It's been repeated stated that a -say- 30% price difference means those 2 vehicles aren't competing with each other. IE; a $30K and a $40K vehicle.

    Here we have a 100% price difference- Model S starts at $81K, the Taycan is going to start at $154K. (Frankly, I don't believe they will be a $75K version- how much de-contenting is going to happen there?)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, balthazar said:


    Here we have a 100% price difference- Model S starts at $81K, the Taycan is going to start at $154K. (Frankly, I don't believe they will be a $75K version- how much de-contenting is going to happen there?)

    The Turbo version starts at $154k...like other Porsches, there will probably be many variations..probably a base Taycan will be around $100k..

    Edited by Robert Hall
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    57 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    When do price tiers go away? 
    It's been repeated stated that a -say- 30% price difference means those 2 vehicles aren't competing with each other. IE; a $30K and a $40K vehicle.

    Here we have a 100% price difference- Model S starts at $81K, the Taycan is going to start at $154K. (Frankly, I don't believe they will be a $75K version- how much de-contenting is going to happen there?)

    Sure they can do a $75K version by just taking 1 motor away for RWD only.

    But will they is the question I ask. Probably not for the first few years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Sure they can do a $75K version by just taking 1 motor away for RWD only.

    $154K - $79K = $75K.
    That means if you subtracted BOTH motors, the rest of the car cost/is worth a negative $4,000.
    Dropping one motor is NOT equatable to half the price of the car.

    The question I have is; will the Taycan turn a profit at $154K??

    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    $154K - $79K = $75K.
    That means if you subtracted BOTH motors, the rest of the car cost/is worth a negative $4,000.
    Dropping one motor is NOT equatable to half the price of the car.

    The question I have is; will the Taycan turn a profit at $154K??

    I get it, I was being a bit sarcastic as my day been a crazy one, but I would hope since the bits of this are being shared across the Audi and VW product line that they should be able to at least break even at that price point and even then if they do drop 1 motor, 1 controller and the wiring to go with it plus other stuff, they should be able to have an entry price point about equal to Tesla I would think.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Porsche from a build quality and dealer network will be GREAT...

    But the price is nuts. The range is way too limited. And why Turbo on an electric car? It's a "better car" than a Model S, but only if you don't mind spending an extra $75k and running out of juice...for short jaunts, and not have as wide spread of a charging network.

    Didn't really hit those marks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, caddycruiser said:

    Porsche from a build quality and dealer network will be GREAT...

    But the price is nuts. The range is way too limited. And why Turbo on an electric car? It's a "better car" than a Model S, but only if you don't mind spending an extra $75k and running out of juice...for short jaunts, and not have as wide spread of a charging network.

    Didn't really hit those marks.

    But...it's Porsche. Price doesn't matter. Dealers and service are exemplary. Good move, regardless. Just not "we killed Tesla".

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, caddycruiser said:

    But...it's Porsche. Price doesn't matter. Dealers and service are exemplary. Good move, regardless. Just not "we killed Tesla".

    Exactly. It matters more that it is a Porsche. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Canada's waterbomber fleet These guys Manitoba's fleet is 40 years old While Quebec's youngest fleet is also at 40 years old while its oldest is 53 years old.     Spain, Greece and France also have the same age range as Quebec's.  The older version which is the CL-215,  is 50 years plus in service for all that use it. They are still flying.  The next gen CL 415 is 30-40 years in service for all fleet users.  Canadair/Bombardier has sold the license to Viking and they are currently working on updating the airplane. It is called the CL 515.   European users are desperately wanting to replace their fleets.  Deliveries of the new CL 515 is said to be in early 2026.  With the water bombers, its not just cycles that put pressure on the sheet metal for metal fatigue. Its the weight of the water itself taking off from a lake. But mostly, when the water gets released.  HUGE amounts of pressure stresses  the structure when the water is released and all that weight that is released instantly and is no more.  
    • I also like black cats. I flew on a 747-400 within the last year or two.  I think it was about 25 years old.  It's an incredible machine.  I'm always a happy camper (without a Subaru) when I'm aboard one. 
    • @A Horse With No Name @oldshurst442 You guys are correct, cycle of take off and landing more than age. I should have expanded myself as my brother inlaw is a manager at Boeing with many patents for his specialty which is the airplane engines on the 737, 757, 777, 787 and the king 747. He has stated that the force of the engines cause fatigue in ALL aircrafts that hit 10 years and depending on the flying they have done, passenger versus freight, while a plane can go 20 or 30 years, many should have a very close inspection at 10 years for corrosion, metal fatigue, etc. Could be one reason some airline companies retire their aircraft after 10 years rather than continue to fly them.  Many things make up the age of an aircraft and years is only 1 little part of it, Force makes up a much bigger part.  Thank you for pointing out what I failed to expand on in my original post.
    • As one who deals with AI daily, building training, coding for data lakes to help others understand their data and what it can do for them, I have come to one reason for turning off copilot, the attempt that it makes over and over in correcting my writing and word use when it does not understand technical terms, legal terms, medical terms and then changes the whole meaning of a sentence due to the changes if I do not catch it. AI bots are great for helping find info on processes and configuration of a product such as our Dell PowerScale OneFS filer or our ObjectScale Object storage devices so that admins can quickly get the instructions on how to configure features. Otherwise, the rest of AI trying to tell me how I should do something makes it annoying and worse yet is the incredible amount of memory / CPU cycles it takes that I would rather use on other things that I do with my computer. Personally, I wish AI bots would not use any resources until I click on it and want it to work, once I close it, it should totally turn off rather than idle in the background listening to you.
    • Yes and ummmmm...no.  Yes.   Metal fatigue is a very real thing in aviation.  Its more about how many times the sheet metal has expanded and contracted  under stress rather than the age of the airplane itself.  10 years is somewhat too young for an airplane to be retired as airplanes are engineered fly double and even triple that age.  Unless of course the airplane in question has taken off, flown and landed enough times that would equal its maximum lifespan in 10 years.   This latest accident, UPS had a 34 year old McDonnel-Douglas MD-11 flying around.  Now...at 34 years of age, this airplane should been of concern... yes.   Like I said, airplanes' lifespans reach 30 years.  Sometimes more than that if maintenance is done properly and rigorously.   Using google and Wikipedia, if fact, 2 months prior, the airplane in question HAD been grounded for 6 weeks because cracks were found in the fuel tanks. Corrosion was also found in the structural beams in its fuselage. Repairs were made.  However, with airplanes, age is not a criteria for maintenance. But hours of flight and "cycles".   A cycle is 1 take-off and 1 landing sequence.  The airplane had logged 21000 and change cycles and the maintenance threshold for what had ultimately failed in the airplane was not due until 28 000 and 29 000 cycles.  Now...at 34 years old, maybe more vigilance was needed... This is how the airplane safety industry works. It takes an accident to amend and/or instate new safety regulations.  Maybe with this accident, NTSB will implement an age criteria too alongside flight hours and cycles.  At age 30 and a more rigorous inspection is to happen and not rely solely on cycles and flight hours.    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPS_Airlines_Flight_2976 The aircraft, N259UP, was a 34-year-old McDonnell Douglas MD-11F with manufacturer serial number 48417. The aircraft was first delivered to Thai Airways International in 1991 with the registration HS-TME,[7] after which it was converted to a cargo aircraft and delivered to UPS Airlines in 2006. It had flown 21,043 cycles and for about 92,992 hours,[8] and was equipped with three General Electric CF6-80C2D1F engines.[9][10][11] The last visual inspections of the left pylon aft mount were performed in October 2021. More rigorous "Special Detailed Inspections" for the mount lugs and wing clevis were not yet due, as the aircraft's 21,043 accumulated cycles were well below the 28,000 and 29,200 cycle thresholds required for those checks. Two months before the crash, it had been grounded for six weeks to repair a cracked fuel tank, and corrosion was later found along two structural beams in the fuselage. The aircraft re-entered service a few weeks before the crash.[12]    
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search