Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Toyota's U.S. CEO Believes Car Sales Are Close to Bottoming Out

      Also said their lineup will be biased heavily towards cars

    The past couple of years has seen a lot of talk about consumers are turning away from cars towards trucks and utility vehicles. U.S. automakers have responded to this trend by announcing cuts to their car lineup - General Motors being the latest one. But other automakers are being more cautious.

    Jim Lentz, CEO of Toyota North America told a gathering at the Detroit Economic Club last week that car sales are reaching the point of bottoming out - just under 30 percent in November sales. Unlike the American brands, Lentz isn't giving up on cars as they represent more than 4 million compact, midsize, and near-luxury cars sold to buyers.

    "There’s no way I’m going to walk away from that. We are always going to have a bias toward passenger cars,” said Lentz.

    The Associated Press reports that sales of passenger cars "are on pace to be 800,000 vehicles below 2017, while truck and SUV sales should increase by the same amount."

    Source: Associated Press



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    I am going to disagree with Toyota CEO.

    I first think the recession we have starting is going to cool sales off further and that especially includes cars sales at the bottom end as lower income workers become even more frugal with their money due to credit card debt.

    Second, I think more and more people who bought in the last 1-3 years will also hold off or if in a lease renew to a like vehicle or buy outright the auto. I hear plenty of people talk about how they would like to reduce the cost of maintenance of their auto. EVs seem to be that next step, people I think are going to hold off on buying to move to an EV.

    Third, I am seeing more cities focus on inner and outer city mass transit and with the push for denser living, I suspect we will see more use in mass transit which will cool or keep even auto sales. I actually do not see them ticking up over the next 3 to 5 years over what they have been.

    Toyota very well could see a gain in car sales but that will be only due to Ford and GM leaving the car market to focus on Trucks / SUV / CUVs with traditional ICE and Electric power trains.

    • Upvote 2
    • Downvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think there is further to go simply because I think a recession is on the way.  Just look at the list of vehicles on the chopping block:

    Sonic, Cruze, Impala, Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Taurus, 300, Charger, Lacrosse, CT6, Volt

    Camry seeing a reduction in production. Accord down, Civic down..... 

    It is seismic. 

    Edited by Drew Dowdell
    missed some
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    33 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I think there is further to go simply because I think a recession is on the way.  Just look at the list of vehicles on the chopping block:

    Sonic, Cruze, Impala, Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Taurus, 300, Charger, Lacrosse, CT6, Volt

    Camry seeing a reduction in production. Accord down, Civic down..... 

    It is seismic. 

    Agree on the scale of what is happening. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

    I am going to disagree with Toyota CEO.

    I first think the recession we have starting is going to cool sales off further and that especially includes cars sales at the bottom end as lower income workers become even more frugal with their money due to credit card debt.

    Second, I think more and more people who bought in the last 1-3 years will also hold off or if in a lease renew to a like vehicle or buy outright the auto. I hear plenty of people talk about how they would like to reduce the cost of maintenance of their auto. EVs seem to be that next step, people I think are going to hold off on buying to move to an EV.

    Third, I am seeing more cities focus on inner and outer city mass transit and with the push for denser living, I suspect we will see more use in mass transit which will cool or keep even auto sales. I actually do not see them ticking up over the next 3 to 5 years over what they have been.

    Toyota very well could see a gain in car sales but that will be only due to Ford and GM leaving the car market to focus on Trucks / SUV / CUVs with traditional ICE and Electric power trains.

    totally agree.....and adding what Drew said..we have not even seen the bottom yet.

    add the upcoming recession, and things deliver ugly.....

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    15 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

    totally agree.....and adding what Drew said..we have not even seen the bottom yet.

    add the upcoming recession, and things deliver ugly.....

    People are not going to be in a buying mood, and yes, things could get ugly. 

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's the other thing; toyota is chained to cars - that's where their volume is. Their CUVs sell well but their trucks do not, and they can't figure out how to get around that, so cutting cars to shift (partially) to trucks wouldn't work for their business model.

    • Upvote 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    57 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Here's the other thing; toyota is chained to cars - that's where their volume is. Their CUVs sell well but their trucks do not, and they can't figure out how to get around that, so cutting cars to shift (partially) to trucks wouldn't work for their business model.

    The Tundra really is a pig compared to the F150, Silverado and Ram. I have no idea why they have such high residual value, or find buyers at all for that matter.

    Tacoma has a cult following, and is the complete opposite situation.

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    59 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    The Tundra really is a pig compared to the F150, Silverado and Ram. I have no idea why they have such high residual value, or find buyers at all for that matter.

    Tacoma has a cult following, and is the complete opposite situation.

    Toyota makes relatively few Tundras compared to demand for them, hence the high resale value.  Ditto for Tacoma.

    Toyota knows that the RAV4 and the Venza and Highlander are rolling in sales and profits, right?  They can slash Camry and Yaris and Corolla production and make more $$$$ right now if they wanted to.  RAV4 is the highest-selling (non-BOF) vehicle on the road right now.

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think manufacturers had some models they hoped would sell more, become niche sellers, like a Taurus.  But hello, the Taurus was fresh in 2010 so you have to change models much more quickly than 8 years or whatever.  

    Mfr's have to act faster to keep up with hot sellers and so I think they want to trim number of models and put more resources into nailing volume segments.  Or segments with more margin, or both.

    Still, as always happens, gas goes up in price, the market changes, and then customers respond.  We got the new Focus and new Cruze in 2011/2012 and all the luxury compact cars.  People embraced those and now after an ownership cycle of pricey gas and stagnant economy, we have cheap gas and good economy and so people want to buy Expeditions and pickups again.

    Bob Lutz i think said people will buy as large as they can afford and that is CUV's, trucks and SUV's because big sedans are taboo.

    Aging population, no one wants to bend down to get into and out of cars, this also why sedans are losing sales.  Not everyone wants an SUV but it is true part of the reason for SUV / CUV sales is the easy to get into factor.  20 years ago, not many choices for taller sitting vehicles.  Now its more the norm and more people are making the choice for it.

    "Sonic, Cruze, Impala, Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Taurus, 300, Charger, Lacrosse, CT6, Volt"

    those are all cars with limited interior space or they are low riders that people don't want to get into and out of.  Just by that nature the numbers would go down if still on the market.  We can be simplistic and merely say if Chevy pulls the Impala, the Blazer is really it's replacement.  Ford will lose Fusion and Taurus but now the Edge may just double in volume.

    Compact CUV's give the illusion of space due to sitting high but their cargo holds with seats up are actually not equal to many sedans.  I see where compact SUV segment tops out in sales and the Blazer, Edge Murano segment gets cheaper access to entry and more market volume.  This is a segment too where A Buick is needed, a 2 row version of the Enclave / Enspire whatever.  Note Honda recognizes this and has the Passport.  2 row larger crossovers without the third row.

     

    Edited by regfootball
    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @regfootball Totally agree with what you have stated, I know way too many 50 year olds up to baby boomers who hate having to do squats to get into and out of a car and just want to slide their ass into the seat. My parents are perfect examples of why they love their Cadillac SRX 2004 and 2008 models. They can just slide into and out of those cars and are very happy with them.

    As the US ages, tastes changes and cars are on the decline, I am hoping we will see cheaper CUVs to replace them.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    [Toyota] can slash Camry and Yaris and Corolla production and make more $$$$ right now if they wanted to.

    Did toyoto make any announcement that the yaris is going to be discontinued?
    They've only moved 26K thru Nov, and that's a 39% decrease from the year before. Seems logical it's on the chopping block; all the  brought-over scion models are dead, 86/FRS has only sold 3K units/yr and that's down 40%; another car waiting to die. Lexus could happily survive on the ES & LS cars (plus the SUVs)- toyoyo has a lot of house cleaning to do.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cheap CUVs will not happen because that is where the demand is these days.  CUVs are the reason the average selling price (for new cars) hovers around $35K right now.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    9 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Cheap CUVs will not happen because that is where the demand is these days.  CUVs are the reason the average selling price (for new cars) hovers around $35K right now.

    One Can hope for CUVs to cover the full spectrum of price points. I think the Suzuki subcompact cuv would be doing well if it was still on sale here. Just too early before people decided to move from cars to CUVs.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    24 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Cheap CUVs will not happen because that is where the demand is these days.  CUVs are the reason the average selling price (for new cars) hovers around $35K right now.

    THIS is why electric cars will not come down in price either, esp since they are unilaterally coupled with running solidly in the red.
    Hmmm... some quick calculator work and : the 14 full electric cars available in the US right now have an average STARTING price of $43K. Not even comparable, because some -Model 3- can escalate their price by $10K or more with 3 or 4 options checked off.


    So, so far; electrics are ALSO driving the price of new cars higher. The couple of trucks in the pipeline are priced well over than number, so the average is going to increase. Get ready to pay a lot more for a new car than you already are.

    • Thanks 1
    • Sad 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    13 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    Toyota makes relatively few Tundras compared to demand for them, hence the high resale value.  Ditto for Tacoma.

    Toyota knows that the RAV4 and the Venza and Highlander are rolling in sales and profits, right?  They can slash Camry and Yaris and Corolla production and make more $$$$ right now if they wanted to.  RAV4 is the highest-selling (non-BOF) vehicle on the road right now.

    How long has the Venza been out of production?  Couple years I think.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    13 hours ago, regfootball said:

    I think manufacturers had some models they hoped would sell more, become niche sellers, like a Taurus.  But hello, the Taurus was fresh in 2010 so you have to change models much more quickly than 8 years or whatever.  

    Mfr's have to act faster to keep up with hot sellers and so I think they want to trim number of models and put more resources into nailing volume segments.  Or segments with more margin, or both.

    Still, as always happens, gas goes up in price, the market changes, and then customers respond.  We got the new Focus and new Cruze in 2011/2012 and all the luxury compact cars.  People embraced those and now after an ownership cycle of pricey gas and stagnant economy, we have cheap gas and good economy and so people want to buy Expeditions and pickups again.

    Bob Lutz i think said people will buy as large as they can afford and that is CUV's, trucks and SUV's because big sedans are taboo.

    Aging population, no one wants to bend down to get into and out of cars, this also why sedans are losing sales.  Not everyone wants an SUV but it is true part of the reason for SUV / CUV sales is the easy to get into factor.  20 years ago, not many choices for taller sitting vehicles.  Now its more the norm and more people are making the choice for it.

    "Sonic, Cruze, Impala, Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Taurus, 300, Charger, Lacrosse, CT6, Volt"

    those are all cars with limited interior space or they are low riders that people don't want to get into and out of.  Just by that nature the numbers would go down if still on the market.  We can be simplistic and merely say if Chevy pulls the Impala, the Blazer is really it's replacement.  Ford will lose Fusion and Taurus but now the Edge may just double in volume.

    Compact CUV's give the illusion of space due to sitting high but their cargo holds with seats up are actually not equal to many sedans.  I see where compact SUV segment tops out in sales and the Blazer, Edge Murano segment gets cheaper access to entry and more market volume.  This is a segment too where A Buick is needed, a 2 row version of the Enclave / Enspire whatever.  Note Honda recognizes this and has the Passport.  2 row larger crossovers without the third row.

     

    Love the post.. and the part I bolded.. if U guys remember was a huge factor in why I decided to get rid of my Camaro backin '13 and get my Impala.. nowadays I won't lie.. I find myself packing on more daily miles in my YUKON than I do in my Impala.. So much so that I have considered selling my Impala, because I often make myself drive it. The Yukon, being higher up.. is simply more comfortable. My ex-wife got rid of her Malibu back in '15 to get an Encore.. same reason. In fact.. many of the people I know who have traded in cars for SUV/CUVs have all commented on the fact that they no longer have to stoop, but rather they have to stretch to get in their vehicle. The Z and V, and 66 are all "fun occasional cars." My V is the most heavily used of the three and after almost 3 years of ownership she only has 10K miles on her. My Stingray before I traded her in for the Z this past March , after 4 years of ownership, had I think 14K on the odo. 

    That being said.. CADILLAC should have.. and I hope reconsiders the death of the CT6, or replaces it with a CT8, because the 1000 sales per month are people who obviously still love cars. They could have easily bought an Escalade. BUT.. did the forecast for the XT6 suggest that they buyers may decide to go for a Full-Size Cadillac CUV over a Full-Size Sedan? Only difference being that the CT6 was RWD based.. and my argument would better suit if the car we were talking about  was the XTS. Because I have talked to people that say many times.. they went into the Chevy dealer looking at the Impala.. and drive off in a Traverse.  VERY similar pricing... fuel economy is the same damn near.. but then the Traverse is higher up and has more cargo

    $28,020†

    STARTING AT

    18/28 MPG†

    CITY/HWY

     

    $29,930†

    STARTING AT

    18  /27 MPG†

    CITY/HWY

    We are also talking about 205,718 GM31XX sales versus 70,025 E2XXL sales. The market spoke. 

    Perhaps the Blazer will take over the Impala sales, but I'm betting that it will be more in line with taking Malibu sales. I think the Equinox's success is what helped kill the Cruze.. The Bolt is to the Volt. The Malibu is to the Blazer, while the Impala is to the Traverse. Sonic is certainly to the Trax. GM might be onto something.. and this is not the same thing as in the 90s when they killed their full size Caprice/Impala, Roadmaster, Fleetwood, and Olds Custom Cruiser and replaced them essentially with Tahoe and Suburban production.. and fuel prices went back up.. and they were without many of their car sales. No.. cars and CUVs have the same damn fuel economy this time.

    BTW.. U suggest that Buick needs a 2 row version of... but they already have the ENVISION. Are U suggesting a larger SUV?

    Edited by Cmicasa the Great
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    True regarding the aging population.   Both my parents and my in-laws switched to crossovers because easier to get in, easier to access and more useful trunk and perceived advantage of AWD in the winter.

    Even my friend who is only 40 but used to a taller vehicles, complained how hard was to get into a Mustang when he rented one in Florida.  And Mustang is not harder to get into more than any other sedan, it is not like it is a Corvette or MIata. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Aging factor may be a slight contributor, but it's certainly not driving the trend. Neither the average American's age or the average car buyer age has remotely shown the degree of change that car sales have fallen off by. This is more so preference and/or product driven.

    EDIT :: average new car buyer age in 2000 was 43.7. As of 2015 it was 51.7- an 8 yr difference. Unless it's gone to 61.7 in the last 3 years, I don't see age driving car sales down to the circa 35% they are of the mix now.
    The 2015 average age of the population was 36.8, BTW,

    Edited by balthazar

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 minutes ago, ykX said:

    True regarding the aging population.   Both my parents and my in-laws switched to crossovers because easier to get in, easier to access and more useful trunk and perceived advantage of AWD in the winter.

    Even my friend who is only 40 but used to a taller vehicles, complained how hard was to get into a Mustang when he rented one in Florida.  And Mustang is not harder to get into more than any other sedan, it is not like it is a Corvette or MIata. 

    I promise U after 40, especially with height.. a Mustang as a Daily Driver is as bad as anyone's Corvette weekend toy. Worse in fact.. same for Camaro. After 35 to be honest. 

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    32 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    I promise U after 40, especially with height.. a Mustang as a Daily Driver is as bad as anyone's Corvette weekend toy. Worse in fact.. same for Camaro. After 35 to be honest. 

    I am 44, I am fine driving a sedan.   I drove Mustang on vacation, I was ok with it too.  I am 6'1" not super tall but not short either.  I think it is more personal than age related.  But I do understand that taller sitting position is more comfortable.  I enjoy driving my wife's crossover when we go on long trips.

    Edited by ykX
    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm 48, 6'0".  I've been driving SUVs as daily drivers for most of the last 24 years.  I drove Mustangs as daily drivers off and on from age 16 to 30, after that drove cars less and less.   I like the high seating position, headroom and ease of entry/exit with an SUV.  Never really liked trunks, always preferred hatchbacks, so that is part of the appeal of an SUV.

    • Like 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    44 minutes ago, ykX said:

    I am 44, I am fine driving a sedan.   I drove Mustang on vacation, I was ok with it too.  I am 6'1" not super tall but not short either.  I think it is more personal than age related.  But I do understand that taller sitting position is more comfortable.  I enjoy driving my wife's crossover when we go on long trips.

    I'm not saying that the Impala is uncomfortable by any means.. what I'm saying is that my Yukon is more comfortable. I'm 6'3, 225lbs.. 46. I also have found that the seating position of any truck damn near is a full knee bend...

    perfect-fit-image-box.jpg

     

    where as the position of most cars.. even the Taurus, Impala, Accord, CT6, CTS, E-Class, S-Class, LS460.. etc.. is a position where your legs are not fully bent. 

    aid829460-v4-728px-Adjust-Seating-to-the

    The seats are simply HIGHER from the floor. 

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    19 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Driving a crossover is more like the shape we're forced to sit in at our desks all day. 

    Which I prefer than the Lazy Boy recliner seating. I loved my grandfather's Cadillac Brougham but I always fell asleep in that car. Way to soft for me if I was driving.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the news is SPOT on with predictions for a Recession that will hit hard in 2019, then Toyota is gonna be in for a shock.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/10/style/2019-financial-crisis.html

    5 major points from the NY Times that covers some of the same points various members here have stated.

    http://fortune.com/2018/12/11/janet-yellen-warns-another-financial-crisis-could-be-brewing/

    Janet Yellen Former Chairwoman of the Federal Reserve is blowing a horn about the bank bundled up leveraged loans that are being sold off to the unsuspecting and the crash this debt could cause on the US.

    She has walked back her Optimism from earlier this year and now worries about the holes in the financial system that have been created by DC.

    To Quote her: Yellen, now an economist at the Brookings Institution, has previously spoken out against U.S. President Donald Trump’s unprecedented criticism of the Fed’s policies. “To totally undermine these institutions that are assets to the U.S. and the globe is worrisome,” she said.

    So Toyota CEO, I would be thinking TWICE about your car sales and the future growth.

    I perceive a slump coming up for the auto industry and some companies just might have to declare bankruptcy.

    I hope the Ford Family has been saving their Pennies as I think Ford is gonna need a bailout.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      Toyota announced today that the Toyota Avalon and Camry would be getting an all-wheel drive option. It's the first time the Camry has offered all-wheel drive since 1991 and the first ever for Avalon.  AWD will be available as a standalone option on Camry LE, XLE, SE, and XSE trims and on the Avalon XLE and Limited trims.
      In both models, the car is powered by a 202 horsepower 2.5-liter 4-cylinder and an 8-speed automatic. Camry XSE AWD and both Avalon AWD trims get 205hp with their dual exhaust. 
      The AWD system is borrowed from the Toyota RAV-4 and is called Dynamic Torque Control AWD. It is designed to help with traction in slippery weather but not drag down fuel economy when the weather is clear. The AWD system can direct up to 50 percent of the torque to the rear wheels.  When AWD isn't needed, the system can disengage the drive shaft from the differential to lessen the drag on fuel efficiency. 
      Neither of these cars was originally planned to have AWD, but given the flexibility of the TNGA architecture they and the RAV4 all ride on, Toyota's R&D department in Saline Michigan was able to modify the cars for this new option.  The body of the Camry and Avalon was combined with the drivetrain of the RAV-4. Floor structure modifications were required, plus the use of an electronic parking brake.  The gas tank was modified, and despite of the addition of a rear differential, the trunk floor height remains the same.  The addition of AWD adds 165lbs to the Camry while the Avalon's weight remains the about the same as the FWD V6 model. 
      Camry AWD will be arriving for model year 2020, while Avalon AWD arrives in 2021. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Toyota announced today that the Toyota Avalon and Camry would be getting an all-wheel drive option. It's the first time the Camry has offered all-wheel drive since 1991 and the first ever for Avalon.  AWD will be available as a standalone option on Camry LE, XLE, SE, and XSE trims and on the Avalon XLE and Limited trims.
      In both models, the car is powered by a 202 horsepower 2.5-liter 4-cylinder and an 8-speed automatic. Camry XSE AWD and both Avalon AWD trims get 205hp with their dual exhaust. 
      The AWD system is borrowed from the Toyota RAV-4 and is called Dynamic Torque Control AWD. It is designed to help with traction in slippery weather but not drag down fuel economy when the weather is clear. The AWD system can direct up to 50 percent of the torque to the rear wheels.  When AWD isn't needed, the system can disengage the drive shaft from the differential to lessen the drag on fuel efficiency. 
      Neither of these cars was originally planned to have AWD, but given the flexibility of the TNGA architecture they and the RAV4 all ride on, Toyota's R&D department in Saline Michigan was able to modify the cars for this new option.  The body of the Camry and Avalon was combined with the drivetrain of the RAV-4. Floor structure modifications were required, plus the use of an electronic parking brake.  The gas tank was modified, and despite of the addition of a rear differential, the trunk floor height remains the same.  The addition of AWD adds 165lbs to the Camry while the Avalon's weight remains the about the same as the FWD V6 model. 
      Camry AWD will be arriving for model year 2020, while Avalon AWD arrives in 2021. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Quarterly:
      Ford Motor Company - Not Reported
      General Motors Co. - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported
      FCA US LLC - Not Reported
      Monthly:
      Audi of America -  Up 19.4% for the month, Down 3.2% for the year
      BMW of North America -  Up 7.5% for the month, Up 1.0% for the year
      Genesis Motor America - Up 420.2% for the month, Up 81.49% for the year
      Honda Motor Co. -  Up 7.6% for the month, Up 0.6% for the year
      Hyundai Motor America -  Up 8.4% for the month, Up 3.3% for the year
      Infiniti USA - Down 23.0% for the month, Down 17.1% for the year
      Jaguar Land Rover North America - 
      Kia Motors America - Up 10.9% for the month, Up 3.3% for the year
      Mazda North American Operations - Up 4.5%  for the month, Down 10.3% for the year
      Mercedes-Benz USA - Up 1.3% for the month, Flat 0.0% for the year
      Mitsubishi Motors North America -  Down 7.9% for the month, Up 1.5% for the year
      Nissan Group - Down 5.8% for the month, Down 7.0% for the year
      Porsche Cars North America Inc. -  Up 13.1% for the month, Up 6.5% for the year
      Subaru of America, Inc. - Up 0.3% for the month, Up 4.0% for the year
      Toyota Motor North America - Down 1.2% for the month, Down 2.3% for the year
      Volkswagen of America - Down 3.2% for the month, Up 3.7% for the year
      Volvo Cars of North America, LLC - Up 20.2% for the month, Up 6.1% for the year

      Brands (Quarterly):
      Alfa Romeo - Not Reported
      Buick - Not Reported
      Cadillac -  Not Reported
      Chevrolet - Not Reported
      Chrysler - Not Reported
      Dodge - Not Reported
      Ford - Not Reported
      Fiat - Not Reported
      GMC - Not Reported
      Jeep - Not Reported
      Lincoln - Not Reported
      Ram Trucks - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported

      Brands (Monthly):
      Acura - Up 2.4% 
      Audi - Up 19.4%
      BMW - Up 9.4%
      Genesis - Up 420.2%
      Honda - Up 8.2%
      Hyundai - Up 8.4%
      Infiniti - Down 23.0%
      Jaguar - 
      Kia - Up 10.9%
      Land Rover -
      Lexus - Up 1.9%
      Mazda - Up 4.5%
      Mercedes-Benz - Up 1.2%
      Mercedes-Benz Vans - Up 1.9%
      MINI - Down 6.4%
      Mitsubishi - Down 7.9%
      Nissan - Down 3.7% 
      Porsche - Up 13.1% 
      Smart - No Longer Reported 
      Subaru - Up 0.3% 
      Toyota - Down 1.6% 
      Volkswagen - Down 3.2%
      Volvo - Up 20.2%

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Quarterly:
      Ford Motor Company - Not Reported
      General Motors Co. - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported
      FCA US LLC - Not Reported
      Monthly:
      Audi of America -  Up 19.4% for the month, Down 3.2% for the year
      BMW of North America -  Up 7.5% for the month, Up 1.0% for the year
      Genesis Motor America - Up 420.2% for the month, Up 81.49% for the year
      Honda Motor Co. -  Up 7.6% for the month, Up 0.6% for the year
      Hyundai Motor America -  Up 8.4% for the month, Up 3.3% for the year
      Infiniti USA - Down 23.0% for the month, Down 17.1% for the year
      Jaguar Land Rover North America - 
      Kia Motors America - Up 10.9% for the month, Up 3.3% for the year
      Mazda North American Operations - Up 4.5%  for the month, Down 10.3% for the year
      Mercedes-Benz USA - Up 1.3% for the month, Flat 0.0% for the year
      Mitsubishi Motors North America -  Down 7.9% for the month, Up 1.5% for the year
      Nissan Group - Down 5.8% for the month, Down 7.0% for the year
      Porsche Cars North America Inc. -  Up 13.1% for the month, Up 6.5% for the year
      Subaru of America, Inc. - Up 0.3% for the month, Up 4.0% for the year
      Toyota Motor North America - Down 1.2% for the month, Down 2.3% for the year
      Volkswagen of America - Down 3.2% for the month, Up 3.7% for the year
      Volvo Cars of North America, LLC - Up 20.2% for the month, Up 6.1% for the year

      Brands (Quarterly):
      Alfa Romeo - Not Reported
      Buick - Not Reported
      Cadillac -  Not Reported
      Chevrolet - Not Reported
      Chrysler - Not Reported
      Dodge - Not Reported
      Ford - Not Reported
      Fiat - Not Reported
      GMC - Not Reported
      Jeep - Not Reported
      Lincoln - Not Reported
      Ram Trucks - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported

      Brands (Monthly):
      Acura - Up 2.4% 
      Audi - Up 19.4%
      BMW - Up 9.4%
      Genesis - Up 420.2%
      Honda - Up 8.2%
      Hyundai - Up 8.4%
      Infiniti - Down 23.0%
      Jaguar - 
      Kia - Up 10.9%
      Land Rover -
      Lexus - Up 1.9%
      Mazda - Up 4.5%
      Mercedes-Benz - Up 1.2%
      Mercedes-Benz Vans - Up 1.9%
      MINI - Down 6.4%
      Mitsubishi - Down 7.9%
      Nissan - Down 3.7% 
      Porsche - Up 13.1% 
      Smart - No Longer Reported 
      Subaru - Up 0.3% 
      Toyota - Down 1.6% 
      Volkswagen - Down 3.2%
      Volvo - Up 20.2%
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Oct-19
      Oct-18
      2019 YTD
      2018 YTD
      Brand
       
       
       
       
      Genesis
      1,935
      372
      16,844
      9,281
      Model
       
       
       
       
      G70
      1,021
      51
      9,527
      52
      G80
      625
      217
      5,488
      7,141
      G90
      289
      104
      1,829
      2,088
      2019 2018 2019 2018 1,935 372 16,844 9,281   420.2%   81.49%  
  • Posts

    • The Jalopnik link makes a mistake in expressing an opinion that GM/Chevy had Tesla in their sites. Had Tesla products as a benchmark... The only thing I gather Chevy/GM had on benchmarking Telsa was the price point in which the Bolt was to be sold at as compared to the Model 3.  From the EV1, all the way to Volt gen 1 and 2, the Cadillac ELR, and then the  Bolt to the mild hybrid stuff on Malibus and Tahoes,  nothing suggests that GM ever wanted to do performance oriented EVs.  And GM could do a performance oriented EV if they chose to do so.  They took a different market approach.  Tesla has found that sweet spot. It does not mean that GM's approach is wrong vis-a-vis Tesla's approach. It just means that GM's approach and its choice of its product's packaging may be at fault... The Cadillac ELR was a 2 door personal luxury coupe econobox with an econobox derived Chevrolet version of its EV. And it also used the Chevrolet Volt's 1st generation tech instead of the 2nd generation tech, in an era when small, 2 door coupes dont sell. In an era when SUVs sell like mad. In an era when Tesla and Fisker were selling sexy body styled sedans and the Tesla was and still is eons ahead in  marketing, styling and dare I say in EV technology in some key tech areas... The Bolt does not fail as an EV product. It fails on its intended mission as an EV product. Not in terms of it not being a capable EV, but it failing of it not being capable of delivering the marketing message that its supposedly sold upon. Packaging. And also, GM does not put full faith in that marketing message either...and so the marketing is also downplayed... The Mustang Mach-E will only eat its lunch if EV buyers buy into a  1. Mustang EV 2. A Ford EV capable of being a good Tesla product equal I think point 1 wont be a problem. But point 2 might very well be. Some EV people have a strong bias against ICE makers and will NEVER take Ford, GM, VW, Nissan, etc, seriously and the Mach-E, as good as it seems on paper, does not have a chance and is DOA...          
    • LOL Listen.  American cars is what I love. From the 1900s to today.  But I'd like to try and learn about  cars from different countries and from their different eras too.   Car craziness and car culture is strong in America, but it aint strictly an American thing. The automobile has defined America and its culture and we revolve our modern lives around it more than any other culture, but there is a car culture elsewhere other than North America. And if it wasnt for 2 devastating world wars in Europe where the automobile was starting to get a grip on life here as well as in Europe, the automobile in Europe would have had the same influence as in America.  But like everything else in nature, the environment influences the surroundings and the same entity evolves differently and at a different pace as the next.  I love to learn about different car cultures around the globe and how the car has influenced that society and how it evolved differently from ours. And from all that,  I learned that car enthusiasts around the world are the same, but have a different take on the performance car than what we have. And from an enthusiast point of view, for which I am, I enjoy enthusiast cars.  And I want to appreciate that.  I have learned that I actually do enjoy European racing cars of the 1920s and 1930s.  Or the rivalry that Ferruccio had with Enzo that produced those slick Italian cars of the 1960s and 1970s from both companies.  I enjoy the French quirkiness and I enjoy an Alpina race to which Renault paid a tribute to just a couple of years ago, kinda like what Ford did with the Ford GT in 2005.  I actually like that Renault/Alpina. Its a cool little sports car.  The Japanese car culture thing is whack. Most of it just seems weird to me. But I definitely like the American influence on their sports cars (which also had a slight Euro touch to them too) which in turn begat a pure Japanese sports car scene.  I get the question marks.  I do not like the shyteboxes that Europe has produced. But then again, I dont like the shyteboxes that Detroit has produced over the years also. But, I do prefer Detroit shyte over Europe's though. And I feel like  what Jay Leno has over other car "influencers" is that he has a certain bias towards cars that I find interesting and I gravitate towards his influence over others.    
    • ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
    • Papa Smurf Mobile!  
    • @oldshurst442 If GM had not stopped at the FWD appliance the Bolt is but also did an AWD Performance version too, I think it would have resonated more with the public. The lack of interior choices as they went too sparse and the quirky exterior have held the Bolt back. If GM would get an all black interior and add a warm brown interior, I think it would sell better. There is so much more GM could do with the Bolt and has not waiting for version 2.0 and Ford is going to eat their lunch with the Mach e.
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. InvictaMan
      InvictaMan
      (61 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...