Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Afterthoughts: What's the Right Size Vehicle?

      A recent bit of window shopping has us wondering about vehicle size

    For the past month, I have been doing a bit of window shopping for a possible replacement for my current vehicle - a 2006 Ford Fusion with almost 270,000 miles on the odometer. Usually, whenever I go look at vehicles, I tend to have automotive ADD; tending to look at all kinds of vehicles with no set price or type. But this recent excursion caused me to notice that I had unknowingly set my sights on a certain group. All of the vehicles I was looking at were all compact cars and none were crossovers. Why is that?

    To get to the bottom of this, I began to look at my driving habits when I am not driving a new car for review. For the most part, I tend to drive in a small radius from where I live - about a 20 to 25 Miles. I don’t really carry passengers in my car and the back seat is primarily used for transporting groceries or other items. Plus, I only get about 22 to 24 mpg in mostly city driving. Looking at this information, it makes some sense as to why I happen to be looking at small cars. I don’t take advantage of all the space on offer for cargo and passengers, and it would be nice to get to some higher fuel economy numbers.

    You might be wondering why am I not considering a compact/subcompact crossover? There are two reasons for this. One is that I find crossovers to be a little too big for my needs and wants. Second is that I can get a better deal on a car than a crossover. For example, I have been looking at various Chevrolet Cruzes and have been surprised how much dealers are marking them down. I have seen price cuts ranging from about $2,000 to $5,000. That means I could get into a decently equipped Cruze for around $20,000 to $22,000. Can’t really do the same when talking about the Equinox.

    There have been a couple pieces flowing around within the past few months talking about how a number of us tend to buy the largest vehicle we can afford because we tend to think about the extremes that will happen rarely during the ownership of the vehicle. Having a big vehicle for when you decide to move or pick up some large items is a nice thing to have, but how often will that happen for most of us? Twice? Three times? We may think that we are using rational reasoning to try and justify buying something bigger, but the irrational parts of our brains ultimately color the final decision.

    All of us should buy a vehicle that fits our needs and wants. But that doesn’t always work out. Some of us enjoy driving a bigger vehicle such as a full-size sedan or pickup truck. If you get a sense of joy every time you get in, despite the faults and issues that will come up, then I don’t see any problem. For me, I would enjoy having a full-size sedan such as a Chevrolet Impala because of its comfortable ride and looks. But at the moment, it doesn’t make sense for me.

    I guess what I am trying to say is the next time you’re deciding on your next vehicle, try your best to keep the needs and wants in check. Don’t fall into those traps of thinking about the extremes. Who knows, you might be like me and find yourself surprised at what you are looking at.

    Pic Credit: William Maley for Cheers & Gears

    Edited by William Maley


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    17 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    It's engine is absolutely not competitive in it's class, and lags in many areas much, much, much further than it excels at one thing- comfortable driving. 

    That's entirely your subjective and highly debatable opinion. If you want to believe an engine that provides statistically, provably competitive acceleration and fuel economy is "absolutely not competitive in its class," that's your prerogative. Sorry about your dog.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, cp-the-nerd said:

    That's entirely your subjective and highly debatable opinion. If you want to believe an engine that provides statistically, provably competitive acceleration and fuel economy is "absolutely not competitive in its class," that's your prerogative. Sorry about your dog.

    Well, I didn't have a dog, but I am sorry about your inability to see past a badge and buy something other than a GM.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    Well, I didn't have a dog, but I am sorry about your inability to see past a badge and buy something other than a GM.

    And yet I haven't put forth a single brand-biased argument in this thread, starting with my comment recommending the Civic, Mazda 3, or Cruze hatchbacks. You can't put forth an objective reason I'm wrong, so you fall back on the "fanboy" label.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i kind of feel guilty here like i might have spurred some bag off on the Cruze but the truth is I really love the Cruze hatchback, and the Cruze in general.  I think people expect way too much out of some stereotype of what a hatchback should be.

    My commentary was just limited to that the good looking sexy roofline maybe tapers down a bit much to the extent that you think maybe it 'could' have a little bit more length and height in the cargo area.  I think i am ok with either side of the fence here, if style wins over a bit of cargo space, it's fair to like that.  If the rear shape is slightly less sexy but had something more along the lines of an Elantra GT rear end that could be ok too.  I do really love the Cruze hatch.  Last time I got my malibu worked on at the dealer they had a loaded orange cruze premier hatch on the showfloor and i just sat in it for like 20 minutes.  Since this thread is about packaging, i do really feel that compact car wise it's a great feeling interior, its sporty, has just enough space for the class (albeit smaller than the new civic) and for people like my sister who would be hatch intenders but aren't bogged down by the car needing to emulate a GTi or some other 'performance hatch', it is a great blend of attitude and every day usefulness.

    Back in 2008 I had my sights set hard on a Saturn Astra and I wanted one badly and was a hair away from pulling the trigger.  What i liked about that car was the slightly more upright rear end was still stylish.  So i tend to identify small hatches more by that and the original Focus.  I admit the original Focus these days would look fat and bulky.

    Maybe the rules of what a hatch is has more leeway now as crossovers go to the folks with more concern for ultimate cargo flexibility and so hatches now don't need to be full utility knives anymore.

    My mom wants a CTS wagon vs an SRX because it sits lower and I explained to her the SRX has much more useful cargo room.  The CTS wagon is more of a 'long hatch' to me but she may be happy with one if and when she commits to get a newer ride.  I have to tell her to sit or get off the pot though because low mile CTS wagons are almost vaporware now.  And how is a 4200 pound CTS wagon any sort of dynamic performing advantage over a 4400 pound SRX?  My ultimate point here is that I think the CTS wagon as a shape but maybe on a simpler FWD platform may be the sweetspot for some.  The new Regal wagon has a dramatically extended overhang which is very useful (and very contrasting with the sportback).  But it is definitely a wagon.

    Back to the Cruze, i think they should keep the 1.4 as the LS engine.  Make the 1.5 an option on the LT.  Put an all new 1.8t or 2.0t in a hopped up version for those who really think a sport hatch is needed.  Cruze is way quieter than Mazda3 and Civic.  Mazda3 is not that good and Civic is loud and tacky.  New impreza I don't understand any appeal.

     

    Ford blew a huge chance with the current Focus.  The terrible and broken dual clutch ruined it for many owners and the 2.0 never got upgraded to a good 4 pot turbo.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As someone who has owned 5 hatchbacks (2 cars, 3 SUVs) I'm more a fan of the more upright hatches...of today's models, I'd have to look closely at the Golf and Golf SportWagen...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    As someone who has owned 5 hatchbacks (2 cars, 3 SUVs) I'm more a fan of the more upright hatches...of today's models, I'd have to look closely at the Golf and Golf SportWagen...

    Agreed.

    2 hours ago, cp-the-nerd said:

    And yet I haven't put forth a single brand-biased argument in this thread, starting with my comment recommending the Civic, Mazda 3, or Cruze hatchbacks. You can't put forth an objective reason I'm wrong, so you fall back on the "fanboy" label.

    I understand all three choices, I do disagree with Reg Football and think new Imprezza belongs here with the strong resale, upgraded interior, unique AWD system, and decent packaging.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    Well, I didn't have a dog, but I am sorry about your inability to see past a badge and buy something other than a GM.

    You have kids, they might want one some day.

    Also agree with Reg, Focus outside of Titanium or ST trim is back of the pack. Will probably never own one but I do love the ST.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Gotta give ford credit though. The current focus shape first arrived in 2011. They sort of led the pack in de nerding compacts. It's just time they invested into some refinement. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/11/2017 at 6:49 PM, smk4565 said:

    Stand up hood ornament it still Boss on a sedan.  The S-class and Rolls-Royce Phantom have stand up hood ornaments.  Only the big dogs have it now.

    Yes the Dying Dinosaurs that really need a modern update and most people will not ever own. While I get the nostalgia for the past, leave it there and move forward.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Yes the Dying Dinosaurs that really need a modern update and most people will not ever own. While I get the nostalgia for the past, leave it there and move forward.

    Excellent words...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, regfootball said:

    Gotta give ford credit though. The current focus shape first arrived in 2011. They sort of led the pack in de nerding compacts. It's just time they invested into some refinement. 

    I thought the Mazda3 in 2004 was pretty good in that regard.  Especially compared to the Focus of that era.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Used to work with a guy that drove a 2010 Mazdaspeed 3...rode in a few times, seemed like a nice little car.

    It is, but the Focus ST and upgraded GTI made it obsolete in a hurry.  Even the fanboys couldn't sell them off fast enough.

    50 minutes ago, frogger said:

    I thought the Mazda3 in 2004 was pretty good in that regard.  Especially compared to the Focus of that era.

     

    My daughters Ohio-rusty 2005 keeps plugging along with 173 thou on the Odometer....neat little car, just drove it yesterday.

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/13/2017 at 10:52 AM, frogger said:

    I thought the Mazda3 in 2004 was pretty good in that regard.  Especially compared to the Focus of that era.

     

    true dat. but then even Mazda went away from that.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/14/2017 at 6:08 PM, regfootball said:

    true dat. but then even Mazda went away from that.

    Second gen was a bit of a letdown.. But third is a really nice car..
    2014-Mazda3-Sport-interior.jpg

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    An excoworker bought a new previous gen Mazda3 with the new skyactivs when they came out, and all while knowing and seeing the new 3 design.  He said he didn't like the new Mazda3 design.  I think the previous M3 design was a big market hit and i think the new one is underwhelming in comparison, even if the interior trimmings are nicer.   Part of it i think for him was he liked the size and packaging and silhouette of the previous hatch design.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, regfootball said:

    An excoworker bought a new previous gen Mazda3 with the new skyactivs when they came out, and all while knowing and seeing the new 3 design.  He said he didn't like the new Mazda3 design.  I think the previous M3 design was a big market hit and i think the new one is underwhelming in comparison, even if the interior trimmings are nicer.   Part of it i think for him was he liked the size and packaging and silhouette of the previous hatch design.

    For a premium small Hatchback I would buy a Wolfsburg Golf.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, regfootball said:

    he autocrosses his.  i think that was why he liked the last gen mazda3, they sort of had cred for that.

    They do have a nice Chassis set up...daughter wants to autocross hers before it goes to the great parking lot in the sky...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    35 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    This is the right size car for me.

    cadillac-ct6-to-offer-42-liter-v-8-but-not-as-a-v-series-photo-665545-s-450x274.jpg

    I thought you just turned 39, not 69? :)

    Edited by ykX
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, ykX said:

    I thought you just turned 39, not 69? :)

    I've been in my 60s since I was 5 years old... at least in regards to my taste in cars.

    These were my first loves as a kid

    cadillac_seville_elegante_1983.jpg

     

    lincoln_continental_mark_v_5_1.jpg

     

    s-l1000.jpg

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I dont think age has anything to do with it.

    You like what you like. You are comfortable in driving in whatever car you want.

    Anecdote:

    PROLOGUE:

    I too...ALWAYS loved a big car. I knew this too, at the age of 5 years old.

    OK...there is a difference in eras between Drew and I. I was 5 years old in 1978. Fullsizers were downsized by then, but were still big and the older fullsized cars were still on the road. It was easier for someone to prefer the fullsized cars versus the absolute dinky-ness of Honda  CVCCs and Chevy Chevettes back then.

    But...I NEVER preferred Corvettes over Trans Ams (bigger and taller car than the Vette and the Trans Am always  MY #1 choice for sports cars) and I knew that midsized muscle like a GTO was my bag, baby.

    austin_powers_its_my_bag.jpg

     

    CHAPTER ONE: (where the anecdote really starts)

    In highschool (starting in the fall of 1986 if I remember correctly), us boys, would talk about cars...

    All the boys, as usual, would mention Ferraris (Magnum PI's Ferrari and the F40 and the 512TT) and Lamborghinis (Countach) and Porsche (911 and 959) and Vettes.

    I would have NONE of those...my friends would ask me what is MY favorite when I would say no way to those! 

    I would say...these:

    trump-limousine-1.jpg?itok=7evScx43

     

     lincoln_town-car_1986_images_1_b.jpg

     

    "LIMOUSINES???!!!"  They'd question.

    "Yes! LIMOUSINES!!!" Id answer.

    "You could only fit one blonde in a Ferrari. I could fit an endless amount of them in my limo!"

    la25.jpg

    home_pic_1.jpg

     

    There is NOTHING old fogey about preferring bigger cars, now is there? ( a limo is a big damned car that doesnt really driveall that fast or corners all too well...something like whippersnappers prefer, right?)

    Later on as the years went by...in about 1994...I was 21...I saw this scene in a movie...and I thought to myself...SCREW LIMOS...A BUS IS THE WAY TO GO!!!

    a-few-facts-about-a-little-movie-known-a

    maxresdefault.jpg

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have never been into sports cars.  My parents always bought obscure shitboxes growing up, Fiat Wagon, VW Type III Squareback, Subaru GL Wagon, Dodge Colt Vista Wagon. I was enamored by the big GM land yachts of the time because they had power windows, power antenna, air conditioning, and doors that sounded like a bank vault.  The Cadillac Seville and Eldorado looks like something old-school movie stars from the '30s might drive today (today being 1983).  The fascination stuck, and here I am today,  

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings