Croc

Well, duhh...I don't watch the show, but I have yet to see a (semi)popular show actually go through with an abortion. You know why? The rightwing nutjobs would have a fit!Reunion didn't go through with it, Grey's Anatomy had a convenient miscarriage, etc... C'mon! Roe v. Wade was in the 70s, it's time to act out an abortion on TV!

Happy Bday!!

Beautiful!

Not so much disregard...just keep in mind how quickly-changing the industry is and how this news could prove to be right, wrong, or still up in the air in a few months...

HAHA This reminds me of high school... OK, I took French due to an horrible Puerto Rican ummm "experience" in middle school...so I really know very little Spanish. We had this Spanish teacher at my HS who would throw Spanish and English together in conversation outside of class. She'd throw on the Spanish accent and sound like this white ghetto Latina...it was funny. Once I was leaving for lunch and she didn't see my ID and she screamed: "NO CHICITO, I DO NOT THINK SO!! BRING THAT ID OVER HERE RAPIDAMENTE...CMON!! RAPIDO RAPIDO RAPIDO!!!!!" It was too funny...

That isn't what I am asking for and you know it. Quit tainting the boards with your useless prattleTo everyone: I'm getting tired of my posts intentionally being misconstrued. Keep it up, and I will stop holding back. Warning.

Not a chance. Back to Indiana for me! Don't get me wrong, I do love California, but I would rather get rich in a place where my dollar goes farther. Also, I just don't have the mentality of most people here. I mean, I think things would be a lot different had I grown up here, but the Hollywood sparkle has worn off, and I'm getting frustrated with how closed in people are. You cannot get to know people! "Friends" seem to be determined by with whom you party most frequently, not how well you know people. I dunno...it may change, but right now it's getting pretty frustrating.

Dude...listen to the others. So many red flags on this car. It sounds like you have your heart set on it, but BE CAREFUL!

She's gorgeous.

I think this post is a case of what is known as "projection."

I'm aware it was the clay model. That said, the design/proportions are the same. As you noted, Chrysler is using the uber-high beltline. Why should Chevrolet? I don't think it fits the Camaro.

Yes. Saw it in a stunning red at LAIAS.

1)The beltline is pretty high. Low roofs are fine, but the overall effect is claustrophobic. Somehow I don't think claustrophobia fits this car's mission.2)The Corvette is a much lower car overall than the Camaro concept. Also, the Corvette has no back seat. The Corvette is a high-powered sports car that competes with Porsches. The Camaro competes with the Mustang most directly, and while not usually a deal-breaker, poor trunk access could hurt Camaro sales. With the Corvette, it is an issue of much lesser importance, though I do think that GM should address it too, especially since it wouldn't ruin the design any. 3)The interior is extremely conceptual, but even the basic design is not something that should make it into production. The interior on the Alero Alpha and Antares concepts were pretty conceptual, too, though the overall design was easily implementable and turned out to be great. This interior direction shouldn't see the light of day.

No. Of course minerals aren't from rusted out equipment . That said, wells "downstream" (groundwater flows) of a farm do tend to have higher sulphur contents. That is a fact, and maybe if you had ever studied geology you would know this.The reason you were pretty hit or miss on the water drilling is because you have to drill down into a confined aquifer that is under pressure.

Chi-town is my #2 favorite city, though I think I told you that already. I agree, a lot of LA girls lack class. That's my biggest (and pretty much only) complaint with LA...a lot of the girls just suck, and not literally. That said, I could grow old alllllll alone out here with the great weather and everything else that's amazing with LA.

With the way you post you can't avoid it. And my sig? That's nice, you can always turn off signatures if they bother you. I really don't see how it's immature........so I will just assume you are saying that since NO ONE is taking your side on this.Here I have an idea: CUT OUT THE INFATUATION BULL$h!!! Mods and members have asked you nicely in the past, and yet you still refuse to comply even though you pay lip service to the requests. It's annoying.

Cool members? Most of the mods, a few members, and everyone in SoCal.

Are you for real? Fly has much better things to do than go around f@#king with people's sigs.

It's so immature, that's what it is. PM him, email him, phone him if you've traded numbers, but keep this trash off the boards!!!!!

Dude...I'm sure you're really cool...but your little infatuation with BV is getting pretty annyoing. Several members have asked you to tone it down, and I'm asking again. It's out of hand, please for the love of everything sacred and good stop!

This is also true. The overall lines seem pretty generic in the high beltline/small greenhouse look of the Chrysler LX cars. I do like what GM did to the rear, and the front for the most part is good (I don't think I care for the beaked grille), but the sides do seem a bit bland.Again, who wants a convertible you cant hang your arm out of comfortably? I'll say this: I think this was retro done very tastefully, but I am sick of retro. It is boring, it lacks imagination. The fact that several of you enthusiasts pointed out "this line is from this year" and "that line is from that year" just says it to me...It is derivative, not necessarily of any other vehicle, but of its own self. With the exception of the first-gen, you can tell a car is a Corvette even though they don't all look completely evolutionary. Same should be with the Camaro in my opinion, especially since design cannot move forward if it keeps looking backward. Again, this is one of the more tastefully-done retro cars, but I still wish it could have been more thoroughly modern.

Yea...and the Camaro design? Not so low-slung. Think about those wheels. Those are really huge wheels. 21" or 22". That's massive. Yet, they don't look huge due to the overall massiveness of the design. I said NOTHING about losing the lines. I think the concept is good overall, but not great. Keep the general lines, but lower the beltline. Don't put words in my mouth. No one wants a homogenized design. Nowhere was that stated. You made that up in your head. The Camaro should be a car, not a rolling bunker. With that high of a beltline and those narrow slits for windows, it is just a bit much. Oh, and as for the Camaro's heritage? Don't even try to tell me the convertible aspect is not important to its success because I will have to laugh.

"like" is San Fernando Valley...and somehow the government-funded extermination program of equipping cell-phone wielding bimbos with driver's licenses has failed to get them all. Some girl was chatting very obnoxiously, and I was, all, like, you know...OH MY GOD!!!!!!! Ocn, you forget I'm from Indiana...and because my parents speak proper English and I went to good schools, I am routinely told out here I have no accent (unless I get really mad, and only on a few words...like "hell" becomes "hail" and "anybody" can sound like "eenybody"). I come out to California...aaaaaaaand...no accent. Except for a few people here and there that do the "O" thing. Or the Spicoli surfer/stoner "accent."