Jump to content

Build Theme!

Photo

LFX 3.6 Liter DI-VVT V6 -- Official Details


37 replies to this topic

Poll: LFX 3.6 Liter DI-VVT V6 -- Official Details (13 member(s) have cast votes)

LFX

  1. Cheers! (12 votes [92.31%])

    Percentage of vote: 92.31%

  2. Boo! (1 votes [7.69%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.69%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1

dwightlooi

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 13 May 2011 - 03:01 PM

For release: April 13, 2011, 9 a.m. EDT

2012 Chevrolet Camaro Engine: More Power, Efficiency

New 3.6L V-6 LFX produces 323 horsepower and 30 mpg on the highway

DETROIT – A new, more powerful and more efficient version of the 3.6L direct-injected V-6 will be standard in the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro. It delivers an SAE-certified 323 horsepower (241 kW) at 6,800 rpm – 11 horsepower (8 kW) more than 2011 models. It is also 20.5 pounds (9.3 kg) lighter than the current engine, which enhances efficiency and driving dynamics.

The changes to the 3.6L V-6 – known by its new “LFX” engine code – represent greater refinements to an already well-balanced package, including the use of new, lighter-weight components and enhancements designed to improve performance, efficiency and durability. And while more powerful than the current 3.6L, the 2012 Camaro 2LS model will deliver an estimated 30 mpg on the highway with the LFX engine.

“This is a great engine architecture and our engineers have never stopped working to make it even better,” said Ameer Haider, assistant chief engineer for V-6 engines. “The enhancements for 2012 will deliver reduced engine weight and lower emissions – along with the greater power that Camaro drivers will certainly appreciate.”

The 3.6L is a 60-degree design, with the cylinder block and cylinder heads cast in aluminum for low weight. A forged steel crankshaft provides optimal strength in the bottom end, while the cylinder heads include four valves per cylinder, with a dual overhead camshaft design incorporating infinitely variable cam phasing. Compared to the 3.6L V-6 in 2011 models, the new LFX engine features:

• New cylinder head design with integrated exhaust manifold
• Improved intake port design and larger intake valves within the cylinder heads
• Longer-duration intake camshafts
• Composite intake manifold
• New fuel pump and isolated fuel rail
• New, optimized-flow fuel injectors
• Structural front cover and cylinder block enhancements
• Stronger and lighter-weight connecting rods
• Camshaft cap and throttle body design enhancements


The LFX engine is significantly lighter than the current 3.6L V-6. The integrated cylinder head/exhaust manifold design saves approximately 13 pounds (6 kg) per engine over the cylinder heads and manifolds of the current engine, while the new composite intake manifold saves approximately 5.5 pounds (2.5 kg) over the current aluminum intake. Additionally, a lighter-weight structural front cover and lighter-weight, high-strength connecting rods bring the total weight savings to 20.5 pounds (9.3 kg), which helps the vehicle’s fuel efficiency and enhances its feeling of driving balance.

“It isn’t often we get the opportunity to take more than 20 pounds off an engine. We met some aggressive targets while retaining great strength and reliability,” said Haider. “The engine is as durable as ever but now with improved performance and efficiency.”

Additionally, the optimized-flow fuel injectors and integrated exhaust manifolds/cylinder heads promote lower emissions. And along with its weight savings, the composite intake manifold has a smaller radiated surface area to help it maintain noise and vibration characteristics comparable to the previous aluminum manifold.

Greater airflow brings more power – and efficiency
The new cylinder heads also bring a revised intake port design that enhances airflow to the combustion chambers. Larger-diameter intake valves (38.3 mm vs. 36.96 mm) are used in the heads and work in conjunction with new, longer-duration intake camshafts to provide the engine’s boost in horsepower.

The valves let air in and exhaust escape from the combustion chambers. The duration of the camshaft determines how long the valves are open. By using larger valves and holding them open longer, more of the air is pulled into the combustion chamber, for a more powerful combustion. Often, the tradeoff for greater power is greater fuel consumption, but the LFX engineers adapted new fuel injectors that are optimized for the engine’s performance parameters. The result is more power without sacrificing fuel economy. The more-efficient combustion also means reduced emissions.

Of course, the LFX engine retains direct fuel injection. It optimizes fuel delivery to the combustion chamber by introducing fuel closer to the combustion chamber. The result is better efficiency in the combustion process leading to increased fuel efficiency at part and full throttle.

The LFX uses a new fuel pump for the direct injection system, along with a new, isolated fuel rail. The new fuel pump is quieter, while the isolated fuel rail further reduces fuel system noise.

Greater refinement and durability
Additional changes incorporated in the LFX deliver greater refinement, quietness and durability, starting with revisions to the front cover. It was redesigned with additional support ribs on the backside and an additional fastener to reduce noise and vibration. The cylinder block is modified slightly to accommodate the front cover’s additional fastener.

Inside the engine, the powdered metal connecting rods use a higher ratio of copper, which makes them stronger and enables further mass savings. Also, the camshafts feature new saddle-type caps for improved durability. Finally, the throttle body is updated with a new, digital throttle position feature that eliminates a previous mechanical contact for more trouble-free operation.

About Chevrolet
Founded in Detroit in 1911, Chevrolet celebrates its centennial as a global automotive brand with annual sales of about 4.25 million vehicles in more than 140 countries. Chevrolet provides consumers with fuel-efficient, safe and reliable vehicles that deliver high quality, expressive design, spirited performance and value. The Chevrolet portfolio includes iconic performance cars such as Corvette and Camaro; dependable, long-lasting pickups and SUVs such as Silverado and Suburban; and award-winning passenger cars and crossovers such as Spark, Cruze, Malibu, Equinox and Traverse. Chevrolet also offers “gas-friendly to gas-free” solutions including Cruze Eco and Volt. Cruze Eco offers 42 mpg highway while Volt offers 35 miles of electric, gasoline-free driving and an additional 344 miles of extended range. Most new Chevrolet models offer OnStar safety, security and convenience technologies including OnStar Hands-Free Calling, Automatic Crash Response and Stolen Vehicle Slowdown. More information regarding Chevrolet models can be found at www.chevrolet.com

# # #

SPECIFICATIONS

LFX 3.6L V-6 DI VVT
Type: 3.6L V-6
Displacement (cu in / cc): 217 / 3564
Bore & stroke (in / mm): 3.70 x 3.37 / 94 x 85.6
Block material: Cast aluminum w/ cast-in-place iron bore liners
Cylinder head material: aluminum
Valvetrain: DOHC, four valves per cylinder, continuously variable valve timing
Ignition system: Electronic individual coil-on-plug; individual cylinder knock control and extended-life platinum-tipped spark plugs
Fuel delivery: Direct fuel injection
Compression ratio: 11.5:1
Horsepower (hp / kW @ rpm): 323 / 241 @ 6800 (SAE certified)
Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm): 278 / 377@ 4800 (SAE certified)
Recommended fuel: Regular unleaded; 87 Octane
Maximum engine speed (rpm): 7200
Emissions controls: Evaporative emissions system, catalytic converter, equal-length exhaust, dual close coupled and dual under floor catalytic converters, positive crankcase ventilation, intake and exhaust cam phasers, electronic throttle control

Edited by dwightlooi, 13 May 2011 - 03:05 PM.

  • 1

#2

dwightlooi

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 13 May 2011 - 03:19 PM

Compared to the 3.0 LF1, the LFX offers:-

  • Equal Specific Output (90.6 bhp/liter vs 90.1 bhp/liter)
  • Superior Specific Torque (78 lb-ft/liter vs 74.4 lb-ft/liter)
  • Lower Peak Torque RPM (4800 vs 5700 rpm)
  • Higher Maximum Permissible Engine Speed (7200rpm vs 7000rpm)*
  • No additional demands on Fuel Grade (87 Octane)

* Manual Cars only; 6L50 and 6T70 transmissions mandates a 7000 rpm maximum shift speed.

Edited by dwightlooi, 13 May 2011 - 03:21 PM.

  • 1

#3

ZL-1

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,745 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 04:53 AM

So could a 3.0L version of this be in the works? As both an entry-level V6 and the basis for turbocharged variants of this same engine family?
  • 0

#4

ehaase

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,298 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 06:36 AM

If it were up to me, the 3.6L should be used across the board, and the 3.0L should only be offered as a twin turbo in the LaCrosse, XTS, SRX, and maybe the Lambdas, ATS, and CTS.
  • 1

#5

eldiablobanshee

    Red-Line

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 204 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 03:28 PM

Wow, I am impressed with all of this on 87 .
  • 0

#6

dwightlooi

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 15 May 2011 - 03:16 PM

So could a 3.0L version of this be in the works? As both an entry-level V6 and the basis for turbocharged variants of this same engine family?


Let's put it this way... the current "LF1" 3.0 and the "LFX" 3.6 are both 2nd generation GM DI V6es. You can think of the "new" 3.6 as a version of the current 3.0. The original 3.6 DI V6 "LLT" is an older design which is more a DI rendition of the "LY7" 3.6 HF V6. The LF1 and LFX shares details like the integrated exhaust collector (the heads both have only one exhaust outlet per bank). Both are around 90hp/liter.

There is a bi-turbo 3.0 on the way... the RPO is LF3.

Edited by dwightlooi, 15 May 2011 - 03:21 PM.

  • 0

#7

ZL-1

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,745 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 03:20 AM

Let's put it this way... the current "LF1" 3.0 and the "LFX" 3.6 are both 2nd generation GM DI V6es. You can think of the "new" 3.6 as a version of the current 3.0. The original 3.6 DI V6 "LLT" is an older design which is more a DI rendition of the "LY7" 3.6 HF V6. The LF1 and LFX shares details like the integrated exhaust collector (the heads both have only one exhaust outlet per bank). Both are around 90hp/liter.

There is a bi-turbo 3.0 on the way... the RPO is LF3.

Ah, OK; I thought the 3.0L was a version of the pre-LFX 3.6L.
  • 0

#8

Potluck

    Red-Line

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 224 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 08:15 AM

With the lighter weight connecting rods, will it be more willing to spin now?
  • 0

#9

dwightlooi

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:51 AM

With the lighter weight connecting rods, will it be more willing to spin now?


Hopefully :smilewide:
  • 0

#10

dwightlooi

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:58 AM

Ah, OK; I thought the 3.0L was a version of the pre-LFX 3.6L.


LFX 3.6 DI-VVT V6 (Note: Integrated Exhaust Collector and single exhaust port per bank)
Posted Image

LF1 3.0 DI-VVT V6 (Note: Integrated Exhaust Collector and single exhaust port per bank)
Posted Image

LY7 VVT V6 (Note: Separate Exhaust Ports; three exhaust outlets per bank)
Posted Image
  • 0

#11

Drew Dowdell

    Unimatrix 01

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,302 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 11:00 AM

What benefit does the integrated exhaust collector provide?
  • 0

#12

riviera74

    GXP Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 650 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 11:24 AM

If it were up to me, the 3.6L should be used across the board, and the 3.0L should only be offered as a twin turbo in the LaCrosse, XTS, SRX, and maybe the Lambdas, ATS, and CTS.


If it was up to me, that new LFX 3.6L v6 would be standard everywhere there is no 4cyl engine (i.e. all Buicks and Cadillacs, and the Impala and optional on the Malibu). The LFX could possibly be the answer to that Ford EcoBoost engine made for Chevy/GMC trucks.
  • 1

#13

Potluck

    Red-Line

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 224 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 03:33 PM

it's interesting after the impala update today, that it will get 300+ horsepower even in front drive versions
  • 0

#14

loki

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,202 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 04:16 PM

What benefit does the integrated exhaust collector provide?

the collector is aluminum instead of cast iron?
O2 sensor is in exhaust, and closer to heads, decreasing warmup time: lowering emissions?
  • 0

#15

dwightlooi

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 04:26 PM


What benefit does the integrated exhaust collector provide?

the collector is aluminum instead of cast iron?
O2 sensor is in exhaust, and closer to heads, decreasing warmup time: lowering emissions?


The collector is part of the cylinder heads and is made of Aluminum like the rest of the head. Proximity to the cylinder heads' water jackets ensures that they never get hot enough to be problematic.

Advantages are:-
  • Eliminates the exhaust manifold -- saving weight, space and cost
  • Makes it easier to turbocharge -- there is only one outlet
  • Makes it possible to locate the Catalytic Converter closer to the exhaust valves -- faster light-off, lower emissions
  • This also happens to be the shortest 3-to-1 header -- great for high RPM expiration

  • 0

#16

loki

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,202 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 06:04 PM

The collector is part of the cylinder heads and is made of Aluminum like the rest of the head. Proximity to the cylinder heads' water jackets ensures that they never get hot enough to be problematic.
Advantages are:-

  • Eliminates the exhaust manifold -- saving weight, space and cost
  • Makes it easier to turbocharge -- there is only one outlet
  • Makes it possible to locate the Catalytic Converter closer to the exhaust valves -- faster light-off, lower emissions
  • This also happens to be the shortest 3-to-1 header -- great for high RPM expiration

nice. i was on the right track with my ideas. lol
  • 0

#17

dwightlooi

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 18 May 2011 - 07:58 PM


The collector is part of the cylinder heads and is made of Aluminum like the rest of the head. Proximity to the cylinder heads' water jackets ensures that they never get hot enough to be problematic.
Advantages are:-

  • Eliminates the exhaust manifold -- saving weight, space and cost
  • Makes it easier to turbocharge -- there is only one outlet
  • Makes it possible to locate the Catalytic Converter closer to the exhaust valves -- faster light-off, lower emissions
  • This also happens to be the shortest 3-to-1 header -- great for high RPM expiration

nice. i was on the right track with my ideas. lol


It's a good engine on paper. I'll reserve the "improved refinement" judgement until I actually drive one. I am kinda disappointed they didn't make a 91 Octane version for Cadillac though. The differences can simply be a set of higher compression pistons and slightly more aggressive camshafts. That'll take it to the 100hp/liter mark. 323 hp is nice and decent. But, 360hp out of 3.6 liters is actually something to brag about and most Caddy buyers probably won't mind the Premium Fuel requirement. A 12.5:1 or 13:1 engine will probably make 350~360hp @ 7000 rpm and about 280~290 lb-ft @ 5500~5800 rpm. It'll be peakier, but it should still have about the same torque output as the LFX below 5000 rpm.
  • 0

#18

ZL-1

    Ultra Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,745 posts

Posted 19 May 2011 - 02:36 AM

It's a good engine on paper. I'll reserve the "improved refinement" judgement until I actually drive one. I am kinda disappointed they didn't make a 91 Octane version for Cadillac though. The differences can simply be a set of higher compression pistons and slightly more aggressive camshafts. That'll take it to the 100hp/liter mark. 323 hp is nice and decent. But, 360hp out of 3.6 liters is actually something to brag about and most Caddy buyers probably won't mind the Premium Fuel requirement. A 12.5:1 or 13:1 engine will probably make 350~360hp @ 7000 rpm and about 280~290 lb-ft @ 5500~5800 rpm. It'll be peakier, but it should still have about the same torque output as the LFX below 5000 rpm.

100% agreed. It would be a fairly simple way of making the Cadillac powerplant unique, as that idea of uniqueness is a driver of the sales price premium a brand such as Cadillac should command.
  • 0

#19

dwightlooi

    OSV Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,631 posts

Posted 20 May 2011 - 12:15 PM

For anyone who wants to see for themselves how that integrated 3-to-1 exhaust collector on the LFX looks like, here's a cutaway photo...

Posted Image
  • 0

#20

riviera74

    GXP Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 650 posts

Posted 21 May 2011 - 09:57 AM

I have to disagree. I am glad GM has largely moved away from requiring 91 octane on most (if not all) of their cars, including Cadillac. What benefit would using premium exists now (as opposed to 1999) given current engineering?
  • 0



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users