• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    GM Plans On Importing CT6 Plug-In Hybrid from China


    • The Buick Envision isn't the only vehicle being exported from China

    General Motors has plans to import a second vehicle from China to the U.S. It's not another Buick, but the new Cadillac CT6 Plug-In Hybrid.

     

    Bloomberg spoke with Cadillac’s chief marketing officer, Uwe Ellinghaus who revealed that the plug-in version would only be built in China. The standard CT6 would be built in the U.S. Why build the CT6 Plug-In Hybrid in China? GM believes with government incentives that encourage people and businesses to buy plug-in hybrids, the market for CT6 Plug-In Hybrid will be much higher.

     

    “That will be the largest market for electrified vehicles. The next generation of fuel-economy rules in China will be quite stringent at the end of this decade and into the next,” said GM President Dan Ammann.

     

    Also, if GM was to build the CT6 Plug-In Hybrid here and import it to China, they would be facing heavy import taxes. Hence, it makes sense for Cadillac to build the hybrid in China and export to the U.S.

     

    The first GM vehicle that will be imported from China, the Buick Envision made its debut last week at the Detroit Auto Show.

     

    Source: Bloomberg

    0


      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    This does not bother me and I think it will work well for GM. Eventually I hope that sales get to the point where they can justify building them here.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The first *GM vehicle to be imported from China will be the Buick Envision.  The Volvo S60 Inscription is already here and is imported from China.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I dunno guys. I love the CT6.  I feel that luxury cars are one of the few cars even that we should expect to represent domestic manufacturing consistently all the time. 

     

    I'm okay with them building the CT6 for local consumption in other markets. Hell, that makes for an intelligent business case. 

     

    But if I had the coin, I'd vote powerfully and not get a plug-in CT6. And I thought there were competitive synergies with building Voltec based vehicles together in the same facility. Clearly, it isn't so. In fact, I want the plug-in to fail in North America, because I simply do not believe consumers of $90,000 plus flagship vehicles should pay for a Chinese made car from an American brand.

     

    I also don't like Audi for building their next North American facility in Mexico for its most profitable models. I just find all this off-shoring appalling. 

     

    And once you lose production, it's gone forever. Part of the blame has to be the noncompetitive organized labour. It's troubling to see them trade away much needed production of vehicles at home in exchange for some meager increases in job security and the production of vehicles that can only succeed in good times with low fuel prices combined. Basically, I think it was so short-sighted to allow production to be off-shored.

     

    Worst case scenario is to see just like the drug discovery industry is see the entire design, development and manufacturing of the cars themselves go along with them out of North America. 

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A Cadillac sold in the USA, made in China is sad.  I think this is the beginning of the slippery slope.  Envision and CT6, then in a few years it could be the Regal and LaCrosse, etc.  Once they start producing cars on the cheap in China they'll keep it going if they can get away with selling them.   I would not buy a Chinese made car.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A Cadillac sold in the USA, made in China is sad.  I think this is the beginning of the slippery slope.  Envision and CT6, then in a few years it could be the Regal and LaCrosse, etc.  Once they start producing cars on the cheap in China they'll keep it going if they can get away with selling them.   I would not buy a Chinese made car.

    But I bet just about everything else you own is made in China. Love how the line is drawn because it is the company you DON'T prefer. Given that Benz has a Chinese facility or two, let me ask you a question. Say you had to move to China (call it job related) and you want to buy a new Benz there that you really like (a long wheelbase E-Class is made there) and that it happens to be made there. Would you buy it?

    Edited by surreal1272
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A Cadillac sold in the USA, made in China is sad.  I think this is the beginning of the slippery slope.  Envision and CT6, then in a few years it could be the Regal and LaCrosse, etc.  Once they start producing cars on the cheap in China they'll keep it going if they can get away with selling them.   I would not buy a Chinese made car.

     

    You would't buy a Cadillac build by Mercedes in the S-class factory, so I don't know what the big difference is to you....

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A Cadillac sold in the USA, made in China is sad.  I think this is the beginning of the slippery slope.  Envision and CT6, then in a few years it could be the Regal and LaCrosse, etc.  Once they start producing cars on the cheap in China they'll keep it going if they can get away with selling them.   I would not buy a Chinese made car.

     

     

    LMFAO.. U won't buy an AMERICAN CAR.. and if U did.. U'd put it down because it wasn't German..

     

    Its all laughable since U go out of your way to support a company only builds 2.. of its 17 vehicles in the United States. Ironically the S-Classes we see could possibly be assembled in India.. not just Sindelfingen, Germany

     

     

    As for the CT6Hybrid.. again.. makes sense. Volume will be low in the segment, especially looking at the competitors Hybrid makes such as the 7Series, S-Class, and Lexus LS Hybrid's sales. GM is smart to utilize its factories. I talked to someone close to the situation and they tell me that this is a situation where there is not profit sharing when they leave the country (China), as it is when they are sold inside.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wouldn't move to China, just as I wouldn't buy a car made in China.  And I owned 2 American cars before the German one.  And before I bought my E-class I also drove a 2010 Genesis 4.6, 2010 CTS and 2010 or 11 MKZ.   The MKZ was obviously the worst car, felt like driving a Fusion, I did like the V8 aspect of the Genesis, but it was just too boring of a car, and the CTS just didn't have enough power form the 3.6, unless it was at 5,000 rpm.  So I didn't just default to a German car.  But I liked the E-class the best.

     

    I wonder how many cars GM decides to make in China and import.  This is the 2nd one, what if there is a 3rd, 4th, or 5th?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As explained in this article and the Envision ones, it's based on where the car will sell the most copies. They're only planning on selling 60k Envisions here, they sold 174k in China in 2015. The CT6 PHEV will likely be very low volume in the US, larger in China, but still relatively small. Makes sense to only have one production line for such a low volume vehicle.

    I expect Regal will move out of north America too eventually, but I could see that going back to Germany where they need the volume to fill the factory capacity. The Chinese bought nearly 100k Regals last year.

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So if the CTS has more sales in China than in the USA, should they move all CTS production to China as well?  I get why they are doing it with the Envision, they need a crossover yesterday and this is the fastest way to do it.  As far as the CT6 goes, they might sell 20 plug in hybrids a month, so I get not wanting factory tooling for that.  I just think if it works here, what is to top GM for building every Cruze in China and shipping it here?  Once you go down that road it is hard to turn back.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wouldn't move to China, just as I wouldn't buy a car made in China.  And I owned 2 American cars before the German one.  And before I bought my E-class I also drove a 2010 Genesis 4.6, 2010 CTS and 2010 or 11 MKZ.   The MKZ was obviously the worst car, felt like driving a Fusion, I did like the V8 aspect of the Genesis, but it was just too boring of a car, and the CTS just didn't have enough power form the 3.6, unless it was at 5,000 rpm.  So I didn't just default to a German car.  But I liked the E-class the best.

     

    I wonder how many cars GM decides to make in China and import.  This is the 2nd one, what if there is a 3rd, 4th, or 5th?

    You didn't answer my question. The key phase there was "if you HAD to move to China" and you side step that completely. That pretty much answers my question though. Thanks. :thumbsup:

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So if the CTS has more sales in China than in the USA, should they move all CTS production to China as well?  I get why they are doing it with the Envision, they need a crossover yesterday and this is the fastest way to do it.  As far as the CT6 goes, they might sell 20 plug in hybrids a month, so I get not wanting factory tooling for that.  I just think if it works here, what is to top GM for building every Cruze in China and shipping it here?  Once you go down that road it is hard to turn back.

    You seem to lack a certain fundamental understanding of world economics. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So if the CTS has more sales in China than in the USA, should they move all CTS production to China as well?

    IMO.. and to spite the American workers who go off and buy Foreign vehicles built by foreign labor.. I'd say YEAH.. Eff the American worker. They reap what they sow. U want GM and Ford to build exclusively in America.. then everyone in the American population needs to shun the Foreign makers and buy strictly GM and Ford, or at the very least.. only vehicle by Foreign companies made right here in the U.S. U can not give GM $h! for importing two vehicles, one very low volume, and not give Toyota $h! for importing the 100K+ Annual Prius from Japan. China or Japan.. same difference to me; feeding a mouth and putting food on a table that isn't AMERICAN

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So if the CTS has more sales in China than in the USA, should they move all CTS production to China as well?  I get why they are doing it with the Envision, they need a crossover yesterday and this is the fastest way to do it.  As far as the CT6 goes, they might sell 20 plug in hybrids a month, so I get not wanting factory tooling for that.  I just think if it works here, what is to top GM for building every Cruze in China and shipping it here?  Once you go down that road it is hard to turn back.

     

    How do you walk around at work without bumping into things? Your vision is so narrow. 

     

    The CTS is built on the same production line as the ATS and Camaro.  Look at the total volume for those cars and that is why they won't move it to China.   The Envision doesn't share a platform with anything currently built in the US (I'm told it will be so different from the Terrain and 'Nox, that even sharing with them is still a question mark for GM).  The Regal would make sense to move to Germany because 1) Volumes are low. 2) Opel could use the extra production volume. 3) The Oshwa plant already has trouble making enough Chevy Equinoxes so freeing up space from Regal would allow greater 'Nox production. 4) It would cut Regal production plants from 3 to 2.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If I had to live in China, no question I would buy the Cadillac made in China.

     

    I'd be the only way.

     

    But what we know is that the hamtramck plant will also build the Bolt. The batteries are coming from LG Chem from South Korea anyways.

     

    But...different markets have different needs at some levels. I object to any Cadillac flagship iteration being assembled in China to sell in America not because the product won't be up to the quality.

     

    I fear that people looking at moroney - and Cadillac is a whole should not put any reasons for people to be belligerent towards the cars it makes, especially a flagship product (even as a placeholder), because Cadillac is really going for it. 

     

    Or Cadillac can hedge their bets, and "fire" any customers that were looking to excuse themselves of excellent product because of bounded rationality and loyalty.

     

    The difference is, that we auto enthusiasts know the score. It makes utter absolute sense for Cadillac to source the car from where it'll sell most. Heck, Ford would've done that for the new Taurus, but probably didn't want the test the "Made in China" waters yet - or didn't want to be the first.

     

    Cadillac will have a hell of a time trying to get people to empathize with them if they nitpick against the place of origin of the CT6 plug-in. But because I do not see the value (the intangible ability to fully claim that the vehicle is fully American, the height of luxury built by Americans, for Americans) being delivered through this arguably wise financial decision... I have to say I would not buy the plug-in.

     

    I'd surely get the 3.0TT Platinum this, check box that, sign here please, Thank you Thursday... thank you.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just think once you build 2 cars in China, it is easy to build 3 or 4, and then they are going down that road.

     

    Johan told Car and Driver that they are working on a 4.2 liter bi-turbo V8 with upper 400s horsepower for the CT6.  They need that ASAP, and I'd actually like to see them put that in the CTS V-sport and ATS-V.  Then the 3.0 TT V6 can be the mid-level engine in the CTS and ATS, and the 2.0T would be the base engine.  Then you don't really need the 3.6 V6 anymore, and Cadillac sedans would be all turbo.  

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I thinking that the HP rating he gave us was buckus. Why building a turbo 4.2l v8 with 460+ when the LF4 already boasts almost 470hp with a smaller displacement. I think this engine will be in the 500 range.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I thinking that the HP rating he gave us was buckus. Why building a turbo 4.2l v8 with 460+ when the LF4 already boasts almost 470hp with a smaller displacement. I think this engine will be in the 500 range.

    I agree, I think he was just blowing smoke for now and expect the twin turbo V8 to be near 600HP when it comes out, no less than 550HP.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This sounds like it is a model turbo V8 and such an engine does have a place in the line-up in base trim.  That doesn't mean it can't be tuned up higher from there.

     

    Based on the Hp/L Cadillac is getting out of the 3.6, the 4.2 should be in the 540 range when maxed out. I have a suspicion that the number will be 500... exactly. 500 has been a magical number for Cadillac before. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the car will be an incredible achievement in technical aspects.

     

    But I think the car does not communicate its purpose so well. I just look at this as another luxury bruiser. But in reality it is a full sized luxury Corvette. So people may still try to gauge the conventional aspects of the car - such as interior quality and overall styling over the dynamic aspects.

     

    And really, the Buick Lacrosse, no, just even the Chevy Impala are excellent enough driving large sedans.

     

    Even ConsumerReport's resident Mercedes-lover, the guy with slickster hair, always wears a tasteful sweater and accent akined the driving dynamics of the Impala to (If I recall correctly) an current gen E-Class. That's good enough in my books, to say the least.

     

    So how much more are people really willing to pay for a better driving car... that is up in the question books. Because the traditional "driver's cars" have regressed in that respect to focus on overall luxury.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the car will be an incredible achievement in technical aspects.

     

    But I think the car does not communicate its purpose so well. I just look at this as another luxury bruiser. But in reality it is a full sized luxury Corvette. So people may still try to gauge the conventional aspects of the car - such as interior quality and overall styling over the dynamic aspects.

     

    And really, the Buick Lacrosse, no, just even the Chevy Impala are excellent enough driving large sedans.

     

    Even ConsumerReport's resident Mercedes-lover, the guy with slickster hair, always wears a tasteful sweater and accent akined the driving dynamics of the Impala to (If I recall correctly) an current gen E-Class. That's good enough in my books, to say the least.

     

    So how much more are people really willing to pay for a better driving car... that is up in the question books. Because the traditional "driver's cars" have regressed in that respect to focus on overall luxury.

     

     

     

    I've been bombarded with this comparison before.. many times. My Impala is constantly thought to be a luxury car. It is constantly challenged by Es and 5s.. GSs and even ugly Equus. Each on have been seriously taken aback.. or had their asses busted.

     

    The Driving capabilities of Epsilon II are just too great to ignore. U just can't do it. Even without MRC they are hands down some of the, if not the, best handling FWD cars on the market. I don't kno what the hell GM was thinking when engineering these vehicles but the result was my Impala can out-handle many RWD tuned application no issue. Even more scary is that the Regal GS and Malibu LTZ... is even more competent. 

     

    To the CT6; I believe that when the embargo lifts next week and U start seeing test drives of the vehicle we will be in awe. If all Cadillac did was transfer the ability of the CTS over to this car it would still be best in class handling.. couple in the size being as large as any of the German 3, with even more tuned, technological capabilities, such as RW-Steering (I will adapt to RWS) and U have a game change.. BEFORE the CT7 and 8 even arrive. That's something. 

     

    I am seriously hoping reviewers, when testing and doing comparos, will put aside their prejudice and preconceived notions about the car not being an "S-Class competitor.." IT IS. Again in the same way the Panamera and XJ are.. and to an extent the LS460.. this car is an S-Class competitor BEFORE the actual S-Class competitor arrives. That's saying something. The question to ponder is; If this is 95% of what the S-Class is supposed to be.. what the EFF does Cadillac have in mind for the CT8?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the car will be an incredible achievement in technical aspects.

     

    But I think the car does not communicate its purpose so well. I just look at this as another luxury bruiser. But in reality it is a full sized luxury Corvette. So people may still try to gauge the conventional aspects of the car - such as interior quality and overall styling over the dynamic aspects.

     

    And really, the Buick Lacrosse, no, just even the Chevy Impala are excellent enough driving large sedans.

     

    Even ConsumerReport's resident Mercedes-lover, the guy with slickster hair, always wears a tasteful sweater and accent akined the driving dynamics of the Impala to (If I recall correctly) an current gen E-Class. That's good enough in my books, to say the least.

     

     

    So how much more are people really willing to pay for a better driving car... that is up in the question books. Because the traditional "driver's cars" have regressed in that respect to focus on overall luxury.

     

    A lot of luxury cars sell well, and the luxury market overall seems to be growing.  People pay $85k for a Cadillac version of the Tahoe, just like people will pay $40k for a BMW 3-series that is the same size a a $20,000 Mazda 3.  I think there are always people willing to pay more money for more performance or more luxury.  A Camaro can do 90% of what a Corvette can do, but they still sell 30,000 Corvettes a year.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not so sure the CT6 will be a game changer, or even do a whole lot to steal from the Germans or Lexus.  But I am quite interested to read the reviews and see the test drive videos, and see the comparisons.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    Loading...



  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. §carlet §wordfish
      §carlet §wordfish
      (27 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Big November Gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac Keep GM the Fastest Growing Automaker
      November U.S. retail market share highest since 2009 Year to Date U.S. Retail Share up 0.5 Percentage Points November Commercial sales were highest since 2008 DETROIT — General Motors (NYSE: GM) sold 197,609 vehicles in November to individual or “retail” customers in the U.S., up 8 percent from last year. Based on initial estimates, GM once again outperformed all full-line manufacturers, led by strong retail sales gains at Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac. GM’s November retail sales performance drove GM’s U.S. retail share to its highest November level since 2009.
      Based on initial estimates, GM’s retail market share jumped 0.3 percentage points in November to 16.8 percent.  GM has gained retail market share in 17 of the past 20 months.
      GM’s four U.S. brands posted strong retail sales results in November compared to last year.
      Chevrolet — up 5 percent for its best November since 2004 Buick — up 22 percent for its best November since 2003 GMC — up 9 percent for its best November since 2001 Cadillac — up 17 percent for its best November since 2013 GM’s total U.S. sales in November were 252,644 vehicles, up more than 10 percent from last year.   All four brands outperformed the industry in November with Buick, Cadillac and GMC posting double-digit gains.
      “GM’s November performance reflects the continued strength of our U.S. business.  We gained profitable retail share, commercial and small business deliveries were strong and we commanded the industry’s best average transaction prices,” said Kurt McNeil, GM’s vice president of U.S. Sales Operations. “We are ahead of plan selling down our 2016 model year inventory and we expect to close out December with more retail share growth. GM is heading into 2017 in a position of strength with the planned launch of key new products, like the all-new Chevrolet Equinox, into the heart of the market.” 
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average and ahead of last November. 

      Through the first 11 months of the year, GM’s U.S. retail sales were up nearly 2 percent compared to last year. GM gained 0.5 percentage points of U.S. retail market share during that timeframe, the largest retail share gain of any full-line automaker. Year to date, Chevrolet U.S. retail sales are up nearly 3 percent and the brand’s retail share has grown 0.5 percentage points to 11.1 percent. Chevrolet continues to be the U.S. industry’s fastest-growing brand.
      Year to date, Buick retail deliveries have grown more than 5 percent and Buick has gained 0.1 percentage points of retail share.
      GM continues to benefit from a strong U.S. economy and strong retail demand for its products.
      “All economic indicators show significantly improved optimism about the U.S. economy including consumer and business sentiment, which continue to drive a very healthy U.S. auto industry,” said Mustafa Mohatarem, GM’s chief economist. “We believe the U.S. auto industry is well-positioned for sales to continue at or near record levels into 2017.”
      November 2016 Retail Sales and Business Highlights vs. November 2015 (except as noted)

      Chevrolet
      Malibu and Volt were up 24 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Silverado and Colorado were up 5 percent and 39 percent, respectively. Suburban, Tahoe, Equinox and Trax were up 6 percent, 12 percent, 7 percent and 47 percent, respectively. Malibu had its best November since 1997. Silverado had its best November since 2003. Colorado had its best November since 2004. Trax, Volt and Equinox had their best November ever. Tahoe and Suburban had their best November since 2007. 17th straight month of year over year gains for Chevrolet full-size utilities. GMC
      Sierra and Canyon were up 14 percent and 43 percent, respectively. Acadia, Yukon and Yukon XL were up 4 percent, 22 percent and 19 percent, respectively. Brand ATP was at $43,887, the highest November on record. Highest November ever for Denali penetration, at 27.8 percent. Best November ever for Canyon and ninth month of year over year increases. Yukon and Yukon XL had their best November since 2007. Buick
      Regal and Encore were up 41 percent and 35 percent, respectively. 68 percent of sales were crossovers. Best year to date retail performance since 2005. Cadillac
      Escalade was up 24 percent and had its best month of the year. Escalade had its best November since 2007. XT5 had its best month since launch with sales up 12 percent over last month and up 27 percent over the SRX last November, the vehicle it replaced. Year to date ATP was $53,690, the highest ever in Cadillac history Average Transaction Prices (ATP)/Incentives (based on JD Power PIN estimates)
      GM’s ATPs, which reflect retail transaction prices after sales incentives, were $35,767 in November, more than $4,000 above the industry average. In November, GM’s incentive spending as a percent of ATP was 13.7 percent, above the industry average of 12.4 percent. However, year to date, GM’s incentive spending was 11.7 percent, slightly above the industry average of 11.4 percent and well below the incentive spending of its domestic competitors and many of its global competitors. Fleet and Commercial
      Automotive Fleet magazine named Malibu “Fleet Car of the Year”. GM Fleet sales were up 19 percent versus last November. Fleet sales were 22 percent of GM’s sales for the month. Commercial deliveries were up 11 percent for the month and it was the best November Commercial sales since 2008. Malibu Commercial deliveries were up 170 percent versus last November. Small Business deliveries were up 15 percent for the month versus last November, driven by large vans, which were up 93 percent and large pickups, which were up 16 percent versus last November. Federal government sales were up 9 percent versus last November. Rental sales were up 27 percent versus last November but are down 25 percent CYTD, according to plan. GM’s outlook on its daily rental sales mix remains in the 11 percent range of total U.S. sales for 2016 and daily rental sales for the year are expected to be down about 75,000 vehicles. Industry Sales
      GM estimates that the seasonally adjusted annual selling rate (SAAR) for light vehicles in November was approximately 17.9 million units. On a calendar year-to-date basis, GM estimates the light-vehicle SAAR was 17.5 million units.
    • By William Maley
      It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.
      The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.
      Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.
      "Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.
      Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.
      Source: IMSA

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.
      The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.
      Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.
      "Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.
      Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.
      Source: IMSA
    • By ccap41
      " It's a golden autumn morning in rural upstate New York. Backpacked kids wait by mailboxes for the school bus. I'm driving through pockets of valley mist to New York state's most famous racing circuit, to witness the shakedown testing of a race car so top-secret, it's still wrapped in camouflage.
      After a 14-year absence, Cadillac is readying its return to endurance racing. The last time the American automaker competed in top-level prototype racing was 2002, when the ill-fated Northstar LMP finished 9th at Le Mans. Audi's dominant R8 prototype notched its third consecutive victory at the Circuit de la Sarthe that year.
      Wayne Taylor and Max Angelelli were co-drivers in that final Cadillac attempt at Le Mans. They'll both be at the track today. Taylor, 60, has graduated from the driver's seat to run Wayne Taylor Racing, the principal team partner in Cadillac's new motorsports endeavor; Angelelli, 49, shares co-driving duties with Taylor's sons Ricky, 26, and Jordan, 24.
      All four will be responsible for the imminent future of Cadillac endurance racing, in a program that tasks itself with making top-level sports car racing engaging and relatable again. I'm here to learn if Cadillac, and the series itself, can cut it.
      The camouflaged Caddy you see here is officially known as the DPi-V.R. It's built to IMSA's new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) formula, to compete in the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship starting in 2017.
      Think of DPi as an effort to make top-level prototype racing a little more interesting, and relatable, for casual race fans. The cars share a chassis with the LMP2 prototypes that compete in the FIA World Endurance Championship and the 24 Hours of Le Mans, built by one of four approved constructors—Dallara, Onroak Automotive, ORECA or Riley/Multimatic. ..."
      http://www.roadandtrack.com/motorsports/news/a31697/cadillac-dpi-v-r-exclusive-photos/
       




    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt
      Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.CheersandGears.com
       
      Europe's 400 Ultra-Fast Charging Network by 2020

      Europe like America has the 3 basic charging standards in play in their fragile network of 2016. These is what we know as the 110, 220 and 440, level 1, 2 and 3 chargers. Yet Europe is not standing by waiting for Tesla or American Auto companies to drive EV auto's. Instead Europe has built the following consortium of Auto companies who have all chosen to contribute an equal amount to building the next generation charger network. VW, GM, BMW, Daimler, FORD, FCA, Hyundai, Volvo and Jaguar Land Rover have choosen to build 400 locations over the next 3 years that will sense and charge up to 350 kW in the period of a quick Coffee break. This is significantly faster and higher than the Tesla 120kW fast charging system. The goal by the European Government is to offer road trip worthy auto's with fast charging to bring less noise and cleaner air to European cities by 2020 and to make the bulk of inner city auto's EV's within 10 years of the fast charging system going live, so by 2030.

      Diamler is wanting to lead the European charge with their 300+ kilometer EV-CUV

      This would seem to show that Tesla has had the desired effect of making a market changing revolution of how companies and governments see the future of transportation.
      Source PM
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)