Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    GM Plans On Importing CT6 Plug-In Hybrid from China

    Sign in to follow this  

      The Buick Envision isn't the only vehicle being exported from China

    General Motors has plans to import a second vehicle from China to the U.S. It's not another Buick, but the new Cadillac CT6 Plug-In Hybrid.

     

    Bloomberg spoke with Cadillac’s chief marketing officer, Uwe Ellinghaus who revealed that the plug-in version would only be built in China. The standard CT6 would be built in the U.S. Why build the CT6 Plug-In Hybrid in China? GM believes with government incentives that encourage people and businesses to buy plug-in hybrids, the market for CT6 Plug-In Hybrid will be much higher.

     

    “That will be the largest market for electrified vehicles. The next generation of fuel-economy rules in China will be quite stringent at the end of this decade and into the next,” said GM President Dan Ammann.

     

    Also, if GM was to build the CT6 Plug-In Hybrid here and import it to China, they would be facing heavy import taxes. Hence, it makes sense for Cadillac to build the hybrid in China and export to the U.S.

     

    The first GM vehicle that will be imported from China, the Buick Envision made its debut last week at the Detroit Auto Show.

     

    Source: Bloomberg

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    This does not bother me and I think it will work well for GM. Eventually I hope that sales get to the point where they can justify building them here.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The first *GM vehicle to be imported from China will be the Buick Envision.  The Volvo S60 Inscription is already here and is imported from China.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I dunno guys. I love the CT6.  I feel that luxury cars are one of the few cars even that we should expect to represent domestic manufacturing consistently all the time. 

     

    I'm okay with them building the CT6 for local consumption in other markets. Hell, that makes for an intelligent business case. 

     

    But if I had the coin, I'd vote powerfully and not get a plug-in CT6. And I thought there were competitive synergies with building Voltec based vehicles together in the same facility. Clearly, it isn't so. In fact, I want the plug-in to fail in North America, because I simply do not believe consumers of $90,000 plus flagship vehicles should pay for a Chinese made car from an American brand.

     

    I also don't like Audi for building their next North American facility in Mexico for its most profitable models. I just find all this off-shoring appalling. 

     

    And once you lose production, it's gone forever. Part of the blame has to be the noncompetitive organized labour. It's troubling to see them trade away much needed production of vehicles at home in exchange for some meager increases in job security and the production of vehicles that can only succeed in good times with low fuel prices combined. Basically, I think it was so short-sighted to allow production to be off-shored.

     

    Worst case scenario is to see just like the drug discovery industry is see the entire design, development and manufacturing of the cars themselves go along with them out of North America. 

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A Cadillac sold in the USA, made in China is sad.  I think this is the beginning of the slippery slope.  Envision and CT6, then in a few years it could be the Regal and LaCrosse, etc.  Once they start producing cars on the cheap in China they'll keep it going if they can get away with selling them.   I would not buy a Chinese made car.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A Cadillac sold in the USA, made in China is sad.  I think this is the beginning of the slippery slope.  Envision and CT6, then in a few years it could be the Regal and LaCrosse, etc.  Once they start producing cars on the cheap in China they'll keep it going if they can get away with selling them.   I would not buy a Chinese made car.

    But I bet just about everything else you own is made in China. Love how the line is drawn because it is the company you DON'T prefer. Given that Benz has a Chinese facility or two, let me ask you a question. Say you had to move to China (call it job related) and you want to buy a new Benz there that you really like (a long wheelbase E-Class is made there) and that it happens to be made there. Would you buy it?

    Edited by surreal1272

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A Cadillac sold in the USA, made in China is sad.  I think this is the beginning of the slippery slope.  Envision and CT6, then in a few years it could be the Regal and LaCrosse, etc.  Once they start producing cars on the cheap in China they'll keep it going if they can get away with selling them.   I would not buy a Chinese made car.

     

    You would't buy a Cadillac build by Mercedes in the S-class factory, so I don't know what the big difference is to you....

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A Cadillac sold in the USA, made in China is sad.  I think this is the beginning of the slippery slope.  Envision and CT6, then in a few years it could be the Regal and LaCrosse, etc.  Once they start producing cars on the cheap in China they'll keep it going if they can get away with selling them.   I would not buy a Chinese made car.

     

     

    LMFAO.. U won't buy an AMERICAN CAR.. and if U did.. U'd put it down because it wasn't German..

     

    Its all laughable since U go out of your way to support a company only builds 2.. of its 17 vehicles in the United States. Ironically the S-Classes we see could possibly be assembled in India.. not just Sindelfingen, Germany

     

     

    As for the CT6Hybrid.. again.. makes sense. Volume will be low in the segment, especially looking at the competitors Hybrid makes such as the 7Series, S-Class, and Lexus LS Hybrid's sales. GM is smart to utilize its factories. I talked to someone close to the situation and they tell me that this is a situation where there is not profit sharing when they leave the country (China), as it is when they are sold inside.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wouldn't move to China, just as I wouldn't buy a car made in China.  And I owned 2 American cars before the German one.  And before I bought my E-class I also drove a 2010 Genesis 4.6, 2010 CTS and 2010 or 11 MKZ.   The MKZ was obviously the worst car, felt like driving a Fusion, I did like the V8 aspect of the Genesis, but it was just too boring of a car, and the CTS just didn't have enough power form the 3.6, unless it was at 5,000 rpm.  So I didn't just default to a German car.  But I liked the E-class the best.

     

    I wonder how many cars GM decides to make in China and import.  This is the 2nd one, what if there is a 3rd, 4th, or 5th?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As explained in this article and the Envision ones, it's based on where the car will sell the most copies. They're only planning on selling 60k Envisions here, they sold 174k in China in 2015. The CT6 PHEV will likely be very low volume in the US, larger in China, but still relatively small. Makes sense to only have one production line for such a low volume vehicle.

    I expect Regal will move out of north America too eventually, but I could see that going back to Germany where they need the volume to fill the factory capacity. The Chinese bought nearly 100k Regals last year.

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So if the CTS has more sales in China than in the USA, should they move all CTS production to China as well?  I get why they are doing it with the Envision, they need a crossover yesterday and this is the fastest way to do it.  As far as the CT6 goes, they might sell 20 plug in hybrids a month, so I get not wanting factory tooling for that.  I just think if it works here, what is to top GM for building every Cruze in China and shipping it here?  Once you go down that road it is hard to turn back.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wouldn't move to China, just as I wouldn't buy a car made in China.  And I owned 2 American cars before the German one.  And before I bought my E-class I also drove a 2010 Genesis 4.6, 2010 CTS and 2010 or 11 MKZ.   The MKZ was obviously the worst car, felt like driving a Fusion, I did like the V8 aspect of the Genesis, but it was just too boring of a car, and the CTS just didn't have enough power form the 3.6, unless it was at 5,000 rpm.  So I didn't just default to a German car.  But I liked the E-class the best.

     

    I wonder how many cars GM decides to make in China and import.  This is the 2nd one, what if there is a 3rd, 4th, or 5th?

    You didn't answer my question. The key phase there was "if you HAD to move to China" and you side step that completely. That pretty much answers my question though. Thanks. :thumbsup:

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So if the CTS has more sales in China than in the USA, should they move all CTS production to China as well?  I get why they are doing it with the Envision, they need a crossover yesterday and this is the fastest way to do it.  As far as the CT6 goes, they might sell 20 plug in hybrids a month, so I get not wanting factory tooling for that.  I just think if it works here, what is to top GM for building every Cruze in China and shipping it here?  Once you go down that road it is hard to turn back.

    You seem to lack a certain fundamental understanding of world economics. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So if the CTS has more sales in China than in the USA, should they move all CTS production to China as well?

    IMO.. and to spite the American workers who go off and buy Foreign vehicles built by foreign labor.. I'd say YEAH.. Eff the American worker. They reap what they sow. U want GM and Ford to build exclusively in America.. then everyone in the American population needs to shun the Foreign makers and buy strictly GM and Ford, or at the very least.. only vehicle by Foreign companies made right here in the U.S. U can not give GM $h! for importing two vehicles, one very low volume, and not give Toyota $h! for importing the 100K+ Annual Prius from Japan. China or Japan.. same difference to me; feeding a mouth and putting food on a table that isn't AMERICAN

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So if the CTS has more sales in China than in the USA, should they move all CTS production to China as well?  I get why they are doing it with the Envision, they need a crossover yesterday and this is the fastest way to do it.  As far as the CT6 goes, they might sell 20 plug in hybrids a month, so I get not wanting factory tooling for that.  I just think if it works here, what is to top GM for building every Cruze in China and shipping it here?  Once you go down that road it is hard to turn back.

     

    How do you walk around at work without bumping into things? Your vision is so narrow. 

     

    The CTS is built on the same production line as the ATS and Camaro.  Look at the total volume for those cars and that is why they won't move it to China.   The Envision doesn't share a platform with anything currently built in the US (I'm told it will be so different from the Terrain and 'Nox, that even sharing with them is still a question mark for GM).  The Regal would make sense to move to Germany because 1) Volumes are low. 2) Opel could use the extra production volume. 3) The Oshwa plant already has trouble making enough Chevy Equinoxes so freeing up space from Regal would allow greater 'Nox production. 4) It would cut Regal production plants from 3 to 2.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If I had to live in China, no question I would buy the Cadillac made in China.

     

    I'd be the only way.

     

    But what we know is that the hamtramck plant will also build the Bolt. The batteries are coming from LG Chem from South Korea anyways.

     

    But...different markets have different needs at some levels. I object to any Cadillac flagship iteration being assembled in China to sell in America not because the product won't be up to the quality.

     

    I fear that people looking at moroney - and Cadillac is a whole should not put any reasons for people to be belligerent towards the cars it makes, especially a flagship product (even as a placeholder), because Cadillac is really going for it. 

     

    Or Cadillac can hedge their bets, and "fire" any customers that were looking to excuse themselves of excellent product because of bounded rationality and loyalty.

     

    The difference is, that we auto enthusiasts know the score. It makes utter absolute sense for Cadillac to source the car from where it'll sell most. Heck, Ford would've done that for the new Taurus, but probably didn't want the test the "Made in China" waters yet - or didn't want to be the first.

     

    Cadillac will have a hell of a time trying to get people to empathize with them if they nitpick against the place of origin of the CT6 plug-in. But because I do not see the value (the intangible ability to fully claim that the vehicle is fully American, the height of luxury built by Americans, for Americans) being delivered through this arguably wise financial decision... I have to say I would not buy the plug-in.

     

    I'd surely get the 3.0TT Platinum this, check box that, sign here please, Thank you Thursday... thank you.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just think once you build 2 cars in China, it is easy to build 3 or 4, and then they are going down that road.

     

    Johan told Car and Driver that they are working on a 4.2 liter bi-turbo V8 with upper 400s horsepower for the CT6.  They need that ASAP, and I'd actually like to see them put that in the CTS V-sport and ATS-V.  Then the 3.0 TT V6 can be the mid-level engine in the CTS and ATS, and the 2.0T would be the base engine.  Then you don't really need the 3.6 V6 anymore, and Cadillac sedans would be all turbo.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I thinking that the HP rating he gave us was buckus. Why building a turbo 4.2l v8 with 460+ when the LF4 already boasts almost 470hp with a smaller displacement. I think this engine will be in the 500 range.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I thinking that the HP rating he gave us was buckus. Why building a turbo 4.2l v8 with 460+ when the LF4 already boasts almost 470hp with a smaller displacement. I think this engine will be in the 500 range.

    I agree, I think he was just blowing smoke for now and expect the twin turbo V8 to be near 600HP when it comes out, no less than 550HP.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This sounds like it is a model turbo V8 and such an engine does have a place in the line-up in base trim.  That doesn't mean it can't be tuned up higher from there.

     

    Based on the Hp/L Cadillac is getting out of the 3.6, the 4.2 should be in the 540 range when maxed out. I have a suspicion that the number will be 500... exactly. 500 has been a magical number for Cadillac before. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the car will be an incredible achievement in technical aspects.

     

    But I think the car does not communicate its purpose so well. I just look at this as another luxury bruiser. But in reality it is a full sized luxury Corvette. So people may still try to gauge the conventional aspects of the car - such as interior quality and overall styling over the dynamic aspects.

     

    And really, the Buick Lacrosse, no, just even the Chevy Impala are excellent enough driving large sedans.

     

    Even ConsumerReport's resident Mercedes-lover, the guy with slickster hair, always wears a tasteful sweater and accent akined the driving dynamics of the Impala to (If I recall correctly) an current gen E-Class. That's good enough in my books, to say the least.

     

    So how much more are people really willing to pay for a better driving car... that is up in the question books. Because the traditional "driver's cars" have regressed in that respect to focus on overall luxury.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the car will be an incredible achievement in technical aspects.

     

    But I think the car does not communicate its purpose so well. I just look at this as another luxury bruiser. But in reality it is a full sized luxury Corvette. So people may still try to gauge the conventional aspects of the car - such as interior quality and overall styling over the dynamic aspects.

     

    And really, the Buick Lacrosse, no, just even the Chevy Impala are excellent enough driving large sedans.

     

    Even ConsumerReport's resident Mercedes-lover, the guy with slickster hair, always wears a tasteful sweater and accent akined the driving dynamics of the Impala to (If I recall correctly) an current gen E-Class. That's good enough in my books, to say the least.

     

    So how much more are people really willing to pay for a better driving car... that is up in the question books. Because the traditional "driver's cars" have regressed in that respect to focus on overall luxury.

     

     

     

    I've been bombarded with this comparison before.. many times. My Impala is constantly thought to be a luxury car. It is constantly challenged by Es and 5s.. GSs and even ugly Equus. Each on have been seriously taken aback.. or had their asses busted.

     

    The Driving capabilities of Epsilon II are just too great to ignore. U just can't do it. Even without MRC they are hands down some of the, if not the, best handling FWD cars on the market. I don't kno what the hell GM was thinking when engineering these vehicles but the result was my Impala can out-handle many RWD tuned application no issue. Even more scary is that the Regal GS and Malibu LTZ... is even more competent. 

     

    To the CT6; I believe that when the embargo lifts next week and U start seeing test drives of the vehicle we will be in awe. If all Cadillac did was transfer the ability of the CTS over to this car it would still be best in class handling.. couple in the size being as large as any of the German 3, with even more tuned, technological capabilities, such as RW-Steering (I will adapt to RWS) and U have a game change.. BEFORE the CT7 and 8 even arrive. That's something. 

     

    I am seriously hoping reviewers, when testing and doing comparos, will put aside their prejudice and preconceived notions about the car not being an "S-Class competitor.." IT IS. Again in the same way the Panamera and XJ are.. and to an extent the LS460.. this car is an S-Class competitor BEFORE the actual S-Class competitor arrives. That's saying something. The question to ponder is; If this is 95% of what the S-Class is supposed to be.. what the EFF does Cadillac have in mind for the CT8?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the car will be an incredible achievement in technical aspects.

     

    But I think the car does not communicate its purpose so well. I just look at this as another luxury bruiser. But in reality it is a full sized luxury Corvette. So people may still try to gauge the conventional aspects of the car - such as interior quality and overall styling over the dynamic aspects.

     

    And really, the Buick Lacrosse, no, just even the Chevy Impala are excellent enough driving large sedans.

     

    Even ConsumerReport's resident Mercedes-lover, the guy with slickster hair, always wears a tasteful sweater and accent akined the driving dynamics of the Impala to (If I recall correctly) an current gen E-Class. That's good enough in my books, to say the least.

     

     

    So how much more are people really willing to pay for a better driving car... that is up in the question books. Because the traditional "driver's cars" have regressed in that respect to focus on overall luxury.

     

    A lot of luxury cars sell well, and the luxury market overall seems to be growing.  People pay $85k for a Cadillac version of the Tahoe, just like people will pay $40k for a BMW 3-series that is the same size a a $20,000 Mazda 3.  I think there are always people willing to pay more money for more performance or more luxury.  A Camaro can do 90% of what a Corvette can do, but they still sell 30,000 Corvettes a year.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not so sure the CT6 will be a game changer, or even do a whole lot to steal from the Germans or Lexus.  But I am quite interested to read the reviews and see the test drive videos, and see the comparisons.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      DETROIT — General Motors Co. (NYSE: GM) delivered 746,659 vehicles in the United States in the second quarter of 2019.
      Crossover sales set a new second quarter record after sales grew year over year by 17 percent. Sales of the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 crew cab and GMC Sierra 1500 crew cab were both up 12 percent year over year. The Chevrolet Equinox and Traverse and GMC Canyon all delivered record second quarter sales. Sales of every Buick crossover were up year over year, with the Envision posting a 28 percent sales increase. The Enclave was up 21 percent and the Encore was up 5 percent. Buick deliveries were up 5 percent and GMC deliveries were up 10 percent. The all-new Cadillac XT4 continues to lead its segment and the all-new Cadillac XT6 has begun shipping to dealers. Cadillac crossover deliveries were up 19 percent in total year over year, helping the brand grow both total and retail sales. The Chevrolet Suburban, Tahoe and GMC Yukon XL were each up more than 20 percent compared to a year ago. Overall, GM deliveries during the second quarter were down 1.5 percent versus a year ago, in line with third-party estimates for industry sales. The company estimates that its retail market share was even with a year ago, with truck and crossover deliveries offsetting lower passenger car sales.  
       
        QUARTER 2 (CALENDAR YEAR-TO-DATE) JANUARY - JUNE   2019 2018 %Change Volume   2019 2018 %Change Volume   Cascada 1,312 1,374 -4.5   2,058 2,292 -10.2   Enclave 15,159 12,551 20.8   27,739 22,420 23.7   Encore 24,291 23,167 4.9   48,897 48,635 0.5   Envision 9,138 7,118 28.4   16,761 16,814 -0.3   LaCrosse 2,487 4,053 -38.6   5,389 11,119 -51.5   Regal 2,985 4,507 -33.8   6,393 8,215 -22.2   Buick Total 55,373 52,891 4.7   107,240 109,695 -2.2   ATS 371 3,785 -90.2   893 7,747 -88.5   CT6 1,862 2,427 -23.3   4,050 4,894 -17.2   CTS 2,443 2,640 -7.5   4,871 5,082 -4.2   Escalade 9,432 9,655 -2.3   16,251 17,766 -8.5   XT4 7,080 0 ***.*   14,106 0 ***.*   XT5 13,118 17,045 -23.0   26,396 31,890 -17.2   XT6 74 0 ***.*   74 0 ***.*   XTS 5,359 3,665 46.2   9,093 8,563 6.2   Cadillac Total 39,739 39,222 1.3   75,734 75,949 -0.3   Blazer 11,772 0 ***.*   14,795 0 ***.*   Bolt EV 3,965 3,483 13.8   8,281 7,858 5.4   Camaro 12,433 13,588 -8.5   24,516 25,380 -3.4   Colorado 31,669 41,016 -22.8   65,163 69,875 -6.7   Corvette 5,788 5,785 0.1   9,731 10,242 -5.0   Cruze 16,166 37,836 -57.3   39,477 77,691 -49.2   Equinox 85,657 73,967 15.8   174,157 156,365 11.4   Express 21,528 21,413 0.5   38,743 41,187 -5.9   Impala 12,536 13,595 -7.8   25,795 27,662 -6.7   LCF 1,305 756 72.6   1,864 1,286 44.9   Malibu 30,974 42,267 -26.7   65,171 76,417 -14.7   Silverado HD 31,496 37,452 -15.9   61,037 76,471 -20.2   Silverado LD 109,930 118,077 -6.9   194,426 214,603 -9.4   Silverado MD 1,038 0 ***.*   1,314 0 ***.*   Sonic 4,024 4,582 -12.2   8,484 10,565 -19.7   Spark 7,226 4,454 62.2   13,649 11,399 19.7   Suburban 18,266 15,136 20.7   29,295 29,861 -1.9   Tahoe 32,942 26,880 22.6   53,795 50,523 6.5   Traverse 38,152 35,892 6.3   72,375 74,090 -2.3   Trax 21,790 26,507 -17.8   46,370 46,989 -1.3   Volt 1,146 4,336 -73.6   3,666 7,814 -53.1   Chevrolet Total 499,847 528,100 -5.3   952,248 1,019,019 -6.6   Acadia 28,420 20,108 41.3   59,620 50,008 19.2   Canyon 11,909 9,635 23.6   18,863 16,848 12.0   Savana 9,503 7,167 32.6   16,069 11,964 34.3   Sierra HD 13,946 14,364 -2.9   23,188 27,022 -14.2   Sierra LD 42,911 45,042 -4.7   74,215 73,852 0.5   Terrain 24,988 22,327 11.9   50,352 55,291 -8.9   Yukon 20,023 19,520 2.6   34,970 34,522 1.3   GMC Total 151,700 138,163 9.8   277,277 269,507 2.9   GM Vehicle Total 746,659 758,376 -1.5   1,412,499 1,474,170 -4.2  
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Cadillac's newest V-series, the CT4-V and CT5-V, disappointed fans when they debuted on May 30th by being substantially less powerful than their predecessors. The CT4-V gets a 2.7-liter turbo four cylinder producing 320 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque, that's a 130 horsepower deficit compared to the ATS-V.   The story for the CT5-V is similar with a 3.0-liter twin-turbo making 355 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque compared to the 640 horsepower of the CTS-V.  GM President Mark Reuss called the previous cars "hammer" and that they intimidated customers. Thus, Cadillac responded by extending the V-series badge down to be more accessible to more customers. 
      Cadillac fans wouldn't have it, and Cadillac was quick to respond saying that more powerful versions of the CT4-V and CT5-V would be on the way, even bringing out higher potency test cars for the Detroit Grand Prix. The CT5-V was rumored to be running with the Blackwing V8, and that car getting the 4.2 Twin-Turbo V8 is not a new rumor. 
      The controversy comes down to what to call the higher powered models when they do arrive. Some fans felt that the models already shown should be V-Sports and the more powerful versions get the V moniker. However, it seems that Cadillac has settled on Blackwing as the name for the high power versions of their V-series, and that name may not be limited to just models with the Blackwing V8, making Blackwing more of a sub-brand for Cadillac like Denali is for GMC.
      What do you think? Is Blackwing a good name for the true high-performance versions of the V-series cars?
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Cadillac's newest V-series, the CT4-V and CT5-V, disappointed fans when they debuted on May 30th by being substantially less powerful than their predecessors. The CT4-V gets a 2.7-liter turbo four cylinder producing 320 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque, that's a 130 horsepower deficit compared to the ATS-V.   The story for the CT5-V is similar with a 3.0-liter twin-turbo making 355 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque compared to the 640 horsepower of the CTS-V.  GM President Mark Reuss called the previous cars "hammer" and that they intimidated customers. Thus, Cadillac responded by extending the V-series badge down to be more accessible to more customers. 
      Cadillac fans wouldn't have it, and Cadillac was quick to respond saying that more powerful versions of the CT4-V and CT5-V would be on the way, even bringing out higher potency test cars for the Detroit Grand Prix. The CT5-V was rumored to be running with the Blackwing V8, and that car getting the 4.2 Twin-Turbo V8 is not a new rumor. 
      The controversy comes down to what to call the higher powered models when they do arrive. Some fans felt that the models already shown should be V-Sports and the more powerful versions get the V moniker. However, it seems that Cadillac has settled on Blackwing as the name for the high power versions of their V-series, and that name may not be limited to just models with the Blackwing V8, making Blackwing more of a sub-brand for Cadillac like Denali is for GMC.
      What do you think? Is Blackwing a good name for the true high-performance versions of the V-series cars?
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The Cadillac CT6 has been in the news a lot lately.  First it was potentially canceled as its home factory in the U.S. is slated for closure. Then there was the Cadillac Blackwing V8.  Most recently it has dropped both the base 2.0T 4-cylinder and the mid-range (now that there is a V8) 3.0 twin-turbo V6. 
      With all of those changes, there is bound to be some price changes to accompany them.
      For 2020, the CT6 will see a base price rise of $8,500 over the 2019 model to $59,900. With that rise, the base engine becomes the 3.6 liter V6 and AWD standard. It is also adding about $3,500 worth of active safety equipment as standard. 
      Moving up to the Premium Luxury model will add $12,000 to the price tag but comes with Cadillac's famous Super Cruise automated driving system, the rear seat package, the Comfort and Technology package, and the 34-speaker Panaray sound system. At $75,490, that's actually a $2,500 discount on those packages over the 2019 model. 
      The top model, the CT6 Platinum will come standard with the Blackwing V8, replacing the 3.0 twin-turbo on the spec sheet. It also gains 20-inch wheels that were optional last year. 
      While the future of the CT6 is murky, the fact that GM continues to make improvements to the model gives us hope that it will live on. 

      View full article
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Samurai
      Samurai
      (46 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...