Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: FCA Considers Calling It Quits on Diesel

      Might be revealed at FCA's latest four-year plan announcement

    More and more automakers are beginning to turn away from diesel due to demand for the fuel dropping and the rising costs of making engines compliant. The latest automaker that could be leaving the diesel fraternity is Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

    The Financial Times has learned from sources that FCA plans on eliminating diesel engines from their passenger vehicles by 2022. This will be announced during the reveal of FCA's new four-year plan expected to take place on June 1st. FCA will continue to utilize diesel engines in commercial vehicles (including Ram Trucks), though it is unclear for how long.

    FCA declined to comment on this report when asked by Reuters.

    Source: Financial Times (Subscription Required), Reuters via Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    Edited by William Maley

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Makes total sense since keeping the bad emission part is so much more difficult in the diesel car. Sadly cost of the powertrain are outweighing the gas mileage benefits.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Almost none of FCA's last 4 year plan was actually implemented except for Alfa (late) and a couple Jeeps.... 

    So true in thinking about this, 4 year Vapor Plans. Wonder what the new 4yr Vapor plan will be once the new CEO takes over. 

    With the changing of the Guard, this makes one wonder why bother releasing a 4yr plan with an outgoing CEO. Might as well wait till the new CEO is in at least 90 days and then release a plan.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Considers?  Volvo just announced that they aren’t going to develop another internal combustion engine, that the one in cars now is the last they will make.  You can’t put money into diesel it is yesterday’s technology.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

    Volvo is FAR from relevant in the industry, and this latest announcement from them diminishes them even further.

    So Jaguar Land Rover, Infiniti, GM (to a point) announced their electrification plants are they "FAR from relevant"?

    Volvo is taking a big gamble with their decision and I like they are taking a chance. Whether or not it will work out remains to be seen.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Almost none of FCA's last 4 year plan was actually implemented except for Alfa (late) and a couple Jeeps.... 

    Still wondering why they  bother making plans.....they could just make it up on the way.....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 2/26/2018 at 3:46 PM, smk4565 said:

    Considers?  Volvo just announced that they aren’t going to develop another internal combustion engine, that the one in cars now is the last they will make.  You can’t put money into diesel it is yesterday’s technology.

    bet those Mercedes diesels are still sweet tho ^^huh^^^

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, regfootball said:

    bet those Mercedes diesels are still sweet tho ^^huh^^^

    The ones they quit selling in the USA 2 years ago?  And they only have them in Europe because it is so diesel heavy, they won't develop a new diesel.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Notice the fine print.  Trucks and other commercial vehicles from FCA will still be available with economical, durable diesel powerplants. 

    Probably Jeeps as well. All Jeeps are technically classified as light trucks, so while the Renegade and Compass will probably never get diesels, the Wrangler and Grand Cherokee still probably could. 

    This announcement really means just no Chrysler 300, Alfa Romeo Guilia, or Maserati Ghibli diesels.... in Europe, no Fiat 500 diesels.  So it's a much smaller announcement than it appears.

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Notice the fine print.  Trucks and other commercial vehicles from FCA will still be available with economical, durable diesel powerplants. 

    :roflmao: ECONOMICAL :huh::wacko: 

    Yes they get solid high mpg, but due to the much higher cost of the powertrain as well as the cost of the fuel, it has been proven that for 90% Plus of buyers, Diesel is NOT ECONOMICAL!

    balthazar and others did the math and it ran from 10 to 20 years to break even on Diesel!

    :roflmao:  ECONOMICAL :roflmao: 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    :roflmao: ECONOMICAL :huh::wacko: 

    Yes they get solid high mpg, but due to the much higher cost of the powertrain as well as the cost of the fuel, it has been proven that for 90% Plus of buyers, Diesel is NOT ECONOMICAL!

    balthazar and others did the math and it ran from 10 to 20 years to break even on Diesel!

    :roflmao:  ECONOMICAL :roflmao: 

    As with all things, it depends on how you use it.  If you already own a boat or camper that you tow often... if you are using your truck for hauling work like my parents do.... then diesel will make up the cost sooner.   Using a gasoline turbo V6 in that way will cause the fuel economy to drop much faster than it would with a diesel.

    That said, I want to remind people that you should never measure the ROI in years but in miles.  I have a friend who leases his vehicles and barely does 20k miles in 3 years where as Balth might do 20k in a year.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I am not aware of travel cases for internal drives. Usually you have the drive and once you have made sure you own static electricity is discharged on your body, open the computer and unplug the power cable and data cable to the HD. Then you unscrew the screws holding the drive in. Put the drive into an Anti-Static bag and then usually into a box that has foam padding on all sides to protect the drive and then tape it up to close it.  With both drives in their proper storage bags, you can then have both drives in between foam insulation for handling any dropping of the box, etc. Pack them in a box and tape shut, should then easily handle going through your carry on or checked in luggage. To ship a hard drive, you need to: Secure the hard drive in its original packaging or anti-static bag. If you don't have an anti-static bag, place the drive into a zipped freezer bag to prevent any moisture getting into the drive during transit. Sandwich the drive between foam or wrap it in bubble wrap to absorb any minor shocks. Put the hard drive in a padded shipping box. Close and seal the box. Label your package. Amazon.com : hard drive shipping box This is pretty much all you need.
    • Either a co-pilot first time landing or something truly went wrong on the plane.
    • The incoming rectangular lamps on many GM cars in that era made them much more attractive.  They made a big difference. Now, as far the powerplant went, the notion of 500 cubic inches was mindboggling even during the malaise era.  If you want to see someone's jaw drop, tell a European that their engines have 8200 cc or 8.2 liters.  For those who aren't driving the occasional Mustang or Camaro you see, they freak out at anything over 2,500 or 3,000 cc.
    • Thank you for the response. I want to reinstall them into the computers, especially the "newer" one.  The old one has been a real champ.   The reason for not leaving them in the desktop is that the basic tower might have to be transported ... and not by me.  That means it will be out of my possession for a while.  Since the HDs would be traveling with me, they'll have to get scanned through airport security a time or two.  I'm guessing that shouldn't mess with the data.   I've already backed up the C drive on several large 1 TB portable hard drives.  I don't want to touch the basic functions and files on the computers since I don't know how that all works.  I stay away from the drives and files I am not familiar with. I tend to donate other things to charity.   I did give the Regal I once owned to charity.   A good friend told me that, about a month or two later, he saw it being driven around the city by its new owner and we had a good laugh. This is what I want to do.  I'm just trying to figure out if the guy or gal at Office Depot can size a case based on looking up the unit and the HD in it.  Any ideas on that part?  Or should I do that and approximate the size and weight of the part to get the cases?
    • I'm wondering about a lot of things related to this.  I am sure that, sadly, the passengers inside were jolted.  This is way different from a rough landing. Why was it even necessary to do it?  What was going on at the airport property at that time?  How does one even pull this off?  I've seen some vids of where they barely touch and then go off again, but this one looks way more complicated.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings