Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    GMC Debuts the 2021 GMC Yukon

      ...AT4 also added to the lineup...

    At an event in Vail, Colorado today, GMC took the wraps off the 2021 GMC Yukon and Yukon XL.  As before, the top of the Yukon lineup will be the Denali trim, but joining the Denali for the first time is the brand's new AT4 trim which is a more off-road ready version.

    The Yukon gets an all-new interior while the Denali gets its own exclusive version. The Denali instrument panel is completely new and there are also unique seats  and four color themes.  Real wood trims with a natural look and texture join with a Denali only leather, hand-stitched interior.  For the driver, there is a 15-inch diagonal multicolor heads-up display.  On the Denali, AT4, and SLT trims, there is an available power sliding center console that allow the console to slide back up to 10 inches offering a large storage area. 

    Joining the lineup is the AT4 version. All GMC nameplates except the Savanna will be getting an AT4 version by the end of this year.  The Yukon AT4 gets a unique front fascia, and body color or dark accents around the outside, and a pair of red recovery hooks on the front.  The AT4 can be ordered with a four-corner air ride adaptive suspension that can raise the vehicle an additional 2-inches. The air ride system also lowers the vehicle 0.75 of an inch when at speed and can lower the vehicle up to two inches for easier ingress and egress. 

    Also included in the Yukon AT4 are at two-speed transfer case, 20-inch wheels, traction select system with off-road mode, hill descent control, skid plats, AT4-exclusive leather appointed seats, heated steering wheel, heated and cooled front seats, and heated outboard second row seats. 

    The 4th generation of GM's magnetic ride control is available in certain trims. Also available is an electronic limited slip differential. When in 4WD low, the eLSD operates at full lock to prevent wheelslip. 

    The Yukon will offer three engine choices. An all-new version of the 6.2-liter V8 that produces 420 horsepower and 460 lb-ft of torque is a buy-up option. Standard is the venerable 5.3-liter, updated with new stop/start technology and dynamic fuel management which can allow the vehicle to run on as few a two cylinders.  Additionally, a 3.0 liter inline 6-cylinder turbo diesel joins the Yukon for the first time.  No matter which engine is selected, the transmission is a 10-speed automatic activated through GMC's new Electronic Precision Shift push-button selector. 

    Like the recently revealed 2021 Chevrolet Suburban and Tahoe, the Yukon gains 4.9-inches in wheelbase and that leads to a big increase in interior room.

      2020 Yukon   2021 Yukon Change

    Wheelbase (inches)

    116

    120.9

    +4.9

    Overall Length (inches)

    203.9

    210.0

    +6.1

    Legroom – Third Row

    24.8

    34.9

    +10.1

    Cargo Room Behind Third Row (cubic feet)

    15.3

    25.5

    +10.2

    Maximum Cargo Room
    (cubic feet)

    94.7

    122.9

    +28.2

     

      2020 Yukon XL 2021 Yukon XL Change

    Wheelbase (inches)

    130

    134.1

    +4.1

    Overall Length (inches)

    224.3

    225.2

    +0.9

    Legroom – Third Row (inches)

    34.5

    36.7

    +2.2

    Cargo Room Behind Third Row (cubic feet)

    39.3

    41.1

    +1.8

    Maximum Cargo Room
    (cubic feet)

    121.7

    144.7

    +23

     

    The 2021 Yukon and Yukon XL go on sale later this year with pricing to be released closer to on sale date. 

     

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    More room is good.  Seems like they have a lot of updates to a formula that works well.  

    Really big grille, I am not a fan of the super size grilles that Audi and Lexus started, and now BMW and others are moving to.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    audi or lexus didn't start that trend.
    - - - - -
    These now-differentiated big GMCs look pretty impressive.
    Seeing the money put into this program has me really curious to see the next Escalade.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Very well done.  The AT4 version looks fantastic.  I also love the Denali dash.  In the screen presentation when they were showing the white AT4 models lined up, you can catch a glimpse of a refreshed Terrain AT4.  Although it will probably be as genuine as the Acadia with regard to real off-road features, it should be cool for ppl who want something different.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I will now officially say that the Yukon is the best looking of all the Fulls Size SUVs.

    I Love both the Interior dash of the Yukon and the Cadillac, but the exterior sucks.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have to say that I love the AT4 external looks and could be happy with the interior, but would rather have the Denali Dash with my AT4.

    Top AT4 Dash, bottom pic is the Denali dash.

    image.png

    I wonder if the AT4 will get the Diesel option for those that want it over the 6.2L V8? 🤔

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The AT4 dash is a more cohesive design with a better layout. 

    They share the same console section/stack, same steering wheel, same instrument cluster. The basic difference is the AT4's screen is mounted higher and the dash isn't topped by a thick layer of padded HVA/C ducting. I agree the design is better executed, but the layouts are nearly the same.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    They share the same console section/stack, same steering wheel, same instrument cluster. The basic difference is the AT4's screen is mounted higher and the dash isn't topped by a thick layer of padded HVA/C ducting. I agree the design is better executed, but the layouts are nearly the same.

    Yeah, I prefer the higher screen to the HVAC vents above the screen.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    Not sure what is to the left of the screen in the Denali.  I see a vertical row of buttons ( gears I think), but what is the slot ringed in bright trim? Looks like a giant HDMI socket.  

    It has something to do with the shift buttons.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, dfelt said:

    I have to say that I love the AT4 external looks and could be happy with the interior, but would rather have the Denali Dash with my AT4.

    Top AT4 Dash, bottom pic is the Denali dash.

    image.png

    I wonder if the AT4 will get the Diesel option for those that want it over the 6.2L V8? 🤔

     

    It's very interesting that they would change that much within the same vehicle. 

    I have no issue with either in their respective ways. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

    Not sure what is to the left of the screen in the Denali.  I see a vertical row of buttons ( gears I think), but what is the slot ringed in bright trim? Looks like a giant HDMI socket.  

    image.png

    I honestly think it is so you know without look which is D and which is R as you can fit your fingers I bet into those HDMI looking spots.

    16 hours ago, balthazar said:

    I would definitely go with the AT4 interior. They built the Denali dash too tall / cliff-like.

    I can totally understand this as I think a persons Height has something to do with how one would feel about the dashes. Being so tall, a tall dash never bothers me, but my Wife is 5'8" tall and you bring up a valid point. I wonder if she would find it too tall to look over. 🤔

    39 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    It's very interesting that they would change that much within the same vehicle. 

    I have no issue with either in their respective ways. 

    Love that GM is getting Unique dashes to various trim levels.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Love that GM is getting Unique dashes to various trim levels.

    I agree. I think it is great and it should also help get buyers to pony up more cash for these higher trims. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, dfelt said:

     

    I honestly think it is so you know without look which is D and which is R as you can fit your fingers I bet into those HDMI looking spots.

    I can totally understand this as I think a persons Height has something to do with how one would feel about the dashes. Being so tall, a tall dash never bothers me, but my Wife is 5'8" tall and you bring up a valid point. I wonder if she would find it too tall to look over. 🤔

    Love that GM is getting Unique dashes to various trim levels.

    Yeah, I was looking on my phone, in a larger photo the use becomes clear. I don't think the Denali dash is any higher than the ATS--the gauge pod appears the same height, it's just the height extends further across on the Denali. I prefer high mounted vents, rather than ones down low.  My 5'3" sister may not like it though... 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ The 2 pics were taken from the exact same distance & angle. While the gauge pod is the same height, the rest of the Denali dash rises higher than the bottom of the windshield, and it's doesn't on the AT4. IMO, that just makes it appear more claustrophobic and has to cut a bit into the outward vision of shorter drivers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

    Thanks for posting, will be interesting to actually see this in action on the Yukon. I honestly after reading the story at the link do not think it will be as tight and controlled as the Rivian.

    Either way for folks that go off road or are up in the snow level area and get pinched into a tight spot, this can come in handy to get out of the tight space.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Thanks for posting, will be interesting to actually see this in action on the Yukon. I honestly after reading the story at the link do not think it will be as tight and controlled as the Rivian.

    Either way for folks that go off road or are up in the snow level area and get pinched into a tight spot, this can come in handy to get out of the tight space.

    It sounds like it's all using braking on one side, not moving the rear wheels like Quadrasteer did..  Probably not as tight as the Rivian which I think steers the front wheels opposite directions to turn tightly. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/18/2020 at 8:46 AM, Robert Hall said:

    It sounds like it's all using braking on one side, not moving the rear wheels like Quadrasteer did..  Probably not as tight as the Rivian which I think steers the front wheels opposite directions to turn tightly. 

    Rivian depending on which way you want to turn, as example to turn to the left, the passenger side wheels will move forward, the drivers side wheels will move backwards. This will keep it much tighter than braking one side and only using wheels on the other side. Be interesting on how they are doing this with the differentials.

    You can do it on dry pavement, but I would imagine it would be hard on the tired and the rest of the power train.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Those use cases will necessitate the purchase of something with a long range, like 300+. But even still, two hours at 11.5kW would put 50 - 70 miles of range back in the car. You might need to make one 10-minute DCFC stop if you had a really busy day, but otherwise, you could make it.
    • I can understand this, but then this is part of my daily life. With two kids with their own families and grandkids it is not uncommon for us to be out and about for the day, come home for a bit before heading out to help with the grandkids and their afterschool activities. Plus, with family that is living from both sides north and south of us, it would not be uncommon to drive 75 miles down south to deal with my wife's side of the family, see the nieces/nephews and then up north to my side to see folks and with both our parents in senior years with health issues, also moving back in forth. Course this is why Sun puts on about 15,000 miles a year on the SS. We all have different use cases.
    • That's all I'm worried about. I'm not going to spend a sht ton more money having a 19.2kW charger installed for the 1 day every 3 years I empty the battery, get home for 2 hours, and have to again drive enough that I couldn't make it back home...  
    • I could see settling on three charger rates, but definitely not one. A Bolt or Kia EV4 type vehicle simply does not need 19kW home charging.  It would be an excessive cost to retrofit a house and the number of buyers who actually use that rate would be pretty close to zero.  That would be like insisting that the Corolla has to have a 6.2 liter. It's excessive and doesn't fit the use case. Now, if we settled into 7.5kW, 11.5kW, and 19.4kW as a standard, that would probably achieve what you are proposing while still giving cost flexibility.  It would allow for entry-level EVs to get the lower cost / lower speed charger while allowing the larger vehicles or premium vehicles to have faster home charging.  For example, the EV6 could have a lower cost 7.5kW charger while the Genesis GV60 on the same platform could get the 11.5kW charger because it is a premium brand and higher cost vehicle.  Then any large EV with or near a 200kW battery could have the 19.4kW charger, but even then, unless it is a newly built house or a commercial fleet, it will still probably charge only at 11.5kW, as that's about the max that the vast majority of homes are wired to do.  Unless you're driving an EV with a 200kW battery to 10% every day, an 11.5kW charger can "fill" an EV to 80% overnight with room to spare, so most people (including me), won't want the extra expense of spending extra money just to say my EV charged faster while I slept.  Either way, it will be ready for me when I need to leave at 7 am.
    • @ccap41 @Drew Dowdell Thank you both, this is the kind of dialogue I feel the Auto buyers need to be made aware of and the various use cases in understanding as I feel most DO NOT really understand this and give into the FEAR Mongering of News Stories. While I still feel that everyone should have the same charging rate capabilities, I also understand both your points. I do feel that this will change electrical across the WORLD over time due to the need of charging.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings