GMC Debuts the 2021 GMC Yukon

Was very mixed about the look of this till I saw the additional pics above. I am liking this.

More room is good.  Seems like they have a lot of updates to a formula that works well.  

Really big grille, I am not a fan of the super size grilles that Audi and Lexus started, and now BMW and others are moving to.

audi or lexus didn't start that trend.
- - - - -
These now-differentiated big GMCs look pretty impressive.
Seeing the money put into this program has me really curious to see the next Escalade.

Have to say I do like it!! AT4 trim is cool here.....

Very well done.  The AT4 version looks fantastic.  I also love the Denali dash.  In the screen presentation when they were showing the white AT4 models lined up, you can catch a glimpse of a refreshed Terrain AT4.  Although it will probably be as genuine as the Acadia with regard to real off-road features, it should be cool for ppl who want something different.

The grille looks juuuuuust a tad off on an otherwise very attractive package. The diesel option is a really cool touch. 

I will now officially say that the Yukon is the best looking of all the Fulls Size SUVs.

I Love both the Interior dash of the Yukon and the Cadillac, but the exterior sucks.

I have to say that I love the AT4 external looks and could be happy with the interior, but would rather have the Denali Dash with my AT4.

Top AT4 Dash, bottom pic is the Denali dash.

I wonder if the AT4 will get the Diesel option for those that want it over the 6.2L V8? ?

I would definitely go with the AT4 interior. They built the Denali dash too tall / cliff-like.

I like the Denali interior better, because of the brown dash, the higher center vents, and the integrated screen. 

The AT4 dash is a more cohesive design with a better layout.  Although I would prefer that design in more than just all black.

32 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

The AT4 dash is a more cohesive design with a better layout. 

They share the same console section/stack, same steering wheel, same instrument cluster. The basic difference is the AT4's screen is mounted higher and the dash isn't topped by a thick layer of padded HVA/C ducting. I agree the design is better executed, but the layouts are nearly the same.

Not sure what is to the left of the screen in the Denali.  I see a vertical row of buttons ( gears I think), but what is the slot ringed in bright trim? Looks like a giant HDMI socket.  

31 minutes ago, balthazar said:

They share the same console section/stack, same steering wheel, same instrument cluster. The basic difference is the AT4's screen is mounted higher and the dash isn't topped by a thick layer of padded HVA/C ducting. I agree the design is better executed, but the layouts are nearly the same.

Yeah, I prefer the higher screen to the HVAC vents above the screen.  

33 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

Not sure what is to the left of the screen in the Denali.  I see a vertical row of buttons ( gears I think), but what is the slot ringed in bright trim? Looks like a giant HDMI socket.  

It has something to do with the shift buttons.

16 hours ago, dfelt said:

I have to say that I love the AT4 external looks and could be happy with the interior, but would rather have the Denali Dash with my AT4.

Top AT4 Dash, bottom pic is the Denali dash.

I wonder if the AT4 will get the Diesel option for those that want it over the 6.2L V8? ?

 

It's very interesting that they would change that much within the same vehicle. 

I have no issue with either in their respective ways. 

14 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

Not sure what is to the left of the screen in the Denali.  I see a vertical row of buttons ( gears I think), but what is the slot ringed in bright trim? Looks like a giant HDMI socket.  

I honestly think it is so you know without look which is D and which is R as you can fit your fingers I bet into those HDMI looking spots.

16 hours ago, balthazar said:

I would definitely go with the AT4 interior. They built the Denali dash too tall / cliff-like.

I can totally understand this as I think a persons Height has something to do with how one would feel about the dashes. Being so tall, a tall dash never bothers me, but my Wife is 5'8" tall and you bring up a valid point. I wonder if she would find it too tall to look over. ?

39 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

It's very interesting that they would change that much within the same vehicle. 

I have no issue with either in their respective ways. 

Love that GM is getting Unique dashes to various trim levels.

5 minutes ago, dfelt said:

Love that GM is getting Unique dashes to various trim levels.

I agree. I think it is great and it should also help get buyers to pony up more cash for these higher trims. 

38 minutes ago, dfelt said:

 

I honestly think it is so you know without look which is D and which is R as you can fit your fingers I bet into those HDMI looking spots.

I can totally understand this as I think a persons Height has something to do with how one would feel about the dashes. Being so tall, a tall dash never bothers me, but my Wife is 5'8" tall and you bring up a valid point. I wonder if she would find it too tall to look over. ?

Love that GM is getting Unique dashes to various trim levels.

Yeah, I was looking on my phone, in a larger photo the use becomes clear. I don't think the Denali dash is any higher than the ATS--the gauge pod appears the same height, it's just the height extends further across on the Denali. I prefer high mounted vents, rather than ones down low.  My 5'3" sister may not like it though... 

^ The 2 pics were taken from the exact same distance & angle. While the gauge pod is the same height, the rest of the Denali dash rises higher than the bottom of the windshield, and it's doesn't on the AT4. IMO, that just makes it appear more claustrophobic and has to cut a bit into the outward vision of shorter drivers.

I understand the new Yukon can do a "hurricane turn" very similar to the Rivian.

12 hours ago, ocnblu said:

I understand the new Yukon can do a "hurricane turn" very similar to the Rivian.

https://www.autoblog.com/2020/01/17/gmc-yukon-hurricane-turn/

3 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

https://www.autoblog.com/2020/01/17/gmc-yukon-hurricane-turn/

Thanks for posting, will be interesting to actually see this in action on the Yukon. I honestly after reading the story at the link do not think it will be as tight and controlled as the Rivian.

Either way for folks that go off road or are up in the snow level area and get pinched into a tight spot, this can come in handy to get out of the tight space.

5 minutes ago, dfelt said:

Thanks for posting, will be interesting to actually see this in action on the Yukon. I honestly after reading the story at the link do not think it will be as tight and controlled as the Rivian.

Either way for folks that go off road or are up in the snow level area and get pinched into a tight spot, this can come in handy to get out of the tight space.

It sounds like it's all using braking on one side, not moving the rear wheels like Quadrasteer did..  Probably not as tight as the Rivian which I think steers the front wheels opposite directions to turn tightly. 

Prolly not quote as tight, but since both trucks require ‘loose surface’ (IE; dirt), I imagine there’s no difference either way.

On 1/18/2020 at 8:46 AM, Robert Hall said:

It sounds like it's all using braking on one side, not moving the rear wheels like Quadrasteer did..  Probably not as tight as the Rivian which I think steers the front wheels opposite directions to turn tightly. 

Rivian depending on which way you want to turn, as example to turn to the left, the passenger side wheels will move forward, the drivers side wheels will move backwards. This will keep it much tighter than braking one side and only using wheels on the other side. Be interesting on how they are doing this with the differentials.

You can do it on dry pavement, but I would imagine it would be hard on the tired and the rest of the power train.