Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Diamler and Volvo Begin Bracing For A Possible Trade War

      One Predicts a Hit on Profits, While the Other Says it will threaten jobs

    The project of a trade war between the U.S. and China (along with the European Union) has many automakers on edge. Some are beginning to speak out about the possible dangers it may bring.

    Mercedes-Benz's parent company, Diamler AG announced yesterday that its full-year earnings will be slightly lower than last year. Their reasoning comes down to consumers in China buying fewer SUVs that are imported from the U.S. Most of Mercedes-Benz SUVs are built in Alabama.

    “Remember, for those following from a Trump/global free trade perspective, this is now a German car maker, warning on the profits coming from their Alabama-made SUVs, which are then sold/exported into China –- a complicated situation indeed!!” wrote Evercore ISI analyst Arndt Ellinghorst.

    According to Bloomberg, shares in Diamler dropped 4.4 percent on this announcement.

    Meanwhile, Volvo Cars CEO Hakan Samuelsson said the trade war could affect plans in the U.S. Speaking at the opening of the Swedish automaker's new assembly plant in South Carolina, Samuelsson told Bloomberg that Volvo would have to limit the number of models it sells due to threat of a 25 percent tariff on imported vehicles.

    “I would have less models to choose from and they would cost more -- that would be the consequence. Shorter menu and higher prices -- not a very good restaurant,” said Samuelsson.

    The factory in South Carolina will provide a small relief for Volvo if tariffs do go into place. Small is the key word as LMC Automotive estimates 87 percent of the vehicles Volvo sells in the U.S. next year will come from other places - Sweden and China.

    Samuelsson also warned that the trade dispute could mess up plans to create up to 4,000 new jobs at the new plant.

    "If you have trade barriers and restrictions, we cannot create as many jobs as we are planning to," explained Samuelsson.

    "We want to export and if suddenly China and Europe have very high barriers, it would be impossible. Then you have to build the cars there. And then all cars will be more expensive, you have to invest more tooling and have every model in every country. That's against all the logic of modern economies that trade with each other."

    Source: Bloomberg, (2), Reuters



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Totally agree that the trade war is going to mess up existing plans. In some regards things will get better for all, in others, things are going to hit home like a bomb going off.

    Interesting times we live in, very interesting! 🤔

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is rather sad that our President is pursuing a policy that benefits few and hurts a lot of people here and abroad.  And all of this is for what exactly?  Since when is protectionism good policy? Since when is autarky good?  I would say NEVER under any circumstances.  Trade wars tend to beget shooting wars, so tread carefully and buy your next car sooner than later.

    Of course, the Chinese warned any who would listen: May you live in interesting times.

    • Upvote 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I believe the goal is just a level playing field as we pay waaaay more in tariffs that others pay to sell their stuff here. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    I believe the goal is just a level playing field as we pay waaaay more in tariffs that others pay to sell their stuff here. 

    We don't pay tariffs to other countries for items exported from the US. The customers in those countries pay the tariff.

    We pay very few tariffs in this country and the ones we do pay are quite low unless you're trying to buy a truck from Germany...

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    21 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    We don't pay tariffs to other countries for items exported from the US. The customers in those countries pay the tariff.

    Correct. Consumers absorb the price increase. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hmmm. Well good bye to S90. 25% tariff on A8, S-Class, and 7 Series.

     

    the way I see it these luxury products will take a super large hit. Good.

    I wonder now. Cadillac will have to stop-sale of the plug-in CT6.

     

    And Buick Envision toodle-loooo. What else?

     

    oh yes, Mexican made Audis, go to hell pls clearly a profit grab nothing else. Damn all these luxury makes that use cheap labour are really gonna take a hit. I think that’s a good thing. Luxury car should mean expensive overpaid labour all the time. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

    Hmmm. Well good bye to S90. 25% tariff on A8, S-Class, and 7 Series.

     

    the way I see it these luxury products will take a super large hit. Good.

    I wonder now. Cadillac will have to stop-sale of the plug-in CT6.

     

    And Buick Envision toodle-loooo. What else?

     

    oh yes, Mexican made Audis, go to hell pls clearly a profit grab nothing else. Damn all these luxury makes that use cheap labour are really gonna take a hit. I think that’s a good thing. Luxury car should mean expensive overpaid labour all the time. 

    Chevy Silverado quad cab, 25% tariff, Dodge Ram 25% tariff, Buick Encore, Chevy Traxx, Chevy Sonic, Chevy Spark 25% tariff.  Ford Fusion, Lincoln MKZ, Chrysler 300/Dodge Charger/Dodge Challenger 25% tariff.  None of those are made in the USA.  

    I bet adding $10,000 to the price of the Silverado and Ram will be good for sales.  Dealership sells less, they lay off workers.

    Mercedes C-class, BMW X5, Mercedes GLE: 0% tariff.   Honda Accord/Pilot/Ridgeline, Acura TLX, Toyota Camry/Highlander/Sienna no tariff.  All those are made in the USA.  

    This tariff garbage only screws the consumer, and will drop auto sales which in turns screws all auto companies.  This isn't like 1960 when Americans made cars in America, Japanese made cars in Japan, etc.  And if you export tax those BMW and Mercedes going to China, and China taxes them coming in because of a trade war and they sell less in China, then BMW and Mercedes lay off workers in South Carolina and Alabama.  Lets kill some more jobs.

    • Thanks 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All of the GMs and the RAM could move production to the US. The cheap ones will probably just get cancelled.

    The ct6 plug in could be built here, they just sell most of them in China.

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    General Motors has 4 facilities in Mexico and 40 in the U.S..

    Fort Wayne & Flint are online to build the next Silverado/Sierra, and fully 80% of GM pickups sold in the U.S. are built in the U.S..

    Edited by balthazar
    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I dunno about increased costs. For one it simplifies the hell out of product planning.

    Yeah you have short turn spike in all the sunk costs associated with developing cars for markets where the crippling tariffs now make them unmarketable.

     

    Consumers NEED value but they WANT choice. 

     

    I’d say something like this might single handedly force automakers to invest even more in America as it’s the large market. Mexico isn’t large. The cars made there are almost always for export! And Canada, heck I’m Canadian - and we really have gotten a great deal, too good of a deal!

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 6/21/2018 at 5:53 PM, Suaviloquent said:

    Hmmm. Well good bye to S90. 25% tariff on A8, S-Class, and 7 Series.

     

    the way I see it these luxury products will take a super large hit. Good.

    I wonder now. Cadillac will have to stop-sale of the plug-in CT6.

     

    And Buick Envision toodle-loooo. What else?

     

    oh yes, Mexican made Audis, go to hell pls clearly a profit grab nothing else. Damn all these luxury makes that use cheap labour are really gonna take a hit. I think that’s a good thing. Luxury car should mean expensive overpaid labour all the time. 

    Not sure if you are being sarcastic but I rather like Audi products. All things considered I probably would buy an Audi over a Cadillac or Lincoln...do not appreciate the administration restricting my choices.

     

    On 6/22/2018 at 12:21 AM, balthazar said:

    General Motors has 4 facilities in Mexico and 40 in the U.S..

    Fort Wayne & Flint are online to build the next Silverado/Sierra, and fully 80% of GM pickups sold in the U.S. are built in the U.S..

    There is something subjective I really like about the current crop of GM pickups. Hopefully the continue to do well in the sales department!

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 6/21/2018 at 10:59 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    All of the GMs and the RAM could move production to the US. The cheap ones will probably just get cancelled.

    The ct6 plug in could be built here, they just sell most of them in China.

    They could move Silverado production to the USA, but that is 250,000 trucks, they would have to retool a factory which costs a lot, and then kill off whatever was being made in that factory.   Look at how it takes 4-5 years of development just to bring a new version of an existing model to market, getting one of these cars companies to build a whole new factory and relocate is like a decade endeavor.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 6/22/2018 at 12:37 AM, Suaviloquent said:

    I dunno about increased costs. For one it simplifies the hell out of product planning.

    Yeah you have short turn spike in all the sunk costs associated with developing cars for markets where the crippling tariffs now make them unmarketable.

     

    Consumers NEED value but they WANT choice. 

     

    I’d say something like this might single handedly force automakers to invest even more in America as it’s the large market. Mexico isn’t large. The cars made there are almost always for export! And Canada, heck I’m Canadian - and we really have gotten a great deal, too good of a deal!

    The American market is the biggest in North America, but in the world it isn't.  China and the EU are larger car markets than the United States.  Audi sales 2 million cars a year, only 200,000 of those are in the USA.   Even GM sells about 4 million cars a year in China and 3 million in the USA.  So if you start these global trade wars, every car maker gets hurt, prices rise everywhere, and the consumer gets stuck with the higher prices.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It’s like everyone forgot that lots of auto plants closed here and even if auto makers make investments in America it’s just to keep the current plants relevant for the continued production of the next model, not to actually increase capacity for new models.

     

    i find it compelelty stupid for example how the Equinox is built in Canada but the XT5 and now Blazer will be built in Mexico, where the value added is much higher for those lower volume products this profit margin per unit much higher.

    It’s just dumb that America in the NAFTA market is far and away the biggest buyer and yet proportionally in terms of employment far lower. 

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The American market is the biggest in North America, but in the world it isn't.  China and the EU are larger car markets than the United States.  Audi sales 2 million cars a year, only 200,000 of those are in the USA.   Even GM sells about 4 million cars a year in China and 3 million in the USA.  So if you start these global trade wars, every car maker gets hurt, prices rise everywhere, and the consumer gets stuck with the higher prices.

    When talking about Mexico about 80% of the output of every plant there is for U.S. 

     

    that’s the problem. I don’t like Mexican VINs nothing to do with the quality of the auto or the people who built it - it’s just that the carmakers pretend it’s the same value added but really they get away with paying lower wages. 

     

    If their argument of lower prices for consumers is not credible, it doesn’t matter where the car is built payment periods are becoming dangerously long

    In no way am I preaching for UAW either...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    26 minutes ago, Suaviloquent said:

    It’s like everyone forgot that lots of auto plants closed here

    Yup! There's a MASSIVE Diamler plant about 45 minutes away from me that's been empty for around a decade now. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You know what’s really f@#king funny though?

    Take for example all these trade war fears...Boeing is going to take HUGE hit in China.

    that’s not a trade war issue actually, the mercantilist protecitnist Chinese government basically forced the hand of all major Chinese airlines to buy into their massively delayed, over promised  Comac C919. And that plane could only have been built with the help of American and European firms.

    Once that is finished the State-owned Comac will reverse engineer everything and what does America get for short term revenue?

    China has a threat to tariffs back the only American exports?! They ARE already looking to screw over Boeing.

    and any competitor to Boeing is also competition for Airbus. I can’t believe the WSJ and others would say this is great for Airbus as it’s complete nonsense. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      Brand achieves 10.2 percent growth over 2018 with 108,234 cars sold Highest sales number since 2007 12,360 cars sold in December 2019; a 40 percent increase over December 2018 Refreshed XC90 sales continue to grow  
      ROCKLEIGH, NJ (January 3, 2020) Today, Volvo Car USA announces double digit sales growth in 2019. Sales were up 10.2 percent over 2018 with a total of 108,234 cars retailed. This strong result reflects twelve consecutive months of year-over-year growth for the brand and marks the best full year result for Volvo Car USA since 2007.
       
      “We are very proud of our sales achievements in 2019,” said Anders Gustafsson, President and CEO of Volvo Car USA. “This result reflects the hard work of our team and retail partners.”
       
      The XC90 leads the brand in sales volume seeing a 13 percent rise in total sales over the previous year. The XC40 compact SUV also achieved a strong result with 17,654 cars sold in 2019; an increase of 42 percent in its second year on sale.
       
      For the month of December, the brand retailed 12,360 cars, representing a 40 percent increase over December 2018.
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Best November sales in 15 years Eleventh consecutive month of year over year growth for the brand XC90 continues to lead in both volume and growth; up 40.9 percent over November 2018 7.2 percent total US sales growth year to date  
      ROCKLEIGH, NJ (November 3, 2019) Today, Volvo Car USA reports the best November sales since 2004 with 8181 units sold, an almost 18 percent year-over-year increase.
       
      Year-to-date Volvo Car USA continues to show strength in the luxury segment with 95,874 units sold, an increase of 7.2 percent versus 89,437 sold in 2018.
       
      Anders Gustafsson, President and CEO of Volvo Car USA, said, “ Refreshed and recharged the XC90 stakes it’s claim as the volume leader  with 3522 units sold, up 40.9 percent over November 2018.”
    • By Drew Dowdell
      ROCKLEIGH, N.J. (Nov 1, 2019) - Volvo Car USA LLC, (VCUSA) reported U.S. sales of 8,807 vehicles for the month of October, an increase of 20.2 percent from the same period last year. Year-to-date VCUSA has sold 86,239 vehicles, an increase of 6.1 percent from the previous year.
      “Our lineup continues to impress American buyers. Volvo Cars has posted a sales gain in twenty of the last twenty-one months.” said Anders Gustafsson, President and CEO, Volvo Car USA & Senior Vice President Americas.
      The XC90 was the most popular car in October selling 2,720 cars, up 18.2 percent versus October 2018. The XC60 followed with 2,285 cars and the S60 with 2,193 vehicles sold.
    • By William Maley
      Automakers want to be first into a new segment for various reasons. They can become the icon for the class and grab a fair chunk of sales as competitors rush to get their models in. There is a significant downside to being first as it allows some of the competition to study and figure out where to improve on. This brings us to the 2019 Volvo XC40 which is the focus of today’s review. It was one of the late arrivals to the subcompact luxury crossover class, but it allowed the automaker to study and figure what it could improve on. How does it stack up?
      The XC40 shares various design traits with the XC60 and XC90 crossovers. They include a familiar boxy profile, wide rectangular grille, and LED headlights with the signature “Thor’s Hammer” element. But Volvo allowed their designers to play around to give it a distinct identity. Take for example the side profile with its beltline that sharply rakes along the rear door and meets the rear pillar. There is also the option of a two-tone color palette that gives the XC40 a youthful look.
      Inside, the XC40 follows the ideals as seen in other Volvos with a minimalist look. But again, Volvo gave free roam to their designers to make it slightly different. While my test vehicle didn’t come with the bright ‘Lava Orange’ carpet, there is patterned metal trim where you would expect to find wood and felt-like material covering parts of the door panels. There is a fair amount of hard plastics used, but Volvo made the smart decision of keeping them in places where they make sense such as panels covering the center console.
      My R-Design tester came with leather upholstery for the seats, along with power adjustments for those sitting in the front. The front seats are the best place to sit in as they offer plenty of support and comfort for any drive length. In the back, there plenty of head and legroom for most passengers. But the XC40 falters on the seats as the bottom cushions come up a bit short and the seat-back doesn’t have any form of recline.
      Volvo’s technology story in the XC40 is mixed. The reconfigurable 12.3-inch display for the instrument cluster is a delight to look at with vibrant graphics and different layouts to present key information. Move over to the center stack to find a nine-inch touchscreen with Volvo’s Sensus infotainment system. Many of the controls for audio, climate control, and systems are controlled through the screen, with a row of buttons sitting underneath for volume and a few other functions. This decision does make for a cleaner dash but also makes accomplishing simple tasks very irritating. To change the fan speed or audio input, you have to go through various screens to find that one menu or slider. Adding more physical buttons would clutter up the dash, but would massively improve overall usability.
      What engine comes under the hood of the XC40 ultimately depends on the driven wheels. Go for front-wheel drive and you’ll end up with the T4 - turbocharged 2.0L four-cylinder with 187 horsepower. Opt for all-wheel drive like in my tester and you’ll get the T5 - the same 2.0L four, but with 248 horsepower. Both come paired with an eight-speed automatic.
      The T5 is the workhorse of Volvo’s lineup by boasting decent performance and fuel economy for most of their models. In the XC40, the T5 becomes a surprising performer with excellent off the line performance and a seemingly endless flow of power when needed for passing. Some credit is due to the 258 pound-feet of torque which is available on the low end of the rpm band. The eight-speed automatic provided timely and smooth shifts.
      Fuel economy is rated at 23 City/31 Highway/26 Combined. My average for the week landed around 24 mpg.
      Opting for the R-Design does change up the chassis setup with an emphasis on sporty driving. This is apparent in the bends as the XC40 feels confident with minimal body roll and quick reflexes. Steering is responsive, but there will be some who wished there was a little bit more weight dialed in. The downside to the R-Design’s chassis is the ride feeling slightly rough, not helped by the optional 20-inch alloy wheels fitted to my tester.
      Despite being somewhat late to the party, the Volvo XC40 stands out from the subcompact luxury crossover crowd. The styling inside and out put the model into its own space that competitors dream about, along with offering a strong performer in the form of the T5 engine. Where the XC40 stands out is the Care By Volvo subscription service. Starting at $700 a month for 24 months, this service gives you the vehicle, complimentary maintenance, insurance, and the ability to upgrade your vehicle to another one after 12 months. No one has been able to match what Volvo is offering.
      The XC40 shows that if you bring something compelling to the party, it doesn’t matter how late you are.
      Disclaimer: Volvo Provided the XC40, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2019
      Make: Volvo
      Model: XC40
      Trim: T5 R-Design
      Engine: 2.0L Turbocharged DOHC Four-Cylinder
      Driveline: Eight-Speed Automatic, All-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 248 @ 5,500
      Torque @ RPM: 258 @ 1,800
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 23/31/26
      Curb Weight: 3,713 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Ghent, Belgium
      Base Price: $35,700
      As Tested Price: $46,385 (Includes $995.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      R-Design Features - $2,500.00
      Laminated Panoramic Sunroof - $1,200.00
      Vision Package - $1,100.00
      Advanced Package - $995.00
      Premium Package - $900.00
      20" 5-Double Spoke Matte Black Alloy Wheels - $800.00
      Harman Kardon Audio System - $800.00
      Heated Front Seats & Steering Wheel - $750.00
      Metallic Paint - $645.00

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Automakers want to be first into a new segment for various reasons. They can become the icon for the class and grab a fair chunk of sales as competitors rush to get their models in. There is a significant downside to being first as it allows some of the competition to study and figure out where to improve on. This brings us to the 2019 Volvo XC40 which is the focus of today’s review. It was one of the late arrivals to the subcompact luxury crossover class, but it allowed the automaker to study and figure what it could improve on. How does it stack up?
      The XC40 shares various design traits with the XC60 and XC90 crossovers. They include a familiar boxy profile, wide rectangular grille, and LED headlights with the signature “Thor’s Hammer” element. But Volvo allowed their designers to play around to give it a distinct identity. Take for example the side profile with its beltline that sharply rakes along the rear door and meets the rear pillar. There is also the option of a two-tone color palette that gives the XC40 a youthful look.
      Inside, the XC40 follows the ideals as seen in other Volvos with a minimalist look. But again, Volvo gave free roam to their designers to make it slightly different. While my test vehicle didn’t come with the bright ‘Lava Orange’ carpet, there is patterned metal trim where you would expect to find wood and felt-like material covering parts of the door panels. There is a fair amount of hard plastics used, but Volvo made the smart decision of keeping them in places where they make sense such as panels covering the center console.
      My R-Design tester came with leather upholstery for the seats, along with power adjustments for those sitting in the front. The front seats are the best place to sit in as they offer plenty of support and comfort for any drive length. In the back, there plenty of head and legroom for most passengers. But the XC40 falters on the seats as the bottom cushions come up a bit short and the seat-back doesn’t have any form of recline.
      Volvo’s technology story in the XC40 is mixed. The reconfigurable 12.3-inch display for the instrument cluster is a delight to look at with vibrant graphics and different layouts to present key information. Move over to the center stack to find a nine-inch touchscreen with Volvo’s Sensus infotainment system. Many of the controls for audio, climate control, and systems are controlled through the screen, with a row of buttons sitting underneath for volume and a few other functions. This decision does make for a cleaner dash but also makes accomplishing simple tasks very irritating. To change the fan speed or audio input, you have to go through various screens to find that one menu or slider. Adding more physical buttons would clutter up the dash, but would massively improve overall usability.
      What engine comes under the hood of the XC40 ultimately depends on the driven wheels. Go for front-wheel drive and you’ll end up with the T4 - turbocharged 2.0L four-cylinder with 187 horsepower. Opt for all-wheel drive like in my tester and you’ll get the T5 - the same 2.0L four, but with 248 horsepower. Both come paired with an eight-speed automatic.
      The T5 is the workhorse of Volvo’s lineup by boasting decent performance and fuel economy for most of their models. In the XC40, the T5 becomes a surprising performer with excellent off the line performance and a seemingly endless flow of power when needed for passing. Some credit is due to the 258 pound-feet of torque which is available on the low end of the rpm band. The eight-speed automatic provided timely and smooth shifts.
      Fuel economy is rated at 23 City/31 Highway/26 Combined. My average for the week landed around 24 mpg.
      Opting for the R-Design does change up the chassis setup with an emphasis on sporty driving. This is apparent in the bends as the XC40 feels confident with minimal body roll and quick reflexes. Steering is responsive, but there will be some who wished there was a little bit more weight dialed in. The downside to the R-Design’s chassis is the ride feeling slightly rough, not helped by the optional 20-inch alloy wheels fitted to my tester.
      Despite being somewhat late to the party, the Volvo XC40 stands out from the subcompact luxury crossover crowd. The styling inside and out put the model into its own space that competitors dream about, along with offering a strong performer in the form of the T5 engine. Where the XC40 stands out is the Care By Volvo subscription service. Starting at $700 a month for 24 months, this service gives you the vehicle, complimentary maintenance, insurance, and the ability to upgrade your vehicle to another one after 12 months. No one has been able to match what Volvo is offering.
      The XC40 shows that if you bring something compelling to the party, it doesn’t matter how late you are.
      Disclaimer: Volvo Provided the XC40, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2019
      Make: Volvo
      Model: XC40
      Trim: T5 R-Design
      Engine: 2.0L Turbocharged DOHC Four-Cylinder
      Driveline: Eight-Speed Automatic, All-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 248 @ 5,500
      Torque @ RPM: 258 @ 1,800
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 23/31/26
      Curb Weight: 3,713 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Ghent, Belgium
      Base Price: $35,700
      As Tested Price: $46,385 (Includes $995.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      R-Design Features - $2,500.00
      Laminated Panoramic Sunroof - $1,200.00
      Vision Package - $1,100.00
      Advanced Package - $995.00
      Premium Package - $900.00
      20" 5-Double Spoke Matte Black Alloy Wheels - $800.00
      Harman Kardon Audio System - $800.00
      Heated Front Seats & Steering Wheel - $750.00
      Metallic Paint - $645.00
  • Posts

    • Latest News Genesis Sprouts An SUV ...after months of leaks, finally the official reveal... ---> Read More GMC Debuts the 2021 GMC Yukon ...AT4 also added to the lineup... ---> Read More Toyota Venza to Stage A Return ...aiming at the Chey Blazer... ---> Read More GMC Refreshes the Canyon for 2021 ...also gets a new AT4 trim... ---> Read More General Motors Plans A Revival of Hummer ..an SUV is also in the works.. ---> Read More December 2019 Sales Figure Ticker ...Who had a Happy Holiday and who got coal in their stocking?... ---> Read More Audi Sport's Electrification Plans Coming into Focus ...E-tron all the things... ---> Read More Latest Reviews Ask Me Anything: 2020 Lexus UX 200 F-Sport ..Lexus' smallest crossover comes in for a review and awaits your questions.. ---> Read More Quick Drive: 2019 Dodge Challenger R/T Shaker Best bang for your buck? ---> Read More Ask Me Anything: 2020 Toyota Corolla XLE ...What do you want to know about this most common of sedan?.... ---> Read More Review: 2019 Hyundai Santa Fe Ultimate ...one surprisingly good crossover, with a slightly problematic engine... ---> Read More Quick Drive: 2019 Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring ...the outlier in the full-size crossover class... ---> Read More Click here to view our privacy policy CheersandGears.com - Established 2001  P.O. Box 17974, Pittsburgh, PA 15235 You can manage your subscription settings at the following link https://www.cheersandgears.com/settings/?area=newsletters
    • As I captain my 6.3 sec 0-60 V6 Colorado, I still have a soft spot for the 2.0L 4WD Ecosport, especially now when competitive pressure is driving the transaction prices way down.  All the reviewers are saying the little Ford has a good ride and handling, and without the impediment of an artificially high selling price, it becomes much friendlier of a proposition. Same with the Trax, which is selling with excellent discounts.  Known for a smooth ride and good handling. I keep checking for Chevy's Build&Price function to come online for the 2021 Trailblazer, too.
    • Ah yes, the ol' "five gallon bucket trick"...
    • It has something to do with the shift buttons.
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Lloyd-TX
      Lloyd-TX
      (65 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...