Jump to content
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    What Mitsubishi Dealers Want

      ...hint, it starts with T and rhymes with puck...

    Mitsubishi dealers are living in interesting times.  After a tumultuous fall in sales after the recession, the last year and a quarter has given Mitsubishi double digit gains in sales.  Sales for 2018 rose 14 percent and so far this year, sales are up an astonishing 17.6 percent

    The question for Mitsubishi is where do they go from here?  With two small crossovers, a large one, and a subcompact car, the next logical answer for their dealers is adding a mid-size pickup to the mix.  Mitsubishi last offered a pickup in the Mitsubishi Raider which was a rebadged Dodge Dakota. 

    Now part of the Nissan-Renault alliance, Mitsubishi is reportedly taking the lead on building the platform for the next line of trucks for the trio. Mitsubishi currently builds the Triton for other global markets, while Nissan fields the Navara, and Renault produces the Alaskan.  All three would be consolidated to a single platform headed by the Mitsubishi effort in about 5 years.  Five years is an eternety in the automotive world, but it may be that the dealerships would need to wait that long to get their wish. 

    It was recently revealed that Nissan is working on a next generation Nissan Frontier, but that truck will use an updated version of its current platform rather than move to a global one.  Still it is possible that a future Frontier could move to the Mitsubishi based platform that is years away from production.

    In the meantime, Mitsubishi is working to expand its dealership network. There are some markets in the US where the brand is non-existent. So Mitsubishi is looking to expand in markets like Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, New York, and Boston. 

    2019_mitsubishi-triton_gls-premium_video-wp.jpg



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I would agree they need a truck and a Mini pickup and mid size would be best for them. Just something better looking than the mess above.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    8 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    I would agree they need a truck and a Mini pickup and mid size would be best for them. Just something better looking than the mess above.

    I remember when writing the Frontier article that Nissan decided the Navara was too small for US tastes.  Maybe this is a way for them to sell the Navara here and avoid stepping on the Frontier's toes much.  Still, I would have liked to see the Triton here in the U.S., it's not a bad looking truck.

    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Call me skeptical.  I doubt anyone will actually BUY a Mitsubishi pickup truck of any sort.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    a lot of the manufacturers that dont make a lot of trucks could really develop one unified global platform for mid size trucks.  Nissan, Mits, PSA, FCA, just about anyone besides Ford and GM, could make one global truck platform and just build models off that.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    13 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    That's what it sounds like Nissan, Mitsubishi, and Renault after planning to do

    Oh really? Now why would anyone BUY a unibody pickup truck from Nissan or Mitsubishi or Renault?  Have they not learned from the failure that is the Honda Ridgeline?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 minute ago, riviera74 said:

    Oh really? Now why would anyone BUY a unibody pickup truck from Nissan or Mitsubishi or Renault?  Have they not learned from the failure that is the Honda Ridgeline?

    Who said it was unibody? If it's the replacement for the Navara and Triton, then it will be body on frame.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What would probably make sense is to build Electric vehicles, since such a huge portion of Mitsubishi's business is you know, Electric.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    14 hours ago, regfootball said:

    a lot of the manufacturers that dont make a lot of trucks could really develop one unified global platform for mid size trucks.  Nissan, Mits, PSA, FCA, just about anyone besides Ford and GM, could make one global truck platform and just build models off that.  

    Why? What's the point?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Why? What's the point?

    for those fringe manufacturers in the truck market it doesn't make sense to have a huge investment by themselves.  if they just want something to round out the product line and 'be in the market' vs. being a dominant player like ford and chevy

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What consumer would bother buying a rebadged global small truck if another mainstream brand original was available?
    A mitshubishi pick-up could only move product by radically undercutting in price/ cutting features/capability. Guess where I'm going is; it wouldn't work in the USDM.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, balthazar said:

    What consumer would bother buying a rebadged global small truck if another mainstream brand original was available?
    A mitshubishi pick-up could only move product by radically undercutting in price/ cutting features/capability. Guess where I'm going is; it wouldn't work in the USDM.

    There are no small trucks in the US. If Mitsubishi comes in with a smaller truck at a lower price it could work. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    There are no small trucks in the US. If Mitsubishi comes in with a smaller truck at a lower price it could work. 

    Americans do not want a small truck.  Other people worldwide might, but a small truck will not sell here to make it profitable.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    29 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Americans do not want a small truck.  Other people worldwide might, but a small truck will not sell here to make it profitable.

    I dunno. I think no one has tried since the old Ranger.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ranger, S-10, LUV, Courier, nissan, toyota…. all the small pickups from the '70s into the '90s disappeared. There's a reason...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Ranger, S-10, LUV, Courier, nissan, toyota…. all the small pickups from the '70s into the '90s disappeared. There's a reason...

    It can't hurt for Mitsubishi to try.  They already have to build it for other markets anyway, why not try and sell a few here too?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It can't hurt for Mitsubishi to try.  They already have to build it for other markets anyway, why not try and sell a few here too?

    Because a small truck, just like subcompacts, do not sell well here in the USA.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    51 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Because a small truck, just like subcompacts, do not sell well here in the USA.

    We haven't had a good one here in so long, there's no way to tell how the market would respond these days.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    We haven't had a good one here in so long, there's no way to tell how the market would respond these days.

    Fair point.  I just don't see who would buy a small truck.  The midsize trucks seem to be doing very well.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Fair point.  I just don't see who would buy a small truck.  The midsize trucks seem to be doing very well.

    15 years ago I would have said a car like the venue would never sell. Now it probably will be one of Hyundai's best sellers

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Volkswagen and Ford are coming with mini trucks.  Of course Mitsubishi could join that fray.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think of small/mini trucks as akin to the car within it's segment with the by-far smallest trunk/interior room. 

    I've yet to hear anyone brag/be happy about that.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Seven years ago, I drove the previous-generation Mitsubishi Outlander for a week-long review. There was a lot to like about the previous model as it featured distinctive shape, comfortable ride, and being somewhat fun to drive. But in other areas, the model fell a bit flat. Poor material choices, firm ride, and the optional V6 engine feeling slightly lackluster. I ended my review with this,
      “Mitsubishi has shown a new Outlander at the Geneva Motor Show earlier this year. Underneath the Outlander’s new sheet metal lies a new vehicle architecture and will have the choice between gas and plug-in hybrid power. The new Outlander also gets revised interior and new safety equipment. The question is will the new Outlander be able to fix the problems of the current one?”
      It has taken a fair amount of time to get my hands on the new Outlander. In that time, Mitsubishi has made a number of changes and updates to the Outlander lineup such as a revised exterior. Was it worth the wait?
      The Outlander’s shape is nothing too special with rounded corners, large glass area, and a set of 18-inch alloy wheels that comes standard on most models. For 2019, Mitsubishi has updated the Outlander’s front end with a new grille shape, headlights, and more chrome trim. It does help spruce up the design that has been with us since 2014. My only complaint is the dark silver paint on my tester. It makes the vehicle look like a giant blob. There isn’t anything that sets the interior apart from rivals. The design is somewhat plain, but material quality is quite surprising with an abundance of soft-touch materials. There is a fair amount of piano black trim, which does attract fingerprints. All Outlanders come with a 7-inch touchscreen running Mitsubishi’s latest infotainment system is standard. Those wanting Apple CarPlay and Android Auto need to step up to the SE or higher. My experience with the system mimics the Eclipse Cross; lags behind the competition in terms of the interface and performance, but its a huge step forward from the previous system. The Outlander is one of the few models in the compact crossover class that can boast having three-rows to allow seating for seven. This seat is best reserved for small kids due to the limited amount of leg and headroom. Having the third-row also eats into cargo space - 10.3 vs. 33 cubic feet with the seats folded. Front and rear seating is fine. There’s enough padding to keep everyone comfortable on a long trip, and most passengers will be able to stretch out. Most Outlanders come equipped with a 2.4L four-cylinder engine producing 166 horsepower and 162 pound-feet of torque. This is paired with a CVT and the choice of front or Mitsubishi’s Super All Wheel Control. Step up to the GT to get a 3.0L V6 packing 224 hp and 215 lb-ft of torque. There’s also a PHEV option which I talk about more in this first drive piece. The 2.4 is serviceable around town with brisk acceleration and minimal noise. But take the Outlander on the highway or fill it up with people and cargo, and the 2.4 feels overwhelmed. Not helping is the CVT that will drone quite loudly when you plant your foot on the gas. Fuel economy is mid-pack with EPA figures of 24 City/29 Highway/26 Combined for the AWD version - front-wheel drive models see a one MPG improvement. My average for the week landed around 24. One area that I was surprised by the Outlander was the ride. Over the varied surfaces on offer in the Metro Detroit area, the Outlander’s suspension smoothed out various bumps. It doesn’t feel comfortable around corners, showing noticeable body lean and a disconnected steering system.  The Mitsubishi Outlander answers the oddly specific question of, “what is the cheapest three-row crossover I could buy?’ I can see why someone on a tight budget would consider one as the Outlander provides a lot of standard equipment, along with seating for seven at a low price. It doesn’t hurt that Mitsubishi’s 5 year/60,000 mile new car warranty does provide peace of mind for those who want a bit of security. But it does become a poor value the higher you climb in price. My Outlander SEL S-AWC tester starts at $29.095. With the optional SEL Touring Package (forward collision mitigation, adaptive cruise control, LED headlights, and a 710W Rockford Fosgate audio system) and carpeted floor mats, the price ballooned to $33,225 with destination. For that amount of cash, you get into a decently equipped Volkswagen Tiguan or Mazda CX-5. I know dealers put cash on the hoods - most dropping the cost to under $30,000, but it is still a tough sell. Disclaimer: Mitsubishi Provided the Outlander, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2019
      Make: Mitsubishi
      Model: Outlander
      Trim: SEL S-AWC
      Engine: 2.4L MIVEC SOHC 16-Valve Four-Cylinder
      Driveline: CVT, All-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 166 @ 6,000
      Torque @ RPM: 162 @ 4,200
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 24/29/26
      Curb Weight: 3,472 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Okazaki, Japan
      Base Price: $29,095
      As Tested Price: $33,225 (Includes $995.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      SEL Touring Package - $3,000.00
      Accessory Carpeted Floors Mats and Portfolio - $135.00

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Seven years ago, I drove the previous-generation Mitsubishi Outlander for a week-long review. There was a lot to like about the previous model as it featured distinctive shape, comfortable ride, and being somewhat fun to drive. But in other areas, the model fell a bit flat. Poor material choices, firm ride, and the optional V6 engine feeling slightly lackluster. I ended my review with this,
      “Mitsubishi has shown a new Outlander at the Geneva Motor Show earlier this year. Underneath the Outlander’s new sheet metal lies a new vehicle architecture and will have the choice between gas and plug-in hybrid power. The new Outlander also gets revised interior and new safety equipment. The question is will the new Outlander be able to fix the problems of the current one?”
      It has taken a fair amount of time to get my hands on the new Outlander. In that time, Mitsubishi has made a number of changes and updates to the Outlander lineup such as a revised exterior. Was it worth the wait?
      The Outlander’s shape is nothing too special with rounded corners, large glass area, and a set of 18-inch alloy wheels that comes standard on most models. For 2019, Mitsubishi has updated the Outlander’s front end with a new grille shape, headlights, and more chrome trim. It does help spruce up the design that has been with us since 2014. My only complaint is the dark silver paint on my tester. It makes the vehicle look like a giant blob. There isn’t anything that sets the interior apart from rivals. The design is somewhat plain, but material quality is quite surprising with an abundance of soft-touch materials. There is a fair amount of piano black trim, which does attract fingerprints. All Outlanders come with a 7-inch touchscreen running Mitsubishi’s latest infotainment system is standard. Those wanting Apple CarPlay and Android Auto need to step up to the SE or higher. My experience with the system mimics the Eclipse Cross; lags behind the competition in terms of the interface and performance, but its a huge step forward from the previous system. The Outlander is one of the few models in the compact crossover class that can boast having three-rows to allow seating for seven. This seat is best reserved for small kids due to the limited amount of leg and headroom. Having the third-row also eats into cargo space - 10.3 vs. 33 cubic feet with the seats folded. Front and rear seating is fine. There’s enough padding to keep everyone comfortable on a long trip, and most passengers will be able to stretch out. Most Outlanders come equipped with a 2.4L four-cylinder engine producing 166 horsepower and 162 pound-feet of torque. This is paired with a CVT and the choice of front or Mitsubishi’s Super All Wheel Control. Step up to the GT to get a 3.0L V6 packing 224 hp and 215 lb-ft of torque. There’s also a PHEV option which I talk about more in this first drive piece. The 2.4 is serviceable around town with brisk acceleration and minimal noise. But take the Outlander on the highway or fill it up with people and cargo, and the 2.4 feels overwhelmed. Not helping is the CVT that will drone quite loudly when you plant your foot on the gas. Fuel economy is mid-pack with EPA figures of 24 City/29 Highway/26 Combined for the AWD version - front-wheel drive models see a one MPG improvement. My average for the week landed around 24. One area that I was surprised by the Outlander was the ride. Over the varied surfaces on offer in the Metro Detroit area, the Outlander’s suspension smoothed out various bumps. It doesn’t feel comfortable around corners, showing noticeable body lean and a disconnected steering system.  The Mitsubishi Outlander answers the oddly specific question of, “what is the cheapest three-row crossover I could buy?’ I can see why someone on a tight budget would consider one as the Outlander provides a lot of standard equipment, along with seating for seven at a low price. It doesn’t hurt that Mitsubishi’s 5 year/60,000 mile new car warranty does provide peace of mind for those who want a bit of security. But it does become a poor value the higher you climb in price. My Outlander SEL S-AWC tester starts at $29.095. With the optional SEL Touring Package (forward collision mitigation, adaptive cruise control, LED headlights, and a 710W Rockford Fosgate audio system) and carpeted floor mats, the price ballooned to $33,225 with destination. For that amount of cash, you get into a decently equipped Volkswagen Tiguan or Mazda CX-5. I know dealers put cash on the hoods - most dropping the cost to under $30,000, but it is still a tough sell. Disclaimer: Mitsubishi Provided the Outlander, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2019
      Make: Mitsubishi
      Model: Outlander
      Trim: SEL S-AWC
      Engine: 2.4L MIVEC SOHC 16-Valve Four-Cylinder
      Driveline: CVT, All-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 166 @ 6,000
      Torque @ RPM: 162 @ 4,200
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 24/29/26
      Curb Weight: 3,472 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Okazaki, Japan
      Base Price: $29,095
      As Tested Price: $33,225 (Includes $995.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      SEL Touring Package - $3,000.00
      Accessory Carpeted Floors Mats and Portfolio - $135.00
    • By Drew Dowdell
      After Nissan having a heavy hand in helping to scuttle the potential merger between Renault and FCA, Renault is getting payback by helping to block corporate reforms Nissan is attempting to put in place after the arrest of Carlos Ghosn and poor financial performance by the company.   Nissan and Renault are fighting because Nissan abstained from the vote on whether to merge, and following that, the French government did as well.  Without the cooperation of the French government, FCA pulled out of the deal.
      Renault holds 43.4 percent of Nissan and is upset with the representation they would have on the board and committees under the current plans.  The French company says that their abstention from voting is not final and can change pending changes to the proposals. 
      Meanwhile, rumors say that FCA and Renault are still looking for ways to salvage the merger while Nissan is pressuring Renault to reduce their holdings in Nissan. Nissan has been seeking more autonomy from Renault ever since the Ghosn scandals. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      After Nissan having a heavy hand in helping to scuttle the potential merger between Renault and FCA, Renault is getting payback by helping to block corporate reforms Nissan is attempting to put in place after the arrest of Carlos Ghosn and poor financial performance by the company.   Nissan and Renault are fighting because Nissan abstained from the vote on whether to merge, and following that, the French government did as well.  Without the cooperation of the French government, FCA pulled out of the deal.
      Renault holds 43.4 percent of Nissan and is upset with the representation they would have on the board and committees under the current plans.  The French company says that their abstention from voting is not final and can change pending changes to the proposals. 
      Meanwhile, rumors say that FCA and Renault are still looking for ways to salvage the merger while Nissan is pressuring Renault to reduce their holdings in Nissan. Nissan has been seeking more autonomy from Renault ever since the Ghosn scandals. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      May 2019
      May 2018
      % chg
      Nissan Group Total sales (units)
      131,983
      131,832
      +0.1
      Nissan Division sales
      121,570
      120,207
      +1.1
      INFINITI sales*
      10,413
      11,625
      -10.4
      NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Nissan Group announced total U.S. sales for May 2019 of 131,983 units, an increase of 0.1 percent compared to the prior year.
      Nissan highlights:
      Sales of the Armada SUV set a May record with 4,490 units sold, up 103 percent. Pathfinder SUV sales, at 7,751 units, were up 27 percent in May. Frontier truck sales increased 8 percent to 7,497 units. Altima sales climbed to 24,218 units, up 5 percent. Nissan's commercial van models, NV and NV200, each set May records. NV van sales were 1,829 units (+8 percent); NV200 compact cargo van sales were 1,825 units, also up 8 percent. Several key models have shown gains in 2019: Armada (+25 percent), Pathfinder (+11 percent) and Versa (+5 percent). *INFINITI sales total included for reference. For more information on INFINITI's May sales performance, please visit INFINITINews.com.
      NOTE: To ensure consistency in global sales reporting, Nissan North America calculates monthly variances on a straight-percentage basis, unadjusted for the number of selling days. May 2019 and May 2018 each had 26 selling days.
      NISSAN DIVISION
      MAY
      MAY
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Nissan Division Total
      121,570
      120,207
      1.1
      540,313
      574,127
      -5.9
      Versa
      8,116
      6,576
      23.4
      39,818
      37,939
      5.0
      Sentra
      18,831
      18,103
      4.0
      88,675
      95,104
      -6.8
      Altima
      24,218
      23,030
      5.2
      92,229
      96,836
      -4.8
      Maxima
      2,153
      3,694
      -41.7
      14,716
      19,548
      -24.7
      LEAF
      1,216
      1,576
      -22.8
      4,852
      5,292
      -8.3
      Juke
      0
      72
      -100.0
      10
      611
      -98.4
      370Z
      198
      343
      -42.3
      1,022
      1,586
      -35.6
      GT-R
      18
      74
      -75.7
      144
      244
      -41.0
      Total Car
      54,750
      53,468
      2.4
      241,466
      257,160
      -6.1
      Kicks
      6,005
      0
      n/a
      22,027
      0
      n/a
      Frontier
      7,497
      6,938
      8.1
      31,976
      34,845
      -8.2
      Titan
      3,189
      3,779
      -15.6
      15,361
      19,173
      -19.9
      Pathfinder
      7,751
      6,119
      26.7
      29,818
      26,966
      10.6
      Armada
      4,490
      2,216
      102.6
      16,208
      13,011
      24.6
      Rogue
      28,600
      38,413
      -25.5
      146,573
      178,198
      -17.7
      Murano
      5,634
      5,881
      -4.2
      20,839
      29,994
      -30.5
      Quest
      0
      0
      n/a
      0
      2
      -100.0
      NV
      1,829
      1,702
      7.5
      7,830
      6,695
      17.0
      NV200
      1,825
      1,691
      7.9
      8,215
      8,083
      1.6
      Total Truck
      66,820
      66,739
      0.1
      298,847
      316,967
      -5.7
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      INFINITI
      MAY
      MAY
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Infiniti Total
      10,413
      11,625
      -10.4
      53,219
      61,472
      -13.4
      Infiniti Q50
      1,857
      2,945
      -36.9
      12,295
      16,526
      -25.6
      Infiniti Q60
      314
      848
      -63.0
      2,043
      4,101
      -50.2
      Infiniti Q70
      203
      390
      -47.9
      1,510
      2,153
      -29.9
      Infiniti QX30
      350
      672
      -47.9
      2,159
      4,158
      -48.1
      Infiniti QX50
      1,829
      1,859
      -1.6
      6,925
      7,356
      -5.9
      Infiniti QX60
      4,100
      3,718
      10.3
      19,703
      18,794
      4.8
      Infiniti QX70
      0
      69
      -100.0
      6
      741
      -99.2
      Infiniti QX80
      1,760
      1,124
      56.6
      8,578
      7,643
      12.2
      Total Car
      2,374
      4,183
      -43.2
      15,848
      22,780
      -30.4
      Total Truck
      8,039
      7,442
      8.0
      37,371
      38,692
      -3.4
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      NISSAN GROUP
      MAY
      MAY
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      TOTAL VEHICLE
      131,983
      131,832
      0.1
      593,532
      635,599
      -6.6
      Total Car
      57,124
      57,651
      -0.9
      257,314
      279,940
      -8.1
      Total Truck
      74,859
      74,181
      0.9
      336,218
      355,659
      -5.5
      Selling days
      26
      26
       
      127
      127
       
  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...