Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Porsche Demands $234 Million From Audi Over the Diesel Emission Mess

    Sign in to follow this  

      Just what Volkswagen needed, family members fighting

    As if the Volkswagen Group needed more headaches, a new report says there's a bit of infighting between Audi and Porsche.

    German tabloid Bild reports that Porsche is seeking 200 million Euros (about $234 million) from Audi to cover costs from the diesel emission scandal. Reportedly, Porsche management delivered this claim in a letter to their counterparts at Audi. Bild doesn't mention any source, so take this report with a fair amount of salt.

    When reached for comment by Reuters, a Porsche spokesman said internal issues were not open for public discussion. An Audi spokesperson declined to comment.

    This dispute stems from Audi admitting back in November 2015 that its 3.0L TDI V6 was fitted with a defeat device. One of those models using the V6 was the Porsche Cayenne.

    Source: Bild, Reuters

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Totally expected and a waste of time unless VW really keeps all the buckets seperate then ouch for Audi.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The ownership structure set up between Porsche, VW, and Audi is so confusing, I'd have to whiteboard it out to fully understand it.  There are no less than three companies in Germany named Porsche.  

    Porsche SE owns 52% of VW AG... Porsche SE is a holding company.

    VW AG owns 100% of Porsche AG... Porsche AG is a company that builds cars.

    Porsche AG owns 100% of Porsche Consulting GmbH..... not sure what Porsche Consulting GmbH does.

    Audi AG (which trades under the stock ticker NSU, an old company Auto Union acquired) is 100% owned by VW AG, but is legally a separate company from VW.   

    Audi AG also owns Ducati, Lamborghini, and... curiously... Audi Sport GmbH (formerly Quattro GmbH).  Never heard of that last one?  They build cars, but they don't sell to the public.  Audi Sport GmbH builds all of the RS models, sells them to Audi AG who then distributes and sells the vehicles. They also make the S-Line parts for the Audi AG cars.   Why they need this super confusing structure, I don't know.....

     

    So... when the article says Porsche is demanding money from Audi.... it still doesn't narrow down enough who is demanding money from whom.

    I wonder if VAG could shave a bunch more costs by simplifying their corporate structure(s) substantially. 

    • Confused 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    50 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The ownership structure set up between Porsche, VW, and Audi is so confusing, I'd have to whiteboard it out to fully understand it.  There are no less than three companies in Germany named Porsche.  

    Porsche SE owns 52% of VW AG... Porsche SE is a holding company.

    VW AG owns 100% of Porsche AG... Porsche AG is a company that builds cars.

    Porsche AG owns 100% of Porsche Consulting GmbH..... not sure what Porsche Consulting GmbH does.

    Audi AG (which trades under the stock ticker NSU, an old company Auto Union acquired) is 100% owned by VW AG, but is legally a separate company from VW.   

    Audi AG also owns Ducati, Lamborghini, and... curiously... Audi Sport GmbH (formerly Quattro GmbH).  Never heard of that last one?  They build cars, but they don't sell to the public.  Audi Sport GmbH builds all of the RS models, sells them to Audi AG who then distributes and sells the vehicles. They also make the S-Line parts for the Audi AG cars.   Why they need this super confusing structure, I don't know.....

     

    So... when the article says Porsche is demanding money from Audi.... it still doesn't narrow down enough who is demanding money from whom.

    I wonder if VAG could shave a bunch more costs by simplifying their corporate structure(s) substantially. 

    WOW :omfg: That is just one big mess and me think the unions is just as much responsible for the mess as the mgmt.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've read of Porsche Consulting in one of the car mags a few years ago.  They do speciality auto engineering consulting for other car makers on the down low. Like helping Hyundai design a cylinder head or Proton design a suspension.  ( not actual examples but hypothetical).   Kind of like what Lotus has done over the years, but without the publicity.  

    There is/was also Porsche Design, not sure where that fit in..they did things like bicycles, purses, laptop cases, etc..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    20 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I've read of Porsche Consulting in one of the car mags a few years ago.  They do speciality auto engineering consulting for other car makers on the down low. Like helping Hyundai design a cylinder head or Proton design a suspension.  ( not actual examples but hypothetical).   Kind of like what Lotus has done over the years, but without the publicity.  

    There is/was also Porsche Design, not sure where that fit in..they did things like bicycles, purses, laptop cases, etc..

    Cool, thanks. Porsche Design GmbH is probably 50% owned by Porsche SE and 25% owned by Ducati AG who is owned by Porsche AG who is owned by VW AG who is 50% owned by Porsche SE....

    Lamborghini has a similar design company who is probably owned by...  Oh forget it!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    18 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The ownership structure set up between Porsche, VW, and Audi is so confusing, I'd have to whiteboard it out to fully understand it.  There are no less than three companies in Germany named Porsche.  

    Porsche SE owns 52% of VW AG... Porsche SE is a holding company.

    VW AG owns 100% of Porsche AG... Porsche AG is a company that builds cars.

    Porsche AG owns 100% of Porsche Consulting GmbH..... not sure what Porsche Consulting GmbH does.

    Audi AG (which trades under the stock ticker NSU, an old company Auto Union acquired) is 100% owned by VW AG, but is legally a separate company from VW.   

    Audi AG also owns Ducati, Lamborghini, and... curiously... Audi Sport GmbH (formerly Quattro GmbH).  Never heard of that last one?  They build cars, but they don't sell to the public.  Audi Sport GmbH builds all of the RS models, sells them to Audi AG who then distributes and sells the vehicles. They also make the S-Line parts for the Audi AG cars.   Why they need this super confusing structure, I don't know.....

     

    So... when the article says Porsche is demanding money from Audi.... it still doesn't narrow down enough who is demanding money from whom.

    I wonder if VAG could shave a bunch more costs by simplifying their corporate structure(s) substantially. 

    They should radically simplify the corporate structure, just to save $$$$.  The only problem is is that VW Group is partially owned by the German Lander (or state) of Lower Saxony.  Simplifying the corporate ownership structure will probably require privatization first, then a buyout under one owner.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    They should radically simplify the corporate structure, just to save $$$$.  The only problem is is that VW Group is partially owned by the German Lander (or state) of Lower Saxony.  Simplifying the corporate ownership structure will probably require privatization first, then a buyout under one owner.

    Unions will probably resist as they do not want change as it could affect their golden goose.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      2021 is going to be a very interesting year for the Mazda3 as two more engines become available.
      According to separate reports from Jalopnik and Hagerty, Mazda will be dropping in the turbocharged 2.5L four-cylinder found in the 6, CX-5, and CX-9. The engine produces 227 horsepower on regular or 250 on premium. Like other Mazda models with this engine, the 3 will have it paired only with a six-speed automatic. Both reports say the engine will have AWD as standard. According to Hagerty's source, the engine will be available on a new trim called Premium Plus - likely taking the top spot in the 3's trim lineup. The source also confirmed this engine will not mean the return of the Mazdaspeed name for a hot variant. 
      The other engine is a 2.0L four-cylinder that Jalopnik reports is only for the sedan. Hagerty believes this engine is the SkyActiv-G used in the previous-generation 3, not the SkyActiv-X with its compression-ignition system.
      Not surprisingly, Mazda said they "“have not announced any details for the 2021 Mazda3," when asked about this.
      Source: Hagerty, Jalopnik

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      2021 is going to be a very interesting year for the Mazda3 as two more engines become available.
      According to separate reports from Jalopnik and Hagerty, Mazda will be dropping in the turbocharged 2.5L four-cylinder found in the 6, CX-5, and CX-9. The engine produces 227 horsepower on regular or 250 on premium. Like other Mazda models with this engine, the 3 will have it paired only with a six-speed automatic. Both reports say the engine will have AWD as standard. According to Hagerty's source, the engine will be available on a new trim called Premium Plus - likely taking the top spot in the 3's trim lineup. The source also confirmed this engine will not mean the return of the Mazdaspeed name for a hot variant. 
      The other engine is a 2.0L four-cylinder that Jalopnik reports is only for the sedan. Hagerty believes this engine is the SkyActiv-G used in the previous-generation 3, not the SkyActiv-X with its compression-ignition system.
      Not surprisingly, Mazda said they "“have not announced any details for the 2021 Mazda3," when asked about this.
      Source: Hagerty, Jalopnik
    • By William Maley
      Nearly a decade ago, Nissan launched an ambitious assault on the U.S. commercial van market with the launch of their NV vans. It started with the Titan-dervived, body-on-frame NV1500/2500/3500 vans. This was followed by the unibody NV200 van, which was for a time the "Taxi of Tommorow" in New York City. But Nissan is reportedly throwing in the towel.
      Automotive News has learned from a source that it will end production of their commercial vans. No time frame was given.
      "We don't want to go more in the business of vans in the U.S. We will exit," said the source.
      Nissan spokesman Brian Brockman declined to comment about the future of the commercial vans, only saying in a statement that the automaker " is considering a number of opportunities to streamline the product portfolio and drive efficiencies within our manufacturing operations."
      When the NV lineup was launched in 2009, Nissan was hoping to steal away sales from the Detroit Three. At the time, Ford and GM had 97 percent of the large van segment. The NV was positioned as being a more modern option compared to the Ford E-Series and Chevrolet Express/GMC Savana. It was more comfortable with adjustable seats, taller ceiling for easier access to the cargo area, and pre-drilled holes in the body to allow owners to add interior racks easily. But Nissan wasn't able to make decent inroads into this market, only achieving around an eight percent share in the marketplace.
      What was the NV's downfall?
      Brand Loyalty to the American brands Using a modified Titan platform for the larger vans comprised them in urban areas with their extended front nose, and cargo capacity. "A third of the vehicle is dedicated to the engine and passenger compartment instead of cargo. The van takes up more real estate for the same amount of cargo space," explained Sam Fiorani, vice president at AutoForecast Solutions. NV200 Taxis were dinged by taxi companies poor ride quality, difficulty entering/exiting the van for elderly passengers, and increasing maintenance costs. Proved to a be a difficult sale to fleet buyers due to the automaker lacking the numerous combinations of light-trucks that the Detroit three can offer. Trucks and vans work hand in hand to attract sales in the commercial market. "Chevrolet and Ford can be everything to everybody," said Tyler Slade, operating partner at Tim Dahle Nissan Southtowne in Salt Lake City. "When we went to some of these fleet companies, it didn't make sense for them to have trucks from Ford and vans from Nissan." Add in $2.8 billion in cuts that the company is planning to stay afloat and COVID-19, and the death knell was coming sooner than later for the NV family.
      If Nissan does go forward with dropping the NV family, this will be a major blow to about a forth of Nissan dealers in the U.S. They made various investments such as installing heavy-duty lifts capable of lifting fully-loaded vans and having a dedicated sales staff to handle specific fleet issues.
      "Dealers now have serious concerns about their investments in commercial vehicles," said Slade.
      There is also the question as to whether Nissan may try again. Automotive News notes that in the new business strategy outlined last month, Nissan is wanting more global cooperation with its alliance partner Renault. The French automaker already has a number of vans in its lineup and is quite successful in various markets. Nissan already sells a version of the Renault Traffic, called the NV300 in Europe.
      But getting a Renault van into the U.S. as a Nissan will be difficult and costly in terms of homologation. Also, Nissan would still need to figure out how to appeal to larger fleet buyers that go with Ford or GM.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Drive
      Pic Credit: William Maley for Cheers & Gears

      View full article
  • Posts

  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Observing and Reporting
      Observing and Reporting
      (45 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...