Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Tesla's Big Gamble With Model 3 Production

      There are risks and then there are Elon Musk's risks

    The Model 3 is Tesla's most anticipated vehicle and biggest gamble the company has undertaken. But this gamble has become more risky thanks to a decision concerning the production line.

    Reuters reports that Tesla is skipping a step most automakers undertake when producing a new vehicle. Prototype tools are bought in on the production line to help determine issues in terms of fit and finish. Once these issues are worked out, the prototype tools are scrapped and automakers place orders for permanent and expensive tools. But Musk told investors last month, Tesla was jumping into the permanent and expensive part first so they can meet their self-imposed volume production deadline of September.

    "He's pushing the envelope to see how much time and cost he can take out of the process," said Ron Harbour, a manufacturing consultant at Oliver Wyman.

    According to a source, this 'soft tooling' caused problems for Model X. Due to a tight timeline to get the vehicle into production, Tesla was unable to take any of the lessons learned from this before ordering the final production tooling.

    "Soft tooling did very little for the program and arguably hurt things," said the source.

    Musk said computer simulations has helped with skipping the prototype tooling stage.

    This move fits Elon Musk's tendency to take big gambles and do things a bit different than what is expected in the industry. Most of the time, it has paid off. 

    The problem is if this equipment proves to be flawed in some way, it could cost Tesla millions to fix the issue and introduce production delays. 

    "It's an experiment, certainly," said Jake Fisher from Consumer Reports. Tesla could possibly fix these errors quickly, "or it could be they have unsuspected problems they'll have a hard time dealing with."

    Source: Reuters

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    G. David Felt

    OUCH, FAILURE! One only has to look at Boeing and the Dream liner to learn that simulations only and direct to production equipment fails. Cost to Boeing was billions to fix the problems of having parts built all over the world and not connecting up fit n finish.

    Tesla could be killing themselves with this error. I truly hope not, but have yet to see simulations that could actually make perfections of moving from prototype to production with no alpha or beta. Yes you could say they did a merge of those two to hit their self imposed deadlines. Be interesting to see how the first few auto's come out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565

    This could pay off for them.  In theory if the tooling is right from the start then all should be fine and allow them to ramp up production volume.  Tesla needs volume to get some money rolling in.

    15 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I guess he's lucky he's rich and this can be a pet project for him.... just keep dumping money into it until it works. 

    I knew he was a billionaire, but I didn't realize til last weekend that is worth 14.5 billion.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt
    4 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    This could pay off for them.  In theory if the tooling is right from the start then all should be fine and allow them to ramp up production volume.  Tesla needs volume to get some money rolling in.

    I knew he was a billionaire, but I didn't realize til last weekend that is worth 14.5 billion.

    Most of that is in Tesla stock. He will be on the low end of extreme rich if he does not watch it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell
    4 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    This could pay off for them.  In theory if the tooling is right from the start then all should be fine and allow them to ramp up production volume.  Tesla needs volume to get some money rolling in.

    I knew he was a billionaire, but I didn't realize til last weekend that is worth 14.5 billion.

    And that's net worth, no? (I haven't looked in a while) That means he has some leverage too.

    I know Solar City is doing well at building a customer base

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    A Horse With No Name
    2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I guess he's lucky he's rich and this can be a pet project for him.... just keep dumping money into it until it works. 

    Problematically his cash flow cannot stand a major hit of any kind...

    2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    And that's net worth, no? (I haven't looked in a while) That means he has some leverage too.

    I know Solar City is doing well at building a customer base

     

    That is good news on solar City.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    oldshurst442

    I too want Tesla to stick around.

    My partner's Model S is problem free so far, he had a couple of recalls, but my wife's Fusion is on 3 going on 4 recalls so....that is not a problem for Ford, why would a recall be viewed as a problem for Tesla?

    Therefore, when my 2012 Acura's time is up in 4-5-6-7 years time, a Model 3 is what Im looking at!

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    A Horse With No Name
    11 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    I too want Tesla to stick around.

    My partner's Model S is problem free so far, he had a couple of recalls, but my wife's Fusion is on 3 going on 4 recalls so....that is not a problem for Ford, why would a recall be viewed as a problem for Tesla?

    Therefore, when my 2012 Acura's time is up in 4-5-6-7 years time, a Model 3 is what Im looking at!

    Agree on the three. I think it might make a nice replacement for the 2003 Cooper S I am currently driving.

    Tesla 3 and a GTI might make for a very nice garage indeed....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    I want to see Tesla succeed, I look at them as a tech company first and car maker second, and I root for American tech companies...weird factoid--Musk and I share a birthday, though I'm a year older.   He's an interesting Silicon Valley guy, a bit crazy and out there, as they tend to be.  Running 3-4 companies, I wonder if he ever sleeps...total workaholic it sounds like..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt
    48 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I want to see Tesla succeed, I look at them as a tech company first and car maker second, and I root for American tech companies...weird factoid--Musk and I share a birthday, though I'm a year older.   He's an interesting Silicon Valley guy, a bit crazy and out there, as they tend to be.  Running 3-4 companies, I wonder if he ever sleeps...total workaholic it sounds like..

    Could be why he is not married yet.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt
    2 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    He's been married and divorced 2-3 times and has 5 kids. 

    wow, did not know this and had not heard this. Amazing, guess his Alpha type personality does not mesh with others well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    riviera74

    I do hope it works out but I have my doubts.  Tesla needs to nail everything down and the Model 3 may need another six months to be fully baked.  It would be better to push back the self-imposed deadline and Get It Right than push out an inferior product into the marketplace.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt
    39 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    I do hope it works out but I have my doubts.  Tesla needs to nail everything down and the Model 3 may need another six months to be fully baked.  It would be better to push back the self-imposed deadline and Get It Right than push out an inferior product into the marketplace.

    Agree, with 400K reservations, if they role out a piss poor product that has issues, I am not so sure the public will be as forgiving as the buyers of their Model X were with the problems. As stated in many articles, the buyers of the Model S and Model X expect things to not be perfect due to being more concept or alpha / beta stage of auto but still do expect it to be fixed down the road.

    Tesla 3 could hurt them more than help if they do not have it solidly baked before selling.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    A Horse With No Name
    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

    wow, did not know this and had not heard this. Amazing, guess his Alpha type personality does not mesh with others well.

    Very common for Alpha type males not to be good husbands...what woman want in romance novels and what they can actually live with on a day to day basis are two entirely different things.

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Agree, with 400K reservations, if they role out a piss poor product that has issues, I am not so sure the public will be as forgiving as the buyers of their Model X were with the problems. As stated in many articles, the buyers of the Model S and Model X expect things to not be perfect due to being more concept or alpha / beta stage of auto but still do expect it to be fixed down the road.

    Tesla 3 could hurt them more than help if they do not have it solidly baked before selling.

    I think if they can stay in Business another 5 years they will pretty much have it made, as they will be able to sell a lot of 3's at some point.  We are still a good 5 years plus away from when things really start to turn to electric IMHO.

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    spelling
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall
    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

    wow, did not know this and had not heard this. Amazing, guess his Alpha type personality does not mesh with others well.

    I read an interview w his first wife that he would tell her that if she were an employee, he would have fired her. She said he treated her and the kids like employees. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    A Horse With No Name
    8 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I read an interview w his first wife that he would tell her that if she were an employee, he would have fired her. She said he treated her and the kids like employees. 

    That seems about right from some of the things I have heard and read...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×

  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • trinacriabob
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      Good morning ... ... good times ...
    • trinacriabob
      Airplanes

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      The Airbus vs. Boeing debate goes on and on.  Here, it's about the newer Airbus 350 versus the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.  Realistically, the A-350 could only compare to a B-787-10, the longest version of the Dreamliner.  That said, they often pit the A-350, which could carry a lot of passengers in 2 class configuration, against the B-777. I have flown on 3 Boeing 787s in the last 5 years.  Two were medium-haul and one was transatlantic - Rome to Philadelphia's AA hub. I just flew on the Airbus 350 for the first time about a week ago.  It was by Finnair, picked up at Helsinki after transferring there for the flight to the U.S. I was truly expecting more from the Airbus 350.  It does what it's supposed to do.  It seems to be getting more sales than the Boeing. I prefer the Boeing 787 Dreamliner by a slight margin.  The most important thing is that the humidification felt better in the 787.  They say the A-350 is quieter, but it's negligible to the untrained ear.  Even though some complain that the crew can lock and control the window dimming on the 787, they did not do this on my flights and I loved it, complete with the big taller windows.   The A-350 metrics seem to benefit the operator.  The A-350 can seat more people, it burns slightly less fuel, and can fly slightly more nautical miles, but it seemed crammed and I didn't like the feel of the cabin, right down to shades on the windows.  In waiting on the delayed plane A-350 for an hour, the heat gain against my window - with the shade down - was too much.  I got up and walked around the rear galley where the air conditioning better cooled me down.  Both have 3-3-3 seating and they say that the A-350 cabin width puts a few more inches on the seat.  That doesn't come into play for me.  Not only that, Airbus puts in more thin Recaro-looking seats that seem hard whereas the Boeing puts in seats with a more conventional sculpted silhouette.  It's subjective.  I didn't find the A350 all that much quieter and like the "open sky" architecture of the 787 cabin, the seats, the dimming, and the humidification.   The A-350 has a straighter looking wing angle with curled wingtips that look cool when they are maneuvering.  However, the fully upward curved wing of the B-787 is stunning.  The B-787 is a slightly better looking plane. I wish more carriers of 9 abreast aircraft would follow Japan Air Lines' move (in their B-787) to 2-4-2, which would make the Dreamliner more of a dream. If 9 across (3-3-3), I would go with the Boeing 787.  However, I could skip this debate and step down in size to Airbus's latest A330-900 neo.  It's got some up the upgrades, and keeps skinny harder seats; however, the 2-4-2 seating is the way to go for more comfort.
    • trinacriabob
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      I don't know what to say ... typical Midwest political demographics where big cities with large minority populations, state capitals, and college towns are blue while everywhere else is red. After the 2016 election, I was driving across I-70 in the Buckeye state.  To my right was a Sonic or Spark with the bumper sticker "Get Lost, Hillary."  As I got alongside it, it was a smaller older white woman whose hair had a blue hue befitting a "bluehair," it also looked like she had stuck her finger in a light socket, and she had a slight underbite like a bulldog.  The funny thing is that this is the demographic of the very people Agent Orange hates because they 'make him look cheap.' I really wanted to get her attention and give her the finger Viggo Mortensen style as in "Green Book."  I might have occasionally done that in the past - in my SoCal days, which wasn't too smart - but I don't really do that anymore.
    • G. David Felt
      Permanent Car Spotters

      By G. David Felt · Posted

      Ran some errands this morning and saw a mint condition CT6 Blackwing in glossy black burbling along the road, sounded really good compared to the crack high pitch noise of the mustangs and other luxury brands. Cadillac nailed the defined muscle sound of the exhaust. Noticeable, but not annoying.
    • Robert Hall
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By Robert Hall · Posted

      I think it's mostly automated, their BS algorithms are doing keyword searches... people also can report things, I do all the time, don't know if they result in time outs. 

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search