Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...

Jeep News: Why No Turbo-Four in the Jeep Gladiator?!


William Maley

Recommended Posts

We have been wondering for some time why the mild-hybrid eTorque powertrain was missing from the Gladiator's available powertrains. The eTorque powertrain pairs a turbocharged 2.0L four-cylinder with a 48-volt mild hybrid system. This not only improves overall fuel economy, but provides slightly more torque than the 3.6L V6 - 295 vs. 260 pound-feet. We assumed the reason came down to possible issues with towing. It seems our hunch was right.

The Drive reached out to FCA to see why the Gladiator wasn't being offered with the eHybrid. This was the response from the spokesperson.

"The 3.6-liter engine can handle the temperatures seen while towing."

Reading between the lines, it seems Jeep doesn't expect eHybrid powertrain to handle the towing duties of a pickup truck. The Gladiator is rated to tow a max of 7,650 pounds, beating the Chevrolet Colorado Diesel by 50 pounds.

Source: The Drive


View full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

Wise decision.  Save the hybrids for Chrysler cars and minivans.

But I thought RAM had a Tow capable 48V Hybrid system already? Why not use it here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dfelt said:

But I thought RAM had a Tow capable 48V Hybrid system already? Why not use it here?

Maybe packaging issues?   The RAM has a lot more space than the Wrangler/Gladiator under the hood...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No benefit to the system.  Ram Rebel E-torque is rated for 22 MPG and gets 17.5 in real world testing over to the TFL... worse than the high-powered 6 cylinder in the Raptor and the good ol' 5.3 in the Chevy Trail boss.  All that for a hefty price premium over the normal Hemi.  LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

Well, if you’re out in the middle of nowhere, where are you going to charge it? 😮 

Just not sure of the use in a Jeep.....

FCA 48V hybrid system assists the ICE power train with much added instant torque and reduced fuel consumption. You can run it on pure gas and still get the electric benefits, you just would not have pure electric range till the battery was charged up.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dfelt said:

FCA 48V hybrid system assists the ICE power train with much added instant torque and reduced fuel consumption. You can run it on pure gas and still get the electric benefits, you just would not have pure electric range till the battery was charged up.

Yeah, I know-just being sassy.. 😉 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/6/2018 at 10:57 AM, Robert Hall said:

Maybe packaging issues?   The RAM has a lot more space than the Wrangler/Gladiator under the hood...

An E-class has a 48 volt hybrid and 6 cylinder under the hood, if it fits there, I am sure it would fit in a Jeep.

They have a turbo 4 in the Silverado, so how can they make it work and not overheat but Jeep can not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 12/6/2018 at 7:17 AM, riviera74 said:

Wise decision.  Save the hybrids for Chrysler cars and minivans.

 

6 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

Agreed...

Less Jeep mess to clean up......

Too Late, the Wrangler PHEV is out already on the roads being tested.

https://www.autoblog.com/2019/03/20/2021-jeep-wrangler-phev-spy-photos/

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ocnblu said:

Sure, at an estimated TEN THOUSAND dollar premium over a normal Wrangler, I am sure they will sell like hotcakes off an electric griddle.

Who says it will cost an extra $10K? 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dfelt said:

Who says it will cost an extra $10K? 🤷‍♂️

I guess that was inferred from this paragraph at the linked story..

Jeep said that the Wrangler plug-in will launch in 2020. It will likely cost a fair bit more than a basic Wrangler, considering the fact the base Pacifica Hybrid is about $13,000 more than a base non-hybrid version. Some of that is probably due to equipment differences, but the hybrid powertrain will still probably command a premium of a few grand.

 

History has shown that no matter the price of options, the Wrangler still sells well..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

I guess that was inferred from this paragraph at the linked story..

Jeep said that the Wrangler plug-in will launch in 2020. It will likely cost a fair bit more than a basic Wrangler, considering the fact the base Pacifica Hybrid is about $13,000 more than a base non-hybrid version. Some of that is probably due to equipment differences, but the hybrid powertrain will still probably command a premium of a few grand.

 

History has shown that no matter the price of options, the Wrangler still sells well..

Agree the wrangler will still sell well.

Was curious, so off to the Chrysler website to see what details were.

Pacifica Limited has a $44,445 MSRP.

Pacifica Limited Hybrid has a $45,545 MSRP

I am expecting Jeep to keep the price tight like this too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is very cool read on how JEEP is planning to make the Gladiator stand out in the crowd starting with the removable doors.

https://www.autonews.com/future-product/jeep-gladiators-conquest-plan-stand-out-crowd

I had no idea that in the US, 1,400 trucks are sold a day here. WOW are we Truck Crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, and the Ford Bronco will have removable doors and roof as well, with the side mirrors attached to the a-pillar, unlike the Wrangler/Gladiola, which have the mirrors attached to the doors.  Ford has a better idea here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings