Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

ccap41

New Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,851

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    88

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ccap41

  1. ccap41
    Yeah that's why I thought it was impossible to be that small.. WOW! Thank You! Come to think of it, I do remember reading how the XT4 was supposed to have the roomiest back seat and I guess that is why, they ate into the hatch space. Still odd that with the seats folded it isn't the same size as the 'Nox/Terrain.
  2. ccap41
    I find it almost impossible to believe there is more cargo space in a Golf than an XT4.
  3. ccap41
    Yup! There's a MASSIVE Diamler plant about 45 minutes away from me that's been empty for around a decade now.
  4. ccap41
    Knowing nothing other than power figures, they should use that 2.7T in a lot of things!
  5. ccap41
    To me, the Cadillac looks leaps and bounds better than the Chevy. I'd buy and drive an XT4/5 but I wouldn't buy the Blazer. Although I'm not excited about the XT4/5 engines at all.
  6. ccap41
    LAME. ??
  7. ccap41
    Luckily, the XT4 and XT5 look the exact same.
  8. ccap41
    Well, if there were winners and losers here you would be in the losers column. The whole point of this blew over your head. I never asked if they compete or what class they're in. They've both on the same mid size crossover platform and I only asked about their looks.
  9. ccap41
    Well, pretty simple, who wore it better?
  10. ccap41
    Unless the styling is spot on to your eyes, I don't see a reason to buy this over a JGC or an Edge. Second thought, I forgot about Ford's old and lame n/a 3.5 as a middle engine next to the GM 3.6. On that end, the Blazer is better but both Jeep and Ford offer more powertrain options, and better ones, IMO.
  11. ccap41
    It's also an Edge, Fusion, and MKX motor.
  12. ccap41
    Completely agree. It just seems really odd to use a n/a 4 banger in something this size. They're taking the Kia Sorento and Highlander approach offering a n/a 4 banger. They are offering more power & torque than those two. I think those are the only three offering those base engines. It seems weird to me. I think they could have done a 2.0T that they already have in-house and tune it for efficiency with something like 225hp and 250tq and it still leaves plenty of room for the upcharged 3.6 with 310hp/266tq... The 3800 would be a better choice! 200hp 230tq would be almost perfect for a base engine. The Traverse has the 2.0T as an option.
  13. ccap41
    Ya know I knew it downsized but I thought the Traverse did too.
  14. ccap41
    I didn't know Acadia and Traverse changed in sizes. I thought they were still twins. My baaaaad. (that's number 4 on his list ?)
  15. ccap41
    Because they have the Traverse.
  16. ccap41
    Pretty sharp looking vehicle. I'm not sure about the doors but it's a concept so they might not stick.
  17. ccap41
    Really?? But...why?
  18. ccap41
    The 2.5 is not a great choice for..either.. Less than 200hp, less than 200tq. The Acadia probably can't get out of its own way. This will be better as it's smaller
  19. ccap41
    Why does the Acadia have a base 2.5 and the Traverse has a base 3.6? The optional engine on the Traverse is the 2.0T and optional engine at GMC is the 3.6...?
  20. ccap41
    First glance instantly reminded me of the Lexus "predator" fascia like @smk4565 said. But why the n/a 2.5???? If this is a JGC and Edge competitor it's way behind on the engine lineup.
  21. ccap41
    Correct. Consumers absorb the price increase.
  22. ccap41
    I believe the goal is just a level playing field as we pay waaaay more in tariffs that others pay to sell their stuff here.
  23. ccap41
    That's where I figured the loophole was... Globally they've had a diesel option in every car, I'm assuming. I have a feeling they know their past products a little better than we do.
  24. ccap41
    They could get the power numbers they need with the 2.0 but it would be a dog on fuel to the point it isn't even worth it.
  25. ccap41
    Yeah if i lived somewhere different and used the extra goodies, I would definitely want that. ORRRRR I'd still want the more "road-ready" JGC and try and invest in a Wrangler as a toy anyway... ??‍♂️
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search