Jump to content
Create New...

Robert Hall

Premium Subscriber
  • Posts

    32,446
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    239

Everything posted by Robert Hall

  1. The badge and dealer experience?
  2. Meh... Yes....so much unrelenting mediocrity. Have they really improved since then with the volume stuff? I know the quality and reliability is better, but the product just seems so uninspired..
  3. True..they've improved since the infinite mediocrity of the 80s-90s X-bodies, A-bodies, J-bodies.....truly generic appliances. Disposable, forgettable cars with no character, just cheap plastics and trivial brand differences. These CUVs have distinct styling, but they are just as forgettable as past GM generics..just fodder for recycling in 10-15 years, nothing memorable. Sad that GM doesn't aspire to do better.
  4. Different badging, different dealers (usually). I'd assume the interior plastics are better than the Chevy, GMC or Buick and they have more interior color choices?
  5. GM just can't help themselves... new GM is like old GM still in that if we have a platform available, every dealer gets a variation... esp. something that is currently hot like midsize crossovers. C1XX is the J-body or W-body etc of today.. same meat, different toppings. I'd assume the '64 A-bodies had the same chassis...same wheelbase. What point would it have been to have different chassis for each brand? I know GM had a lot of duplication back then like different V8s at each brand, but I would have thought they would strive for some commonality for economies of scale in manufacturing, esp. with the dirty bits. I would think the '65 B-body chassis would have been similar across the brands also other than wheelbase variations...likewise for the C-bodies. Anyway, back to present day..the one vehicle w/ different trims view is intriguing...what is a GM brand/division these days, beyond styling and trim? Just a marketing organization mostly..
  6. Good news for the Motor City, good news for Jeep.
  7. Maybe more reliable...the Korean products tend to be more simpler and more reliable than the infinitely complex Germans.
  8. Who knows...even in the ancient black & white world GM did have some body and platform sharing between divisions.
  9. The more things change with GM, the more they stay the same...every brand gets it's own versions. They went so crazy w/ GMT360, surprised Pontiac and Cadillac didn't get variations of that...
  10. I don't know, doesn't look like it has enough rear legroom for you...;)
  11. Didn't see that post. Doesn't sound encouraging for them.
  12. ??? Peugeot is a PSA brand, Renault is a Renault-Nissan brand. Unrelated. I don't think there has been any announcement about Renault returning to NA.
  13. I'm not sure what they can do to stand out in a crowded market. Citroen or DS would have been a better choice for emphasizing the 'Frenchness'...Citroen today, though, doesn't have the weird factor that was their strength in the past. Other than VW, there aren't any non-premium mainstream European brands in the US these days, so Peugeot could fit in that way, as an alternative to VW or the mainstream Korean and Japanese brands....but with what hook to make it stand out?
  14. Alas, the world is full of such uniformed, clueless people...and this is an enthusiast page, so we are aware of common platforms...I have no interest in what the general public think about anything...
  15. I don't know why Chevy would target Acura, though..that's what GMC or Buick is for. Chevy should be targeting Honda, Nissan, Toyota, Ford, Hyundai, etc...the entry level brands.
  16. The Blazer seems like a Murano competitor more than anything...they even copied the older Murano styling w/ the kicked up quarter window.
  17. I suppose so, but I can't really compare cars from long ago with these plastic generic FWD lease appliances. Different GM, different time and place. Ford doesn't have any filler brands anymore, though since they got rid of Mercury..so I'm not surprised they run the price up to Lincoln price points.
  18. box with blue box w/ question mark.
  19. They still have some filler brands, though...GMC and Buick. At least the styling is differentiated..
  20. Damn that gray plastic interior is ugly...and what is up w/ the center vents so low on the dash....better inside than a 2005 Equinox, I suppose, but still ugly gray and cheap.
  21. Maybe..2008-2009 was a really bad time for the auto industry... they were barely hanging on then.
  22. Well, it is 10+ year old vehicle so the fit & finish probably wouldn't be that great... I see a few around here occasionally, rusty and worn out but still running.
  23. Base 4cyl power in midsize pickups seems to vary quite a bit...the Ranger seems to have the most base power in the US market...2.3 Turbo w/ 270hp. The Colorado has a 2.5 w/ 200hp, and Nissan Frontier has a 2.5 w/ 152hp, so the Tacoma is consistent w/ the Frontier in base power.
  24. True, but this is GM...they always seem to compete with themselves..
  25. Though I don't see consumers cross shopping Chevy and Cadillac, the Blazer gives the Chevy dealer something to compete w/ the Acadia and XT5 at dealers across or down the street...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search