Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Spying: 2018 Buick Regal

    Sign in to follow this  

      We get our first glimpse at the next Regal

    We have been waiting to get our first look at the next-generation Buick Regal since spy shots of Opel Insignia first surfaced back in August. Well today, Motor Authority got their hands on the first spy shots of the next Regal.

     

    Much like the Insignia spy shots, the Regal mule is heavily camouflaged. But there is on detail that we can pull from the pictures. It looks like Buick is sticking with the sedan design. The Insignia spy shots revealed a fastback roof that was similar to the Audi A7.

     

    The Regal is expected to use the E2XX platform that currently underpins the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu.

     

    It is expected that Opel will reveal the Insignia at the Paris Motor Show in October. The Regal will follow shortly thereafter.

     

    Source: Motor Authority

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I'd bet 100 dollars to a donut that if they made a Crossover Coupe based on E2XX or D2xX that it would outsell the Regal 2 to 1 or more.  

     

    I can't see the Regal moving any worthwhile volume to even continue with the product.  People spending $30-35k will just buy a crossover, and car enthusiasts like myself that hate crossovers wouldn't buy a Buick.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Given that the Malibu comes with an 8-speed auto and 2.0T, I'm curious what this leaves for Buick besides AWD and a variable suspension. Buick's manual transmission take rate was far too low to continue offering. Will we see a Regal GS re-imagined as a meaningful AWD sport sedan and 300+ horsepower? The brand does seem to be lacking a meaningful halo car for generating brand interest and showroom appeal.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Buick needs styling to bring customers in, not some halo car that tramples over Cadillac. And Buick has styling now in spades. Easily the Enclave is their halo vehicle already.

     

    Remember, the original branding strategy of GM was to have distinct brands for the life stage and wealth of the customer. 

     

    I do not equate Buick as a brand that needs some sexy coupe that won't sell at this time. The brand needs more new crossovers and the 2-3 new sedans being marketed, they need the meat. And the styling of a RWD car can easily be duplicated onto a FWD vehicle, as shown by the new Volvo S90 and Mazda 6, and to a lesser extent, Lincoln Continental.

     

    The Regal GS is already pitted against faux sport sedans like the CLA and Volvo S60, and against the former it's no contest and against the latter there are a lot of similarities.

     

    The brand interest is there CP. and the brand interest these days is all about crossovers. The coupe days are kinda over for too many companies. Boomers with bad backs and increasing upward economic mobility of women and a renewed focus on practicality but without a dowdy minivan form equates to future crossovers continuing to outpace sedans.

     

    I do not want Buick to get a re-skinned Cadillac. The brand's most profitable models, the Enclave, Encore and Lacrosse are all based off of their non-premium company platforms, which allows for a lot of luxury features to be delivered in a stylish and competitive package.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I read CP's post and I was like...DAMN RIGHT, CP!!!

    Bring on the Avista 4 door coupe!!!!

     

    Then I read Suave's post. and I was like...DAMNED RIGHT Suave!

    The Avista is not needed!

     

    But then I was like...Hey! Wait a minute! Didnt I just contradict myself???!!!

     

    So...right now, Im one confused hombre.

     

     

    Then I got the little light bulb working...

    Buick actually needs both.

     

    They need a flashy car. Because flashy cars always have somebody talk about the brand...whether it sells or not is not important. Flash gets you noticed. Its good to be noticed because you dont want to fall by the way side.

    But Buick also needs to vehicles that people actually buy and want to buy, because after all, what good does the flash do, get talked about, but have no desirable yet feasible and ATTAINABLE cars in the showroom for people to actually buy? 

     

    SUVs/CUVs sell at this point in time.

    But everybody gots those in their showrooms.

    How does a brand distinguish these bland appliances from the next guy?

     

    BMW calls them SAVs, but they also have all sorts of other flashy cars in the show room that garner desirability which in turn garners the plebeian SUV called SAV desirable...

     

    How does Buick do that?

    Yes, by having a pretty face does not do any harm, but, Hyundai and Lincoln and Audi and everybody else also have SUVs with pretty mugs...

     

    There comes a time when Buick's pretty face does get lost in the crowd...

     

    So...a flashy car that instills lust in the brand helps people get their lazy asses in the Buick showroom. And if the right product is there for people to buy when they see the flashy car in person, they drive off in a brand new shiny Buick just the same, even if it aint the flashy car but the plebeian appliance SUV with that has the pretty face!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Really, I just think that having a halo car is not as effective as it used to be. Having that one pricy product that is RWD, low-slung, no space is just isomorphic. 

     

    You need a real stunner. You need more than even COTY. You need something that makes every brand scramble to copy you. That is the halo car. A disruptor, a latent need deliverer...the kind of vehicle that makes people say, "why didn't they think of that sooner? It's brilliant!" It doesn't have to be a coupe or sedan. It just has to capture, captivate, and create the need for that kind of proposition made by that kind of product.

     

    Cadillac's halo is still the Escalade.

     

    And Buick, I'd rather some guy who wants a nicer Buick to exist, aka has the big bucks, to just go to the Cadillac showroom. and be happier that he/she didn't have to wait... Instead of GM really wasting money to get the same customer. 

     

    Even Avista 4 door will have a lot of resistance inside GM. It's not about what the brand is about. It's about how well a product fits with that strategy. It is so much easier and more effective for Buick just to have modern, stylish products. I'm no armchair product planner - but I think Buick is already doing real well or as well as they can. In global markets like China - the Buick so well known already.

     

    Avista styling on an existing name plate makes perfect sense. Make the Regal look a lot like the Avista, except perhaps overhangs and dash to axle, you're already there. Buyers don't care which wheels are driven, heck they probably think all AWD systems are the same, because they all boast superior traction and performance. 

     

    People gobble up Enclaves and Encores, and want even more. They don't need a halo car that meets the traditional definition of a low-slung, future defining product. In any case, the Enclave performed the same role when it came out 6-7 years ago. It wasn't a sporty car - but it previewed into the future, and at a the time was almost unrivaled anywhere.

     

    Halo cars are myth, because sometimes they fail, they flop and no value is created. And Buick to deliver a halo car that is special, will obviously have to be better than some Cadillacs. Other carmakers also don't need to chase for sporty and coupe-like, because once everyone does that - obviously the people who need headroom and space in a sedan will go elsewhere.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And now...Im back in being one confused hombre again.

    But not really, because...

     

    Point very well understood, Suave. And Im swinging back to your side of the fence.

    Edited by oldshurst442

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I read CP's post and I was like...DAMN RIGHT, CP!!!

    Bring on the Avista 4 door coupe!!!!

     

    Then I read Suave's post. and I was like...DAMNED RIGHT Suave!

    The Avista is not needed!

     

    But then I was like...Hey! Wait a minute! Didnt I just contradict myself???!!!

     

    So...right now, Im one confused hombre.

     

     

    Then I got the little light bulb working...

    Buick actually needs both.

     

    They need a flashy car. Because flashy cars always have somebody talk about the brand...whether it sells or not is not important. Flash gets you noticed. Its good to be noticed because you dont want to fall by the way side.

    But Buick also needs to vehicles that people actually buy and want to buy, because after all, what good does the flash do, get talked about, but have no desirable yet feasible and ATTAINABLE cars in the showroom for people to actually buy? 

     

    SUVs/CUVs sell at this point in time.

    But everybody gots those in their showrooms.

    How does a brand distinguish these bland appliances from the next guy?

     

    BMW calls them SAVs, but they also have all sorts of other flashy cars in the show room that garner desirability which in turn garners the plebeian SUV called SAV desirable...

     

    How does Buick do that?

    Yes, by having a pretty face does not do any harm, but, Hyundai and Lincoln and Audi and everybody else also have SUVs with pretty mugs...

     

    There comes a time when Buick's pretty face does get lost in the crowd...

     

    So...a flashy car that instills lust in the brand helps people get their lazy asses in the Buick showroom. And if the right product is there for people to buy when they see the flashy car in person, they drive off in a brand new shiny Buick just the same, even if it aint the flashy car but the plebeian appliance SUV with that has the pretty face!

     

    There is a limit to how flashy you can go.

     

    Buick is above all, still known for being very comfortable.

     

    I don't want Buick to chase after any brand. So many companies think they can be better if they emulate other company's success. Of course if this was the 60s, then I'd reverse my words and say hell yes make a RWD barge like they used to. 

     

    Blindly chasing sales and segments is not good. However, there is a time and place for halo vehicles. If say, Cadillac was the level of Bentley in prestige, and Buick was the level of Cadillac as it is today... would you not expect to just see the Cadillac of today reskinned as Buicks. 

     

    Then the Avista would be almost what we consider the El Miraj concept, expect the El Miraj would be in production, and an Alpha coupe like the Camaro would be nowhere near as prestigious, and therefore would never overlap the Omega coupe.

     

    Some kinds of overlap are perfectly reasonable. Buick based off platforms shared by Chevy is perfectly acceptable, because by large, the new Chevy cars drive pretty awesome as it is. 

     

    What they needs is the meat. And that's what they're doing. They should only get the Avista if they know for sure that the product delivers different things from any comparable Cadillac. Which is hard for me to believe.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It doesn't matter, the car serves a place in the Buick lineup.  They are going to make this car for Europe anyways, so its ready made to add to the lineup here.

     

    Especially since the new LaCrosse is no longer sexy looking.....its back to staid cars for the biggest Buick, and in this case it has plenty of Chinese + old Hyundai charisma.  Not that that is bad, the new LaCrosse will still sell.

     

    Buick is littering their lineup to be a collection of inconsistent looking product from the world bag.  Again, not really too bad a thing.  Just keep the quality up, keep them comfortable and keep the retail experience upper class.  One big reason Buick and GMC exist is so people who like GM are not forced to slum in the Chevy show room.

     

    But SOMETHING in the Buick lineup has to be a little lively, while still being comfortable, and so even if this only sold 30,000 a year its the defacto Buick performance sedan.  A sprinkle of Euro in the Buick showroom to offset all those China vibes alone is well worth it.

     

    No way the car is anything besides a fancier version of the new Malibu.  And that may be a good thing.  Those clamoring for the Avista.  Give it up.  With the new LaCrosse, Regal, and Verano in the showrooms, and with the need for more crossovers, the brand can't support a 4 door coupe like the Avista.  Especially if its on the small Camaro chassis.  No way you can make a case for that niche car when the Regal fills the niche in the US and makes its sales volume in Europe.

     

    And then Buick's own crossovers will kill it too.

     

    I do prefer the shape of the lift back here, too bad it won't get here.  Maybe the wagon will.

     

    I know its heavily disguised but between this and the projected renderings out there, I don't expect it to be too flashy.  But maybe tasteful enough and with a nice enough interior to stand apart from the other Buicks and the Malibu, it will make that 30,000 unit mark if they keep the price in check.

     

    This the car they should put a 2.0 diesel in.

    Edited by regfootball
    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe it is the cameo to cover the car so guess I have to wait and see but it still looks like the same bland Jelly Bean style of so many cars right now. :(

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just looks like a generic midsize sedan covered in crap.  Anyways not expecting too much, this isn't a very interesting segment.   I'd be shocked if anything close to the Avista gets produced, it's much better looking than A&S Cadillacs.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I read CP's post and I was like...DAMN RIGHT, CP!!!

    Bring on the Avista 4 door coupe!!!!

     

    Then I read Suave's post. and I was like...DAMNED RIGHT Suave!

    The Avista is not needed!

     

    But then I was like...Hey! Wait a minute! Didnt I just contradict myself???!!!

     

    So...right now, Im one confused hombre.

     

     

    Then I got the little light bulb working...

    Buick actually needs both.

     

    They need a flashy car. Because flashy cars always have somebody talk about the brand...whether it sells or not is not important. Flash gets you noticed. Its good to be noticed because you dont want to fall by the way side.

    But Buick also needs to vehicles that people actually buy and want to buy, because after all, what good does the flash do, get talked about, but have no desirable yet feasible and ATTAINABLE cars in the showroom for people to actually buy? 

     

    SUVs/CUVs sell at this point in time.

    But everybody gots those in their showrooms.

    How does a brand distinguish these bland appliances from the next guy?

     

    BMW calls them SAVs, but they also have all sorts of other flashy cars in the show room that garner desirability which in turn garners the plebeian SUV called SAV desirable...

     

    How does Buick do that?

    Yes, by having a pretty face does not do any harm, but, Hyundai and Lincoln and Audi and everybody else also have SUVs with pretty mugs...

     

    There comes a time when Buick's pretty face does get lost in the crowd...

     

    So...a flashy car that instills lust in the brand helps people get their lazy asses in the Buick showroom. And if the right product is there for people to buy when they see the flashy car in person, they drive off in a brand new shiny Buick just the same, even if it aint the flashy car but the plebeian appliance SUV with that has the pretty face!

     

    There is a limit to how flashy you can go.

     

    Buick is above all, still known for being very comfortable.

     

    I don't want Buick to chase after any brand. So many companies think they can be better if they emulate other company's success. Of course if this was the 60s, then I'd reverse my words and say hell yes make a RWD barge like they used to. 

     

    Blindly chasing sales and segments is not good. However, there is a time and place for halo vehicles. If say, Cadillac was the level of Bentley in prestige, and Buick was the level of Cadillac as it is today... would you not expect to just see the Cadillac of today reskinned as Buicks. 

     

    Then the Avista would be almost what we consider the El Miraj concept, expect the El Miraj would be in production, and an Alpha coupe like the Camaro would be nowhere near as prestigious, and therefore would never overlap the Omega coupe.

     

    Some kinds of overlap are perfectly reasonable. Buick based off platforms shared by Chevy is perfectly acceptable, because by large, the new Chevy cars drive pretty awesome as it is. 

     

    What they needs is the meat. And that's what they're doing. They should only get the Avista if they know for sure that the product delivers different things from any comparable Cadillac. Which is hard for me to believe.

     

     

    I didn't say anything about reskinning a Cadillac or using the Avista. I'm opposed to the Avista.

     

    I wondered if they would turn the Regal GS into a real AWD sport sedan like Volvo or Audi offers. We already know the car is on the E2XX platform, which means FWD/AWD. I'm just saying Buick could break their self-imposed glass ceiling and create a better vehicle with the equipment at their disposal. Torque vectoring AWD, active suspension, and a 300+ horsepower engine would be quite potent. I'd like to see turbo V6s back in the Buick brand.

     

    The refreshed 2014-2016 Regal GS is about 50 horsepower short of something far more special, why did they sit on their hands to the point that Ford took the obvious formula Buick was already staring at and will soon build a 325 horsepower AWD Fusion in the same price range?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I saw the Lacrosse today and I expect this to be a cheaper smaller version. I was surprised as I am not a Lacrosse fan but it really is a nice car.

    I would look for AWD and better trim.

    I would suspect a Turbo 2.0 will be more common in this model and better magnetic suspension.

    GM needs about only 25 more HP as most of these cars will have to walk it back in the near future to hit the MPG marks or raise the price to limit volumes.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    I read CP's post and I was like...DAMN RIGHT, CP!!!

    Bring on the Avista 4 door coupe!!!!

     

    Then I read Suave's post. and I was like...DAMNED RIGHT Suave!

    The Avista is not needed!

     

    But then I was like...Hey! Wait a minute! Didnt I just contradict myself???!!!

     

    So...right now, Im one confused hombre.

     

     

    Then I got the little light bulb working...

    Buick actually needs both.

     

    They need a flashy car. Because flashy cars always have somebody talk about the brand...whether it sells or not is not important. Flash gets you noticed. Its good to be noticed because you dont want to fall by the way side.

    But Buick also needs to vehicles that people actually buy and want to buy, because after all, what good does the flash do, get talked about, but have no desirable yet feasible and ATTAINABLE cars in the showroom for people to actually buy? 

     

    SUVs/CUVs sell at this point in time.

    But everybody gots those in their showrooms.

    How does a brand distinguish these bland appliances from the next guy?

     

    BMW calls them SAVs, but they also have all sorts of other flashy cars in the show room that garner desirability which in turn garners the plebeian SUV called SAV desirable...

     

    How does Buick do that?

    Yes, by having a pretty face does not do any harm, but, Hyundai and Lincoln and Audi and everybody else also have SUVs with pretty mugs...

     

    There comes a time when Buick's pretty face does get lost in the crowd...

     

    So...a flashy car that instills lust in the brand helps people get their lazy asses in the Buick showroom. And if the right product is there for people to buy when they see the flashy car in person, they drive off in a brand new shiny Buick just the same, even if it aint the flashy car but the plebeian appliance SUV with that has the pretty face!

     

    There is a limit to how flashy you can go.

     

    Buick is above all, still known for being very comfortable.

     

    I don't want Buick to chase after any brand. So many companies think they can be better if they emulate other company's success. Of course if this was the 60s, then I'd reverse my words and say hell yes make a RWD barge like they used to. 

     

    Blindly chasing sales and segments is not good. However, there is a time and place for halo vehicles. If say, Cadillac was the level of Bentley in prestige, and Buick was the level of Cadillac as it is today... would you not expect to just see the Cadillac of today reskinned as Buicks. 

     

    Then the Avista would be almost what we consider the El Miraj concept, expect the El Miraj would be in production, and an Alpha coupe like the Camaro would be nowhere near as prestigious, and therefore would never overlap the Omega coupe.

     

    Some kinds of overlap are perfectly reasonable. Buick based off platforms shared by Chevy is perfectly acceptable, because by large, the new Chevy cars drive pretty awesome as it is. 

     

    What they needs is the meat. And that's what they're doing. They should only get the Avista if they know for sure that the product delivers different things from any comparable Cadillac. Which is hard for me to believe.

     

     

    I didn't say anything about reskinning a Cadillac or using the Avista. I'm opposed to the Avista.

     

    I wondered if they would turn the Regal GS into a real AWD sport sedan like Volvo or Audi offers. We already know the car is on the E2XX platform, which means FWD/AWD. I'm just saying Buick could break their self-imposed glass ceiling and create a better vehicle with the equipment at their disposal. Torque vectoring AWD, active suspension, and a 300+ horsepower engine would be quite potent. I'd like to see turbo V6s back in the Buick brand.

     

    The refreshed 2014-2016 Regal GS is about 50 horsepower short of something far more special, why did they sit on their hands to the point that Ford took the obvious formula Buick was already staring at and will soon build a 325 horsepower AWD Fusion in the same price range?

     

    the current Regal AWD actually fared pretty well for itself vs. the Germans etc. in a not too far back comparo test on Motor Trend.com, i think they gave it high marks.

     

    It was only like 10 years ago, a 260hp motor was the bomb, now we expect 300, 325, 350.........

     

    if you google '2017 opel insignia' and then tab to images, you see some of the common renderings out there.

     

    I'm disappointed the new Regal is being delayed so much.  The Malibu is out already, get this thing in the hopper NOW too.

    I saw the Lacrosse today and I expect this to be a cheaper smaller version. I was surprised as I am not a Lacrosse fan but it really is a nice car.

    I would look for AWD and better trim.

    I would suspect a Turbo 2.0 will be more common in this model and better magnetic suspension.

    GM needs about only 25 more HP as most of these cars will have to walk it back in the near future to hit the MPG marks or raise the price to limit volumes.

    did you mistake it for a 2007 Hyundai?lol

    Edited by regfootball

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not at all as it was a very nice looking car. It was Impala size but had much more upgraded details.

    As for a Hyundai No mistaking anything from GM for that mess. Looked at an Optima and for the same price the new Bu has it beat.

    The New Buick convertible was nice but kinda felt as old as it really is. Nice details but the dash looked like it was 5 years or more old. Which it is.

    The new Regal can not come soon enough.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think they could make a 2.0T and AWD standard in the Regal for $27k and it will still be a slow seller.  People buying a sport sedan aren't shopping for a Buick.  They'd be better off just taking the Lacrosse dashboard, putting it in the Regal and setting the suspension to mush mode, and hoping that they can convince Lexus/Toyota buyers to spend $29k on a Regal rather than $39k on an ES350.  

    • Downvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's hard to tell with all the camo, but I'm not thrilled with what I think it looks like.

    Let them uncover it. I was not impressed with the Lacrosse till I saw it in person. It is much better in person.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I`m not sure if it`s been made clear, but this is just going to be a different trimmed version of the Insignia.

     

    Good on GM to do so, but the Malibu is a global car as well. And the two cars IMO will be closer in this generation than the one before.

     

    Because the low-end is reaching higher, and the top-end cars are going lower. At some point there will be a lot of overlap.

     

    The new Malibu is dynamic looking and feeling too. 

     

    And yes, the Buicks of today, if based on Alpha platforms and Omega, would be perfect substitutes for Cadillacs as long as Cadillac was a ultra-luxury brand not really focused on the hard-core performance, but just absolute luxury and presence.

     

    The new Regal needs presence. Every midsize sedan has already gone the European design route for sedan shapes.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      QUARTER 4 (CALENDAR YEAR-TO-DATE) JANUARY - DECEMBER   2019 2018 %Change Volume   2019 2018 %Change Volume   Cascada 77 743 -89.6   2,535 4,136 -38.7   Enclave 10,143 14,420 -29.7   51,156 49,647 3.0   Encore 28,497 23,326 22.2   102,402 93,073 10.0   Envision 8,380 7,535 11.2   33,229 30,152 10.2   LaCrosse 463 2,118 -78.1   7,241 15,527 -53.4   Regal 1,514 3,110 -51.3   10,363 14,118 -26.6   Buick Total 49,074 51,257 -4.3   206,929 206,863 0.0   ATS 83 831 -90.0   1,134 10,859 -89.6   CT5 43 0 ***.*   43 0 ***.*   CT6 2,276 2,398 -5.1   7,951 9,668 -17.8   CTS 966 2,442 -60.4   6,965 11,219 -37.9   Escalade 8,889 9,573 -7.1   35,424 36,872 -3.9   XT4 8,895 7,573 17.5   31,987 7,785 310.9   XT5 11,168 13,582 -17.8   49,879 60,565 -17.6   XT6 7,169 0 ***.*   11,559 0 ***.*   XTS 1,062 5,063 -79.0   11,304 17,727 -36.2   Cadillac Total 40,551 41,462 -2.2   156,246 154,702 1.0   Blazer 23,008 27 ***.*   58,115 27 ***.*   Bolt EV 3,307 6,212 -46.8   16,418 18,019 -8.9   Camaro 11,474 11,135 3.0   48,265 50,963 -5.3   Colorado 25,484 30,004 -15.1   122,304 134,842 -9.3   Corvette 3,491 3,910 -10.7   17,988 18,791 -4.3   Cruze 2,699 32,955 -91.8   47,975 142,617 -66.4   Equinox 92,092 98,239 -6.3   346,048 332,618 4.0   Express 16,652 22,543 -26.1   77,457 81,239 -4.7   Impala 9,545 12,604 -24.3   44,978 56,556 -20.5   LCF 1,273 940 35.4   4,495 2,810 60.0   Malibu 34,314 37,084 -7.5   131,917 144,542 -8.7   Silverado HD 36,704 34,222 7.3   131,953 142,632 -7.5   Silverado LD 124,619 126,950 -1.8   438,686 442,943 -1.0   Silverado MD 2,018 6 ***.*   4,961 6 ***.*   Sonic 3,339 2,765 20.8   13,971 20,613 -32.2   Spark 11,016 5,174 112.9   31,281 23,602 32.5   Suburban 10,242 15,200 -32.6   51,928 60,633 -14.4   Tahoe 21,086 24,679 -14.6   101,189 104,153 -2.8   Traverse 33,631 39,536 -14.9   147,122 146,534 0.4   Trax 33,039 22,378 47.6   116,816 89,916 29.9   Volt 370 5,063 -92.7   4,910 18,306 -73.2   Chevrolet Total 499,404 531,985 -6.1   1,958,925 2,036,023 -3.8   Acadia 19,471 25,128 -22.5   99,429 88,621 12.2   Canyon 6,525 8,219 -20.6   32,825 33,492 -2.0   Savana 3,136 2,905 8.0   24,226 19,684 23.1   Sierra HD 18,228 16,550 10.1   59,871 60,389 -0.9   Sierra LD 50,494 50,762 -0.5   172,452 159,165 8.3   Terrain 28,060 31,595 -11.2   101,470 114,314 -11.2   Yukon 20,966 25,366 -17.3   74,673 80,784 -7.6   GMC Total 146,880 160,525 -8.5   564,946 556,449 1.5   GM Vehicle Total* 735,909 785,229 -6.3   2,887,046 2,954,037 -2.3                     78 selling days for the QUARTER 4 this year and 77 for same QUARTER last year.  
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Well the inevitable finally happened, Buick has confirmed that the Regal will not be returning to the U.S. after the 2020 model year. After that, Buick will be an all-SUV brand.  The move comes as light-truck sales take 70% of the U.S. market and 90% of all Buick sales.  While the Regal retreats from these shores, it will still continue to be sold in China where demand remains strong. 
      As of the end of Q3 this year, Buick moved only 8,849 units of Regal year to date. That's down 19.6% from the year prior. Regal's demise was hinted at during the Los Angeles Auto Show where no Regals were on display.
      The Buick Lacrosse sedan and Buick Cascada convertible were canceled earlier this year.
      Starting next year, the Buick Encore GX will join the lineup, a slightly larger iteration of the Buick Encore, but on a new platform and using a new 3-cylinder engine. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Well the inevitable finally happened, Buick has confirmed that the Regal will not be returning to the U.S. after the 2020 model year. After that, Buick will be an all-SUV brand.  The move comes as light-truck sales take 70% of the U.S. market and 90% of all Buick sales.  While the Regal retreats from these shores, it will still continue to be sold in China where demand remains strong. 
      As of the end of Q3 this year, Buick moved only 8,849 units of Regal year to date. That's down 19.6% from the year prior. Regal's demise was hinted at during the Los Angeles Auto Show where no Regals were on display.
      The Buick Lacrosse sedan and Buick Cascada convertible were canceled earlier this year.
      Starting next year, the Buick Encore GX will join the lineup, a slightly larger iteration of the Buick Encore, but on a new platform and using a new 3-cylinder engine. 
  • Posts

    • Oh it is??  Typical me; I don't pay attention to the toyoters much. 🤮 1. It doesn't look 'really ordinary' IMO (it's a Ford, yes?), but more to the point - it doesn't look really cheap. Not Ram Tradesman cheap. 2. Shouldn't a Lincoln equivalent be much nicer??
    • @ ANYBODY that wants to discuss this. But it is directed towards @ocnblu if he feels like discussing this.  Yeah...it was either a downvote or a laughy thingy... MAYBE YOU THINK THIS POST WILL BE LONG... BUT LETS DISCUSS... IT IS AN AUTOMOTIVE FORUM AFTER ALL...  UNLESS OF COURSE YOU WANNA TREAT THIS FORUM LIKE THE SUNDAY FUNNIES... But I wanna know why you feel like laughing when in fact...air pollution is a real phoquing problem on our planet... We are 7 billion plus humans and by 2050...its projected we will be 10 billion.   I mean...in 1985 there was 4.5 billion or so souls around. In 1960 3 billion and in 1970 3.7 billion. We have doubled our population from the height of the muscle car era.   Serious talk now...  Dont laugh.  Because you are so against EVs and the government forcing us to buy them...but you NEVER seem to wanna discuss it. This is real serious shyte... Los Angeles air was unbreathable several times a year then and it got worse and then CAFE came about and I KNOW you are against that too...but Los Angeles air is better today?  Maybe? Because I really dont how you feels about Los Angeles air pollution then and now.  Are you in denial it was bad for LA then but its better now? What is it that bothers you about this whole thing? You laugh at us for it or you downvote, but you never seem to discuss it.  Cars then were huge and got huge-ier.  Engines in 1970 in the North America were just about at the peak of horsepower and torque and got the shyttiest of gas mileage coupled with even shyttier exhaust pollution.   Do you deny that also? Where Im going with this. Beijing today is where Los Angeles was.   The 3rd world that was then is starting to become the 1st world today. Do you deny that Europe was not economically sound in the 1970s? Asia? Do you deny that these places today enjoy the same economic success that we had in North America in the 1970s? Imagine what shape the planet would be in today if the whole damned planet drove the behemoths that we had during the 1960s and early 1970s (BEFORE the government took our fun away)? Do you deny that the planet would be in a very shytty place today had it NOT been for all that catalytic converter stuff and downsizng of our engines and cars?  Yes the party was over and the fun continues to be sucked right out... But you deny that we need to change? What is YOUR solution? Because quite honestly...in a short while...we will be 8 billion people.  And yes...we will continue using gasoline and oil for other stuff...but...at least...can we NOT use it for our daily needs for transportation? I mean...is it soooooo phoquing horrible to wean off of gasoline for our daily driven vehicles? Old car batteries could be recycled in usage for powering our commercial industries when they are no longer viable  for cars. That kind of thinking could ease off the power grid. Yes. Yes. Recharging the cars will obviously put pressure on the power grid. Ill ask you this.... Aint America about INNOVATION? When Trump says Make America Great Again, in what way did he mean it as and how did his voters interpret it? Because if you tell me that batteries are not gonna work or batteries are pollutants as well... Well... STOP WITH THE BULSHYTE ARGUMENTS and START INNOVATING? (yes question mark because some Americans have become too phoquing complacent in their big fat ass (literally|) ways and just whine and bitch but do NOTHING about it...but also bitch about how good the good 'ole days were) The thing is...this is the way the PLANET wants it to be. There are some that DONT want change but others want change.   PHOQUE IT!!! FIND PHOQUING SOLUTIONS!!! Because the internal combustion engine is NOT the solution for the next 100 years!!! Whether you want to believe it or not!!! Whether you like it or not, It WAS the solution 100 years ago. The planet is no longer where it was a decade ago, let alone 100 years ago...            
    • Communist economics were radically dialed back since 1978.  The Communists in China still run the government. As for demand for EVs, no one knows how many will sell this year or next year or 10 years from now.  Right now, yes it is less than 1%.  Sounds like a lot of the rest of the world.  Then again, oil prices are only about $55/barrel now.  The GM EV1 failed because oil prices were $10/barrel back in the late 1990s.  Call me when oil prices approach $200/barrel, then show me EV sales at that point.
    • If that is the top trim, that is really ordinary.  I suspect that the Lincoln equivalent has a much nicer interior.  Also, these days the Explorer is nowadays a police vehicle for the most part, hence the rental/fleet issues.
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bcs296
      bcs296
      (32 years old)
    2. jcgable
      jcgable
      (33 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...