Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Cadillac XTS Refresh Surfaces In China

      It looks somewhat CT6-ese

    It seems Cadillac has some updates in store for the XTS if some leaked pictures from Chinese website Autohome are the real deal.

    The pictures show the XTS taking some ideas from the CT6 and XT5. Up front is a broader, more upright grille with new headlights. Around back is a more sculpted trunk lid and L-shaped taillights.

    Powertrains are expected to carry over, meaning the U.S. will stick with the 3.6L V6 and twin-turbo 3.6L. Over in China, the XTS will stick with the 2.0L turbo-four. We wouldn't be surprised if there is an update for the CUE system.

    Source: Autohome

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I really hope this a bogus photoshop job because why in the world would this even merit an update when it was supposed to be on the way out. It is also a possibility that this is just a China market update since Cadillac has a bigger presence there than they do here (seems like it anyway). The picture really does look like a bad patch job on the front end though. Just hideous.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This news excites me just as much as the Lambo Urus news...

    And in case you have no clue what that may be....a cute GIF that explains my position on the matter

    c0c.gif

     

    I always wanted to like the ΧTS, but I was lying to myself.

    The first year the ΧΤS came out, I was head over heels over it....call that blind love for GM...

    But I hated myself....I felt dirty....

    Then I realized I was not honest about this whole XTS thing. I finally saw the XTS for what it really was...one ugly whale!

    There is no excuse for that when Epsilon and Super Epsilon platform mates Lacrosse and Impala look damned good...

    This refresh might make it look more like the current front fascia of the recent Caddys, the poor XTS is uglier than ever.

    Just my not so over the top yet >ahem< humble opinion.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Oldshurst442, maybe Cadillac does not really CARE about the XTS as they do other models.  It is the only holdover from pre-bankruptcy GM left in the stable.  Maybe it is a placeholder for the (supposed to be awesome) CT8 flagship that has not yet been released.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    54 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Oldshurst442, maybe Cadillac does not really CARE about the XTS as they do other models.  It is the only holdover from pre-bankruptcy GM left in the stable.  Maybe it is a placeholder for the (supposed to be awesome) CT8 flagship that has not yet been released.

    XTS came out 4 years after bankruptcy, even though it was developed on a shoe-string budget post bankruptcy.  I think it was more a way to replace the DTS with a car of similar size with a V6 that got better MPG to help CAFE, and they had to use what was in the parts bin since the G-body and Northstar were well past their prime.

    I don't think that CT8 is ever coming.  They have talked about a Cadillac flagship since Ed Whiticare was CEO in 2010, 7 years later, nothing, and large sedans are a shrinking market, the XJ is probably getting cancelled, the A8 sales are in the tank, Lexus GS is getting killed so they can sell more LS's since it's sales are in trouble.  There is no market for it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Oldshurst442, maybe Cadillac does not really CARE about the XTS as they do other models.  It is the only holdover from pre-bankruptcy GM left in the stable.  Maybe it is a placeholder for the (supposed to be awesome) CT8 flagship that has not yet been released.

    It was supposed to be a placeholder for when the CT6 arrived....

    Regardless, it was ugly then when it first showed us its ugliness, and its uglier now.

    GM and Cadillac DO care as the XTS is printing money for them. Here and especially China. And I get that!

    I just wished Cadillac would start to cease on relying on this type of vehicle to make them money.

    I just wished Cadillac would cut FINALLY cut ties with their late 1970s-80s vision of selling Cadillac image...

    This is just a better version of this car

    1993_cadillac_deville_sedan_base_fq_oem_

    and then this car

    94con.jpg

    selling to the same clientele that Cadillac vowed to leave behind even as far back when they introduced this car

    cadillac-catera-04.jpg

    And to tell you the truth...both Devilles I posted look 1 000 times better then the ΧTS....

    Yeah yeah....the XTS is miles ahead in chassis refinement and performance.

    The XTS is:

    1. UGLY with a capital F as in F***king ugly

    2. outdated in by at least 25 years in what actual vision Cadillac wanted to be in when they went RWD with the Catera and later the CTS and we could add another 5 years to that as the FWD STS

    wk9404.1-lg.jpg

    did a BETTER job is keeping with that "modern" image they have been pushing for!

     

    I must admit though, many people from the foreign crowd who get themselves into a XTS LOVE their experience with one!

    Which perplexes the phoque out of me as the ΧΤS in essence is what drove them AWAY from GM/Cadillac and American cars in general in the first phoquing place!

    I STILL DONT LIKE THE XTS, though....ITS FUGLY!

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Like the updates.  More presence. Hope they have a new center stack with a decent new CUE.  Hope the turbo six can stay.  

    The XTS is something that someone like my mom would be good with. Something to replace the DTS although she would believe the XTS is small. She doesn't like the shape and beak of the new CTS and the ATS being of no size is not an option. 

    It's ok to have the XTS hold down the cheapskate Cadillac buyers market.  Caddy needs to fix all the CT6 problems in order to keep the prices up for that .  It's too narrow  the styling is bland and has some proportion issues  the interior is cheap  we may see an early rename and reskin back to DTS

    I would focus on making the CTS geared to those who have a higher sensitivity to sharp handling and tactile feel and performance  they could invest in nicer seats and interior bits  give us the twin turbo plus AWD  

    The ATS it will be interesting  they need to find a niche for the smaller size in the US  and add some backseat room  they would be better off cutting back us inventory for ATS and making it niche like  try to guide those sales to the CtS  

    crossovers are king but there are still people who don't want one  my mom is short and small enough that she doesn't think an srx would work for her  hard to step up into  she still wants a larger car though  even at her age she would probably benefit from the small downsize from dts to XTS  for ease of driving and parking etc  

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @oldshurst442 I get you do not like it, but the baby boomers love it and as long as we have millions buying them here and the Chinese who love their versions as personal limos it makes good sense to tweak and continue to build it.

    In fact I can see the XTS being moved to the classic form and still being built especially for the Limo, Livery and private auto chauffeur business at the airports past 2020.

    I agree with many that it is a relic of the past GM, but does make money, has a clear market that wants it and no reason to kill it. 

    Why kill a money maker just because. Kinda like the stupid decision to kill the Avalanche / Escalade Ext.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Is XTS a money maker, or does it steal sales from a higher priced CT6?


    I don't have the sales figures, but I'm almost positive half of XTS sales are fleet. I wouldn't be surprised if the retail sales were cannibalizing the CT6 to some extent.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Is XTS a money maker, or does it steal sales from a higher priced CT6?

    I can honestly say that my own parents who are baby boomers do not like the CT6 but love the XTS. 

    With that said, yes you might have 10% of the XTS sales cannibalizing CT6 sales but not much more if that. Looking at both side by side and sitting in them, clearly two different beasts and appealing to two different customers. Ride alone is where you divide the type of customer and this is very much age driven.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, dfelt said:

    @oldshurst442 I get you do not like it, but the baby boomers love it and as long as we have millions buying them here and the Chinese who love their versions as personal limos it makes good sense to tweak and continue to build it.

    In fact I can see the XTS being moved to the classic form and still being built especially for the Limo, Livery and private auto chauffeur business at the airports past 2020.

    I agree with many that it is a relic of the past GM, but does make money, has a clear market that wants it and no reason to kill it. 

    Why kill a money maker just because. Kinda like the stupid decision to kill the Avalanche / Escalade Ext.

     

    I fully understand this....

    I agree to a point for its existence.

    You are preaching to the choir about these kinds of Cadillacs. I LOVE these kinds of Cadillacs myself (except this one)

    However

    1. I understand that there are some of us that like the looks of it....like your parents and @Sal Collaziano (welcome back is in order although I did not know you then) but there are many that think its a whale....

    That is not good going forward....especially when its usually the older folk that loves these things....yes yes...younger folk like them too, but most of the younger crowd buy the XΤ5 αnd the Slade which better aligns with Cadillac's vision of the Arts and Science crowd rather than the mid 1970s and 1980s crowd that bought these types of Cadillacs.....

    2.

    USC40CAC193D021001.png

    Not a very good image to have if you ask me....

     

    Hey....when Cadillac sold these

    3302e41de211b40d286fdc2bcb153156.jpg

    Cadillac also sold these when these (and Cadillac) where on top of the world

    1959-cadillac-eldorado-biarritz.jpg

     

    Remember....

    That Cadillac was starting to become a laughing stock when this came out....

    dfd83a70bff4834c03e41f6585fda441.jpg

     

    A livery service vehicle is not a bad thing....but ONLY when you are on top of the world

    33DDBCD900000578-3574969-image-a-16_1462

    Cadillac has not had a DESIRABLE halo car like the M-B on the bottom in 4 decades!

    brabus-850-6-0-biturbo-coupe_100501837_h

     

    1. So....not only is a ΧΤS is ugly to me and it looks better in hearse mode (NOT a good thing) and Cadillac DESPERATELY NEEDS A PRETTY CAR

    2. keeping it around for just the money is not a viable reason for me....

    It sells!   

    GREAT!

    So does a XT5 and any other SUV Cadillac is willing to sell....

    Cadillac, if it WANTS THAT MONEY...maybe they should have invested in MORE CUVs and SUVs that align BETTER with their IMAGE THEY want to sell to make that money!!!

    I thought they wanted to do away from that crowd that wants the XTS...well, they sure got me on board to NOT want these types of vehicles....am I being duped by Cadillac marketing folk?

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Never cared for the styling of the XTS, esp. the front...I liked the DTS quite a bit, enjoyed the one my sister and I had for 4 years.   I wouldn't mind a late DTS as a cruiser... 

    I do like the 'type' of Cadillac the XTS represents, though..the traditional comfortable luxury cruiser Caddy rather than the Audi/BMW/MB style 'serious' models..there is a place for both kinds of Caddy, IMO.   

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When Cadillac started chasing after BMW, Lexus came in with soft luxury and took all their customers. Look at BMW these days, growing by leaps and bounds with soft luxury. Of course, Audi is also growing by leaps and bounds being typically "German". But it doesn't work for everyone. BMW would do fine either way - but the brand is perceived as "luxury" more so than Audi - so the softer sprung suspensions and supple leather are doing well for them.

    I think there's still a place for Cadillac's supreme luxury theme - especially now that Lexus is moving away from it and trying to be more BMW and Audi-like. Watch out for Lincoln. Lincoln is taking the soft luxury approach. If you think Lincoln can't make a come back - you must have missed Hyundai's luxury brand. Their G80 and G90 are excellent luxury sedans and they've got a lot more to come...

    My personal prediction is that Lincoln is going to take the luxury sales crown in America within 2-3 generations...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    49 minutes ago, Sal Collaziano said:

    Look at BMW these days, growing by leaps and bounds with soft luxury.

    BMW U.S. sales peaked in 2015, they were down 10% in '16 and are down slightly in '17 from that. Their cars are getting particularly hard hit; down 15% in '16 & 10% so far in '17. Whereas prior to, the reviews for BMW have been consistent, the more recent ones I've read have hit their product in BMW's foundation: steering, braking, etc. While I would give the benefit of doubt to market fluctuation, something else seems to be going on here. They desperately need a new design direction and tighter focus on their 'middle-age spread' of a catalog.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    G80 and G90 are good products, but they feel like someone went through a check list of "must haves" but forgot all of the details.

    The reason the XTS is sticking around is likely China. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Sal Collaziano said:

     Look at BMW these days, growing by leaps and bounds with soft luxury.

     

    9 hours ago, balthazar said:

    BMW U.S. sales peaked in 2015, they were down 10% in '16 and are down slightly in '17 from that. Their cars are getting particularly hard hit; down 15% in '16 & 10% so far in '17. Whereas prior to, the reviews for BMW have been consistent, the more recent ones I've read have hit their product in BMW's foundation: steering, braking, etc. While I would give the benefit of doubt to market fluctuation, something else seems to be going on here. They desperately need a new design direction and tighter focus on their 'middle-age spread' of a catalog.

    With BMW auto's turning into fire storms and burning peoples houses down, I do not see a bright future over the near term for them. I suspect now that many countries are looking into this self burning of the auto's, BMW is going to have to deal with an ugly short term mess.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @oldshurst442 I am surprised that the funeral business only uses car based hursts. Yet then I search and find out that there is a company building them off SUV's.

    CadillacHurst.jpg

    OK, I now will say officially the XTS needs to die. This is a far better last ride machine!

    Imagine this as the new Ghost Busters Ride! :D 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, dfelt said:

    @oldshurst442 I am surprised that the funeral business only uses car based hursts. Yet then I search and find out that there is a company building them off SUV's.

    CadillacHurst.jpg

    OK, I now will say officially the XTS needs to die. This is a far better last ride machine!

    Imagine this as the new Ghost Busters Ride! :D 

     

    You always find a way to humour me!!!!   Cheers to you :cheers:

     

    PS: Yup...if the remake of Ghostbusters was a complete reversal of roles, then HELL YEAH that 'Slade should have been their ride!

    An overly expensive and blinged out brand new Escalade representing the last of the petty cash would have been funny! 

    (AND NO!  I HAVENT SEEN THE REBOOT!)  (AND HELL TO THE NO WILL I EVER SEE IT!!!)

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, NINETY EIGHT REGENCY said:

    The concept from years ago had it right.  The production car did not..

     

     

    And still no hybrid!!!!

    A Saturn Vue was scheduled to have a hybrid! Then this car where it being a Cadillac  could absorb the  cost and sticker price better...(that is what the dude said, and what he did not say but I am saying....a car that could at least make some competition to Tesla and not be blown away by it!) 

    At least offer hybrid tech on it now!!!! Even if only in China for Pete's sake!!!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • This is too funny and I HOPE HOPE HOPE Amazon moves forward with this as all the auto's on Amazon for sale will have a TRUMP TARIFF line that shows how much TARIFF tax they will pay. Trump’s ‘Pottery Barn rule’ problem
    • I don’t know if this vehicle, a Toyota Prius Hybrid HEV, represented an upgrade.  It’s just what I was assigned as a mid-size rented vehicle for 3 days.  I had a general idea that this vehicle was recently refreshed and that it looked a lot better.  As I got closer to it and got into it, I was able to get a better look.  The new Prius looks a lot better than I recall a Prius ever looking.  It looks sleek, sporty, and even sort of low-slung.  Interesting exterior features show that they made this a priority.  The front lights and fascia are thin and understated, working well with the more unified exterior.  The rear fascia is definitely Prius’s own and it gives the car some interesting, angled vantage points.  They even incorporated gullwing handles into the sedan’s rear doors and, having once had these in the last rendition of the W-body Buick Regal coupe, I like their look and just plain using them. Its low-slung aspect can present a slight demerit.  The windshield and profile of the front doors is very raked and, as a person of average height, I had to duck a little more than usual to enter the car.  Similarly, the rear backlite borders on almost being horizontal.  This does give the rear storage area a little more usable height. Inside, the front pillars’ rake is mitigated by fixed renditions of what used to be vent windows in older cars.  However, they still seem to block an instinctive sight line compared to more upright vehicles like the current Camry and Corolla.  Inside, the feeling is more cockpit-like.  Similarly, the rear view has the thicker pillars and flatter backlite that require more proactive work – looking over the shoulder attentively and using the amber traffic monitoring warnings in the outside mirrors.  A complementary feature is the chime that assisted lane changes. The Prius has a 4-cylinder engine that seems to spend more time in EV mode than did the hybrid Camry.  That means good fuel economy and, over 3 days, I only added 6 gallons for between 200 and 300 miles of motoring.  In terms of power, handling, and roadability, the Prius gets mixed comments from me.  It does have agility when the pedal is pressed and it moves from eco to power mode.  It also eases upward to higher than anticipated highway speeds if not paying attention!  The transmission is a CVT with a “faux” first gear and it works well.  The Prius has a more noticeable wheezing sound when in reverse gear, which actually advises those inside the car and near it.  However, when pushed, the powertrain gets buzzy, as in noisy.  But at steady speed, any engine noise is not that noticeable.  The vehicle’s handling, smoothness, and quietness vary.  Handling is always nimble and, even at highway speeds, it maneuvers adeptly.  The ride is mostly smooth.  However, noise control could use some improvement.  Some of that can come from the tires they equip the car with, fitted with aluminum wheels that hearken to the ones on Tesla products.  That said, it’s hard to tell if the drone is tire thum or wind.  However, if you prioritize handling among these, I was surprised to see how well the Prius handles … on the highway, on city streets, and even in tight parking spaces, where 3-point attempts are rarely necessary. The cockpit is unusual and very different from yesterday’s Priuses, which I’ve only seen and never driven or been a passenger in one.  I remember how the first model had an oval main instrument pod set up on the cowl in the middle of the dashboard but angled toward the driver.  Today’s Prius has thin and smaller pods, almost set on ledges that seem to staircase down as the cowl approaches the driver.  The main panel looks like a small tablet that is set quite far from the steering wheel.  Depending on how the wheel is titled, there could be some visibility issues seeing all the information.  This required adjusting the wheel and the seating height.  Also, the front seat can be very far from the pedals.  So, while the door is low, taller drivers might like this potential distance.  The infotainment center sits slightly forward of the main instrument screen and is conventionally placed atop the center stack.  Thankfully, it continues with touch operation as opposed to being operated via a remote dial.  Most functions are the ones you’ve known for a while, so setting things up doesn’t take long.  I did struggle a little with the Android Auto, even though the Bluetooth pairing was quick.  Note that, while the Camry has USB-C ports, the Prius does not.  Further down on the center stack, the climate control is easy to work with (not the 3-dial type that so many exports and even domestics have) and the A/C blows colder a little quicker than in the last Camry I drove.  The console deck is about the right height and its overall dimensions, including the box, are generous.  The compactness of the shift lever is sort of fun … think of a small underpowered low-cost EV Corvette! When going into gear, it’s not about moving the selector linearly.  A quick jog to the left and up toward the instrument panel is for reverse while that same quick jog followed by a rearward move puts the vehicle in drive.  It doesn’t take long to get used to this.  Also, the park feature is easy to work with.  Just push in P when stopped and, whether in reserve or drive, the gear selector goes to park.  The only thing is that it is not forgiving when shifting the lever … your foot must be firmly on the brake, so no slipshod maneuvers.  The seating is comfortable and the buckets seem a little high, but this offers support from top to bottom.  The same is true in the rear of the cabin and the headrests do intrude with an already thicker rear sail panel / C-pillar.  Legroom in the rear also seems good and the length of the vehicle allows for that.  Space is sensibly distributed in the 3 volumes from front to back. I always thought a Prius would have something daunting or different about it.  Its look is different in that it lost its first-gen look that looked like an upright Nissan Versa of 2016 … sort of like the runt of the litter that is on the run because it has been kicked in the rump.  This Prius looks planted.  Upon pushing the prominent and easy to use “power” button on the dash, there will be no noise and the dash will literally tell you when it, and you, are “ready” to go. It's a smaller but roomy vehicle where the price isn’t a bargain, but not that steep in today’s terms.  I find there are a few things that I wasn’t crazy about – the height, the main instrument pod sitting in the distance, and not the best noises suppression – but I liked most other things about it.  With so many Priuses going the long haul, this one will probably do the same … and look a lot more presentable while doing it. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING  
    • I'm laughing.   There are always reasons why things are "discounted." With me, it's DFW and Austin that give me heartburn.  San Antonio, too, even though I don't know it as well.  I just don't like the look of the DFW area, whether natural or built.  I don't like Austin for being the governmental engine of a big red place next to a massive university with over 50,000 students that is a big blue place.  I'm more of a moderate and don't want extremes in either element.  I also don't like the "way cool" leanings in Austin. Houston has its negatives, but I'd take it for nearby Galveston, and water in general, the extensive pinewoods, the dark red brick homes, an attractive downtown, and for being America's most ethnically diverse city that has always rolled with that spirit.  There is no "you shouldn't be here" factor.  IIR, I've heard of a saying about Madrid that goes, 'When you're in Madrid, you're from Madrid.'  Having lived in various places, I pay attention to those subleties.
    • Very cool to see This Hyundai Ioniq 5 Owner Managed 413,991 Miles In Under Four Years, With One Big Catch
    • Removing tariffs that idiot47 caused so much pain with for getting nothing in return show how stupid a person can be in not understanding true business and how to negotiate.  A real man with Business sense would have put together a package of tariffs to present to China to address specific areas that are an imbalance not just attack everything and see what falls out. As such, incompetence in not understanding the long road map to building greatness shows how foolish the current administration is and now they are going to sign an exception list for the auto industry. Destroy good trading partners just to cause Chaos! Never a sound business strategy. Trump to Sign Order Later Tuesday Easing Auto Tariff Impact
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search