Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Rumorpile: The ATS Rumor Twilight Zone

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    February 3, 2012

    Motor Trend is reporting that a coupe version of the new Cadillac ATS has been put on hold. The reason lies in GM’s stock price dropping like a rock; 30% drop since from its November 2010 initial public offering price. GM hopes by delaying or cancelling projects to save money, that will raise their stock price up.

    This is where we begin to enter the twilight zone of ATS rumors. For the past year, we’ve been hearing different models of the ATS moving around from going into development, put on the shelf, or being cancelled. Last year, rumors had said the ATS would come in Sedan, Wagon, Coupe, and Convertible form. So far, rumors have said the wagon is dead, the coupe is on hold, and the Convertible was dead before being resurrected. In other words, we have no idea what is coming.

    When asked for comment by Autoblog, Cadillac spokesman David Caldwell gave the usual we don’t talk about future product line. But Caldwell did say “there has been no recent radical shift in strategy" for the ATS.

    "We do plan to do variants. We haven't yet called our shot of how we're going to execute that." Caldwell said.

    So what does that mean? Well, there will be more variations of the ATS besides the sedan. As to what, its still up in the air.

    Source: Motor Trend, Autoblog

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Sal Collaziano

    Cadillac doesn't need both an ATS and CTS coupe. I don't think the next generation CTS will have one so that makes me think we'll see an ATS coupe in time. We just don't need one overlapping the other in the current lineup. I bet an ATS coupe will arrive when the third generation CTS shows up without one...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565

    The CTS will be moving up in size a bit. I can definately see room for a CTS coupe and and ATS coupe. Think 3-Series coupe and 6-series.

    Mercedes makes a C-class coupe and E-class coupe so there is definately room for both. But why does the CTS have to go up in size?

    E-class wheelbase: 113.2" Length/Width/Height: 191.7"/73.0"/57.9" 3,825 lbs (base)

    CTS wheelbase: 113.4" Length/Width/Height: 191.3"/72.5"/58.0" 3,854 lbs (base)

    The CTS is the correct size, aside from the trunk is smaller than competitors. The CTS's price is the problem if the ATS is to be priced against the A4/3-series/C-class. And then do people want to pay $50-60k for a V6 CTS when the CTS was always Cadillac's cheapest car.

    Looks like the ATS coupe is on hold for a while, which is a shame. Cadillac must have some fears, otherwise they'd roll out more body styles and engines.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Sal Collaziano

    The CTS will be moving up in size a bit. I can definately see room for a CTS coupe and and ATS coupe. Think 3-Series coupe and 6-series.

    I think an ATS coupe and a Cadillac-type 6-Series coupe would work very nicely.

    Mercedes makes a C-class coupe and E-class coupe so there is definately room for both. But why does the CTS have to go up in size?

    I think Mercedes is the only mainstream brand with a mid-size coupe (E-Class). Sure Cadillac can do it but considering how much GM appears to dislike coupes I seriously doubt we'll see both an ATS and CTS coupe in showrooms at the same time.

    The CTS feels noticeably smaller inside than a 5-Series. It needs to grow to compete affectively.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    smk4565

    3-series and G37 offer coupe and convertible, A5 and C-class coupes, Lexus IS convertible, if that is what the ATS wants to compete with, looks like they need a coupe and/or convertible. Their 5 closes competitors offer it. The BMW 6-series used to be smaller than the CTS, but now it is 1 inch longer, still in the mid-size segment though. But few luxury makes do a mid-size coupe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Sal Collaziano

    I see the 6-Series in the same way I see a CLS. If Cadillac were to do that, it would be priced far enough away from the ATS coupe that the two cars would rarely get cross shopped - if at all. A convertible would be nice but I'd rather see a coupe if I had to choose...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    hyperv6

    ]Lets just see how this all pans out. Too little info to get crazy yet.

    If the ATS sedan takes off well even witht he coupe on hold it will spur them to bring it to market.

    The fact is GM has a lot of other highr volume things to get done right now vs worrying about low volume cars. Trucks and an Impala out and doing well will change the value of stock faster than anything.

    Also it would have been nice if they had the 2.5 and new 2.0 engine out now do they would not have to fool around with old engines in new cars for a year like the Verano and Malibu.

    I would expect a coupe could be delayed but in time it will find it's way to maket. Also keep in mind how often Motor Trend has been wrong or has not gotten the full story in the past.

    Edited by hyperv6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Camino LS6

    ]Lets just see how this all pans out. Too little info to get crazy yet.

    If the ATS sedan takes off well even witht he coupe on hold it will spur them to bring it to market.

    The fact is GM has a lot of other highr volume things to get done right now vs worrying about low volume cars. Trucks and an Impala out and doing well will change the value of stock faster than anything.

    Also it would have been nice if they had the 2.5 and new 2.0 engine out now do they would not have to fool around with old engines in new cars for a year like the Verano and Malibu.

    I would expect a coupe could be delayed but in time it will find it's way to maket. Also keep in mind how often Motor Trend has been wrong or has not gotten the full story in the past.

    BS

    They need to make a plan, and then stick to it.

    Their volume assessments should be tied to architectures, not specific bodystyles. When looked at in that way, the myopic reliance on a single bodystyle becomes absurd. This is a problem of mindset, not reality.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    hyperv6

    ]Lets just see how this all pans out. Too little info to get crazy yet.

    If the ATS sedan takes off well even witht he coupe on hold it will spur them to bring it to market.

    The fact is GM has a lot of other highr volume things to get done right now vs worrying about low volume cars. Trucks and an Impala out and doing well will change the value of stock faster than anything.

    Also it would have been nice if they had the 2.5 and new 2.0 engine out now do they would not have to fool around with old engines in new cars for a year like the Verano and Malibu.

    I would expect a coupe could be delayed but in time it will find it's way to maket. Also keep in mind how often Motor Trend has been wrong or has not gotten the full story in the past.

    BS

    They need to make a plan, and then stick to it.

    Their volume assessments should be tied to architectures, not specific bodystyles. When looked at in that way, the myopic reliance on a single bodystyle becomes absurd. This is a problem of mindset, not reality.

    The Alpha is more than just a Cadillac. It is a Chevy and more than likely a Buick. Just because one coupe could be delayed does not mean there is not going to be an Alpha coupe.

    GM needs cars that show great profit.

    I love the CTS coupe to death and would love to have one. I want to see a ATS couple too but the the fact is even the CTS coupe sales are small compared to the sedan. I get excited to see a coupe as they are almost as rare as the wagon. Now CTSV sedans are a dime a dozen. GM needs to invest in products that bring earnings up to where they will bring the stock price up. Companies like GM are built on cars like Cruze, Malibu and the trucks/SUVs. The sooner GM pays off the bail out the better off they will be on Wall St and with the public.

    Besides I think the anouncement here is a little premature. Like I stated Motor Trend is often wrong so don't get too excited yet. I expect you will have a coupe at some point and it may be sooner than they are saying.

    Edited by hyperv6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    Any chance of an ATS monster truck?

    As always... sedan, coupe, convertible, wagon are all necessary. Hmmm... shooting brake sounds wicked though.

    Yes. I'd love to also see a CTS 4dr 'coupe'..i.e. the 4dr w/ the 2dr's fastback rear end...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Camino LS6

    ]Lets just see how this all pans out. Too little info to get crazy yet.

    If the ATS sedan takes off well even witht he coupe on hold it will spur them to bring it to market.

    The fact is GM has a lot of other highr volume things to get done right now vs worrying about low volume cars. Trucks and an Impala out and doing well will change the value of stock faster than anything.

    Also it would have been nice if they had the 2.5 and new 2.0 engine out now do they would not have to fool around with old engines in new cars for a year like the Verano and Malibu.

    I would expect a coupe could be delayed but in time it will find it's way to maket. Also keep in mind how often Motor Trend has been wrong or has not gotten the full story in the past.

    BS

    They need to make a plan, and then stick to it.

    Their volume assessments should be tied to architectures, not specific bodystyles. When looked at in that way, the myopic reliance on a single bodystyle becomes absurd. This is a problem of mindset, not reality.

    The Alpha is more than just a Cadillac. It is a Chevy and more than likely a Buick. Just because one coupe could be delayed does not mean there is not going to be an Alpha coupe.

    GM needs cars that show great profit.

    I love the CTS coupe to death and would love to have one. I want to see a ATS couple too but the the fact is even the CTS coupe sales are small compared to the sedan. I get excited to see a coupe as they are almost as rare as the wagon. Now CTSV sedans are a dime a dozen. GM needs to invest in products that bring earnings up to where they will bring the stock price up. Companies like GM are built on cars like Cruze, Malibu and the trucks/SUVs. The sooner GM pays off the bail out the better off they will be on Wall St and with the public.

    Besides I think the anouncement here is a little premature. Like I stated Motor Trend is often wrong so don't get too excited yet. I expect you will have a coupe at some point and it may be sooner than they are saying.

    You miss the point.

    It makes no sense at all to offer the same bodystyle on a plethora of architectures as compared to a variety of bodystyles on a few architectures. And I'll take that even farther, it makes no sense not to offer multiple bodystyles for a single nameplate rather than only having a choice of bodystyles spread over several architectures at the same brand.

    This goes double for Cadillac if they ever want to have a comparable range to fight BMW and MB with.

    So what if a variant doesn't sell in high numbers, the overall numbers for the nameplate will increase with each variant offered.

    This is a really basic concept, and a proven one, which we are talking about here. Waiting for sales results on a sedan prior to offering other variants is tantamount to intentionally missing the boat. I thought GM learned this lesson given what they have been saying about offering more bodystyles built on fewer architectures. But that only works if you actually do it, instead of just talking about it.

    If they waste Alpha the way they wasted Zeta, they deserve to suffer the consequences.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    This is a really basic concept, and a proven one, which we are talking about here. Waiting for sales results on a sedan prior to offering other variants is tantamount to intentionally missing the boat. I thought GM learned this lesson given what they have been saying about offering more bodystyles built on fewer architectures. But that only works if you actually do it, instead of just talking about it.

    If they waste Alpha the way they wasted Zeta, they deserve to suffer the consequences.

    Well, this is GM...new or old company, they are good at finding ways to squander opportunities...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    Agreed with Camino, GM does like to squander RWD platforms. They gave up fast on the Sigma SRX and STS, Zeta will be pretty short lived, who knows what they do with Alpha.

    And yet the FWD platforms are eternal...look at how long the W lasted...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    hyperv6

    wow... all the GM hating stirred up from one false report....

    I am waiting for the Occupy GM Movement to start and the attack of the GM headquarters. LOL!

    It is little soon to panic.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Sal Collaziano

    Agreed with Camino, GM does like to squander RWD platforms. They gave up fast on the Sigma SRX and STS, Zeta will be pretty short lived, who knows what they do with Alpha.

    With the Camaro going on Alpha I don't see the platform going anywhere any time soon...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell

    Alpha is simply a better and lighter platform. If Zeta had been the superior one, it would still be around. Yes I know Zeta handles great, but GM threw out their rule book for Alpha. The engineers got to make the decisions necessary to move Alpha up a notch. Alpha is lighter than Zeta which means they can get all of the handling characteristic that Zeta has plus more and do more with it because it weighs less.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Camino LS6

    Alpha is simply a better and lighter platform. If Zeta had been the superior one, it would still be around. Yes I know Zeta handles great, but GM threw out their rule book for Alpha. The engineers got to make the decisions necessary to move Alpha up a notch. Alpha is lighter than Zeta which means they can get all of the handling characteristic that Zeta has plus more and do more with it because it weighs less.

    True or not, all of that is beside the point. GM fumbled zeta from the start and utterly failed to use it to its potential. They then quickly abandoned it in favor of the then vaporware alpha, so we spend literally years waiting for "great things".

    They need to produce this time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    hyperv6

    From what the engineers have stated on the Alpha was they could design it to be light from the start and that was not an option with the RWD cars they has already. They worked on this car from the wheels up and did it to where they could make it.

    As for the Zeta for the most part it is an old car and it has already seen upgrades. I think the were smart to choose to invest in the new platform that will carry them on into the future.

    The Electonics make the ZL1 a killer car. Imagine they same with a car that is 600 pounds lighter. As of now you have only seen the base of the Alpha and not even seen a hint to where it can go. The ATS is going to suprise many and when we see the Camaro and V series they will be left speachless.

    The bottom line is the Alpha is the Zeta we had asked for and never got.

    If they put the money into the Zeta to make it right we would still not have the Alpha and the Zeta would still not be as good.

    Let GM at least show us where this is going before we hit the panic button here. Once you see the plan laid out then you can complain.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Camino LS6

    Sure I can!

    They've been futzing-around with this and making promises they didn't keep for years! We've been cheated out of good things we could have had from Zeta while they diddled around, instead of having those good things while they worked on Alpha.

    They completely flubbed Zeta, and I'm not letting them forget it until some serious Alpha goodness hit a Chevy showroom. And I mean beyond simply a 6th gen Camaro.

    I expect more, much more.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    Let GM at least show us where this is going before we hit the panic button here. Once you see the plan laid out then you can complain.

    That's assuming they are executing a clearly defined long-term product plan and not simply in quarterly chaos as often is the case in corporate America...

    They completely flubbed Zeta, and I'm not letting them forget it until some serious Alpha goodness hit a Chevy showroom. And I mean beyond simply a 6th gen Camaro.

    <cynical-realist>

    I can't imagine any Chevy Alphas beyond the Camaro...Chevy has a full suite of FWD appliances for the sedan market.

    </cynical-realist>

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    hyperv6

    If there isn't some more to Alpha at Chevy than Camaro, I guess I'll just have to stick to building my own cars.

    Twinkie?

    I expect a Chevy based sports sedan in RWD at some point. Think Camaro like 4 door. I could see that one doing well as there are many who pass on the Camaro because of the two doors. The G8 proved there is a market and this car could be sold globally very easy with a Holden and Vauxhall badge.

    There have been hints of a car like this but we just have not been given a time line. One of the engineers spoke openly about one a little while ago. I had expected it on the Zeta but now I suspect could we see it on the Alpha?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    dwightlooi

    I don't think there is any chance that they'll cancel the coupe and other variants of the ATS. This is especially true at this stage in the development cycle where much of the development costs are already sunken costs.

    However, I fully expect a staggered introduction, meaning that there won't be a coupe, convertible or wagon in the first model year and they won't all show up in the 2nd model year either. This actually makes sense; in fact, this is preferrable to launching all fourr variants the same year and not having enough engineering or marketing resources to go around leading to a patch job on each.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    hyperv6

    I don't think there is any chance that they'll cancel the coupe and other variants of the ATS. This is especially true at this stage in the development cycle where much of the development costs are already sunken costs.

    However, I fully expect a staggered introduction, meaning that there won't be a coupe, convertible or wagon in the first model year and they won't all show up in the 2nd model year either. This actually makes sense; in fact, this is preferrable to launching all fourr variants the same year and not having enough engineering or marketing resources to go around leading to a patch job on each.

    .

    That was already a given. GM made that clear 1-2 years ago on the ATS and other future models form them. Mark I think was the one who stared this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×

  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive

  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • ccap41
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By ccap41 · Posted

      I don't plan on gardening anytime soon. We need to finish other things before I'd have a permanent spot for a garden, but I would like a small garden in the future. We consume enough various peppers, onions, and zucchinis that I think it would be pretty cool to grow them myself. 
    • Drew Dowdell
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By Drew Dowdell · Posted

      If you do tomatoes or any water hungry container veggies, Pittmoss is the GOAT and will save you a ton of headache with watering.
    • ccap41
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By ccap41 · Posted

      Thanks! Yeah, from what I've read it needs a lot of water but also media that drains well so the roots can dry out between waterings. I've now looked into this Pittmoss stuff, and it sounds pretty dang good. I think I'll order some and mix it with planter soil, as well. 
    • David
      What did you do to your ride today?

      By David · Posted

      All done with the detail inside and out of the SS for the spring/summer season.
    • trinacriabob
      Infiniti Q50 - Nissan Altima’s richer cousin who went the Ivy League route – via rental

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      I had never driven an Infiniti Q50 before, let alone ever really looked at them.  I also didn’t know much about these cars. I was supposed to be assigned a medium sized SUV, but remarked I wanted the luggage area to be hidden.  The rental agent told me they could not guarantee the presence of a retractable cover. (Why would they order a car without one or why would someone take one?  eBay?)  They didn’t have any SUVs anyway, and I got put into an Infiniti Q50.  I checked my phone to verify the cost would be covered by my insurance and the credit card parameters.  It came in at around $43,000.  That’s if new.  That said: “no worries.”  However, this unit would be a much-depreciated 3+ year model with 57,000 miles.  I relaxed.  At any rate, I put less than 500 miles on it over a week.  As one walks up to it, you can tell its heritage … and rather quickly.  You can instantly see similarities to the Nissan Altima in the instrument panel’s main cluster and in the switches much the same way that a CT6 by Cadillac and a Cruze by Chevrolet share dials and such.  However, the assembly and detailing are nicer in the Q50.  It had leather seating, which I don’t care for in a warm weather location, that was comfortably contoured and nicely finished.  The same could be said for the doors and other trim and fittings.  Inside, I liked the way that the dash, center stack, and console flowed together.  The scalloped tops of the dash hearken to those of the very last Impala, which had an attractive dashboard on various levels. The center stack is slightly like that of an Olds Aurora.  These comments go along with the often-cited commentary that this car is traditional and old school in a lot of ways, thus not breaking any new ground. The least favorable aspect of the interior is operating the various touch screen and stalk functions.  Some are redundant and confusing.  However, for one, it is possible to pull up a clock that resembles old school chronometer and have it sitting at the top of the center stack. On the interior's plus side, there are perfectly contoured and angled slots to store water bottles at the base of the front doors.  On the minus side, there is a remote latch release for the trunk, but not one for the fuel cap door.  (The fuel cap door remains closed if the car is locked.) I figured that this Infiniti would have a V6.  It was no ordinary V6, but 3.7 liters worth of V6 with twin turbochargers.  Rarely does one need this much power and, in one week, I got aggressive with the throttle in one merging situation and one passing situation.  It is up to the task and kicks out a little torque steer.  Its hum is a rather muted purr.  As would be expected in what is supposed to be a premium car, the automatic transmission is a geared unit.  It has 7 speeds.  The first 2 shifts can be felt while the remaining shifts are not.  However, if in stop and go traffic, and alternating speed, those early shifts can be a little less smooth as the transmission seems to hunt.  (It could also be how many miles were on the unit.) Why 7 speeds?  How about 6 … or 8?  I’m talking even numbers! With the powertrain comes the requirement for premium fuel.  Also, compared to many full-size Japanese cars working with 4 cylinders and turning in commendable gas mileage, this car with its V6 is a little thirsty. Ride, handling, and noise are related, but different enough.  The ride was supple and controlled, but not much more so than that of an uplevel 4-cylinder sedan.  Handling was better and this Infiniti tracked accurately and nimbly.  Also, the Q50 was fairly hushed, but I might have expected a little more isolation and a higher premium "feel" for the price jump from a Nissan to an Infiniti. Its exterior features that extra chrome and trim to make it uplevel within the Nissan family tree, yet the greenhouse is an almost familiar one.  This car delivered on one greenhouse dimension I’m fussy about - rearward vision from the driver’s vantage point is very good. I don’t know how the order sheet was configured when this car was purchased. There was an indicator for forward alerts, but I never got to experience it in action.  Also, whether on the rearview mirrors or inside of the front pillars, there was nothing to warn of side traffic and there weren’t parking assists that kicked in.  Perhaps they were there, but the car was not put in a situation where they’d engage.  On another rental car of a lower price point, those were always at work and perhaps a little too eager.  I almost prefer the latter. I didn’t read any reviews about this car before beginning the rental or during the rental.  I echo what they have to say.  For its niche, it doesn’t drum up much enthusiasm.  The best point is its more premium handling while the negatives are some difficulties in setting it up when first getting in and its slight thirstiness. If something about this overall package is appealing and a person connects with the Q50, then the consumer will probably go for it.  I don’t know how it will hold up and how much it will cost to service over the long haul.  While there are no Toyota and Nissan dealerships in Beverly Hills, California, as an example, there is a Lexus agency there while the Infiniti dealership seems to have closed.  Infiniti seems to want to ride the same wave that Lexus is riding, though I’d think piggybacking onto Toyota might be a more lauded genealogy. This is very much a personal decision and you’re on your own.  I was going to turn in the Q50 after a day to see if I could get something more familiar to me but decided to keep it.  Exchanging cars is a hassle.  Once past the learning curve and adjustments, it’s fairly easy to live with, but it’s neither a remarkable nor compelling vehicle. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings