• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    General Motors Considering Selling Rebranded Peugeot Vans In U.S.


    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    July 11, 2013

    A new report from Reuters cites France's La Tribune story that General Motors is in talks with PSA Peugeot-Citroën about possibly selling vans in the United States. The report doesn't say which vans are in consideration, only saying that van would be sold under ofne of GM's brand, most likely Chevrolet.

    This news doesn't come as a surprise. GM currently has some of the oldest full-size vans on the marketplace and with fresh models coming in from Europe, GM could use all the help they can get. Also, GM recently struck a deal with Nissan to sell the NV200 as the Chevrolet City Express.

    Source: Reuters

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    Well the Peugeot Boxer is the same as the Fiat Ducato... or the Ram Promaster to us Yanks, and the smaller vans are all related to Opels or other Fiats (or both)

    Why couldn't GM just use Opel?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Most likely Chevrolet would sell these vans and GMC too. Let's look at these commercial vans they sell at Peugeot- Citroen.


    The Peugeot Boxer:


    http://www.peugeot.com/en/products-services/vans/peugeot-boxer


    The Peugeot Expert:


    http://www.peugeot.com/en/products-services/vans/peugeot-expert



    The Peugeot Partner:


    http://www.peugeot.com/en/products-services/vans/peugeot-partner



    The Peugeot Bipper:


    http://www.peugeot.com/en/products-services/vans/peugeot-bipper


    My opinion is I do not think they are ugly. I think they would do well. How do you put the face of Chevrolet and GMC on these vans?

    Here is an interesting side fact. These vans are co developed with Fiat. So, basically Ram and Chevrolet and GMC will be selling the same vans. That is globalization for you. This is one of the many draw backs to globalization. Everything is becoming the same globally and we have fewer choices. Everyone's economy impacts the other's economy. I just hate how American things are being lost in favor of the European or Asian way or look of things. Granted, I do appreciate we can connect globally better with each other in many ways, but I just do not want to see our own personal identities and customs and traditions and identifying characteristics die in globalization. It is all about the dollar.


    Let's look at the Fiat/Ram versions:


    Ram Promaster:


    http://www.ramtrucks.com/en/2014/ram_promaster/#promaster/bright_white/mono


    http://www.ramtrucks.com/en/2014/ram_promaster/gallery/#



    Ram Promaster video:






    Fiat Ducato/ FIAT vans:

    http://www.fiatprofessional.co.uk/uk/


    http://www.fiatprofessional.co.uk/uk/Models/Ducato_Goods_Transport


    This is my question if they are going through all this trouble to sell the Peugeot-Citroen van, then why are they not using the Renault version at Europe at Opel/Vauxhall?
    Wouldn't it be easy to do a global designed and engineered GM van?
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is my question if they are going through all this trouble to sell the Peugeot-Citroen van, then why are they not using the Renault version at Europe at Opel/Vauxhall?

    Wouldn't it be easy to do a global designed and engineered GM van?

    It would cost more $$$ and time for GM to do their own rather than a badge-engineered model. Would be cool to see a sharp angled luxury van for Cadillac.. :)

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not just Ram, Chevrolet, GMC... but Fiat, Opel, Citroen, Peugeot... and eventually Nissan.

    At least when the slightly revised, multiple versions of the same thing came from the same corporation, there were arguments for it, but this is just utter madness.

    Ninety-Eight- I agree with your sentiments RE 'American thing lost'... unfortunately most noobs are told 'it's fine, don't worry about it'.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Ninety-Eight in asking why GM shouldn't take the lead on something like this. Let Opel work on it (gives them something useful to do) and be the design supplied to Peugeot Citroen Isuzu Holden Vauxhaull Chevy and GMC.

    3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Ninety-Eight in asking why GM shouldn't take the lead on something like this. Let Opel work on it (gives them something useful to do) and be the design supplied to Peugeot Citroen Isuzu Holden Vauxhaull Chevy and GMC.

    I guess GM doesn't see the ROI in designing and building such product in-house.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Ninety-Eight in asking why GM shouldn't take the lead on something like this. Let Opel work on it (gives them something useful to do) and be the design supplied to Peugeot Citroen Isuzu Holden Vauxhaull Chevy and GMC.

    I guess GM doesn't see the ROI in designing and building such product in-house.

    Isn't this utter BS repeated in practically every GM business case for sensible investments?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Ninety-Eight in asking why GM shouldn't take the lead on something like this. Let Opel work on it (gives them something useful to do) and be the design supplied to Peugeot Citroen Isuzu Holden Vauxhaull Chevy and GMC.

    I guess GM doesn't see the ROI in designing and building such product in-house.

    If they can't find the ROI in designing and building a global small delivery van, likely based off of Delta III, then they just need to pack it up and stop building cars.

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Ninety-Eight in asking why GM shouldn't take the lead on something like this. Let Opel work on it (gives them something useful to do) and be the design supplied to Peugeot Citroen Isuzu Holden Vauxhaull Chevy and GMC.

    I guess GM doesn't see the ROI in designing and building such product in-house.

    If they can't find the ROI in designing and building a global small delivery van, likely based off of Delta III, then they just need to pack it up and stop building cars.

    One would think so, but this is GM we are talking about...

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Ninety-Eight in asking why GM shouldn't take the lead on something like this. Let Opel work on it (gives them something useful to do) and be the design supplied to Peugeot Citroen Isuzu Holden Vauxhaull Chevy and GMC.

    YES! TAKE THE LEAD AND BE THE BEST

    otherwise it gets reduced to how well you market the same stuff that everyone else is selling. it becomes more about marketing and not about superior product.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Ninety-Eight in asking why GM shouldn't take the lead on something like this. Let Opel work on it (gives them something useful to do) and be the design supplied to Peugeot Citroen Isuzu Holden Vauxhaull Chevy and GMC.

    I guess GM doesn't see the ROI in designing and building such product in-house.

    If they can't find the ROI in designing and building a global small delivery van, likely based off of Delta III, then they just need to pack it up and stop building cars.

    FORD CAN WHY CANT GM

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Ninety-Eight in asking why GM shouldn't take the lead on something like this. Let Opel work on it (gives them something useful to do) and be the design supplied to Peugeot Citroen Isuzu Holden Vauxhaull Chevy and GMC.

    I guess GM doesn't see the ROI in designing and building such product in-house.

    If they can't find the ROI in designing and building a global small delivery van, likely based off of Delta III, then they just need to pack it up and stop building cars.

    FORD CAN WHY CANT GM

    Bankruptcy (that's been the default answer for GM behavior the last 5 years, probably will continue to be for the next 5-10)

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm with Ninety-Eight in asking why GM shouldn't take the lead on something like this. Let Opel work on it (gives them something useful to do) and be the design supplied to Peugeot Citroen Isuzu Holden Vauxhaull Chevy and GMC.

    Opel sells rebadged Fiat and Renault vans over here IIRC...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I know they do... I'm suggesting that if Opel is in such dire straits these days... perhaps giving them something to work on that could have huge profit potential might not be such a bad idea.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with Drew and many others here that this is a perfect chance for GM to use the Opel Division to build a global compact to large van line that would compete rather than re-badge an ugly, very ugly Peugeot or Fiat which I just do not see what is so great about those vans after looking at all the links.

    It just makes me want to :puke:

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Opel has their hands full already trying to reinvent their entire line into a more expensive brand in a down economy. Opel will not do it with the present cars but with each and every new Opick they make. Buick and Opel will need 5-10 years to bring all new models to carry them closer to their goal. Opel has little time to deal with work vans that are generally sold on price and utility vs. any other quality.

    Ford rebranded their little carrier from overseas and imported them from Turkey. I saw them I though that will never fly just as many here also thought and today Ford is making truck loads of money on the deal. They have been very popular and selling better than they ever believed.

    This is also nothing new for GM as for how long have they also imported rebadged chassis tucks as GMC and Chevy from Asia. Now it is time for them to do the same here. Even Ram has one well with the White/Daimler vans.

    The key here is get good utility, good MPG, Low operating cost and low purchase price and companies will flock to these. Styling and other issues associated with cars here are non factors. If a company can buy your product to do the job and save money they will be there with their checks in their hands.

    We are not selling cars here.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I remember when rolls royce & bmw said the same thing RE a really good automatic trans. They're still using the same source for their auto...... Oh yeah.

    If margins are slim & the segment is slight, its one thing. If the picture is otherwise (ask Ford), investment can have its returns (yep, I realize the Connect already was). 10 years ago, there were hardly any small commercial vans available. Leaders lead, the rest follow ( or rebadge).

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like that leaders lead and the rest rebadge, good line.

    These commercial vans seem all the rage, maybe in 10 years time we won't even have small cars, but instead the Transit Connect and the Puegeot Partner will take the place of Civics and Rav4's. Some of these car companies seem more interested in getting a commercial van than they do in building a good mid-size car.

    You'd think that the Cruze diesel would be a good basis for a van, because if you took that chassis and strengthened it and beefed up the suspension, all you have to do is convert the unibody to a box and you have a van, with the desired torque and fuel economy that the business customer needs.

    Edited by smk4565
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    With all the other product GM needs to have great investment in and divisions to fix and new technology they need to invest in for higher MPG I see the rebadge is more then enough here. They will make a good profit here and can do something here once they get the rest of their house in order.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The '14 TransitConnect is a sharp little van, imo. I know they're keeping diesels out of their U.S. versions because of costs, but I think it would be really cool to have one with a diesel that could be driven daily and then used to camp in on the weekends. I've seen several clever camper conversions on the current version.

    See, even non-commercial users find them useful. GM needs to wake up and smell the coffee.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The most pressing need is a replacement for the large Chevy Van. Ford will have their new Larger Transit out this year to take the place of the old discontinued Econoline. Chevy has had it easy in this segment but with the new van comes lower operating cost and GM will have to have something for it.

    In the mean time they do not have the time and money to mess with the smaller segment unless they have something coming that can fill this need that we have not seen.
    GM has so much to do and only so much money and man power that the rebadge is not a cop out but a link to when they address the issue properly.

    The one vehivcle that was doing well for small companies was of all things the HHR panels. There are still many full and half panels still in use. They were cheap to run, hauled light loads with no issue and were cheap to buy. GM needs something small like this and they needed 4 years ago so we can either rebadge or we can wait 4-5 more years.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hyperv6:

    Thank you for your clear and concise explantations. I had a conversation with some guy on another GM forum last night and I think he may have worked for GM because he was saying the same things you are saying about Opel and Buick and what GM is trying to do. They were detailed explanations just like yours. He said the same things about why GM is making the most of what they have and reinventing Opel and Buick in the processes. This why why GM is reabadging the Peugeot-Citroen vans to be in the Euro Van game. They cannot afford to lose out. GM and Ford did not count on the success of Ford Transit Connect. GM knows like you said they have to act instead of react. I was told going forward the Opels and Buicks will be designed and engineered for America, China, and Europe. Buick and Opel have to do a image change and just like Cadillac go through a renewal process that GM will have to invest and build on for years. It is about being competitive. Opels and Buicks will be aimed at high end Volkswagens and low end Audis. I was also told that Americans are more receptive to imports or Euro designs as opposed to Europeans who are not as receptive to American designs.

    The reason why Buick ended up with Opels was because Buick did not have anything in the pipeline and they used that money on the suvs as the suvs are making money and bring profit to GM. They also are converging things globally.

    Chevrolet- Holden

    Buick- Opel/Vauxhall

    GMC

    Cadillac- If you notice most of their products are unique to them with the exception of the Escalade. This is something Ford has not done with Lincoln yet.

    The current situation with Buick is a temorary fix until the real product can come. I was told the Monza concept car that was partitally unveiled is an example of the new Buick-Opel image and look.

    As far as these vans, this is just to keep GM in the game until they have time later to invest in a global commercial van. GM will modify them I am sure to look like GMC and Chevrolet.

    Looks like Volkswagen is testing their Euro Van in Arizona. No one knows why.

    Sighted: Volkswagen Crafter

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    VW is testing here as I am sure they will sell their van not only here but also in other places like the middle east. Testing is safer in Winslow vs. Syria right now!

    The realignment of GM is just now showing itself and more people will start to see the picture. Those of us who watch GM have seen this and understand what has been taking place but the product the most obvious sign of the realignment just has not taken place.

    Too many people look at GM and what they are doing and only think products but tend to leave out the business end of things. There is much more than just numbers and building cars on emotion or feeling. Anymore you have to get the most out of each platform and return on investment. While we on the web pine away about building diesel powered AWD wagons here there are people at GM would like to build these but they have to maximize the return on investment and that is difficult when all those who say they will buy it do not show up at the dealers when they do. Now that GM has a Diesel Cruze it will be interesting to see just how many buy, As for those who say they will not buy because it has leather seats etc. really were never in the market anyways as if you really wanted a Diesel would a seat fabric really stop you?

    GM needs to be in this segment now and not 5 years from now. Even with the way things are going it may take time to get new product here so they need to take advantage of what resources they have. God knows there are still a lot of Isuzu's with bow ties still working for a lot of companies and each one made GM money and companies loved them as they saved money not only buying them but also in MPG with the turbo Diesels.

    That Scott really knows his stuff. PM sent!

    Edited by hyperv6
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Every Chevrolet Bolt that will be rolling off the assembly line will lose General Motors close to $9,000 once they are sold. This seems like madness, but according to a report from Bloomberg, there is some method to it. 
      Thanks to new regulations done by California Air Resources Board, automakers have to sell a certain amount of zero-emission vehicles if they want to sell other vehicles - primarily crossovers, SUVs, and trucks - in the state. These new regulations say by 2025, zero-emission vehicles need to make up 15.4 percent of the market. Since then, nine other states including New York have adopted these regulations. All told, these ten states make up 30 percent of the total U.S. auto market.
      Take for example Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. CEO Sergio Marchionne revealed a couple years back they take a hit of $14,000 on every Fiat 500e sold. But if they wanted to sell Ram pickups and Jeep SUVs in California, they need to take the hit.
      How does Bloomberg get the $9,000 figure? That's due to a source at General Motors who revealed the estimate is based on the Bolt's $37,500 base price. A GM spokesman declined to comment.
      If General Motors is able to sell enough Bolts, they'll be able to gather enough credits to not only sell other vehicles which will make up for the Bolt's loss, but also be able to sell extra credits to other automakers. Tesla has taken advantage of this to great effect. In the third quarter, Tesla made $139 million from selling credits.  
      Source: Bloomberg
       
       
       

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Every Chevrolet Bolt that will be rolling off the assembly line will lose General Motors close to $9,000 once they are sold. This seems like madness, but according to a report from Bloomberg, there is some method to it. 
      Thanks to new regulations done by California Air Resources Board, automakers have to sell a certain amount of zero-emission vehicles if they want to sell other vehicles - primarily crossovers, SUVs, and trucks - in the state. These new regulations say by 2025, zero-emission vehicles need to make up 15.4 percent of the market. Since then, nine other states including New York have adopted these regulations. All told, these ten states make up 30 percent of the total U.S. auto market.
      Take for example Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. CEO Sergio Marchionne revealed a couple years back they take a hit of $14,000 on every Fiat 500e sold. But if they wanted to sell Ram pickups and Jeep SUVs in California, they need to take the hit.
      How does Bloomberg get the $9,000 figure? That's due to a source at General Motors who revealed the estimate is based on the Bolt's $37,500 base price. A GM spokesman declined to comment.
      If General Motors is able to sell enough Bolts, they'll be able to gather enough credits to not only sell other vehicles which will make up for the Bolt's loss, but also be able to sell extra credits to other automakers. Tesla has taken advantage of this to great effect. In the third quarter, Tesla made $139 million from selling credits.  
      Source: Bloomberg
       
       
       
    • By William Maley
      As sales of compacts and sport cars begin declining, automakers are faced with tough decisions as to what in terms of production and workers. General Motors made the difficult decision to lay off 2,000 workers at two plants.
      Bloomberg reports that GM will be cutting the third shift at their Lansing Grand River plant in Michigan (home to Cadillac ATS, CTS, and Chevrolet Camaro) and a shift at Lordstown, Ohio plant (home to the Chevrolet Cruze). GM spokesman Tom Wickham said the company is treating the layoffs as permanent, although some workers will be able to transfer to other plants.
      The layoffs are due to sales of compact and sports cars going down due to consumers buying more crossovers. Sales of the Chevrolet Cruze dropped 20 percent through October, while the Camaro has seen a drop of 9 percent.
      On the same day, General Motors announced a $900 million investment for three plants - Toledo Transmission Operations, Bedford Casting Operations in Indiana, and Lansing Grand River. Wickham said this investment would not add any new jobs.
      Source: Bloomberg, General Motors
      Press Release is on Page 2


      General Motors today announced initiatives to strengthen and align its production output at key U.S. manufacturing operations. The plans include investing more than $900 million in three facilities — Toledo Transmission Operations in Ohio, Lansing Grand River in Michigan and Bedford Casting Operations in Indiana —  to prepare the facilities for future product programs.
      GM also announced plans to align production output with demand for cars built at the Lordstown, Ohio, and Lansing Grand River, Michigan, assembly plants. As the customer shift from cars to crossovers and trucks is projected to continue, GM will suspend the third shift of production at both facilities in the first quarter of 2017. 

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      As sales of compacts and sport cars begin declining, automakers are faced with tough decisions as to what in terms of production and workers. General Motors made the difficult decision to lay off 2,000 workers at two plants.
      Bloomberg reports that GM will be cutting the third shift at their Lansing Grand River plant in Michigan (home to Cadillac ATS, CTS, and Chevrolet Camaro) and a shift at Lordstown, Ohio plant (home to the Chevrolet Cruze). GM spokesman Tom Wickham said the company is treating the layoffs as permanent, although some workers will be able to transfer to other plants.
      The layoffs are due to sales of compact and sports cars going down due to consumers buying more crossovers. Sales of the Chevrolet Cruze dropped 20 percent through October, while the Camaro has seen a drop of 9 percent.
      On the same day, General Motors announced a $900 million investment for three plants - Toledo Transmission Operations, Bedford Casting Operations in Indiana, and Lansing Grand River. Wickham said this investment would not add any new jobs.
      Source: Bloomberg, General Motors
      Press Release is on Page 2


      General Motors today announced initiatives to strengthen and align its production output at key U.S. manufacturing operations. The plans include investing more than $900 million in three facilities — Toledo Transmission Operations in Ohio, Lansing Grand River in Michigan and Bedford Casting Operations in Indiana —  to prepare the facilities for future product programs.
      GM also announced plans to align production output with demand for cars built at the Lordstown, Ohio, and Lansing Grand River, Michigan, assembly plants. As the customer shift from cars to crossovers and trucks is projected to continue, GM will suspend the third shift of production at both facilities in the first quarter of 2017. 
    • By William Maley
      Mercedes-Benz Reports October Sales Of 28,659 Units
      MBUSA posts 0.7% YTD increase ATLANTA, Nov. 1, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Mercedes-Benz USA (MBUSA) today reported October sales of 28,659 vehicles, decreasing 1.0% from the 28,952 vehicles sold during the same month last year. Mercedes-Benz Vans also reported October sales with 2,724 units, down 2.7% and smart reported 418 units, bringing MBUSA grand total to 31,801 vehicles for the month, down 2.1% from last year. On a year-to-date basis, Mercedes-Benz retails totaled 277,863. Adding year-to-date-sales of 27,880 for Vans and 4,462 for smart, MBUSA posted a grand total of 310,205 units in October, increasing 0.7% from the previous year.
      "We're on track for another great year as we continue into the fourth quarter," said Dietmar Exler, president and CEO of MBUSA. "Overall MBUSA sales for the year are outperforming last year, which was our highest year on record."
      Mercedes-Benz volume leaders in October included the C-Class, GLE and E-Class (including the CLS) model lines. The C-Class took the lead at 6,227, followed by the GLE at 4,042. The E-Class, rounded out the top three with 3,827 units sold.
      Mercedes-AMG high-performance models sold 1,903 units in October, with a total of 17,545 units sold year-to-date (up 40.8 %).
      Separately, Mercedes-Benz Certified Pre-Owned (MBCPO) models recorded sales of 10,022 vehicles in October, an increase of 4.1% from last year (9,629). On a year-to-date basis, MBCPO sold 102,256 vehicles, an increase of 2.9%.
      MERCEDES-BENZ USA 
      Sales -- October 2016
       
      Mercedes-Benz
      Passenger Vehicles
      Oct-16
      Oct-15
      Monthly %
      YTD 2016
      YTD 2015
      Yearly %
                    B-CLASS
      58
      81
      -28.4%
      526
      1,768
      -70.2%
                    CLA
      2,295
      1,867
      22.9%
      21,846
      25,120
      -13.0%
                    C-CLASS
      6,227
      7,283
      -14.5%
      62,561
      71,818
      -12.9%
                    E-CLASS/CLS
      3,827
      5,162
      -25.9%
      41,403
      45,103
      -8.2%
                    S-CLASS
      2,420
      1,921
      26.0%
      15,834
      17,969
      -11.9%
                    SLC/SLK
      238
      516
      -53.9%
      2,797
      3,653
      -23.4%
                    SL
      299
      252
      18.7%
      3,145
      3,384
      -7.1%
                    AMG GT
      81
      105
      -22.9%
      1,039
      997
      4.2%
                    *SLS AMG
      0
      1
      -
      1
      28
      -
                    GLA
      2,560
      2,025
      26.4%
      19,967
      20,672
      -3.4%
                    GLC/GLK
      3,588
      1,943
      84.7%
      39,978
      22,320
      79.1%
                    GLE/M-CLASS
      4,042
      4,880
      -17.2%
      41,523
      41,327
      0.5%
                    GL/GLS
      2,828
      2,613
      8.2%
      24,072
      21,942
      9.7%
                    G-CLASS 
      196
      303
      -35.3%
      3,171
      2,741
      15.7%
                    TOTAL
      28,659
      28,952
      -1.0%
      277,863
      278,842
      -0.4%
                    Vans1
      2,724
      2,799
      -2.7%
      27,880
      23,073
      20.8%
                    smart
      418
      721
      -42.0%
      4,462
      6,153
      -27.5%
                    MBUSA
      Combined Total
      Oct-16
      Oct-15
      Monthly %
      YTD 2016
      YTD 2015
      Yearly %
                    GRAND TOTAL
      31,801
      32,472
      -2.1%
      310,205
      308,068
      0.7%
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)