Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    California Mulls Ban On Combustion Engines

      Come on, don't tell us you didn't see this coming

    California is considering joining France and Great Britain in banning the sale of gas and diesel-powered vehicles.

    Governor Jerry Brown has been expressing an interest in banning the sale of internal-combustion engines according to Mary Nichols, chariman of the California Air Resources Board.

    “I’ve gotten messages from the governor asking, ‘Why haven’t we done something already?’ The governor has certainly indicated an interest in why China can do this and not California,” she said to Bloomberg.

    As we reported earlier this month, China is also considering a ban on internal combustion engines.

    California has set an ambitious goal reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 80 percent from 1990 levels by 2050.

    “To reach the ambitious levels of reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, we have to pretty much replace all combustion with some form of renewable energy by 2040 or 2050. We’re looking at that as a method of moving this discussion forward,” said Nichols.

    If California was to go forward with this, it would send massive shockwaves in the automotive industry due to the size of state's auto market. Last year, more than 2 million new passenger vehicles were registered, topping countries like France and Spain. Automakers would be under new pressure on making EVs the standard.

    But that doesn't mean California will have an easy time with this. While the state has the authority of writing its own pollution rules thanks to the 1970 Clean Air Act, they cannot be enacted with getting waivers from the EPA. With the Trump administration going on record that it would challenge California on any new environmental act, the state is looking for alternative ways to get what they want.

    “We certainly wouldn’t expect to get a waiver for that from EPA. I think we would be looking at using some of our other authorities to get to that result,” said Nichols.

    Nichols did say it will be a long time before something like this is implemented.

    “There are people who believe, including who work for me, that you could stop all sales of new internal-combustion cars by 2030. Some people say 2035, some people say 2040. It’s awfully hard to predict any of that with precision, but it doesn’t appear to be out of the question.”

    Source: Bloomberg

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    They might be able to ban new car sales, but they cannot stop the of the used, or simply the use of them. 

    Many simply could not afford it, and they cannot get massive public transportation that fast either.....

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can see a sale of New ICE auto's ending by 2040. Existing auto's I can see being limited to collector status and limiting miles driven. Many ways to force / change the type of auto's driven and the way they are driven.

    This could also push people into the conversion big time as people change over ICE powered auto's they like to EV powertrains.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There is going to need to be massive investment in charging infrastructure.  Even if chargers are common enough for today's level of EV use, they aren't nearly plentiful enough for the entire state of CA to go EV. 

    I've started to contemplate having the outlet installed in my garage in the next few years.  When I get back into writing reviews in a few months time, I want to be able to take in plug-in vehicles. 

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    54 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

    They might be able to ban new car sales, but they cannot stop the of the used, or simply the use of them. 

    Many simply could not afford it, and they cannot get massive public transportation that fast either.....

    I'm assuming it is applicable to new cars, similar to the ban taking place in Great Britain. 

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Anyway we can get California to literally join France? As in move it next door? ;)

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    I can see a sale of New ICE auto's ending by 2040. Existing auto's I can see being limited to collector status and limiting miles driven. Many ways to force / change the type of auto's driven and the way they are driven.

    You cannot DO this: force people who legally own an approved consumer good as vital as a vehicle to suddenly be severely limited in its use. For one, the value of these items would instantly plummet to near zero, rendering these people without a trade-in (Would be no surprise to me if CA suggests a special tax to write every ICE owner a compensatory check). The only way this passes general acceptance is to allow grandfathering / attrition... over the course of many decades. Gov't can only ban the production of NEW ICEs... just as there are no retro-active vehicular equipment laws (that I'm aware of)- even after 50 years of federal vehicle regulation.

    The 'next step' then comes to question- what about people traveling into CA? Or moving to CA? And what about semi-trucks- would they be exempt?

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If CA does it, then the rest of the country will follow shortly after or auto makers will just give up on gas engines.  If California had 2 million car sales, that is 1/8th of all car sales in the USA.  That is huge.  

    They can't take away someone's gas car, but they can stop sale of new ones.  So if they want to be emission free by 2050, they need to ban sales of ICE cars around 2035 to allow 15 years for existing cars to run their life cycle.

    I think EV's will get better and better and no one is going to want a gas car anyway in 2030.

    • Like 1
    • Downvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    If CA does it, then the rest of the country will follow shortly after or auto makers will just give up on gas engines.  If California had 2 million car sales, that is 1/8th of all car sales in the USA.  That is huge.  

    They can't take away someone's gas car, but they can stop sale of new ones.  So if they want to be emission free by 2050, they need to ban sales of ICE cars around 2035 to allow 15 years for existing cars to run their life cycle.

    I think EV's will get better and better and no one is going to want a gas car anyway in 2030.

    Oh, they could-but the results would be quite bad...

    Don't get me wrong, I like EVs, but you can't drag race them....:)

     

    But who knows, maybe Apple will make EVs.......

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

    Oh, they could-but the results would be quite bad...

    Don't get me wrong, I like EVs, but you can't drag race them....:)

     

    But who knows, maybe Apple will make EVs.......

    Yes you can, the Model S just won't Motor Trend's World's greatest drag race.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Just now, smk4565 said:

    Yes you can, the Model S just won't Motor Trend's World's greatest drag race.

     

    More interested in the mainstream cars, not the higher end ones.....

    And I highly doubt you could abuse the model S like you could with say, A hemi.....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    35 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

     

    More interested in the mainstream cars, not the higher end ones.....

    And I highly doubt you could abuse the model S like you could with say, A hemi.....

    Its an electric motor. (2 motors...1 in the front, 1 in the back)

    3 phase.

    Are you trying to tell us that an induction motor is less durable and less reliable and less capable of achieving high and sustained RPMs than an internal combustion engine?

    I dont feel like writing a high school essay on why an induction motor is less likely to fail in a drag race versus an internal combustion engine.

    • While heat is detrimental to both...the internal combustion engine produces a shyte load of it while the induction motor produces very little, if any...
    • There are no fluids to overheat and to spill via ruptured hoses in an induction motor...
    • There are no gears to grind as there is no transmission...just a single speed transmission in an induction motor...
    • Running high RPMs all day long 365/24/7 is kinda the electric motor's thang...

     

    And that is just for starters...

    Its OK for you people not to like EVs...please though...dont just spew whatever comes to your head to justify your views...it dont look good for you folk when others are reading your shyte!

    • Like 1
    • Downvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    PS: When HEMIs decide to self destruct, they make a huge and loud BOOM!

    Louder and bigger than any other engine in the racing world...something to be proud of actually...

     

     But... THAT is the explosive nature of an internal COMBUSTION engine....so...

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    31 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Its an electric motor. (2 motors...1 in the front, 1 in the back)

    3 phase.

    Are you trying to tell us that an induction motor is less durable and less reliable and less capable of achieving high and sustained RPMs than an internal combustion engine?

    I dont feel like writing a high school essay on why an induction motor is less likely to fail in a drag race versus an internal combustion engine.

    • While heat is detrimental to both...the internal combustion engine produces a shyte load of it while the induction motor produces very little, if any...
    • There are no fluids to overheat and to spill via ruptured hoses in an induction motor...
    • There are no gears to grind as there is no transmission...just a single speed transmission in an induction motor...
    • Running high RPMs all day long 365/24/7 is kinda the electric motor's thang...

     

    And that is just for starters...

    Its OK for you people not to like EVs...please though...dont just spew whatever comes to your head to justify your views...it dont look good for you folk when others are reading your shyte!

    Helps if you read my other posts though.....

    I happen to like EVs  (rode in a new Volt and really liked it), and I am not flat out bashing it either. I'm just not sure they are just ready for prime time abuse just yet. I sadly and personally know of someone who managed to kill a very nice 2013 Volt.....

    And while I'm sure any drag race they would be fine....driving like one stole it might for a while might be interesting...like I said-I am just not sure about the long term-yet. I have no doubt the automakers are doing their best (personally seen what goes into a Volt at D-Ham) and they are building them tough-but they haven't met the dumb half of John Q. Public yet.....

    But I know like anything else, they'll be just as tough as a Toyota Corolla given to a 16 year old....:P

    And,"you Folk"?

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    6 hours ago, daves87rs said:

    but they haven't met the dumb half of John Q. Public yet.....

    But they have...

    electric motors...(different kinds of electric motors)...are EVERYWHERE IN EVERYDAY stuff stupid John Q public uses...I dont think e-motors dont wreak havoc upon us...

    But we are talking about a 3 phase induction motor.

    A stator, a rotor, copper wire, magnets and a shaft...

    The shaft may misalign itself...but that wont be because of stupid John Q misusing it...

    There are no fluids that will be forgotten to be topped off...

    The magnetic field that is needed to be produced for an induction motor to kinda do its thang kinda happens all by itself...

    A 3 phase  motor is inherently, kinda-like...idiot proof.

     

    If "you Folk"  is all you got on me, I suggest you revisit high school electric/physics class...

     

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    9 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Motor Trend "World's Greatest" drag only had 12 cars in it.

    Tesla Model S 100D : 10.6
    Dodge Hellcat Demon : 9.6

    Zero percent chance they could replicate a sub 10 second pass on an air strip. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    7 hours ago, 67impss said:

    Smk how in the world do you get that these electric cars are emission free. They are still causing the burning of fossil fuels in over 90% of all power plants and would use 50% more than gasoline in MN.

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/electric-cars-are-not-necessarily-clean/ 

    Which only lends credence to the fact that states like Minnesota need to use different and cleaner forms of energy to produce said power. Arizona’s solar industry has grown every year and will continue to do so, lending a perfect match to charging up those EVs. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    17 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Anyway we can get California to literally join France? As in move it next door? ;)

    You cannot DO this: force people who legally own an approved consumer good as vital as a vehicle to suddenly be severely limited in its use. For one, the value of these items would instantly plummet to near zero, rendering these people without a trade-in (Would be no surprise to me if CA suggests a special tax to write every ICE owner a compensatory check). The only way this passes general acceptance is to allow grandfathering / attrition... over the course of many decades. Gov't can only ban the production of NEW ICEs... just as there are no retro-active vehicular equipment laws (that I'm aware of)- even after 50 years of federal vehicle regulation.

    The 'next step' then comes to question- what about people traveling into CA? Or moving to CA? And what about semi-trucks- would they be exempt?

    Valid Points, The west coast give big breaks to people who register their old auto's as Collectors and you are limited in how many miles a year you can drive them for all the perks  of being a collector. 6000 miles in Washington.

    Many ways for the gov to limit auto's being driven. Especially if it is not a daily driver, why not take the breaks and savings that can be had with limited driving.

    13 hours ago, daves87rs said:

    Oh, they could-but the results would be quite bad...

    Don't get me wrong, I like EVs, but you can't drag race them....:)

     

    But who knows, maybe Apple will make EVs.......

    WRONG, You need to learn young padawan!

    White Zombie is one of many that are street legal and officially Drag Race.

    Here is a video of it eating up all types of drag race cars. EV kills ICE.

     

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    13 hours ago, daves87rs said:

     

    More interested in the mainstream cars, not the higher end ones.....

    And I highly doubt you could abuse the model S like you could with say, A hemi.....

    Actually the EV is more reliable and can take the abuse better than the Hemi.

    This comes down to a less complex engine or motor able to react faster.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    But they have...

    electric motors...(different kinds of electric motors)...are EVERYWHERE IN EVERYDAY stuff stupid John Q public uses...I dont think e-motors dont wreak havoc upon us...

    But we are talking about a 3 phase induction motor.

    A stator, a rotor, copper wire, magnets and a shaft...

    The shaft may misalign itself...but that wont be because of stupid John Q misusing it...

    There are no fluids that will be forgotten to be topped off...

    The magnetic field that is needed to be produced for an induction motor to kinda do its thang kinda happens all by itself...

    A 3 phase  motor is inherently, kinda-like...idiot proof.

     

    If "you Folk"  is all you got on me, I suggest you revisit high school electric/physics class...

     

     

     

    No, I was actually asked what you meant by it. And since you want to insult  me like a high schooler, no point in adding anything further.......

    I'm just pointing out ideas for debate...and if I learn something new, cool....all for it in my quest for knowledge. And you come off like I am against it- when the that's not true. I just question how ready, that's all.....

    And I know dfelt is picking on me (cause he's a good guy)- but not sure if you are...

    If you don't like my idea train-just say so....:)

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    42 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Valid Points, The west coast give big breaks to people who register their old auto's as Collectors and you are limited in how many miles a year you can drive them for all the perks  of being a collector. 6000 miles in Washington.

    Many ways for the gov to limit auto's being driven. Especially if it is not a daily driver, why not take the breaks and savings that can be had with limited driving.

    WRONG, You need to learn young padawan!

    White Zombie is one of many that are street legal and officially Drag Race.

    Here is a video of it eating up all types of drag race cars. EV kills ICE.

     

     

    I've heard about it....but damn that's cool.....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    38 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Unless they have quick chargers at drag strips that's still not a viable option. 

    For the west coast, yes, Level 3 quick chargers are now standard. The public and Professional drag races are pretty cool seeing all the various teams that are going EV.

    6 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

     

    I've heard about it....but damn that's cool.....

    Check out NEDRA, the West Coast EV Drag Racing association.

    Also check out the European EV Drag Racing, crazy cars at 500HP

    Current World fastest EV Drag Racer, VW Beetle baby with a 9.5 sec run.

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      The EPA has officially released its assessment of the 2020 Jeep Wrangler EcoDiesel. The EcoDiesel is only available as a 4-door with an 8-speed automatic and in that configuration, the EcoDiesel manages to get 29 mpg highway, 22 mpg city, and 25 combined. That is slightly better than a 4x4 Ram 1500 with the same powertrain. The next closest model in terms of fuel efficiency is the 2-door, 4-cylinder, manual transmission, rear-wheel drive Wrangler at 24 highway mpg, 22 city mpg, and 23 combined. 
      The diesel engine is a $4,000 option though so you may not ultimately save money. Instead, Jeep believes the EcoDiesel option is best suited for those who need the gobs of torque generated by the V6 diesel when going off-road. With 260 horsepower and 442 lb.-ft of torque, the Wrangler EcoDiesel has torque in spades. To the dismay of many, the Ecodiesel does come standard with electronic stop/start.
      If diesel isn't your thing, there is the 2.0T 4-cylinder which produces 270 horsepower and 295 lb.-ft of torque or the 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 which produces 285 horsepower and 260 lb.-ft of torque.  Both engines also come with stop/start or can be upgraded to the eTorque system that smooths out the torque band and either engine is available with a manual transmission or 8-speed automatic.
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The EPA has officially released its assessment of the 2020 Jeep Wrangler EcoDiesel. The EcoDiesel is only available as a 4-door with an 8-speed automatic and in that configuration, the EcoDiesel manages to get 29 mpg highway, 22 mpg city, and 25 combined. That is slightly better than a 4x4 Ram 1500 with the same powertrain. The next closest model in terms of fuel efficiency is the 2-door, 4-cylinder, manual transmission, rear-wheel drive Wrangler at 24 highway mpg, 22 city mpg, and 23 combined. 
      The diesel engine is a $4,000 option though so you may not ultimately save money. Instead, Jeep believes the EcoDiesel option is best suited for those who need the gobs of torque generated by the V6 diesel when going off-road. With 260 horsepower and 442 lb.-ft of torque, the Wrangler EcoDiesel has torque in spades. To the dismay of many, the Ecodiesel does come standard with electronic stop/start.
      If diesel isn't your thing, there is the 2.0T 4-cylinder which produces 270 horsepower and 295 lb.-ft of torque or the 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 which produces 285 horsepower and 260 lb.-ft of torque.  Both engines also come with stop/start or can be upgraded to the eTorque system that smooths out the torque band and either engine is available with a manual transmission or 8-speed automatic.
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      As we reported last month, Jeep is adding a diesel to the Wrangler lineup.  The 3.0-liter diesel will produce 260 horsepower and 442 lb-ft of torque and be paired only with the 8-speed automatic. Electronic Start-Stop is also standard issue. 
      As for how much it is going to cost, be prepared to shell out up to an additional $6,000 over the base model.  It breaks down like this:  $4,000 for the diesel engine + $2,000 for the automatic transmission.  All in all, it ends up being a $3,250 upgrade over a Wrangler with a Pentastar V6 and 8-speed automatic.   The diesel will only be offered in 4-door trims of Sport, Sahara, and Rubicon.  In the RAM 1500 with the same powertrain, highway fuel economy is rated for 30mpg. Expect the lighter but less aerodynamic Wrangler to match that once EPA numbers are finalized.
      Diesel Wranglers start down the production line in late November, but the order books are already open if you want to head down to the dealer and put your order in. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      As we reported last month, Jeep is adding a diesel to the Wrangler lineup.  The 3.0-liter diesel will produce 260 horsepower and 442 lb-ft of torque and be paired only with the 8-speed automatic. Electronic Start-Stop is also standard issue. 
      As for how much it is going to cost, be prepared to shell out up to an additional $6,000 over the base model.  It breaks down like this:  $4,000 for the diesel engine + $2,000 for the automatic transmission.  All in all, it ends up being a $3,250 upgrade over a Wrangler with a Pentastar V6 and 8-speed automatic.   The diesel will only be offered in 4-door trims of Sport, Sahara, and Rubicon.  In the RAM 1500 with the same powertrain, highway fuel economy is rated for 30mpg. Expect the lighter but less aerodynamic Wrangler to match that once EPA numbers are finalized.
      Diesel Wranglers start down the production line in late November, but the order books are already open if you want to head down to the dealer and put your order in. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Jeep is finally offering the 3.0-Liter EcoDiesel from the Ram 1500 in the Jeep Wrangler as a late availability option for 2020.  For the Wrangler, the engine will produce 260 horsepower and 442 lb-ft of torque. The diesel will be offered on Sport, Sahara, and Rubicon editions, and only on 4 door models. The only transmission available to pair with the diesel is the 8-speed automatic. Electronic Start-Stop (ESS) is standard on the diesel and all other engine options. 
      Other changes for the Wrangler include the addition of the mild-hybrid 48 volt eTorque system to either the 2.0-liter 4-cylinder turbo or the 3.6-liter Pentastar V6. The eTorque system takes the place of ESS and also smooths out the torque band. The 3.6 Pentastar produces 285 horsepower and 260 lb-ft of torque while the 2.0T produces 270 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque. These numbers hold true with or without the eTorque system. Only the Sahara trim gets eTorque.
      Two special editions take their place in the Wrangler lineup. The Willys edition is aimed at the off-road enthusiast. As far as hardware, it comes with a limited-slip differential, Rubicon rock rails and shots, heavy duty brakes, two-speed transfer case, and big 32-inch all-terrain tires. Visually, it gets 17-inch wheels with grey accents, all-weather floor mats, LED headlights and foglights, and a gloss black grille, along with the Willys badging.  The Willys edition can come either in a 2-door for $35,235 or the 4-door for $38,735.
      A second special editions is primarily cosmetic. Called the Black & Tan edition (pictured above), it is mainly a retro looking that gets a tan soft-top, 17-inch Machine Granite wheels, tan cloths seats, side steps, and more.  The Black & Tan edition is available on both 2-door and 4-door models. 

      View full article
  • Posts

    • I do not know what is happening in your neck of the woods, but Quebeckers, older Quebeckers were heavy heavy smokers.  These folk still smoke today regardless of the health warnings and the general un-cool factor that it has today unlike the status it once had.  But...older French Quebecker males DO smoke less than French women today .  Also, at least in the Montreal area, YOUNGER females smoke (and vape) far far more than the males.   I wanna know why that is?    
    • For those who endured wickedly mean nuns, it would take much more than $ 350. By the time I had some of the few who were left, they had thankfully mellowed out.
    • Enough said.  Especially with the Farrah Fawcett hair. This lady is probably of the variety that relishes, or relished, her smoke breaks outside her place of work with kindred souls.  Oh yes, this (stereo)type definitely exists.  Don't be arguing with me, folks, and throwing down that PC card.
    • I think he @ykX is equating a  'wallowy" suspension with crappy ride.  To that he aint wrong about the cars having wallowy suspensions during the time he is referencing which is from the late 1960s to the early and mid-1980s.   I aint gonna judge nobody for liking and not liking this type of ride. I dont care really what somebody's preference is for car suspensions, but there are some things that I will take exception to.  But his or anybody else's preference aint one of them.   The thing I WILL take exception to though is about calling it a crap ride as opposed to a tighter European "road hugging, stiffer suspension is that I will DEFEND the wallowy ride for these reasons: BECAUSE our NORTH AMERICAN roads and CAR CULTURE DICTATED that OUR cars RODE like we are in our living room on our sofas in COMFORT.   Our highways, to THIS day, are STRAIGHT for THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of miles and when we USED to go on family trips from coast to coast practically, East to West or North to South and EVERYTHING in between, in European terms, many borders of many countries, 5-6 -7 countries, would be crossed. Europe is also very very mountainous, and hence their cars being smaller and because most of their roads were horse and donkey travelled, cars HAD to be tighter for turning.   American roads flattened the mountains or go right through them, but NOT travelling around the perimeter of the mountain when on one side is the mountain, the other side is a plummet to your death and you have to share the very very narrow road with cars going the opposite side.  Brakes and handling and turning radius had BETTER be tight... City driving is the same.  HUGE phoquing boulevards. Street light to street light...racing.   Is THAT a better ride over the other? Well, take a North American road trip in a small, tight suspension-ed Japanese or European car of that era and you would realize that those cars were NOT great for OUR roads AND car culture.  Id say shytty if we were truly honest about this whole thing. By contrast, traditional big American cars SUCK for Europe...for many many reasons. As many as those 1970s European and Japanese cars were for us.  High gasoline prices was probably the SOLE reason why these cars even got a foothold on our shores. Again, if we were truly honest about this whole thing...  What I have said is not a secret. I aint teaching anybody anthing knew here.  Its just sometimes, we let our biases get in the way... 
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Benoit38
      Benoit38
      (39 years old)
    2. Deds
      Deds
      (32 years old)
    3. DSFD506
      DSFD506
      (37 years old)
    4. gmpartsgirl
      gmpartsgirl
      (47 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...