Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Kia Optima To Get Name Change, Two Turbo Engines

      ...following the path of the Sonata...

    The Kia K5 was unveiled in South Korea last month, but now we have some technical details to go with it. It sounds like Kia will ditch the Optima name in the U.S. and go with the K5 name used in South Korea going forward.

    The engine selection is similar to that of the Hyundai Sonata.  There will be a 1.6-liter turbo 4-cylinder with 178 horsepower and 195 lb.-ft of torque. There will also be a 2.5 liter naturally aspirated and direct injected 4-cylinder that produces 191 hp and 181 lb.-ft of torque. The bigger news is that the Kia K5 GT will also get the 2.5-liter turbocharged 4-cylinder going into the Sonata N-Line, that motor produces 286 hp and 311 lb.-ft of torque. That final engine is paired with an 8-speed dual-clutch transmission and should get the sedan from 0-60 in 6.6 seconds. Sometime in the future, a hybrid version of the car will be released, but Kia isn't going into detail on that just yet.

    Probably the biggest news for the K5 is that it will gain an all-wheel drive system that can shift power to the rear axle based on road conditions and driver input. It should be noted that the Sonata doesn't get an all-wheel drive option, so this gives the Kia a point of distinction over its cousin.

    The K5 has a sporty exterior with a wide tiger nose grille running the entire width of the vehicle. New headlights with a 'heart beat' daytime running light feature flank both sides. The stance of the K5 is said to lean forward with a rakish windshield and sloping roof.  In the rear is a dual exhaust system and integrated spoiler along with a LED light bar.  Wheels start at 16-inches and range up to 19-inches on the GT.

    The K5 is 193.1 inches long, longer than its predecessor, it's also lower and wider.  Wheelbase grows by 1.8-inches. 

    2021-Kia-K5-25.jpgThe cabin is all new with fancy new seats and a flat bottom steering wheel. There is an availabe infotainment system that sports a 10.25-inch screen while an available gauge cluster is fully digital and 12.3 inches complimented by an 8.0-inch heads up display. Some models of K5 will get a rotary gear selector while others get a more traditional T-Shifter.

    The K5 will have a bunch of driver assistance technologies including forward collision avoidance assist, blind-spot monitoring and assist, smart cruise control, driver attention warning, and highway driving assist.  Also available is a Level 2 semi-autonomous driving system and a remote park assist that will allow users to move their vehicle forwards or backwards with a key fob in order to get into or out of a tight parking spot.

    The 2021 Kia K5 goes on sale in the first half of 2020.

     

     

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    50 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Looks great inside and out.  I hope they don’t start calling cars K5, K4,K3, etc

    Does seem silly...the Forte is the K3 in SK, and the Credenza is the K9 I believe...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This will be interesting.  Non-luxury makes have names, not alphanumeric designations.  I understand that KIA already has them and wishes to import the alphanumerics used in SK to the USA.  NOT SURE this will sell.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Interesting as I wonder what Marketing was done to justify this change especially when we seem to see auto companies go back to names and ditch the alpha numeric's.

    Peter Schreyer and Luc Donkerwolke both came to Hyundai/Kia from Audi, so....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    Peter Schreyer and Luc Donkerwolke both came to Hyundai/Kia from Audi, so....

    That explains allot since they FAILED at Audi, Cadillac, so many attempts to copy German way of naming auto's and ended up with declining sales. Sad, so sad!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    FIRST EVER K5!!!!!!

    i thought Kia threw a shitload of market cred out the window when they ditched the Spectra name and went to Forte.

    Kia hit jackpot on the Sorento and Sportage and Soul names, and also THEY HIT JACKPOT on the Optima name.

    Cadenza (CREDENZA) not such a good name.

    WHY WOULD THEY BE SO STUPID TO DITCH ALL THAT?  IS KIA GM?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Do you know what Corolla and Camry sell  Because those names have been around for 50 year, people know what they are like Pepsi and Coca-Cola.  No one will know what a K5 is or what brand even sells it.  

    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Do you know what Corolla and Camry sell  Because those names have been around for 50 year, people know what they are like Pepsi and Coca-Cola.  No one will know what a K5 is or what brand even sells it.  

    so has Chevy Blazer!!!!!   now admittedly, what a Blazer is, is slightly different now.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, regfootball said:

    FIRST EVER K5!!!!!!

    i thought Kia threw a $h!load of market cred out the window when they ditched the Spectra name and went to Forte.

    Kia hit jackpot on the Sorento and Sportage and Soul names, and also THEY HIT JACKPOT on the Optima name.

    Cadenza (CREDENZA) not such a good name.

    WHY WOULD THEY BE SO STUPID TO DITCH ALL THAT?  IS KIA GM?

    Apparently nobody at KIA has learned that the American market requires certain things and that switching to alphanumerics HERE once you already are currently using names is generally a bad idea.  GM changed names (and dumped them from Cadillac) because some of the products associated with the names either had poor reputations or were just bad cars.  Chevrolet cars went through this the most.  Oldsmobile went through that about 25 years ago.  Often it did not go as well as hoped.  KIA's perceived problem is that they seem to only want all KIA products to be named exactly the same everywhere around the world.  American consumers are far too parochial to own a world car unless it is exceptional.

    Now if only GM could take market share away from Hyundai/KIA for several years . . . . . .

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

    Well, you can’t get attached to a K5......

    Hold up Uncle Dave!  This trailer begs to differ!

     

    ChevroletBlazer_01.jpg

    Pretty car!  Why is my perception of Kia so much more positive than Hyundai?  They're like the Korean Chevy and Pontiac of yore, but I would own a Kia and feel good about it much sooner than I would its sister brand.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the K5's styling...some of the details are weird--I don't like the large vents on the sides of the bumper, from the side, but they are less noticeable on dark colored cars...like that blue and gray.  The roofline reminds me of the MKZ.  I like the lighting details and the small upper grille..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

    I like the K5's styling...some of the details are weird--I don't like the large vents on the sides of the bumper, from the side, but they are less noticeable on dark colored cars...like that blue and gray.  The roofline reminds me of the MKZ.  I like the lighting details and the small upper grille..

    i thought MKZ also.  so then my next question to myself would be why not just find a good CPO low mileage MKZ.....

    (with the 400hp turbo v6)

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Hold up Uncle Dave!  This trailer begs to differ!

     

    ChevroletBlazer_01.jpg

    Pretty car!  Why is my perception of Kia so much more positive than Hyundai?  They're like the Korean Chevy and Pontiac of yore, but I would own a Kia and feel good about it much sooner than I would its sister brand.

    How that is one I can get behind... 🙂 

    Yeah, KIa is kinda growing on me......

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would have thought with those power numbers the 0-60 would be much quicker... is it very heavy? The car in my opinion is beautiful inside and out.  I prefer this to the Sonata.  The lighting treatment for ambient inside and accent outside is tastefully done.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Those use cases will necessitate the purchase of something with a long range, like 300+. But even still, two hours at 11.5kW would put 50 - 70 miles of range back in the car. You might need to make one 10-minute DCFC stop if you had a really busy day, but otherwise, you could make it.
    • I can understand this, but then this is part of my daily life. With two kids with their own families and grandkids it is not uncommon for us to be out and about for the day, come home for a bit before heading out to help with the grandkids and their afterschool activities. Plus, with family that is living from both sides north and south of us, it would not be uncommon to drive 75 miles down south to deal with my wife's side of the family, see the nieces/nephews and then up north to my side to see folks and with both our parents in senior years with health issues, also moving back in forth. Course this is why Sun puts on about 15,000 miles a year on the SS. We all have different use cases.
    • That's all I'm worried about. I'm not going to spend a sht ton more money having a 19.2kW charger installed for the 1 day every 3 years I empty the battery, get home for 2 hours, and have to again drive enough that I couldn't make it back home...  
    • I could see settling on three charger rates, but definitely not one. A Bolt or Kia EV4 type vehicle simply does not need 19kW home charging.  It would be an excessive cost to retrofit a house and the number of buyers who actually use that rate would be pretty close to zero.  That would be like insisting that the Corolla has to have a 6.2 liter. It's excessive and doesn't fit the use case. Now, if we settled into 7.5kW, 11.5kW, and 19.4kW as a standard, that would probably achieve what you are proposing while still giving cost flexibility.  It would allow for entry-level EVs to get the lower cost / lower speed charger while allowing the larger vehicles or premium vehicles to have faster home charging.  For example, the EV6 could have a lower cost 7.5kW charger while the Genesis GV60 on the same platform could get the 11.5kW charger because it is a premium brand and higher cost vehicle.  Then any large EV with or near a 200kW battery could have the 19.4kW charger, but even then, unless it is a newly built house or a commercial fleet, it will still probably charge only at 11.5kW, as that's about the max that the vast majority of homes are wired to do.  Unless you're driving an EV with a 200kW battery to 10% every day, an 11.5kW charger can "fill" an EV to 80% overnight with room to spare, so most people (including me), won't want the extra expense of spending extra money just to say my EV charged faster while I slept.  Either way, it will be ready for me when I need to leave at 7 am.
    • @ccap41 @Drew Dowdell Thank you both, this is the kind of dialogue I feel the Auto buyers need to be made aware of and the various use cases in understanding as I feel most DO NOT really understand this and give into the FEAR Mongering of News Stories. While I still feel that everyone should have the same charging rate capabilities, I also understand both your points. I do feel that this will change electrical across the WORLD over time due to the need of charging.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings