Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    911 Plug-In Hybrid Has Been Shelved

      File this in the not happening folder

    Porsche was planning to do a plug-in hybrid variant of the next-generation 911, but it seems those plans have been scrapped.

    August Achleitner, head of 718 and 911 development revealed to Car and Driver revealed that plug-in 911 project was canceled last year. Two issues ultimately brought the downfall to this project. First was the plug-in hybrid 911 wouldn't have the same driving dynamics as the standard 911 due to additional weight brought on by the hybrid components. Second is Porsche would not be able to make the same profit margins as they do on other 911 models.

    “In the end, the disadvantages outweighed the advantages,” said Achleitner.

    Source: Car and Driver

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Well...

    The 911 really does not need to go EV or hybrid (for Porsche) just yet.

    1. The 911 has sold 1 million copies

    2. Porsche has got the 918 right now

    3. Porsche has got other EVs in the pipeline

    4. Because of all that, the 911 (and Porsche) has no need to re-define itself...especially if the 911's traditional driving dynamics were to be compromised....the traditional 911 buyer continues on with his purchase of the 911 as is and if a newbie wants an EV from the Porsche brand, he has the 918 and other models to choose from soon.

    5. When the time will come when the traditional 911 buyer will demand an EV version, Porsche will be ready for one as Porsche by then, will have the tech, experience and money to do an EV 911 as close to a traditional 911 as possible.

     

    Without derailing this thread and talking about a Corvette and Corvette branding.

    But this is why Corvette/Chevy/GM is in a pickle if Corvette does not go hybrid soon....

    Porsche has got other models such as the 918 that does the EV/Hybrid thing...there is no immediate need for the 911 to go that route...

    Porsche....as a BRAND, could build and sell other project specialty cars or outright volume models to satisfy the EV/Hybrid market. And that is EΧACTLY what they will do as THAT is EΧΑCTLY what they said they will do!

    Corvette as it stands, needs to do battle with the 911 and ALL its variants, the convertible 911, the Boxster, the Cayman, the 918...

    Chevy or Cadillac as in GM as a whole does NOT have an EV/Hybrid to do battle with ANY sports car that is EV/Hybrid and Chevy has not mentioned ANY word on the next C8...let us not forget that even Acura has gone the EV/Hybrid route with the NSΧ...

    The next C8 might be mid-engined, might not be....and its less  clear if a hybrid powertrain will be offered....and THAT to me is more of an issue for Corvette and GM going forward rather than the 911 not going EV/Hybrid.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    So there will be a Porsche EV/Hybrid that is NOT a 911.  OK.  GM probably should consider a Camaro-based EV to deal with any high performance EVs out there soon.

    Corvette is the big dog.

    The NSX is EV/Hybrid.

    Mclaren P1 is EV/Hybrid.

    Ferrari LaFerrari is EV/Hybrid. And Ferrari has hinted that all Ferraris in the future will be EV/Hybrid. If that hasnt  changed yet...

    The Porsche 918 is EV/Hybrid.

    All these are Corvette's competition. The Z06 (&Z07 package) and ZR-1 were engineered to do battle with these....and the C8 is said to be mid-engined to BETTER compete (to actually win) the performance metrics!

    If you dont think that the Corvette belongs in this category, the Camaro belongs even less in this field with these cars...

    So THAT is why the Corvette NEEDS to go EV/Hybrid! Especially if the next gen is to be mid-engined!

     

    And if you say no to that....then the Corvette brand needs to be a brand by itself...because the Corvette cannot simply  continue being a Jack-of-all-trades sports  car....it will cease to dominate and Corvettes are KNOWN to DOMINATE....THAT is what the REAL essence of Corvette is all about!

    The 911 DOMINATES!

    It has MANY variants to be able to do so....

    The  Corvette does not have that.

    The 911 is Porsche and Porsche is 911.

    With that being said, Porsche also has the Boxster, Cayman, 918 that represent Porsche quite well!

    All all cars seem to dominate helping the Porsche brand excel.

    In turn, helping to continue the LEGEND of the 911!

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Corvette is the big dog.

    The NSX is EV/Hybrid.

    Mclaren P1 is EV/Hybrid.

    Ferrari LaFerrari is EV/Hybrid. And Ferrari has hinted that all Ferraris in the future will be EV/Hybrid. If that hasnt  changed yet...

    The Porsche 918 is EV/Hybrid.

    All these are Corvette's competition. The Z06 (&Z07 package) and ZR-1 were engineered to do battle with these....and the C8 is said to be mid-engined to BETTER compete (to actually win) the performance metrics!

    If you dont think that the Corvette belongs in this category, the Camaro belongs even less in this field with these cars...

    So THAT is why the Corvette NEEDS to go EV/Hybrid! Especially if the next gen is to be mid-engined!

     

    And if you say no to that....then the Corvette brand needs to be a brand by itself...because the Corvette cannot simply  continue being a Jack-of-all-trades sports  car....it will cease to dominate and Corvettes are KNOWN to DOMINATE....THAT is what the REAL essence of Corvette is all about!

     

    Wait, the Corvette competes with a LaFerrari and P1?  They aren't even close.  If a Corvette Z07 and a LaFerrari were in a 50 lap race on just about any race track in the world, the LaFerrari would lap it several times over. 

    Corvette should also not be its own brand, in fact I would say that Cadillac should have sports cars, rather than try to spin Corvette into a brand with crossovers like Porsche and multiple sports cars. 

    I think Corvette will not offer a hybrid in the next 15 years and maybe never, because they like to keep the powertrain cheap and the car light.  That being said I think GM should look into performance hybrids, I'd rather see it on Cadillac, but I'd be in favor of a hybrid Camaro or Corvette, I just doubt they could sell many of either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Wait, the Corvette competes with a LaFerrari and P1

    Not directly the Vette doesnt....

    Not on price, not on platform but definitely on performance...sure the LaFerrari and P1 might beat it (Z07 and upcoming ZR1)

    5 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    If a Corvette Z07 and a LaFerrari were in a 50 lap race on just about any race track in the world, the LaFerrari would lap it several times over. 

    That is why I said might...

    But you got to admit...the Vette for its engineering and its price point, even if it does lose(Z07 and upcoming ZR1) ...which it might not..sure as hell gives the LaFerrari and P1 a run for THEIR  money....

     

    But hold on now...

    Its not as if the Vette aint engineered for track use to beat up on Ferraris...

    tumblr_on2v9e18RW1v5jzqco1_500.jpg

    And just for that....the Vette INDIRECTLY competes with the LaFerrari...

     

    16 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Corvette should also not be its own brand, in fact I would say that Cadillac should have sports cars, rather than try to spin Corvette into a brand with crossovers like Porsche and multiple sports cars. 

    Like I said...the Corvette CANT CONTINUE being Jack-of-all trades!

    Its for guys like YOU that this  cant continue....

    YOU just berated a 100 00 dollar  car that is engineered to take on your 1 500 000 dollar LaFerrari.

    YOU just laughed it off saying that a 1 500 000 dollar will lap it several times over when that is NOT the case as the  C5R, C6R and C7R Corvettes are all 24 hour LeMans winners in their respective GT class often not far behind their LMP class competitors...

    And THIS will change as the C8 will probably be a mid-engined affair to better put down that power for track use...remember...LaFerrari DOES have a 300 some odd horsepower advantage over the Z06....the C7R actually produces LESS power than the civilian model....as it stands now....the C7 being front engine rear wheel drive is at the limits of what that layout could do....

    So....while LaFerrari MIGHT outlap it in a 50 lap race...that has more to do with the drive train layout rather than Ferrari's 1 500 000 dollar price tag's engineering versus Chevy's 100 000 dollar effort...

    And THAT is why the CC8 will probably be a mid-engined affair...and if THAT is the case...LaFerrari will definitely NOT lap the Vette....

    Why Cadillac?

    Price tag?

    Irrelevant...

    See the C7 and C7R versus the high dollar hitters and envision that same scenario with a mid-engined C8 and C8R at more or less Chevrolet price tags...

    Like I said....Chevy engineers a techno tour de force to compete with the big wigs of the racing world and puts that into the civilian model Vette..

     The engine, the body, the aerodynamics, the suspension benefits the C7 Stingray, Z06(Z07), ZR1 from the C7R...

    Cadillac has no racing pedigree...

    Chevrolet does...

    And it all started with the Corvette....

    52 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Corvette should also not be its own brand, in fact I would say that Cadillac should have sports cars, rather than try to spin Corvette into a brand with crossovers like Porsche and multiple sports cars.

    Well....because the Vette is and will always be a Chevy....no need for Porsche-like SUVs ....

    OK...maybe a  couple of Corvette tuned Trailblazers and Tahoes to make a mark....

    Just a diversity of Corvettes specializing in destroying every sports car market there is...

     

     

    36 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    That being said I think GM should look into performance hybrids, I'd rather see it on Cadillac, but I'd be in favor of a hybrid Camaro or Corvette, I just doubt they could sell many of either.

    Yes they should....

    I dont know about the Camaro being a sales success with hybrids but I dont see how Corvette could fail.

    Corvette as of now has very strong brand recognition world wide along the same lines as Ferrari, Porsche, Jeep and Mustang...

    Tesla is bringing out a new generation Tesla roadster...

    THAT is NOT Cadillac territory in 2017, nor in 2018, nor in 2019, nor in 2020, nor in 2021, nor in 2022...

    THAT is in CORVETTE TERRITORY NOW!!!

    And it WILL ALWAYS BE CORVETTE TERRITORY....

    And NOT just Corvette territory but Corvette IDENTITY to be a SPORTS CAR...

    Cadillac's TRUE mission was always LUXURY....Past, present and future....

    So....Cadillac does not really EVER need an exotic race car...THAT is what Corvette is for!!! And its a Chevy!

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I mentioned Corvette and at least 2 posters are in denial where Corvette fits in the sports car world...and just THAT proves my point that the Vette needs to diversify and to specialize (hence to become its own brand to offer MORE DIVERSE MODELS keeping FR and OFFERING mid-engine at the same time) to better compete with several sports car markets as the Stingray, Z06 and soon ZR1 aint enough....and in reality, its just a more modern muscle car approach in offering a bigger engine and MOAR power that was done in the 60s and 70s.

    Jack-of-all trades but master of none!

    EXCELLENT engineering but the Jack-of-all trades approach lacks the focus of the specialty sports cars the Vette does battle with directly and indirectly....

    Now...back to the 911 and the cancellation of the EV/Hybrid 911

     

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Corvette should be a $50-100k car, I think they could go base V6 maybe turbo V6.  Maybe a V6 hybrid set up to get 400 hp and keep weight manageable.  The C7R does well in its race league but it isn't a top tier league.  A stock LaFerrari could beat those GT class racers or a NASCAR for that matter.

    Let's look at real lap times form the Red Bull Ring, 4.3 km circuit

    Ferrari LaFerrari 1:38.9

    Lamborghini Hurcan 1:45.4

    Nissan GT-R Nismo 1:45.5

    Mercedes-AMG GT S 1:48.9

    Corvette Z07 1:49

    Porsche Cayman GT4 1:50.9

    And the Hurcan on down were the same driver.  The Corvette would give up 10 seconds a lap to the LaFerrari, that is a big gap, the LaFerrari would lap it every 10 laps.  And the LaFerrari gives up over 30 seconds a lap to an F1 car, think about that.

    So my point is the performance level that is possible is way, way above even a Corvette Z07, way above a 911 turbo (which is why they have the 918) and I think a road car can go way above that which Mercedes will prove this fall.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Corvette IS a $50-$100K+ car. Base MSRP of SR coupe is $56K, Z07 is $100K.
    Weight IS "managable- it's 200-350 lbs lighter than MB, 600 lbs lighter than the nissan.
    Corvette "road car" will be "way above that"- the ME Corvette C8 is coming.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    So my point is the performance level that is possible is way, way above even a Corvette Z07, way above a 911 turbo (which is why they have the 918) and I think a road car can go way above that which Mercedes will prove this fall.

    What Balthy says....PLUS

    LaFerrrari has 900+ horsepower

    Corvette Z06 has 650....and its at the limits of performance due to FR layout...

     

    WHAT I KEEP SAYING AND YOU JUST SAID IT:

    6 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    way above a 911 turbo (which is why they have the 918)

    The Corvette does battle with the 918 too!

    How?

    INDIRECTLY

    Corvette-C7R-Le-Mans-2014.jpg

    which begets this (the one on the left)

    2016-chevrolet-corvette-z06-c7r-edition-

    and when Chevy realizes that even that is not enough to impress the likes of you with a price tag of ONLY 100 000, Chevy engineers this:

    2017-04-18_15-47-03-960x430.jpg

    landscape-1492711552-zr1-exhaust.jpg

    And that 10 second lap will probably be less....by leaps and bounds.....with LESS HP than either the 918 or the LaFerrari.....but the price tag wont increase by leaps and bounds....and the C7 ZR1 will still be hampered by the FR layout....

    But yeah....INDIRECTLY...the LaFerrari and the 918 ARE the Vette's  competitors...JACK-OF-ALL-TRADE approach...

    In reality SMK, we really are saying the same thing! Think about it...

    You choose to put every other brand on a high pedestal by trying to downplay what the Vette does by throwing ALL models of said brands in the Vette's path and saying: "You see! A Vette cant  compete with ABC brand's 1 000 000 dollar car"

    And of course you mentioned Mercedes!

    What I do is I agree with YOUR philosophy, but I dont downplay what the Vette can do...

    I say the Vette is a JACK-OF-ALL-TRADES car and a master of none but I PRAISE what it does at a price point that is LESS than even its DIRECT competitors!

    The thing is...minus the hybrid tech and the lack of a MR layout but the C7-C6-C5 really is a Front MID engine layout, the Corvette Z07 package employs the same amount of engineering tech to EXPLOIT THE MAXIMUM IT CAN OUT OF ITS DRIVETRAIN AND POWERTRAIN....

    And when the MR C8 comes out...with all the racing tech learned with the C7R and the MR Vette Daytona racer

    Corvette-Daytona-Prototype-1.jpg

    will probably be on par with that 1 500 000 LaFerrari in track times at 10% of LaFerraris price tag!

    And YOU want this tech to go to Cadillac?

    I said that Corvette needs to be its own brand to diversify so Vette could have a roadster EV to do battle (and win) with the Tesla EV

    To have a FR TTV6 layout to do battle (and win) with Porsche's Boxster and Cayman

    To have a base model roadster to do battle (and win) with Mazda's Miata...technically, THAT WAS the Corvette's ORIGINAL 1953 mission anyway!

    To remain like it is now (Stingray, Z06, ZR1) to do battle (and win) with Porsche's many specialized 911 variants.

    To have a MR layout and go all out to do battle (and win) with the likes of LaFerraris, 918s, P1s, Ford GTs, hell, even put a TTV6 in it to do battle (and win) the NSΧ...

    Το ΜΑΥΒΕ even offer a Trailblazer tuned by Corvette racing to do battle (and win) Cayennes and BMW M badged crossovers!

    Because as it stands now....the Vette does battle with all cars mentioned directly and indirectly and its Jack-of-all-trades stance, it aint focused enough to win any battles....

    So yeah, SMK, we ARE saying the same thing....its just that you prefer to downplay the Corvette!

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    The Corvette should be a $50-100k car

    And who says that?

    YOU?

    Corvettes of the past had models that surpassed that limit some want to put on it!

    Corvette was NOT about price point...it became that way in the mid 70s all the way to the 2000s with the mid 70s C3 and C4 and C5 and it started to break free from those shackles with the C6 and with the C7 going forward, the Vette is going back to its 1955 mission of DOMINATING the STREET AND RACING CIRCUIT no matter what price point...at your friendly CHEVROLET dealership....

    The Corvette at this time was NOT an affordable car...

    It wasnt an exotic like the Gullwing, but it wasnt priced a tad more than a Chevy Impala like it is now either at its lowest!  And at its highest, it sure was HIGHER in price than Cadillac's offerings!!! In which today at 100 000 is on par with Cadillac!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    The Corvette should be a $50-100k car, I think they could go base V6 maybe turbo V6.  Maybe a V6 hybrid set up to get 400 hp and keep weight manageable.  The C7R does well in its race league but it isn't a top tier league.  A stock LaFerrari could beat those GT class racers or a NASCAR for that matter.

    Let's look at real lap times form the Red Bull Ring, 4.3 km circuit

    Ferrari LaFerrari 1:38.9

    Lamborghini Hurcan 1:45.4

    Nissan GT-R Nismo 1:45.5

    Mercedes-AMG GT S 1:48.9

    Corvette Z07 1:49

    Porsche Cayman GT4 1:50.9

    And the Hurcan on down were the same driver.  The Corvette would give up 10 seconds a lap to the LaFerrari, that is a big gap, the LaFerrari would lap it every 10 laps.  And the LaFerrari gives up over 30 seconds a lap to an F1 car, think about that.

    So my point is the performance level that is possible is way, way above even a Corvette Z07, way above a 911 turbo (which is why they have the 918) and I think a road car can go way above that which Mercedes will prove this fall.

     

    WAIT.


    Did you just say a LaFerrari would beat a GT3/GTE car around a track??

     

    You cannot be serious. A GTE/GT3 car would absolutely murder any of the most recent crop of hyper cars on a circuit. 

     

     

     


    Also-
     

    A Corvette don't compete with a hybrid hypercar. They exist for two completely different reasons, they appeal to completely different mindsets, and they are in totally different price and performance leagues.

     

    There will be a hybrid Corvette in way less than 15 years. I'd wager less than 5. No way is GM letting all the stuff they're learning with the Volt/Bolt and Malibu Hybrids go to waste. A hybrid Corvette is a no-brainer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Corvette IS a $50-$100K+ car. Base MSRP of SR coupe is $56K, Z07 is $100K.
    Weight IS "managable- it's 200-350 lbs lighter than MB, 600 lbs lighter than the nissan.
    Corvette "road car" will be "way above that"- the ME Corvette C8 is coming.

    I think they could make the Corvette $49,900 as a base model.  The Corvette has a low weight now, but if they added all wheel drive and/or a hybrid system the weight would go up.  Then you need carbon fiber to get it back down, and then cost sky rockets.  I think a ZR1 Corvette should be $100,000 at 600 hp max.  If GM wants to build sports cars above that, go to Cadillac and make Cadillac a credible performance brand.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If Corvette were to become it's own brand, with stand alone dealerships,  then different story.  Then you could have the $55-100k front engine/rear drive coupe/convertible that we know.  Then there could be a mid-engine, a crossover, a hybrid, a pure EV, etc.  They could have 4 or 5 models and cover a wide price range.  But as it is, the Corvette is a single model, and it is a Chevy, which is the value brand of GM.  

    And when Porsche wanted a hyper car, they didn't see how far they could push the 911, they just put a 918 above it.  Mercedes didn't see how much extra they could ring out of a GT, they know the GT is in the $120-170k range and won't ever compete with a hyper car.  So they will make a new car to beat the hypercars.

    If Corvette wants to be the top performance car, then they need to achieve 1000+ hp, sub 3,000 lbs, all wheel drive and hybrid, that all has to be there.  And you can't do that for anything under a million dollars.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    If Corvette were to become it's own brand, with stand alone dealerships,  then different story.  Then you could have the $55-100k front engine/rear drive coupe/convertible that we know.

    Corvette is a sub-brand under Chevrolet. And I don't understand "then you could have" - we ALREADY have.
     

    Quote

    Then there could be a mid-engine, a crossover, a hybrid, a pure EV, etc.  They could have 4 or 5 models and cover a wide price range.  But as it is, the Corvette is a single model...

    The crossover corvette, et al, is just stupid. but The 'Vette is not a single model, it's 3 models in 2 bodystyles and a price range well over double the base price- that is 'wide'. And a 2nd configuration is coming, along with more models. Suggesting a EV Corvette just shows you really have no clear view of the car's mission.
     

    Quote

    If Corvette wants to be the top performance car, then they need to achieve 1000+ hp, sub 3,000 lbs, all wheel drive and hybrid, that all has to be there.  And you can't do that for anything under a million dollars.

    And here I thought you were going to suggest 2000 HP.

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Corvette is a sub-brand under Chevrolet. And I don't understand "then you could have" - we ALREADY have.
     

    The crossover corvette, et al, is just stupid. but The 'Vette is not a single model, it's 3 models in 2 bodystyles and a price range well over double the base price- that is 'wide'. And a 2nd configuration is coming, along with more models. Suggesting a EV Corvette just shows you really have no clear view of the car's mission.
     

    And here I thought you were going to suggest 2000 HP.

    Corvette is not a brand.  A Brand has in many cases a stand alone dealership (unless it is FCA) and a Brand has usually 4 or more different car lines.  

    Suggesting that the Corvette is a brand, means the Mercedes E-class is a brand.  It has 4 body styles and 2-3 models within each body style.  And it is not a brand.

    For Corvette to be a brand it can't be sold at Chevy dealers and that will never happen.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • This is too funny and I HOPE HOPE HOPE Amazon moves forward with this as all the auto's on Amazon for sale will have a TRUMP TARIFF line that shows how much TARIFF tax they will pay. Trump’s ‘Pottery Barn rule’ problem
    • I don’t know if this vehicle, a Toyota Prius Hybrid HEV, represented an upgrade.  It’s just what I was assigned as a mid-size rented vehicle for 3 days.  I had a general idea that this vehicle was recently refreshed and that it looked a lot better.  As I got closer to it and got into it, I was able to get a better look.  The new Prius looks a lot better than I recall a Prius ever looking.  It looks sleek, sporty, and even sort of low-slung.  Interesting exterior features show that they made this a priority.  The front lights and fascia are thin and understated, working well with the more unified exterior.  The rear fascia is definitely Prius’s own and it gives the car some interesting, angled vantage points.  They even incorporated gullwing handles into the sedan’s rear doors and, having once had these in the last rendition of the W-body Buick Regal coupe, I like their look and just plain using them. Its low-slung aspect can present a slight demerit.  The windshield and profile of the front doors is very raked and, as a person of average height, I had to duck a little more than usual to enter the car.  Similarly, the rear backlite borders on almost being horizontal.  This does give the rear storage area a little more usable height. Inside, the front pillars’ rake is mitigated by fixed renditions of what used to be vent windows in older cars.  However, they still seem to block an instinctive sight line compared to more upright vehicles like the current Camry and Corolla.  Inside, the feeling is more cockpit-like.  Similarly, the rear view has the thicker pillars and flatter backlite that require more proactive work – looking over the shoulder attentively and using the amber traffic monitoring warnings in the outside mirrors.  A complementary feature is the chime that assisted lane changes. The Prius has a 4-cylinder engine that seems to spend more time in EV mode than did the hybrid Camry.  That means good fuel economy and, over 3 days, I only added 6 gallons for between 200 and 300 miles of motoring.  In terms of power, handling, and roadability, the Prius gets mixed comments from me.  It does have agility when the pedal is pressed and it moves from eco to power mode.  It also eases upward to higher than anticipated highway speeds if not paying attention!  The transmission is a CVT with a “faux” first gear and it works well.  The Prius has a more noticeable wheezing sound when in reverse gear, which actually advises those inside the car and near it.  However, when pushed, the powertrain gets buzzy, as in noisy.  But at steady speed, any engine noise is not that noticeable.  The vehicle’s handling, smoothness, and quietness vary.  Handling is always nimble and, even at highway speeds, it maneuvers adeptly.  The ride is mostly smooth.  However, noise control could use some improvement.  Some of that can come from the tires they equip the car with, fitted with aluminum wheels that hearken to the ones on Tesla products.  That said, it’s hard to tell if the drone is tire thum or wind.  However, if you prioritize handling among these, I was surprised to see how well the Prius handles … on the highway, on city streets, and even in tight parking spaces, where 3-point attempts are rarely necessary. The cockpit is unusual and very different from yesterday’s Priuses, which I’ve only seen and never driven or been a passenger in one.  I remember how the first model had an oval main instrument pod set up on the cowl in the middle of the dashboard but angled toward the driver.  Today’s Prius has thin and smaller pods, almost set on ledges that seem to staircase down as the cowl approaches the driver.  The main panel looks like a small tablet that is set quite far from the steering wheel.  Depending on how the wheel is titled, there could be some visibility issues seeing all the information.  This required adjusting the wheel and the seating height.  Also, the front seat can be very far from the pedals.  So, while the door is low, taller drivers might like this potential distance.  The infotainment center sits slightly forward of the main instrument screen and is conventionally placed atop the center stack.  Thankfully, it continues with touch operation as opposed to being operated via a remote dial.  Most functions are the ones you’ve known for a while, so setting things up doesn’t take long.  I did struggle a little with the Android Auto, even though the Bluetooth pairing was quick.  Note that, while the Camry has USB-C ports, the Prius does not.  Further down on the center stack, the climate control is easy to work with (not the 3-dial type that so many exports and even domestics have) and the A/C blows colder a little quicker than in the last Camry I drove.  The console deck is about the right height and its overall dimensions, including the box, are generous.  The compactness of the shift lever is sort of fun … think of a small underpowered low-cost EV Corvette! When going into gear, it’s not about moving the selector linearly.  A quick jog to the left and up toward the instrument panel is for reverse while that same quick jog followed by a rearward move puts the vehicle in drive.  It doesn’t take long to get used to this.  Also, the park feature is easy to work with.  Just push in P when stopped and, whether in reserve or drive, the gear selector goes to park.  The only thing is that it is not forgiving when shifting the lever … your foot must be firmly on the brake, so no slipshod maneuvers.  The seating is comfortable and the buckets seem a little high, but this offers support from top to bottom.  The same is true in the rear of the cabin and the headrests do intrude with an already thicker rear sail panel / C-pillar.  Legroom in the rear also seems good and the length of the vehicle allows for that.  Space is sensibly distributed in the 3 volumes from front to back. I always thought a Prius would have something daunting or different about it.  Its look is different in that it lost its first-gen look that looked like an upright Nissan Versa of 2016 … sort of like the runt of the litter that is on the run because it has been kicked in the rump.  This Prius looks planted.  Upon pushing the prominent and easy to use “power” button on the dash, there will be no noise and the dash will literally tell you when it, and you, are “ready” to go. It's a smaller but roomy vehicle where the price isn’t a bargain, but not that steep in today’s terms.  I find there are a few things that I wasn’t crazy about – the height, the main instrument pod sitting in the distance, and not the best noises suppression – but I liked most other things about it.  With so many Priuses going the long haul, this one will probably do the same … and look a lot more presentable while doing it. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING  
    • I'm laughing.   There are always reasons why things are "discounted." With me, it's DFW and Austin that give me heartburn.  San Antonio, too, even though I don't know it as well.  I just don't like the look of the DFW area, whether natural or built.  I don't like Austin for being the governmental engine of a big red place next to a massive university with over 50,000 students that is a big blue place.  I'm more of a moderate and don't want extremes in either element.  I also don't like the "way cool" leanings in Austin. Houston has its negatives, but I'd take it for nearby Galveston, and water in general, the extensive pinewoods, the dark red brick homes, an attractive downtown, and for being America's most ethnically diverse city that has always rolled with that spirit.  There is no "you shouldn't be here" factor.  IIR, I've heard of a saying about Madrid that goes, 'When you're in Madrid, you're from Madrid.'  Having lived in various places, I pay attention to those subleties.
    • Very cool to see This Hyundai Ioniq 5 Owner Managed 413,991 Miles In Under Four Years, With One Big Catch
    • Removing tariffs that idiot47 caused so much pain with for getting nothing in return show how stupid a person can be in not understanding true business and how to negotiate.  A real man with Business sense would have put together a package of tariffs to present to China to address specific areas that are an imbalance not just attack everything and see what falls out. As such, incompetence in not understanding the long road map to building greatness shows how foolish the current administration is and now they are going to sign an exception list for the auto industry. Destroy good trading partners just to cause Chaos! Never a sound business strategy. Trump to Sign Order Later Tuesday Easing Auto Tariff Impact
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search