oldshurst442

I will admit, the Continental with a 6 inches longer wheelbase looks good. This 6 inches longer wheel base should have been the Continental for sale when it went on sale a year or two ago... Suicide doors or not, Lincoln should have made THIS Lincoln Continental... That hood though where the hood meets up with the top of the grille. THAT has got to go... A more snug fitting like the concept should have been Lincoln's goal then...and now!!!

The time I took off from this place, I felt the same way... I still loved the Hellcat brothers and the Demon. The Mustang was a close second. Tesla got on my nerves... Went to Greece for vacation. Saw a few Euro cars. Fell in love with the Mercedes Sprinters. They are everywhere in Greece. Hotel/airport/small island transit/ shuttles for locals and tourists. Very versatile. It took a passenger van with different wheel bases and configurations to rekindle my love with the automobile. And then, my neighbour got his Tesla Model 3 delivered in the early fall. A white AWD performance model. I took a ride in it. (did not drive it) but WOW! In between seasons I saw a couple of 4.7liter V8 Maseratis. The sound these make... And the way it looks, the GrandTurismo, its just...well, lets just say that in my muscle car dream garage, there would be a Challenger (Hellcat or Scatpack), a 1970 Oldsmobile 442, a 1973 Trans Am SD455, and a brand new 2018/2019 Maserati GrandTurismo S/MC/MC Stradale. With the latest news on Ford canceling its sedans, GM almost doing the same thing, and with Cadillac, the CT6...its just laughable. But, I look at the Maserati, then I see my neighbour drive away to work in his awesome Tesla Model 3 AWD performance, than I go to youtube to see the Superfast 812 Ferrari, and I just sing to myself, what a wonderful world...

This should have had the the suicide doors... If I was Lincoln, I wouldnt be spending the engineering costs on a vehicle they are about to kill off, Id be spending the dough on this Aviator and Id demolish the competition with it... Oh...as a hater of CUVs and SUVs...I LOVE this one!!!

The 2018 Escalade's 6.2 liter is the truck engine of the 2014 release of the LT1 in the Corvette Stingray. Its also called a Gen V of Chevy small blocks Gen IV were the LS engines. Gen III were the LT engines again. No...the Gen V small block LT is NOT a Gen III LT small block. No...the Gen III LT small blocks have nothing in common with Chevrolet's original 1950s small block V8s... Yes...the Gen IVs are different from the Gen IIIs. Yes...the Gen Vs have some similarities to the LS based Gen IVs, but... All Gen V engines are aluminum blocks with aluminum cylinder heads and include features such as direct injection, piston cooling jets...something that the Gen IV LS engines do not have... The Gen Vs are...brand new and employ state of the art technology keeping them on par in technology and sophistication with exotic V8s from exotic V8 makers such as Ferrari... Mercedes V8s are good. AMG V8s are awesome. The Chevrolet Small Block V8...is legendary. You may not agree with this. But its OK. I, would love to see the new TT 4.2 liter in a new Cadillac product, in the Escalade though, I am more than happy to see a detuned LT5 under the hood. Why? Its a truck. Its the Escalade. 4.2 liter versus 6.2 liter. Twin turbo sure. Its good. 2.65 liter supercharger....think about that for a moment... Cadillac should always be about arrogance... Unless Cadillac puts 2 supersized turbos the size of 1 gallon paint, on the possible Escalade 4.2 liter to produce that 700 or so horsepower, I would prefer the 2.65 liter supercharger under the hood of my 'Slade. But that is just me. Trying to retain some American Muscle, Cadillac arrogance in my American automobiles...something that the dudes that run Cadillac should be thinking about as well...

Oh of course, there's no other explanation.

And to quote you on this...the experience on a Tesla blackhole/retail location could not be worse than a stealership one... And laughable how this movie scene may be, this type of stealership experience is still continuing in 2018 for realz...

I do not doubt that. Gasoline powered cars as it seems, have problems also. The Nasa space shuttles and rockets also had problems. German WW2 tanks. Problems. Airplanes of any era...had and continue to have problems. Boats and trains, diesel powered or gasoline or coal. Problems. Nuclear powered subs and aircraft carriers...yup, you guessed it...all have and continue to have problems... You know what...horses die sometimes...resulting in what we are calling it in this thread...problems. https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/caleche-horse-collapses-and-dies-in-old-montreal-1.4163205 It seems that everything that humans use to move us around, all seem to have...problems...

If it aint staged, the other explanation would be that this aint her car...and she does not know what a Tesla is and what kind of car it is...that she borrrowed it from somebody else. Tesla, electric vehicles, are specialty cars at this time... If she actually bought the car, she would actually want that car, she would actually go out of her way to actually buy an electric vehicle. Telsa cars are not exactly in the Toyota appliance realm of the automotive spectrum. And remember, no dealerships for a Tesla...that means that she would literally know where to buy it...not stumble across a stealership and get duped into buying something she knows nothing about buying something she does not need... She would have to order what type of battery she would want. What type of charger she wants to buy for her home. The reps over at Tesla would also tell her how to use her smartphone Tesla app and superscreen to found out where the Superchargers are at in her vicinity when she needs to charge up and ultimately, the Model S itself would warn her where to charge her vehicle via the Tesla superscreen... Therefore, if these people filming this episode of epic fail youtube vids, if these people want to fool us and sell us on the notion that a human being willfully sought out a Tesla store in a shopping center where everything about a Tesla store just smells of electricity, not gasoline then yeah...I do not believe it... Therefore fake. If not fake, she burrowed that Tesla from somebody, and yes, she might be clueless, but then again, if somebody does not know about cars, then somebody does not know about cars...Tesla or otherwise...

On the Tesla fail. Funny. But fake. Just another reality TV/youtube/facebook garbage entertainment meant for clicks and views for revenue streams and thumbs up posts...

I dont think the interior quality of these had any bearing of the success (or lack of success) of these. Seeing that Pontiac and Saturn were shutdown shortly after the Kappa twins were introduced to the world. I think the lack of success of the Kappa twins were in fact just a symbolic gesture of the lack of focus and attention their respective brands got from parent company General Motors. Saturn did not really need a roadster at this time. Saturn needed to get back to what made Saturn a success in the first place. And that was product that was not badge engineered from the GM umbrella. The whole purpose of Saturn was to be a different kind of car company. Pontiac, had lost its identity when they started ditching their engines and went for Chevrolet/GM corporate engines. And then the whole FWD badge engineered platforms they shared with virtually every other GM brands...and into the 1990s and the 2000s, with Saturn too... Pontiac at this time did not know if they wanted to be plastic cladded boy racer FWD appliances that appear to be sporty, or plastic cladded boy racer FWD soccer mom vehicles that appear to be sporty or hanging on to RWD...ditching RWD but then going back to RWD with 4 cylinder roadsters and muscle cars from Australia that have ZERO Pontiac DNA...(those muscle cars from Australia were awesome, but they were more or less GM corporate affairs than anything else...OK...Chevrolet DNA with a "put another shrimp on the barbie" accent... GM badge engineered the Kappa twins(triplets) and lost focus on what their respective brands actually needed. Twas Pontiac only that really needed the RWD roadster to spark excitement into the brand. Opel and Saturn did not need these. And in turn, the Kappa twins(triplets) were wrongfully marketed to their respective brands. And in turn, the other GM brands, including the recipients of the Kappa twins(triplets) were starved of funds and R&D for much needed better product planning... On the Fiat 124 roadster. Abarth or Lusso. Very Italian. Very Nicely done. The Kappa twins were good, but I think Fiat was wise to go to Mazda. GM tried to do it on their own, came up short. This Fiat on all trims (124, Lusso, Abarth) is a winner, and if Im not mistaken, has outlived the Kappa twins(triplets)...

Firstly, Secondly, To whom? To you of course. Sometime in the near future when all pistons and cylinders have gone the way of the

Why are we revising history? Its good to REVISIT history, not so good to REVISE it… The SSR was NOT a concept car that GM happened to produce for reals just because…to have a limited supply toy in their stable… The SSR was indeed a car produced to replace the toy they already had in their stable called the Camaro they just killed off… They did this car(truck) on the cheap, by using their GMT360 platform. You know…their midsized bread and butter SUV platform…Trailblazer, Envoy, Bravada and when Oldsmobile died, the Rainier and SAAB X7 something or other… In other words, GM wanted the SSR to be produced longer than the 3 years they actually did produce it for,,, GM did in fact shoot themselves in the foot with the thing, as the high cost of engineering that trick hardtop convertible roof made the bean counters force the production version cheap on the inside. And because the SSR was the Camaro replacement, not directly but indirectly, through the backdoor of Chevy performance…remember the SSR stood for Super Sport Roadster…SUPER SPORT…as in SS, as in Impala SS, Camaro SS, Chevelle SS, Lumina SS (middle east), Cobalt SS, as in Chevrolet SS a decade later… And the only reason why it looked retro was because retro was all the rage back then…as in PT Cruiser just before WW2 and right after WW2 car design/truck like retro looks. As in HHR as well…and I doi believe there was an HHR SS as well… But let us be reals on this, the SSR was indeed a real effort to fill the Camaro void…and if Chevy offered 700 horses in the SSR back then, I do not think the interior would matter much and we wouldnt have a Camaro today, but we would continue to have SSRs. 1500 horsepower SSRs in 2 door hardtop configurations, convertibles both of the soft and hard types, and 4 door AWD versions for soccer moms, Z-71 offroading versions, and quite possibly an electric version of it being engineered right now as we speak…And…Cadillac of course would have all those versions too. Hey…700 horsepower in 2003!!! And now lets talk about the Holden Monaro…aka Pontiac GTO. Like the SSR at Chevy, the Monaro was made into a Pontiac to replace the Firebird. The other F-Body. With the cost of reworking the gas tank and other minor yet costly things, and the cost of producing these cars in Australia and shipping them to the US, and by not even offering this car to be bought by Canadians…GM shot themselves in the foot by marketing BOTH F-Body replacements wrongly, offering a miscalculating the public’s thirst for horsepower by offering inadequate drivetrains especially when these new car offerings were to fill a performance void left by the outgoing F-Bodies, over engineering identities, and cheapening out the interior of what could have been a real cool concept car turned into a production car. The SSR was expensive as hell to buy. With an anemic 5.3 liter V8 trying to motivate a really really heavy car… The GTO’s V8 was not so bad, but Pontiac faithful wanted a GTO that actually looked like a GTO, not a Cavalier, and essentially what a Monaro really was, it was just a heavily re-worked 2 door Catera/Omega/middleeastern Lumina and Caprice and because the Trans Am was no longer, at least GM could have given the GTO some more muscle to ease the pain from all that…because the Firebird (and Pontiac) faithful actually were quite savvy and privy to those facts. I know I was. Its fair to say other Pontiac and Trans Am enthusiasts were also. All those millions, possibly billions to re-engineer the GMT360, to over engineer its convertible top, to re-engineer the Holden gas tank, to re-style a Pontiac front end for it, and back end that says ‘GTO’, to flip the steering wheel for US consumption, to ship it to the other side of the world, it may have been cheaper just to create a new F-Body platform… So yeah…let us not revise history, please! (I do not know what the sales figures were for both dead on arrival vehicles were at the end of their production when finally GM gave them their proper motorvation, but it does not matter, it was a case of too little too late by then anyway. The Pontiac Fiero falls into this same category…GM has a loooong history of this. Like DFELT has said…lost opportunities, wasted time and effort and most importantly, piss poor management, product planning, quality and marketing and eventually unmistakably, unavoidably shooting themselves in the foot with these 2 vehicles… I just want to point out, that I think the SSR has been one of the coolest cars to come out of GM the last 30 years. The GTO too. I totally would own a SSR. 5.3 liter or otherwise. I totally would own a GTO as well… Another thing, we are so into not wanting EVs to succeed, we make up all kinds of storylines to adhere to our reluctance to see that EVs are a thing and here to stay and ICE vehicles lifespan is shorter than we think… We invent all kinds of excuses yet we cannot see that the Tesla Model 3…car…outselling any other car of any kind in its price range…EV, PHEV or ICE, in a world of CUVs and SUVs… Despite all that production hell Musk was talking about, people stuck around with it. More orders continue to pile up for it. Despite the fact that the US has $h!ty EV infrastructure. Despite the fact that the US population prefers CUVs and SUVs, and despite that those Model 3 sales are exclusively in Canada and in the US. Europe and China, I believe, has not yet been included for the sale and delivery of said Model 3… The world is awaiting for the Model 3…To boot, the US and Canada are not the only markets whose populations prefer CUVs and SUVs. Around the globe, CUVs and SUVs are THE market… The Bolt aint selling in Model 3 high numbers, NOT because the Bolt is a Chevrolet and NOT a Tesla, but the Bolt is NOT the right sized and/or right kind of EV car or the right type of EV… Im not sure how pick-up truck drivers/owners view a Rivian pick-up truck, or how a Ford F-150/Ram/Silverado owner would react to an EV F-150/RAM/Silverado, but I sure as well DO know that an affordable RIGHT SIZED EV CUV/SUV that looks HALF AS GOOD as a Tesla Model S or Model 3 from ANY mainstream automaker, not only from Tesla, would sell. Sell a lot. The Model 3 deliveries PROVE price may NOT be a factor either…as all these Model 3 deliveries are of the higher end versions… The entry level Model 3 is STILL not available for purchase… When that happens, many MORE people will opt for the Model 3…government discounts be damned…

Do you need the ceramic brakes? You will be tracking it... But...once a year? Are ceramics worth it for that once a year track thing? Is suede seats worth the 22 000 difference to you? If either of those is yes...then buy new... But...if I were you, Id buy the used one...and keep that 22 000 dollar difference and put it towards the new CT6 V Sport. I know you want that Caddy... Shyte...the new Vette and the used one really have no visual difference. You have to look very closely to see. So..im my opinion...22 000 dollars is best put towards the CT6 V-Sport. Awseome is what I need to say next!!!! Im sending you some love your way!!!

Not necessarily focusing on you Balthy or on Paolino with my 1st world problem statement... Just a general statement that 1st word people like to complain about...in general. But as you and Paolino have stated in these posts, and how you even said: Yes...1st world problems. Manufactures in the USA have collected enough data over the last car buying century, have conducted many focus group meetings, that they have more or less stream lined the options available in their offerings... Pay up and shut up it shall be. And that means that the way these options are being offered is just to facilitate the money coming in for these companies...you know...profit. Profit is the driving force of a 1st world country. I understand what you want out of cars as I have a feeling we both want the same thing out of our cars regarding these safety features. I always buy the top of the line trim model, yet I hardly use the features that come with the car. I pay up and shut up...but that is how I want it anyway. In Paolino's case, either he pays up and shuts up with a higher trimmed Buick that he doesnt want, but living in the 1st world, he has options to buy somewhere else other than Buick. It is NOT frustrating because we, North Americans, are free and rich enough to buy almost whatever we want, whenever we want it. Look at his statement... He has another year to go to get another car. He KNOWS he will get another car. He just does NOT know what he wants yet. He is frustrated with a false sense of not getting what he wants. Yet what he wants is available somewhere no doubt... He WILL find it. He WILL acquire it. There is no doubt that he will find it and acquire it. Next year. Its a guarantee. In your case. You want the option to de-option. But your fellow American citizens want their cars to do their laundry for them if it was possible. Your fellow Americans are now even tired to wait in a drive-thru window to get their coffee that they would want their car to place an order through their car's internet connection and their restaurant of choice and they want their coffee to be ready as soon as they arrive... And these features are a must today... So...maybe not a 1st world complaint you have Balthy, but your complaint resides with the North American market DEMANDING these 1st world options to be available at ANY price point. So...you and I have no other choice but to pay up and shut up as WE are in the minority... So yeah...1st world problems where we have these options at our feet, we either complain because we dont want them, or we complain because we want them offered a certain way... Yet in other parts of the world... OK...less grim... That would be asylum seekers in a country that is thought to be paradise... Yes..that would be Greece... And lets look at Greeks in Greece. Forget that...lets look at Detroit Michigan... So yeah...1st world problems complaining about being frustrated at the lack of features on a Buick... Like I said. Buick offers no features you like. Do not buy Buick. Buy something else. In America, we still have plenty of choices to choose from. This aint an angry rant. Just a defensive post defending my 1st world statement.

1st world problems are nice to have. Buick does NOT offer you what you want in a car. Dont buy Buick. Buy something that offers you what you want at the price you want it for.

Problem is... You never actually offer ANY kind of rebuttal... You make fun, you chastise, you complain about anything remotely political that goes AGAINST your political spectrum. You revert to sarcasm with stuff like kevlar wheels like the post I quoted you on... But you never ever offer ANY kind of rebuttal. On the off chance that you do...on a rare occasion...an occasion so rare, it could be called a miracle by bible belt Christians....its often short sighted. Its often full of half-truths and inaccuracies.... And when somebody actually tries to enlighten you...tries to show you that there is a different rerality than yours stuck in Lancaster Pennsylvania...you downvote and the whole process of you whining and/or making fun continues... I understand fully of one's surroundings could influence one's opinions... HELLO...I COME FROM MONTREAL!!!

Im going by what YOU said... Standard of living of the 1950s... WW2 ended a decade prior. Europe was war torn. Japan was war torn. China and India were 3rd world countries. In some instances...China and Indai are still 3rd world... 1955 America... All was well...wasnt? Marylin Monroe. Joe Dimaggio. James Dean. Elvis. You wanna keep on going to the hop...problem is... Times...they are a changin' That Jewish boy with the whiny singing voice sang that one a decade later...and from then even...times kept on a-changin'....and time keeps on a-changin'. You in that quote mentioned a manufacturing economy is not ideal but as a safe guard...its good. Montreal actually does have a manufacturing industry that from the 1970s-1990s thrived. It still does. Bombardier Aerospace. Also...Quebec with Bombardier and its trains also stayed afloat... I dunno where middle America resides in all of this. But I do know one thing. America better take care of herself going forward because if America does NOT educate herself, take care of her schools....which is a huuuuge problem, does NOT influence and does NOT accept influence from others, and just keeps on closing her mind to change, does NOT go with the flow, wants to keep that status quo, in trying desperately to keep America in 1955, America is in grave danger. The calender on the wall says 2018. Marilyn Monroe. Joe Dimaggio. James Dean. Elvis. All DEAD! if the French in Quebec have accepted to speak English...and they have...they always did accept to speak English...and if the English in Quebec, the ones that stayed, have accepted to speak French, and together we actually work on towards the future and we are not still stuck on the bloody Plaines of Abraham, (referred to as the French and Indian War in the United States). I surely would hope that people as closed minded as BLU is to new technology and EVs and all that will change... Im not the one downvoting anything remotely relating to EVs. Im not the one remotely dissing the arrival of EVs. Im not the one remotely denouncing them. Saying stuff like it will take 50 years before the fossil fuels only START to begin to die off. 50 years? Like I said...in America, perhaps... Instead of fighting over liberal this and conservative that...perhaps all that energy made to divide you folk should be concentrated on improving your education. Your schools. Your road infrastructure. MODERNIZE it... Alls I hear is excuses. Its too old. Its crumbling. OK...fix it! At that same time...when fixing it...MODERNIZE it!!! It takes trillions? Yes it does... FIX IT!!! Coal powered electric plants? Hey...I do not know who voted in Donald Trump...but protecting coal was a numb-nutz move... The future is NOT in coal... The Americans USED to be innovators...what the hell happened? Stuck in 1955 we are... MAGA? SURE!!!! With coal? With fossil fuels? The WHOLE PHOQUING PLANET WANTS TO MOVE AWAY FROM THAT!!! General Motors ENVISIONS selling 1 MILLION ELECTRIC CARS by 2026... HELLO???!!!! WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT TELL YOU???!!! Not in America though...in China... What are YOU folk gonna do? Whine when China gets all the nice shiny and techy General Motors cars while we get the shyte? Well...2026 is NOT that far away...Chinese people will be gobbling up the electric cars...and that Chinese Buick EV CUV has shwon us what at where is GM thinking about its future and the future of cars... What did GM give us in Detroit or New York this year? its quite telling...isnt it? So...while you ask me where in middle America does it pertain to Montreal or China...I honestly dont know and dont care frankly... Montreal is actually growing and evolving...is middle America? THAT SHOULD be the question you should be asking...

I KNEW BLU would downvote!!! You are soooooo phoquing predictable!!! You scream and shout and whine about liberal Californians. YOU SHOVE SHYTE MY way about how EVs is NOT your thang... How phoquing conservative YOU are... Yet when someone has a differing opinion that yours...you downvote away... Typical! Like I said...good luck to you out there in Lancaster. Or as a Motor Trend forum poster used to say about places like Lancaster. Bubblephoque, USA.

I do not know at what rate... Actually I do! Quebec politics circa 1970s. There was the quiet revolution where the French people of Quebec fought back against their Anglais (English) overlords. Montreal was the city of the future just a few years prior to 1970. Montreal thinks big in the 1960s. New highways, new subway systems. Expo '67 highlighted that. New international airport that debuted in 1975 that was one of the most advanced and futuristic airports at that time. The idea to have an international airport AWAY from the main city and having highspeed trains connect your airport to the city along with that same high speed rail system connect you to the other major cities surrounding you. Those would be NYC, Boston and Toronto were all on the table. The Summer Olympics of 1976 was the pinnacle. Montreal was on top of the world. Then politics got in the way. Twice. Those politics was necessary and for whatever reason. But Im not gonna delve into that as this is an automotive forum.... OK...it took Montreal 40 years to recover from that. Those politics, necessary as they were, blinded Quebec people for the next 40 years and it took away from progress. 40 years. In that time span, Toronto surpassed Montreal. Boston, from a small town that was beleaguered in ghetto crime and in organized crime saw itself rise into a wonderful metropolis itself. Boston dug itself literally out of the hole with many projects, including the Big Dig. Stopped the crime, stopped the brain drain, kept its students. NYC saw the same thing. Montreal...although we are still fighting off that organized crime thing, we are only NOW growing. The quiet revolution brought out the change we wanted. At a cost. But there were other changes that we did NOT think of changing. We tried. But we failed because other shyte was going down. When Montreal was on top of the world, we even got the 1st Major League Baseball team that was outside the USA. At our downfall, we lost this baseball team. 40 years of recession after recession after recession and broken down businesses. Empty building after empty building. No new construction of anything. No new highways. No new international projects. No national pride. 40 years to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure. You think YOU guys have it bad? HA! Its worse in Quebec. Well, it was worse. As of now, not only are we thinking about new infrastructure as in extending our existing subway lines, we are introducing new electric rails for our people to commute. To highways. Extended highways. New bridges being built to replace the ones that are literary falling down. The Champlain Bridge is the busiest in Canada. Its failing. Its getting replaced... EVs...Quebecois are embracing them. It helps though that Quebec DOES have Hydro-electric power. It has now for 100 years... The baseball team in Montreal will most probably be back with 5 years at the most. Eventually, the high speed rail system will be made to connect Boston, NYC, Montreal and Toronto. Change...how fast you want it? Believe me...40 years is a long phoquing time. I do not think you want to wait that long. I do not think some parts of America will have the same 40 years Montreal had. We were lucky to come out of it OK. We were lucky to have resources at our finger tips. Such as: We do have more higher education institutions than Boston does. Good ones too. Along the lines of a Harvard. We DO have a population that is literate and speaks a MINIMUM of 2 languages. We DO have a MULTICULTURAL background that gives us an edge in seeing things from different angles... We have a port. Montreal's port is one of North America's busiest. One of the oldest in North America too. Our seaway trade goes further than that. The North American indigenous peoples used this rivers to trade with one another. Boston, NYC and New York State in general and other neighboring US states have a very close relationship with Quebec. Montreal survived this way. When Toronto and Ottawa were not so kind to Montreal and Quebec, we did have the US to turn to. Does Lancaster Pennsylvania have these same resources? Do other parts of America that seem to stuck in 1955 have that what Montreal has? Montreal was stuck in 1967 to1976 a looooong phoquing time! It was NOT pleasant. We had our joie de vivre...but that was it... Good luck to you guys...I mean it! But it was not fun economically during those times in Montreal...

https://www.investors.com/news/tesla-gm-joined-in-1-million-ev-sales-race-by-japanese-rival-nissan/ As of March 23, 2018... Nissan, Toyota, Tesla, GM, Volkswagen all want to sell 1 million EVs by as early as 2022 and as late 2026. These are sales targets... Tesla wants 1 million by 2020. They dont have to production knowledge to do so. I keep on hearing that people dont want EVs... Well...maybe in certain parts of the United States of America. But other parts of this phoquing planet...they want EVs... Infrastructure and range anxiety are all of the bullsyte argument variety. If one wants change....change DOES happen... I have NO DOUBT that each and every one of these automakers WILL succeed in selling 1-2-3 million EVs a year EACH by 2030. Not here though. Not in North America. As long as people like you, BLU, who lives in a bubble...will NEVER happen! MONTREAL is currently hosting its 2nd annual EV autoshow. Like right now! Like April 20, 21 and 22. Like this very week-end. SEPARATE from the Montreal Auto Show and a lot smaller. But it is growing... https://svem.ebems.com/home.html Its fine to NOT want EVs... Just dont snicker at the fact that the phoquing planet is MOVING away from gasoline engines... In China and in Japan for instance...the infrastucture for EVs is being built RIGHT NOW by LEAPS and BOUNDS... Yes...I know...the United States of of America people, much like yourself, dont want that change... Its cool... Dont phoquing complain when people from OUTSIDE of the United States of America make fun of you... Just like you folk made fun of others outside the USofA...its payback time if you folk do NOT go with the flow... From the late 1970s... From 1985... Just before this scene...DOC makes fun of Japanese electronics... from 2018... Its not nice to laugh...but the Smokey and the Bandit laughter at Japanese cars was told in blindness. The Back to the Future laughter was satirical and an eye opener. The Trump thing was just flat out backwards and catering to the folk that are simply...simpletons...the simpletons of America dragging your beautiful country down... All this to say...America IS falling behind... America is NOT the world leader it once was... NOT because America has lost it completely. Its because the WORLD itself has had a chance to catch up to America. Yes...thanx in part to America...but that is the thing. The world is such a smaller place right now... Other world powerhouses do influence the world, including America. If you dont evolve with the times, be prepared to fall by the way side. Take that as you will BLU, but change only happens if you want it. Success happens ONLY if you STRIVE for it. Hoping for the best and NOT doing ANYTHING about it will ONLY result in failure. You see, other engineering brainiacs and innovative entrepreneurs ELSEWHERE on the planet get to dictate what is the future going to be and if you living in Lancaster Pennsylvania can not see that and still see China and Japan and Korea as rice patty places and Germany and France and Greece as 3rd world countries devastated by war...yes Greece...Greece still has the brain power to reverse severe austerity measures...then you living in Lancaster Pennsylvania will be the one to be what those countries were in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s... Laugh...but that horse and buggy will be coming to you soon if you dont adapt... Laugh...but what Greece is experiencing right now, what the USA experienced in 2009, will happen again, but PERMANENTLY if you Americans CONTINUE to live a life on credit but FAIL to MODERNIZE!!! Yes...MODERNIZE!!! Fossil fuels are coming to an end...be it 20 years from now or 50 years from now... Change needs to happen to YOUR country NOW... EV infrastructure needs to be built NOW...and not at a slow sloth pace its at...at the the rabbit pace its happening in China... California, Washington...its got it! Lancaster Pennsylvania...I feel sorry for you!

Wasn't there a commercial sometime in the 1950s or 1960s that said you want a sports car but you marry an Oldsmobile? (Or was it Buick?) But yeah... Aphrodite: Greek Goddess of beauty, love and fertility. Eros: Greek God of love and SEXUAL DESIRE! No need to commit. One could have flings! There is nothing wrong with that. One could have lustful desires and one could indulge in them without the burden of love and commitment...if its between 2 consenting adults that are NOT committed with other people in a bond of holy matrimony. If one could have strong lustful desires and love with a wife or husband, then that is awesome... I know...Christianity does not allow for lustful desires outside the bonds of holy matrimony. Its a good thing for us Greeks that there is loophole for us as Aphrodite and Eros allowed us that for a minimum of 3500 years BEFORE the Holy Trinity took it away from us...and...the Holy Trinity is only bossing us around for ONLY 2000 years after that.... With THAT being said... Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW also have HORRID emotional problems. The thing is, long term relationships with those 3 are at a minimum...people lease those cars, non? Actually, people lease faithful Chevys, Hondas and Toyotas. People just dont want commitment today! People lust over those buxom blonde Germans, yet they are aware of the long term problems so they dont commit long term. They dont marry them.... Same for Alpha Romeos. One could EASILY have lustful flings with Alpha, as long as one takes a 3 year lease term. And then one moves unto another conquest. To frolic naked in the Garden of Eden with a lover doing all kinds of nasty and dirty things to said lover...

Well...I have said that Corvette needs to be a brand on its own. Which in turn, means that a Corvette CUV is necessary, as part of a brand... About the proposal above concerning Mustang and Camaro: NO! I wouldn't mind a Mustang and Camaro being 100% electric sometime in the (near) future (maybe?)...as 2 door sporty cars...just as they are now, but with electric motors and batteries. I wouldn't mind AWD either. Actually, I wouldn't mind AWD now! Both top Mustangs and Camaros have upwards (or will have for the Mustang soon) of 650 horsepower and 650 ft.lbs . of torque. AWD will benefit them. OK, maybe not as weight may be an issue. As long as Mustang and Camaro stay true to their original purpose, for me, what powers them is irrelevant. If GM and FoMoCo need sporty CUVs to peddle, Im sure they could find a way to engineer, market and sell a new product and create new brand identity with said new vehicle. Does that mean the death of 2 door sporty cars if in the future people wont be buying them which in turn will make Mustang and Camaro nameplates disappear? Sure! But what is the point of slapping the name Mustang or Camaro on a product and that particular product is the exact opposite of what Mustang's and Camaro's original purpose was? If that is the case, the original purpose to Mustang and Camaro is clearly dead...so clinging on to names just for the sake of the names is useless... Marketing should find a way to make Mustang and Camaro...AS 2 DOOR SPORTS CARS RELEVANT IN ANY FUTURE!!! Marketing should also find a way to create NEW brands to be as iconic as Mustang and Camaro in the future as well as sporty CUVs... Engineering should take care of business to make all that happen!

You know what? Id still take the Eagle over the Mercedes... Its just a rendering though, so all this negative talk over the Mercedes is for nothing. All that I wanted to say is that what is old is new again...

Well...we've seen this styling before... From Mercedes... And we all know the PT Cruiser was throwback styling to these... Yes! American cars from the mid to late 1930s just before America entered WW2 and the US automakers shut down automobile production... This a Buick. 1938. With running boards for a SUV look. These are high off the ground. They actually DO have a trunk. They got today's high beltline styling. They look aerodynamic... Ive actually said this before...if we are gonna go down the SUV craze for a tad longer...I want my SUV to look like this. Now...take that monstrosity rendering from Mercedes. Which one would YOU like to be seen in? Id take the 1938 Buick Special please!!! The design is more coherent. More fluid. More elegant...and dare I say it? MORE MODERN!!!! Even with those fenders and the upright windshield!!! So...like I said, NOBODY would be copying that M-B. Its UGLY! If anything...automakers would be looking to Harley Earl's designs from 80 years ago for inspiration...

This...deserves a frowny face. Nothing this hideous will make ANY automaker copy it. Not even the Chinese or the Koreans...