Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

ccap41

New Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,692

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    86

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ccap41

  1. ccap41
    It looks terrible in the animated pictures. I'm curious what it looks like in person. It certainly wouldn't be towards the top of my list but at least they give you more than black, grey, and lighter grey as options.
  2. ccap41
    Gotta get maximum light for Olds, so he doesn't feel like he's in a prison.
  3. ccap41
    There are 23 other options, you don't have to get black and green.
  4. ccap41
    Getcha a Mercedes. You get a nice palette even on the little GLC300. You even get these choices on the GLA. Spend the big bucks and you can almost get anything you want.
  5. ccap41
    The Bolt has a terrible shape to it and this looks the exact same.. EDIT: I didn't realize that was a video of it morphing. It certainly is different and better.
  6. ccap41
    You do realize there is an aftermarket for BOTH engines.. Comparing the Diesel to the base engine..not the most popular V6. While they both cost the same to drive 25 miles, the diesel will be a WAY better experience than the n/a 2.5, 4 banger.
  7. ccap41
    My dad is in a similar driving situation with his Tacoma. 2012 and it has around 45,000 miles on it. He only lives 3 miles from work and when him and my mom go places they usually take her car as it gets better mileage. She had a 2012 Fusion and just a few months ago got a 2020 RAV4 TRD. It's a pretty dang sweet little CUV. The ONLY thing it doesn't have that I'd want is a more powerful engine. It's pretty loaded up for not being the top trim. I'm not really sure what the top trim really adds to what they have. Theirs has heated and cooled seats, lane keeping assist, radar cruise control, a rearview mirror like Caddy's that acts as a camera when you flip the switch, and of course their neat off road touches like crawl control and hill hold. Daaaamn, so like ONE TANK OF GAS?!? I average about 12,000 per year. I think the average american is in the 12,000-15,000 range.
  8. ccap41
    10,000 miles per year really isn't too bad for that lease. I would have expected one of the "ultra low" 8,000 miles per year, kind of leases.
  9. ccap41
    Understandable, I don't think I've ever seen one in person and yet Raptors are pretty common. I think a SuperCap is still "only" 57k.
  10. ccap41
    This is a fantastic looking vehicle.
  11. ccap41
    Maybe they finally said "screw it" and "EcoBoosted" the 5.0!?! Haha I doubt it but there's still a chance until there's an official reveal.
  12. ccap41
    I think Ford would be smart to continue a lesser Raptor with the 3.5 at a more reasonable price and then the s/c 5.2 for a 5-10k premium. The current Raptor starts at 54k in SuperCab without extra options and the TRX starts at 72k. There is definitely room to keep a lesser Raptor around the 55k range and then something pricier to compete with the TRX.
  13. ccap41
    I believe you're the first/only person I've talked to that doesn't like it and I talk to plenty of fanboys of their respective brands. I thought it was quite unanimous that they hit it out of the ballpark outside of the IFS for those serious off-roaders.
  14. ccap41
    Personally, if they said not to use it and VW went ahead and used it, that's not on them. Should they have told on them, I guess... ??‍♂️I don't hold them responsible for what VW did.
  15. ccap41
    Not a fan of the Bronco?
  16. ccap41
    There was a VW documentary I watched and I believe there was an email exchange that they stated the part was not to be used in consumer vehicles and obviously VW did what they wanted with the part(s). I think they covered their own backside with the scandal. The buying public who's spending tens of thousands of dollars on their vehicle just want the product they want. I think very few people actually care about what goes on behind closed doors, they just want the best product(in their eyes).
  17. ccap41
    I mean I understand what you're talking about but at the same time, the high trims are typically easy cash for them. The next Ranger will be on the Bronco's platform so they could just plug and play with whatever they do to the Bronco. It should be relatively easy cash. I can't imagine them doing NOTHING to the next Ranger that would be exciting off-road.
  18. ccap41
    People who buy Mercedes will never even know. You could extend that to almost any manufacturer because the public doesn't care.
  19. ccap41
    I'm not sure if they would put a front locker in the Ranger and it'll always be behind in that regard. Hopefully they do because the Bronco has one so it could very well be the same exact part number. Do you think they'd just turn the wick up on the 2.7T or something more like the 3.5T? I think it would be awesome if they dropped in a retuned S/C 5.2 but I'm just not sure if they will have the balls to do that. I can't imagine how stressful that much power and torque is on the off-road components and that's a lot of re-engineering.
  20. ccap41
    Do you guys think that after VW was flying high and passing the diesel tests that the other manufacturers all bought TDI's and found the cheating software and essentially copied it? I find it a little tough that they all made cheating software because isn't this like the 3rd or 4th company to get busted?
  21. ccap41
    I do like that they tried to keep it somewhat squared off instead of all coupe-like to maximize aerodynamic efficiency. The windshield has a crazy rake to it but he rest is pretty square and I appreciate that. I don't like the wheels but that's relatively minor and "easy" to change(assuming they're smart enough to use the same lug pattern as some other manufacturer).
  22. ccap41
    What's everybody's thoughts on Ford or GM's(mostly Ford because GM doesn't seem to have the nuts to enter the segment...?) rebuttal to the TRX?
  23. ccap41
    The Durango is not a body on frame SUV. It is a uni-body architecture, like the othe CUVs. It is just RWD based instead of FWD based.
  24. ccap41
    I don't factually know this, but, I have to assume crash standards have changed quite a bit in the last 10 years. i also think the exact 5.3 from the Silverado would be one bada$$ engine in the Colorado. 355hp/375tq(or so..I don't remember the exact numbers).
  25. ccap41
    I mean, almost everything is at this point. The only ones I can think of that aren't are the V8's and 3.3 V6(base F-150 engine). I think the last n/a 4-banger is the hybrid engine in the Escape and I think everything else has turbos.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search