Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

surreal1272

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,608

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    49

 Content Type 

Everything posted by surreal1272

  1. surreal1272
    Not sure why you quoted me as my comment was about the Model X being an SUV when it really isn't.
  2. surreal1272
    Exactly my point in another thread. It is not even close to an SUV and barely qualifies as a CUV.
  3. surreal1272
    ^^THIS!
  4. surreal1272
    The Bentayga and the CTS-V have an indetical 0-60 time of 3.5 seconds, with one being a W12 and the other being a V8.
  5. surreal1272
    And you know this because a Yukon has actually been tested there right? Oh wait. All I know is that a mid-engine Vette will eat them all for breakfast, lunch, and dinner and that is what this thread is ACTUALLY about.
  6. surreal1272
    That's a bold statement.
  7. surreal1272
    Don't care. You're just looking for an excuse to make a mountain out of a molehill.
  8. surreal1272
    Actually he never said the Yukon would beat it. He only said that it would "hold its own" which is a subjective measure.
  9. surreal1272
    Shhhhh! We don't talk about that.
  10. surreal1272
    Did you actually read his last post? Good grief.
  11. surreal1272
    You do realize that you are only hurting your argument since right now Benz has only one EV and it is going bye bye due to $h! sales? Btw, he included the Volt since it is a plug in. As far as your Benz hybrid statement, are you telling us that they will have only hybrids and nothing else (i.e. Gas only models)?
  12. surreal1272
    Read my last post before posting again. I specified what I meant by the Bolt being a CUV. And again, the X is a crossover which, by the very definition, is a CUV.
  13. surreal1272
    Exactly. Much like Tesla calling the X a "crossover SUV", it is just not so clever marketing going on here.
  14. surreal1272
    I am speaking tongue in cheek. No need to get literal. Fact is though that all CUVs are just tall hatchbacks in my book. You also missed the initial point when SMK claimed that Tesla has an SUV when they do not. It is a CUV that they try to market as an SUV with the word "crossover" in front of it. Sorry but that's a CUV any way you slice it.
  15. surreal1272
    The Bolt is a small CUV that is called a hatchback (which all CUVs are). Thanks for playing though.
  16. surreal1272
    Just stop. Tesla is just like every other make out there and every other make has prioritized CUVs over sedans because that is what's selling. To pretend otherwise is just an obvious case of bias to suit your argument of the day. "Cadillac needs seven CUVs to compete" "Tesla doesn't need a CUV to compete" That's how you're coming off right now. Finally, no one has an electric SUV including Tesla. They have an electric CUV and so does GM.
  17. surreal1272
    Please, by all means, enlighten us.
  18. surreal1272
    They will not, I repeat, will not sell 200K Model 3s in one year.
  19. surreal1272
    So in this world of yours, sedans are selling better than CUVs? Oh and they had 65,000 cancellations. Exactly my point.
  20. surreal1272
    This should have been out before the 3.
  21. surreal1272
    You were specifically agianst options for such a "low volume" car. Only after it was pointed out that others do the same thing, did you move the bar.
  22. surreal1272
    It is quite sharp. Pricey, but sharp nonetheless.
  23. surreal1272
    I do not care about volume. I only highlighted it to show you that low volume clearly doesn't matter when it comes to offering options. Surely if Benz, Porsche, and a host of other makes can get away with it, then so can GM. It's that simple, regardless of the obvious trolling attempt going on here. Because this is about GM. That's why it's perplexing him. If this were about Benz, the narrative would be completely different.
  24. surreal1272
    Thanks for proving my point because S Class worldwide sales are still low volume (and I should clarify that I was referring to US sales) by definition and offering multiple engine packages has clearly never been an issue for them. What's funny here is that despite having as large an R&D budget as Benz, you don't think GM has the resources or the need to spread that out on a world beating car.
  25. surreal1272
    So I saw this today and said to myself something I though I'd never say, "That's a sharp looking Lexus".
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search