Drew Dowdell

It really depends on what your definition of "better" is. You seem to think that everyone out there shopping in the $45k - $55k range takes along their stop watch, lateral g-force meter, and helmet. If if were my $50k to spend, I almost certainly would go with the XTS over the CTS because, as much as I like the CTS, I prefer quiet and comfortable.... two traits that I'm certain the XTS will be better at. I'm already not adverse to either RWD or FWD, but I would opt for AWD for reasons of climate and terrain that I know you understand first hand. The reason I can make this prediction on my spending habits is that if it were my $38k and the choice was between a Lacrosse or CTS, I would still go with the Lacrosse. No old man is going to be able to operate Cadillac's CUE system just like they can't operate iDrive.

Alpha is the zeta replacement.

I think they'll be closer to the MKX

To the 4-cylinder doubters, look at those power numbers. Northstar like HP and Torque at a lower RPM than the actual Northstar itself.

Edsel's luxury division

Ute

How about increasing sales of the mainstream stuff first.

if it was made in a 3door, would Ocn buy?

Land Rover HAS a performance brand. It's called Jaguar. If Jaguar performance types are the letter R, then Land Rover should be the letter J. I really wonder about these executive and marketing types sometimes. Do they live in a bubble?

gladly

No, call it something other than Verano.

You have no idea what the powertrain is in the XTS yet. However, using the Lacrosse CXS as a bare minimum, the Lacrosse V6 is more powerful than the 528i by 50 horsepower and 30 ft-lb of torque and equal in horsepower to the 535i though behind in torque (but should be no surprise that the turbo BMW has more torque than the non-turbo Buick). Simply turbo-charging the HF V6 will make the engine at least identical to the BMW in power if not more. The biggest downfall for Cadillac would be the lack of an 8-speed transmission, but that is a GM problem not a platform problem.

you just pointed some of them out. Pedestrian impact standards (euro) and rear impact standards (US) GM not bringing Zeta sedans here had nothing to do with government standards and the proof is that GM is selling Zeta sedans here today. Just because they won't sell one to you personally... don't blame the government. The address you want to complain to is: The Office of Dan Akerson Renaissance Center Detroit Michigan

The orientation of the engine has nothing to do with how mainstream or not the car is. Subarus have north/south engines. Dodgefan's Intrepid has a north/south engine. The last generation VW Passat had a north/south engine. The Geo Tracker and Kia Sportage had north/south engines and they were way more mainstream than the SRX ever will be. The Camaro is going to sell close to 100k copies this year... do they have to be careful not to go over that or it will suddenly become "mainstream"?

boxers have an upper limit to displacement in front engine cars. The downside to boxers is the width of the engine between the front wheels.

The flat four is the one redeeming quality on a car that has a Toyota badge.

You mean like the joke like the Rolls Royce Ghost ($225K) on the 7-series platform ($71k) which is in turn based on the 5-series platform ($41k)?? Re-fixed.

viel gluck!

I'm not the best writer in the world, but it is a struggle to read that article.

desperate times...

Ok.. help me out with those tail lights. Lincoln Premier?

TAKE PICS!

No. The best name to describe SAAB is Terri Schiavo, the eyes are fluttering, technically still alive, but there is no hope to be had and it just lingers on till someone gets a court order to pull the plug.