• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Alfa Romeo Goes Back To The Drawing Board Due To China


    • With Chinese Auto Market Experiencing Some Downs, Alfa Romeo Goes Back To The Drawing Board

    Last May, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles announced some ambitious plans for Alfa Romeo. By 2018, the brand would hopefully sell 400,000 vehicles annually thanks to 5 billion Euro investment that will lead to the introduction of eight new models. This past week, FCA is going back to the drawing board.

     

    Speaking with analysts on the company's third-quarter results, CEO Sergio Marchionne said due to the weakness of imported luxury vehicles in the Chinese market, FCA is currently reassessing their plans. Marchionne said a good chunk of the 400,000 vehicle sales was assigned to China. But in light of what is happening in the country, those proposed sales will need to absorbed into other regions.

     

    Now all of the vehicles that Alfa Romeo that Alfa Romeo has planned will still be developed, but the brand will need to 'rejig' its plans to focus on launching models that will suit Europe and North American rather than China. Plans for the revised rollout will happen in January.

     

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    You can roast me all you want, I do not care, but this is the worlds UGLIEST car Ever. This continues to prove the idiot leading FCA needs to be fired and this brand put back where it should have stayed in the history books. Waste of Billions that should have stayed in the states to build new models for Jeep, Dodge, Ram and Chrysler.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Between this and Cadillac, I feel like the auto industry is turning into an episode of the Brady Bunch, "MARSHA! MARSHA! MARSHA!"

    CHINA! CHINA! CHINA!

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wow. I wish continued failure for the Fiat brand of FCA. Because it's the only one that isn't contributing anything. Someone ougt to raise the flag of wasted effort on escalation of commitment. I can see the worth in Alfa Romeo, and then Maserati. But man is it going to be ardous to build them up.

     

    All this while FCA US is getting shafted, and being taken advantage of by the strong American Auto Industry Recovery. 

     

    I have never seen so much product potential wasted by terrible mismanagement. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's the thing. Sergio talks a lot about automaker consolidation and restructuring.

     

    Other than the Ferrari sale, we have yet to see something of this nature at FCA itself.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's the thing. Sergio talks a lot about automaker consolidation and restructuring.

     

    Other than the Ferrari sale, we have yet to see something of this nature at FCA itself.

     

    Because it would mean closing Serg's pet brands.  Serg is bleeding Chrysler to keep Fiat, Alfa, Maserati and for some reason Lancia (Italy Only) alive. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If FCA wanted real consolidation, they could probably keep Fiat as the small cheap car brand, pick one of Dodge and Chrysler for the middle, dump Alfa and put the effort into Maserati as the luxury brand.  Then you have a 3 step car line up.  Jeep and Ram stay for trucks and SUVs.   But they won't do that because they like having 8 boutique brands rather than 4 strong ones.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think they need to choose between Dodge and Chrysler.  

     

    Fiat - niche small fun hatchbacks and crossovers at a cheap price.  Price of Scion + Cuteness of Mini

    Dodge - FCA's answer to Ford and Chevy in cars and some crossovers

    Chrysler - FCA's answer to Buick, the Avalon/ES, Acura, and Lincoln in cars and maybe a crossover or three, plus the Minivan.  300 would need to move up in status by a good chunk.

    Maserati - The BMW/Benz/Cadillac competition - too sporty to go up against Lexus.  They would need to come down in their segments, probably take over the Guilia... but not go as far south as Mercedes and BMW have gone.

     

    Ram and Jeep stay right where they are.

     

    edit:  And yes, I think this could work globally even if they just rebranded the Dodge/Chrysler vehicles as Fiats or Lancia's (only one or the other) overseas, but Chrysler could probably be used with success.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And people said GM needed Pontiac and Saturn, etc.  And GM is doing better with 4 brands than they did with 8.   There just seems like a lot of overlap still in FCA and you don't need to be all things to all people.  Jeep builds crossovers and SUVs, do you really need carbon copies of them in other brands if Jeep, Dodge and Chrysler are all in the same dealership?  Do we need a 300 and a Charger?  And is Maserati ever really going to compete?  

     

    Sergio wants to consolidate, but has an army of low volume niche products, and probably about 1/3rd of their products are really profitable.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think they need to choose between Dodge and Chrysler.  

     

    Fiat - niche small fun hatchbacks and crossovers at a cheap price.  Price of Scion + Cuteness of Mini

    Dodge - FCA's answer to Ford and Chevy in cars and some crossovers

    Chrysler - FCA's answer to Buick, the Avalon/ES, Acura, and Lincoln in cars and maybe a crossover or three, plus the Minivan.  300 would need to move up in status by a good chunk.

    Maserati - The BMW/Benz/Cadillac competition - too sporty to go up against Lexus.  They would need to come down in their segments, probably take over the Guilia... but not go as far south as Mercedes and BMW have gone.

     

    Ram and Jeep stay right where they are.

     

    edit:  And yes, I think this could work globally even if they just rebranded the Dodge/Chrysler vehicles as Fiats or Lancia's (only one or the other) overseas, but Chrysler could probably be used with success.

     

    And people said GM needed Pontiac and Saturn, etc.  And GM is doing better with 4 brands than they did with 8.   There just seems like a lot of overlap still in FCA and you don't need to be all things to all people.  Jeep builds crossovers and SUVs, do you really need carbon copies of them in other brands if Jeep, Dodge and Chrysler are all in the same dealership?  Do we need a 300 and a Charger?  And is Maserati ever really going to compete?  

     

    Sergio wants to consolidate, but has an army of low volume niche products, and probably about 1/3rd of their products are really profitable.

     

    Biggest problem with FCA is their Unionized BS agreements that makes them think they have to keep their mass production going as well as keep stupid Italian lines alive. They are going down the Bankrupt road and will hit it soon.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They need to fix the holes in their lower brands before they go about trying to restart Alfa.

    I was really hoping the Giulia platform might get off the ground before something like this went down...

    They need small cars that don't have Fiat badges stat.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. stlcadet11
      stlcadet11
      (27 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      The rivalry of the Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang has been going for ages in the U.S. But now this fight has expanded into China.
      Automotive News reports that a growing group of Chinese buyers are being drawn towards to these models as the exude the no-apologies Americana attitude.
      "We're seeing the beginning of a muscle car culture here. Something that is uniquely American appeals to the Chinese consumer. The image that it relays to the automotive public is very positive," said James Chao, a China market auto analyst with IHS Markit.
      Sales of both models are small with Chevrolet only moving 2,000 Camaros since its launch 2011. Ford is doing slightly better with 6,200 Mustangs sold since its launch in 2015. In the first quarter, Mustang sales saw a 90 percent increase to 963 vehicles. Part of the reason for the slow sales comes down to the price. The Camaro starts about 399,900 yuan (about $58,000) - more than double of the base price of $26,900 in the U.S. The Mustang isn't that far behind, costing about $15 dollars less. Prices are increased due to a 25 percent import tariff on U.S. made vehicles, homologation and shipping fees, and Chinese buyers trending to splurge on higher-time models.
      But despite the low sales, the Camaro and Mustang are bringing buyers to dealers. These models act as eye candy to help draw shoppers into showrooms with the hope they'll purchase a vehicle, where it be the eye candy or something a little less exciting.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The rivalry of the Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang has been going for ages in the U.S. But now this fight has expanded into China.
      Automotive News reports that a growing group of Chinese buyers are being drawn towards to these models as the exude the no-apologies Americana attitude.
      "We're seeing the beginning of a muscle car culture here. Something that is uniquely American appeals to the Chinese consumer. The image that it relays to the automotive public is very positive," said James Chao, a China market auto analyst with IHS Markit.
      Sales of both models are small with Chevrolet only moving 2,000 Camaros since its launch 2011. Ford is doing slightly better with 6,200 Mustangs sold since its launch in 2015. In the first quarter, Mustang sales saw a 90 percent increase to 963 vehicles. Part of the reason for the slow sales comes down to the price. The Camaro starts about 399,900 yuan (about $58,000) - more than double of the base price of $26,900 in the U.S. The Mustang isn't that far behind, costing about $15 dollars less. Prices are increased due to a 25 percent import tariff on U.S. made vehicles, homologation and shipping fees, and Chinese buyers trending to splurge on higher-time models.
      But despite the low sales, the Camaro and Mustang are bringing buyers to dealers. These models act as eye candy to help draw shoppers into showrooms with the hope they'll purchase a vehicle, where it be the eye candy or something a little less exciting.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt - Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.cheersandgears.com
      China’s Influence on GM, EVs, and Others!
      We saw just at the end of 2016 Toyota saying they would build a team to focus on EVs. This being a complete reversal of their pledge in 2013 to focus on Hydrogen as the practical alternative to traditional ICE autos. Toyota will have a long range EV auto out on the market for the 2020 auto year. Being that 2019 is when you're 2020 autos will start selling, this puts Toyota 4 years behind GM's Chevrolet BOLT EV.
      What would cause this change to happen? China is what has happened. China started to push the global auto industry by stating that 8 percent of auto sales in 2018 be each vendor has to be EV or plug-in hybrid. 10 percent is the number for 2019 and 12 percent in 2020.
      Toyota one would think should be fine with their Prius line of Hybrids until you realize that China has stated all hybrids such as the Prius, Volt and others built outside of China are considered ICE autos. Currently the only Hybrid being built in China that is a legal hybrid is the Cadillac CT6 plugin hybrid. Toyota is planning to start selling a plugin hybrid in China in 2018 as a 2019 model.
      So we are seeing that Toyota is being forced to get over their EV allergy and come up with a real plan to have a global EV on the market in 2019 as a 2020 model year. Daimler has a large EV roll out planned for the global market by 2021. VW has stated they will have multiple EVs rolled out around 2019 through 2021. So has BMW, Audi, etc.
      So where does that leave GM? What is GMs strategy now that China is flexing their muscle and setting some big standards for an auto company to play in their backyard?
      We have the Cadillac CT6 plugin hybrid. Chevrolet BOLT EV able to be exported to China. GM announced that they will start building a China market Chevrolet Volt as they start to push the Chevrolet brand in China next year. GM has also announced a Buick Velite 5 Hybrid for the Chinese market starting at 265,800 yuan or about $38,600 US. This will have a 72 mile pure electric mode before the generator kicks in giving it a 480 mile range. EVs in China are exempt from sales tax and license plate quotas.
      According to Fox Business news, Buick sold 1 million autos in China for calendar year 2016 rising to the number two auto brand sold behind Volkswagen. They also go onto say that Chevrolet has been selling legacy models only up till now and GM has announced 20 new models for China by 2020 the first being a China version of the Chevrolet Equinox. GM says China is demanding the same models they have in the US and as such, China and the US will be more aligned to have identical models. GMs China business is stated to have produced $2 billion in income last year. China clearly helping GM to sell 10 million cars in 2016 globally.
      How important is the China Market to GM? In the Month of January Cadillac sold 10,298 autos in the US. Cadillac sold 18,000 in China for the month of January. Clearly China will continue to take on a bigger and bigger role in GM’s ongoing growth.
      So where does that leave GM in regards to EVs, auto production, etc.? Reuters points to a story they did back in January 2016 where CEO Mary Barra stated that they could build the dies used to stamp the auto parts in china for 20 to 40 percent less than in Europe or the US. Dies will start to be built and shipped out worldwide from China. Clearly this would tend to show that GM will be affected by the China market more and more.
      So this brings me back to my original question of what is GMs plan for their EV strategy. We have seen and heard so much about the competition and yet with GM this seems to be a black hole. Knowing that GM sold about 1.5 million auto’s last year in China and now for next year 10 percent will have to be EV / Plugin Hybrids, that means 150,000 of these auto’s. For Volkswagen, this is an even bigger number since they are number 1 in the market and have no EV or hybrid that I am aware of.
      All Auto companies who do not have a specific plugin hybrid built in china or EV to import into China is going to find selling auto’s to be very difficult.
      References
      Reuters story
      AP story
      Fox Business Story
      CNN Money Story
      Motley Fool Story
      Reuters 2016 story
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)