• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Next BMW X5 to Use Underpinnings from 7-Series


    • The next BMW X5 will have something in common with the 7-Series

    A new BMW X5 is coming within the next year or so and it will be using the same underpinnings as the 7-Series.

     

    Autocar reports the next-generation X5 will use BMW's new CLAR - Cluster Architecture - modular platform. This platform is comprised of high-strength steel, aluminium, and carbon fiber. Not only does this cut weight, but increases structural rigidity. CLAR is predominantly built for rear-wheel drive applications, but it can take on an all-wheel drive system.

     

    This platform will go on to underpin a number of other BMW vehicles such as the next-generation 3 and 6-Series.

     

    Engine choices for the next X5 are reported to be a 3.0L straight-six, a new twin-turbocharged V8, and a 6.0L V12 for the high-end models. There is also the possibility of a hybrid model.

     

    One interesting item is that the new X5 will not share much with the recently announced X7 crossover. The X7 will the flagship of BMW's crossover lineup and take on the likes of the Mercedes-Benz GLS-Class and Range Rover. As BMW head of sales and marketing Ian Robertson told Autocar, the X7 will pick various engines across the lineup.

     

    Source: Autocar

    0


      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    So then BMW will attempt to have an CUV to compete against Cadillacs SUV. Be interesting to see if this X7 get compared to the XT7 from Cadillac or if people look at price and compete against Escalade.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    CLAR - Cluster Architecture

     

     

    When I read that.....only one thing came to my mind...

    Can you folk guess what that might have been?

     

    53855893.jpg

     

    Because I bought the DVD last week and we watched it another 3 times for a total of 5.

    Twice in the movie theatre and thrice more at home...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    CLAR does sound like a cluster of materials.  The new 7 is lighter than the previous, so I assume they will be able to used this mix material concept and cut weight on all models.  

     

    What is interesting is that the X7 is going to be a different platform.  Maybe a Rolls-Royce platform then, but that seems odd that they wouldn't use the 7-series platform for it.  They say there will be a V12 in the X5, that won't happen, the X7 is getting a V12 though.

     

    I would assume CLAR must be really flexible, because Mercedes builds the GLE and GLS off an SUV platform they have, it is not shared with any cars.   Thing about the Cadillac XT7 though is it is going to be Enclave based, that won't hold a candle to a rear drive V8 and V12 SUV.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    -----------lSo then BMW will attempt to have an CUV to compete against Cadillacs SUV. Be interesting to see if this X7 get compared to the XT7 from Cadillac or if people look at price and compete against Escalade.

    The X5 has always been a unibody RWD/AWD model, so nothing is really changing as far as it's positioning or general layout...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    CLAR does sound like a cluster of materials.  The new 7 is lighter than the previous, so I assume they will be able to used this mix material concept and cut weight on all models.  

     

    What is interesting is that the X7 is going to be a different platform.  Maybe a Rolls-Royce platform then, but that seems odd that they wouldn't use the 7-series platform for it.  They say there will be a V12 in the X5, that won't happen, the X7 is getting a V12 though.

     

    I would assume CLAR must be really flexible, because Mercedes builds the GLE and GLS off an SUV platform they have, it is not shared with any cars.   Thing about the Cadillac XT7 though is it is going to be Enclave based, that won't hold a candle to a rear drive V8 and V12 SUV.

    SMK where did you hear officially that the XT7 will be based on the Enclave? I have found nothing and heard nothing to this statement at all.

     

    We have no idea what the new platform will be. Yes the XT7 could be a stretched bigger version of the XT5 but nothing has really been stated yet.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    CLAR does sound like a cluster of materials.  The new 7 is lighter than the previous, so I assume they will be able to used this mix material concept and cut weight on all models.  

     

    What is interesting is that the X7 is going to be a different platform.  Maybe a Rolls-Royce platform then, but that seems odd that they wouldn't use the 7-series platform for it.  They say there will be a V12 in the X5, that won't happen, the X7 is getting a V12 though.

     

    I would assume CLAR must be really flexible, because Mercedes builds the GLE and GLS off an SUV platform they have, it is not shared with any cars.   Thing about the Cadillac XT7 though is it is going to be Enclave based, that won't hold a candle to a rear drive V8 and V12 SUV.

    SMK where did you hear officially that the XT7 will be based on the Enclave? I have found nothing and heard nothing to this statement at all.

     

    We have no idea what the new platform will be. Yes the XT7 could be a stretched bigger version of the XT5 but nothing has really been stated yet.

    There were pics of a test mule a while back, bit there was some debate. The belief was the XT7 along with Enclave and Traverse would be on long wheel base C2xx, while Acadia and XT5 are short wheel base.

    If I we're Cadillac I'd build it on Omega, make it 1,000 lbs lighter than Escalade and put a 400 hp turbo V6 and a 500 HP V8 in there.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think it means do not expect the X5 to lose a TON of weight.

     

    The 7 Series did not lose a lot, but that's probably a lot of weight was put back in adding tech equipment for the available features.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      Thing about the Cadillac XT7 though is it is going to be Enclave based, that won't hold a candle to a rear drive V8 and V12 SUV.

     

     

    How do U kno? Just wondering. Your comment about an unknown mule means zero; and quite frankly I'm quite confident that with GM's Platform engineering even if the vehicle was on C2xx there is no guarantee that it will not run circles around the German SUVs. What Benz and BMW should really worry about, in terms of performance, is if Cadillac does use Alpha or Omega.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac should do an Alpha SUV and an Omega SUV.  GM has all these platforms, put them to use.  XT5 is already on C2xx, that is fine for competing with the Lexus RX and Lincolns and Acuras of the world, a D2xx could slot below that in the low $30s.  People buying a low $30s crossover are probably coming from a Rav4 or Ford Edge or something, they'll like the move to a fwd based crossover that drives like what they are used to but has more luxury.  With 2 front drive crossovers you cater to the sheeple that blindly buy anything that is a crossover, and with Alpha and Omega crossovers you can sell performance.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The BMW X7 is getting a V12, the only thing GM has that is close is the Z06/CTS-V engine.  They aren't going to match that V12 in smoothness or refinement, they could be close in power and torque.  

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The BMW X7 is getting a V12, the only thing GM has that is close is the Z06/CTS-V engine.  They aren't going to match that V12 in smoothness or refinement, they could be close in power and torque.  

    Your information, as usual, is erroneous.

     

    BMW V-12 : 592 HP / 590 TRQ

    Cadillac V : 640 HP / 630 TRQ

     

    Already puts the smack down on the V-12, with a half-liter less displacement & 4 less cylinders. And no smoothness penalty.

    BMW's 12 needs a major overhaul.

    3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The BMW X7 is getting a V12, the only thing GM has that is close is the Z06/CTS-V engine.  They aren't going to match that V12 in smoothness or refinement, they could be close in power and torque.  

    Your information, as usual, is erroneous.

     

    BMW V-12 : 592 HP / 590 TRQ

    Cadillac V : 640 HP / 630 TRQ

     

    Already puts the smack down on the V-12, with a half-liter less displacement & 4 less cylinders. And no smoothness penalty.

    BMW's 12 needs a major overhaul.

     

    I think I read some rumor where BMW might up the power of the V12, as Rolls Royce will use it too.  But if it is the 592 of the 760 which it probably will be, that engine does make peak torque at 1,500 rpm, which is really low.  The CTS-V makes peak torque at 3,600.

     

    Regardless though, it is physically impossible to make a V8 as smooth as a V12 or an inline six for that matter.  The V12 is the smoothest engine configuration.  

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    balthazar

    Posted (edited) · Report

    You "think" you read "some rumor"??

    K.

     

    Bottom line; for a 6.6L V-12, the power levels are rather anemic for 2016.

     

     

     

    Regardless though, it is physically impossible to make a V8 as smooth as a V12 or an inline six for that matter.

    ​Point being- there is zero issue with the NVH of the 6.2 V8. Buyers aren't balancing nickels on the plastic engine covers of their shopping choices.

     

    But the smoothest configuration of all is the V16. If anyone actually cares.

    Edited by balthazar
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BMW's V12 is a bit weak, they should be getting more power from it, even though it is tuned for low end torque and smoothness.  Mercedes V12 is better and hasn't had a power bump in nearly a decade, although it is supposed to.    Even the Mercedes 4.0 V8 is supposed to make 577 or 612 hp next year.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    The BMW X7 is getting a V12, the only thing GM has that is close is the Z06/CTS-V engine.  They aren't going to match that V12 in smoothness or refinement, they could be close in power and torque.  

    Your information, as usual, is erroneous.

     

    BMW V-12 : 592 HP / 590 TRQ

    Cadillac V : 640 HP / 630 TRQ

     

    Already puts the smack down on the V-12, with a half-liter less displacement & 4 less cylinders. And no smoothness penalty.

    BMW's 12 needs a major overhaul.

     

    I think I read some rumor where BMW might up the power of the V12, as Rolls Royce will use it too.  But if it is the 592 of the 760 which it probably will be, that engine does make peak torque at 1,500 rpm, which is really low.  The CTS-V makes peak torque at 3,600.

     

    Regardless though, it is physically impossible to make a V8 as smooth as a V12 or an inline six for that matter.  The V12 is the smoothest engine configuration.  

     

     

    So wait.. the BMW "only" makes it's 590 lb-ft at 1,500 rpm, and that's the most you'll ever get..... and the CTS-V makes that same 590 lb-ft at 2,000rpm and will continue to deliver another 40 lb-ft  once reaching 3,600rpm...

     

    post-51-0-55232000-1462586204_thumb.jpg

    .

    but somehow the BMW is better and has better power delivery?  What exactly have the Germans been putting in your Kool-Aid?

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I didn't say better power delivery, but the BMW V12 torque hits really low so it should pull pretty well off the line.   The 600 hp comes in at 5500 rpm on the BMW also, it is hitting it's peak sooner, so that can help make up the 40 hp difference.  Not totally, but the overall power is close.  The Rolls-Royce SUV could have over 760 lb-ft of torque, that could be a whole other animal, and the BMW won't get that tune it sounds like.

     

    The thing with the X7 V12 is what is the completion?  Mercedes could do a GLS65 and out power it.  A GLS600 Maybach would have less power.  But they haven't decided anything, and any of that would be next generation of GLS in 2019.   Cadillac could put the CTS-V engine in the Escalde, but look at the weight, at near 6,000 lbs no way would it be as fast as a unibody X7.  

     

    And a V12 is a V12.  There is something special about that regardless of the power rating.  I am excited for the X7 in that it will force Mercedes to up their game with the GLS, but the downside is BMW is probably going to steal GLS sales.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Uh, no. That is a completely dishonest comparison..comparing when the torque peaks occur is basically immaterial. The BMW and Cadillac produce the same amount of torque within 500rpm of each other, but the Cadillac goes on to produce even more as the RPM climbs while the BMW gets left behind.

    No one ever in all the history of automobiles is going to complain about 590 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm (plus more later) verses 590 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm (absolute max)... Except of course you and your badge snobbery.

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac could put the CTS-V engine in the Escalade, but look at the weight, at near 6,000 lbs no way would it be as fast as a unibody X7.

    Piece of cake- aftermarket tuners have built Escalades (LAST generation) going 0-60 in 3.3.

     

    'Big E' starts @ 5550 lbs, even the straight-up 6.2L engine is 8.6 lbs/HP. 750 HP is 7.4 lbs/HP, or less than a 4700 lb V-12 SUV @ BMW.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Will they test the Escalade-V on the Nurburgring?

    I'm not 100% sure they will, but I am 100% sure it doesn't matter. The Housewives of Miami who will buy this can't even pronounce Nurburgring.

    2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Will they test the Escalade-V on the Nurburgring?

    Wtf does that matter? Why is it that everytine to get proven wrong, you completely change the subject instead of just manning up and admitting that you don't have a clue about anything that doesn't come from Germany?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Will they test the Escalade-V on the Nurburgring?

    Wtf does that matter? Why is it that everytine to get proven wrong, you completely change the subject instead of just manning up and admitting that you don't have a clue about anything that doesn't come from Germany?

    Damn autocorrect. Let me revise the first part.

    Why is it that everytime YOU get proven wrong...

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A BMW fan will argue Nurburgring = more better. I am a Mercedes fan, not a BMW fan. To me the good thing about the X7 is it pushes Mercedes to up the ante on the GLS.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    Loading...



  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Raybob9289
      Raybob9289
      (50 years old)
    2. Z06C6Vette
      Z06C6Vette
      (28 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      The Buick Enclave and Chevrolet Traverse are well past their sell-by-date. GM knows this and will be introducing new versions of both within the next year. We haven't seen any spy shots of either model, til today.
      Autoblog published some spy shots of the next-generation Buick Enclave undergoing some hot-weather testing in Death Valley. From the shots, it looks like Buick will be retaining the shape of the current model. Although, it looks like the roofline has changed somewhat towards the back. We can pick out the new grille that we first saw on the new LaCrosse along with a set of LED running lights.
      The Enclave is expected to use a stretched version of the Chi platform that currently underpins the new GMC Acadia.
      Source: Autoblog

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The Buick Enclave and Chevrolet Traverse are well past their sell-by-date. GM knows this and will be introducing new versions of both within the next year. We haven't seen any spy shots of either model, til today.
      Autoblog published some spy shots of the next-generation Buick Enclave undergoing some hot-weather testing in Death Valley. From the shots, it looks like Buick will be retaining the shape of the current model. Although, it looks like the roofline has changed somewhat towards the back. We can pick out the new grille that we first saw on the new LaCrosse along with a set of LED running lights.
      The Enclave is expected to use a stretched version of the Chi platform that currently underpins the new GMC Acadia.
      Source: Autoblog
    • By William Maley
      BMW Group U.S. Reports August 2016 Sales
      BMW brand sales decrease 8.0 percent MINI brand sales decrease 2.7 percent Woodcliff Lake, NJ – September 1, 2016… Sales of BMW brand vehicles decreased 8.0 percent in August for a total of 25,531 compared to 27,755 vehicles sold in August, 2015.  Year-to-date, the BMW brand is down 8.3 percent in the U.S. on sales of 204,744 vehicles compared to 223,348 sold in the first eight months of 2015.
       
      Notable vehicle sales in August include the BMW 7 Series which increased to 1,230 cars, the BMW X3 which increased to 4,668 vehicles, and the BMW X5 which increased to 4,121 vehicles.
       
      “The clear trend toward Sports Activity Vehicles took a good-sized leap forward in August, as our U.S. plant again increased production and availability of the always popular BMW X3 and X5 pushing total X model sales to 44% of BMW retail in the U.S. in August,” said Ludwig Willisch, President and CEO, BMW of North America. “With the production increase, I fully expect the key SAV numbers to remain strong in the U.S. through the end of the year.”
       
      BMW Group Sales
      In total, the BMW Group in the U.S. (BMW and MINI combined) reported August sales of 30,500 vehicles, a decrease of 7.2 percent from the 32,864 vehicles sold in the same month a year ago.  Year-to-date, BMW Group sales are down 9.2 percent on sales of 239,631 vehicles in the first eight months of 2016 compared to 263,908 in the same period in 2015. 
       
      MINI Brand Sales
      For August, MINI USA reported 4,969 automobiles sold, a decrease of 2.7 percent from the 5,109 sold in the same month a year ago.  Year-to-date, MINI USA reported a total of 34,887 automobiles sold, a decrease of 14.0 percent from 40,560 automobiles sold in the first eight months of 2015.

    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt
      Alternative Fuels & Propulsion writer
      www.CheersandGears.com
       
      2017 Chevy BOLT Update

      Car & Driver did a ride along on a near production BOLT with  Bolt’s chief engineer, Josh Tavel . It was interesting to read that while Tavel stated the BOLT does zero to 60 in 7 seconds, that that drove it said the feel in the butt is that it is faster than that. They also stated that hit feels even faster the the BMW i3. Picture are here of a early run on the assembly line of a Chevy BOLT. These car pictures are our best view of what the production run BOLT will look like and it is looking very nice indeed.
      Some of the other interesting notes is that Josh is an SCCA Spec Racer. As such he had been very focused on making sure the BOLT is dialed in for the best of both worlds, daily driver and performance junkie. The story had the following to say as they got to take the BOLT out and about in the Detroit area.
      At 3600lbs, this compact CUV is what the public wanted when GM did their research, not some slick slice through the air Jelly bean car like Tesla, but a CUV. So this pretty much puts to rest the whole airflow thing, as they did their best while giving the public what it has asked for, a roomy, high seat position CUV.
      Also with 200HP and 266lbs of Torque, the story states that you have a clear choice, put the transmission in D and drive it like any other auto or slip it into L and Drive it normal but enjoy just like the Tesla S a return on regenerative power. What this means is you can get some of the battery recharged driving in the regen mode. Interesting is that Josh says if you drive the full 200+ miles you can get about 40 miles added back into the battery, so then you have a 200+ range plus 40 miles more when driving in L mode using regenerative mode.
      To quote the Story in regards to steering as many here have always talked about the numb feel in various auto's;
      " The electrically assisted rack-and-pinion steering is slack-free on-center, quick to respond, and nicely weighted. Walking that fine line between comfort for civilian drivers and engaging dynamics for enthusiasts is no easy feat, but Tavel deserves credit for balancing the two conflicting mentalities."
      There is plenty more to be said about the auto, an example is that using a DC quick charge, gives you 90 miles of range in 30 min. It is worth clicking the link above to read the story.
      Over all this has made me even more excited about the BOLT and what it can do for the public. Especially that after a 50+ mile drive in the BOLT, they say that having plenty of space for passengers, personal stuff and a highly congenial attitude makes the BOLT a Joy. I do like the BOLT in White as the 19 Pictures show with a decent interior.
      If you want to read just how much the BOLT beats the BMW i3, then read this story. 
      Chevy BOLT stacks against the BMW i3
      Considering this is written by the folks at BMWBlog, they feel the BOLT was designed to give customers the range of a Tesla but focused on the i3 as it's clear CUV competitor.  They also feel that the BOLT is faster than the stated 7 seconds for 0 to 60. They make some other statements and still claim that the i3 is an excellent package for the money. Not sure how they see that as the i3 is 80 miles range compared to the 200+ of the BOLT. Plus looking at the pictures, the BOLT is a superior interior I believe, but then this was written by a BMW fan.

    • By William Maley
      The Mazda CX-5 is now the oldest crossover in their lineup. But Mazda has some big plans for the next-generation model.
       
      A spy photographer caught a CX-5 mule filling up at a California gas station. The mule was heavily camouflaged, but we're able to pull some key details about the design. The first is that the CX-5 will be taking some design ideas from the larger CX-9. For example, the front end features narrower headlights and a more pronounced grille surround. The back of the roof also appears to have a sharper slant.
       
      We wouldn't be surprised if Mazda brings some premium materials and design to the CX-5's interior, along with more advanced driver assistance systems. One item up in the air is what will power the CX-5? Will they carry over the 2.0 and 2.5L four-cylinder engines? We would expect front-wheel and all-wheel drive to be on offer.
       
      Mazda could show the next-generation CX-5 later this year at the LA Auto Show/
       
      Source: Left Lane News, Motor1.com
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)