Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Ladies & Gents, I Give You The Cadillac XTS

    gallery_51_134_8996.jpg

    The picture you see here is the brand new 2013 Cadillac XTS. The picture was accidentally posted on Cadillac's home page today before being taken off. Luckily, a reader from Jalopnik captured the picture for all of us to see. Since then, Cadillac has confirmed this will be the XTS we see next week at the LA Auto Show.

    The production model is almost a carbon copy of the XTS Platinum concept shown at last year's Detroit Auto Show, with a different design for head and foglights. The XTS will also have Cadillac's new CUE infotainment system.

    Source: Jalopnik

    Edit: GM has since officially released the XTS photograph. I've updated the photo in this article with the GM Media supplied one - DD

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    God knows it is an improvement over the DTS.

    I don't think it's an improvement over the DTS. It's too narrow, and I don't care for the third window in the C pillar.

    I think it could succeed modestly if priced at the level of the Lexus ES350, but I fear Cadillac will price it much higher.

    That I feel is where the target is. I have seen people place much higher price on this than it will really be. SInce it is based on a standard platform this will help keep the price in a affordable range. ALso if GM plans to use it for fleet and livery sales it will have to keep it affordable.

    This is not a flag ship and it will not be a performance car. It will be a comfortable sedan with good MPG that will be affordable to the older buyers and commercial buyer.

    None of us should put any big expectations on this car for leading edge performance to ultra Luxury. This will be a more modern traditional luxury car and a affordable luxury car. It is taking the slot that the town car left and Lincoln is trying to get a new model to replace. It is a slot where there is good profit but not a lot of flash.

    As for the DTS it was showing its age and needed help. As for size many of these cars will be getting shorter and more narrow to remove weight. They need MPG's andI fear what we may see just to meet the new stadards unless the goverment wakes up.

    Edited by hyperv6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not seeing the crazy modifications to the production design over the concept. The windows on the side are now functional and the fog lamps are a bit different.

    Here's something I whipped up illustrating the differences. I couldn't help to pepper in a little opinion in the commentary, so simply ignore where I ramble a bit if you have to.

    post-8523-0-59244800-1321152607.jpg

    Ignore how crude it is. My graphic design skills have gotten very rusty since I quit taking classes.

    And, once again, the only things that I see that had to be changed on the concept car (which, once again, was touted to be a "thinly veiled" version of the eventual product) to make it production friendly are:

    • The size of the side-view mirrors.
    • The headlamp detailing.
    • Some interior parts and switchgear.

    Once again, I think the glasshouse was changed so that the hardpoints of this larger version of EPII could more easily be shared with the upcoming Chevrolet Impala.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not seeing the crazy modifications to the production design over the concept. The windows on the side are now functional and the fog lamps are a bit different.

    Here's something I whipped up illustrating the differences. I couldn't help to pepper in a little opinion in the commentary, so simply ignore where I ramble a bit if you have to.

    post-8523-0-59244800-1321152607.jpg

    Ignore how crude it is. My graphic design skills have gotten very rusty since I quit taking classes.

    And, once again, the only things that I see that had to be changed on the concept car (which, once again, was touted to be a "thinly veiled" version of the eventual product) to make it production friendly are:

    • The size of the side-view mirrors.
    • The headlamp detailing.
    • Some interior parts and switchgear.

    Once again, I think the glasshouse was changed so that the hardpoints of this larger version of EPII could more easily be shared with the upcoming Chevrolet Impala.

    The question is how many people who are the target of this car will really notice?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Depressing...all the Cadillac cars look the same. They come out with all these neat looking concept cars, you know GM can build them, then the company gives us this. The older I get the more I miss the old days. At least the cars had some character.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not seeing the crazy modifications to the production design over the concept. The windows on the side are now functional and the fog lamps are a bit different.

    Here's something I whipped up illustrating the differences. I couldn't help to pepper in a little opinion in the commentary, so simply ignore where I ramble a bit if you have to.

    post-8523-0-59244800-1321152607.jpg

    Ignore how crude it is. My graphic design skills have gotten very rusty since I quit taking classes.

    And, once again, the only things that I see that had to be changed on the concept car (which, once again, was touted to be a "thinly veiled" version of the eventual product) to make it production friendly are:

    • The size of the side-view mirrors.
    • The headlamp detailing.
    • Some interior parts and switchgear.

    Once again, I think the glasshouse was changed so that the hardpoints of this larger version of EPII could more easily be shared with the upcoming Chevrolet Impala.

    The question is how many people who are the target of this car will really notice?

    Doubt it... it's a DTS replacement and a competitor for the MKS, RL and ES..nothing more..will provide a steady volume and fleet sales for a while.

    I hope we eventually see a real, serious Cadillac range topping full size sedan that will be competitive in the big leagues..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just want to have an informed opinion. I am not a fan of this class of car but I am willing to give it a shot and to be fair I need to see it in person first. Too many have made harsh comments about a car only to have to take back or change their opinion later once the car is seen in person and does well on the market.

    I can understand having an informed opinion about the car, sure. As I've said, though, the one photo we've got is enough to form an opinion on this car from a design standpoint and regarding how the changes made from the concept car affect the design overall.

    Once again, I've only condemned the car from a design standpoint.

    It's kind of like me forming an opinion on you. I would rather meet you first vs Just hating you based on seeing you in one drunken photo on facebook! LOL!

    Well, no ... not really. While you can't form a rounded opinion about my behavior and personality from one photograph, you can certainly form an opinion about my appearance (e.g. "He's got a nice smile" or "He looks like he might be a bit of a slob").

    No one here, myself included, is making any firm assumptions about the car aside from how it has been designed. Again, notice no one has said in this thread that the car "is going to drive like shit" or "will be weak and underpowered." We don't have any hard data to go on here, hence why no one has said anything regarding those two aspects of the car, myself included.

    As for the concept vs production car. I think most are smart enough to understand the need for many changes. There is no need to explain on further.

    Really? Again, I'm going to have to disagree with you here unless you can explain why so much had to be changed from the production-ready concept car.

    I've given my explanation here and -- I'm sorry -- that's the only thing that makes logical sense. It's certainly not because that the original concept car would be expensive to produce on the outside.

    I look at cars like this as how the public will react and if there is a market segement to support it. I see there will be enough of each for this car if they keep the price down untill they can get to the kind of car they really want here. It was either this car for 4-5 yerars in the show room or an empty space in the showroom for the next 4-5 years. It will make money and do well till the right car is ready.

    Livery sales alone will make back any investment here. The Ma and Pa buyers need cars too. As for China it will do well. It will return better than average MPG and the back seat I suspect will be the best seat in the house in their version. Most owners in this class do not drive they are driven there.

    I don't know if the general public will get behind this one if it's going to max out beyond $50k price wise.

    Then again, it's really too early to assume anything about this car sales wise. That doesn't mean I won't speculate, though.

    However, I will guarantee this: if this car does not deliver on all expectations regarding fuel economy, an involving driving experience, interior fit and finish, the level of standard content, and overall quality then the press will crucify this car, Cadillac, and GM as a result. They had better hope that they've built a good enough stop-gap until they decide to produce the Ciel for general consumption (but I'm not holding my breath regarding the Ciel), otherwise this car will haunt them until they pull the plug on it.

    Regarding China, I really think this car will consistently lose out to the Park Avenue. Just saying and speculating.

    I don't look at it quite so sternly. The XTS, regardless of what anyone said or did not say, is not and will not be Cadillac's flagship. That will be the Ciel or whatever it ends up being called. The XTS is Cadillac's competitor to the Lexus ES350. It is not the Caddy with which to take on the S-class, the 7-series or the LS460. In this regard, I believe it will price in the 40s and it must exceed the expectations of Lexus ES and Acura RL buyers, as well as appeal to DTS/Deville customers looking for a follow-on caddy to buy. That standard is high, but it is not astronomical. And, from the superficial look I am getting so far, I don't see any obvious failings.

    The car must be extremely comfortable and whisper quiet. It must look and feel well made and classy. It should also have decent fuel economy and performance, but these aren't top priorities to this class. It doesn't have to be the ambassador as to everything that Caddy can accomplish -- it does not have to be a halo car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The question is how many people who are the target of this car will really notice?

    That's not the sole point I'm trying to make. I'm just wondering why GM chose to make Lee's Famous Recipe when they could've just as easily made KFC -- the real thing -- with not much more effort or cost.

    Want to know something, though? I don't know why all of those styling changes bother me, to be honest. Maybe it's because I feel that GM was capable of greater, effortless, and production feasible design prowess here and that makes me worry what that might mean for some future car that I'll be far more inclined to care about and actually purchase.

    I get there are all these changes, but the untrained eye says "looks just like the concept"

    I don't think you'd need a trained eye to pick up on the differences. I know I found a lot of them on my first glance. Then again, I'm not about to go out and find people to hold those two pictures up to.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't look at it quite so sternly. The XTS, regardless of what anyone said or did not say, is not and will not be Cadillac's flagship. That will be the Ciel or whatever it ends up being called. The XTS is Cadillac's competitor to the Lexus ES350.

    Here's my thing though... it was said before that Buick was positioned to take on Lexus.

    Why, again, is Cadillac redoubling Buick's mission?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I will say after looking at it again that it certainly appear to have much better proportions than the LaCrosse which sometimes looks super awkward esp from rear 3/4 view. I would agree with Ocn though that overall the 9-5 has the best execution of the Epsilon II cars so far although this is second in my mind.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The question is how many people who are the target of this car will really notice?

    That's not the sole point I'm trying to make. I'm just wondering why GM chose to make Lee's Famous Recipe when they could've just as easily made KFC -- the real thing -- with not much more effort or cost.

    Want to know something, though? I don't know why all of those styling changes bother me, to be honest. Maybe it's because I feel that GM was capable of greater, effortless, and production feasible design prowess here and that makes me worry what that might mean for some future car that I'll be far more inclined to care about and actually purchase.

    I get there are all these changes, but the untrained eye says "looks just like the concept"

    I don't think you'd need a trained eye to pick up on the differences. I know I found a lot of them on my first glance. Then again, I'm not about to go out and find people to hold those two pictures up to.

    Based on what I have learned from GM people many things are changed to meet many requirements. What seems like a little thing to you and me can add many many problems and dollars if it goes into production.

    Things as small as the smell of the leather scent cost money. This was one thing they were asking the diciples on the Camaro. Areas where sheet metal is crimped can be inportant to keeping it more rigid as they reduce the gage of the metal on the new cars to cut weight. LED fogs add to cost and on a car like this. GM wants to keep this cars price in check as it is more a volume car vs a high dollar limited car.

    Whlile we all like to have Kobe steak a New York Strip at the Texas Road House fits the need more.

    Now if this were the Cadillac flag ship no comprimise is needed. That is the car that will sell in lower volume and a higher price so no corners need be cut.

    Also for anyone who thinks this will be nothing but just another Larcrosse clone it would be wise to hold that thought. This car will offer things you will not ever find in a Lacrosse. By the time you do find them in a Buick Cadillac will have moved on.,

    This is just going to be the volume car for Cadillac and it is just filling empty space in the show room. Much of the work on this car was done prior to the Chapter 11 just as the Malibu and ZL1. GM rushed a lot of project to put on the shelve so they would have new cars in less time when they came out of the bail out. It is a good thing they did or they would be like Chrysler and hurting for relivent new product for the show room. So far the redesigns are helping but the Fiat is a flop. Chrysler still needs small cars and it will still be some time till more rebadged Fiats arrive.

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    people soiled their panties all aghast when the last SRX became the Cadillac Vue, but look at the sales charts.

    take last months STS+DTS numbers and then go 4x on it and I am gonna guess that is where XTS goes once up and running.

    CTS and LaCrosse may take a little bump in the shorts but hey that is how GM balances out production and new car programs. it should even out the resources and sales over time.

    ATS will also steal a few CTS sales, but really the XTS being the ES Cadillac and the ATS becoming the 3 series cadillac just means to me that the next CTS will become a bit of a de facto flagship in the next gen. These days, a flagship doesn't NEED to be the largest. And even then, if Cadillac does carry through with a true S class competitor, it will have to be that much better than the next gen CTS.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So it's 202 inches long with 40 inches of rear seat leg room, 18 cubic feet of trunk space and an unfettered 3.6L V6. Standard 19" wheels, with 20" rims on Platinum trims. The GM photos still make it look a bit high and narrow in the front 3/4 shot. And the rear still has the proportions of the concept, with a short decklid but long "underhang".

    It's something to get used to. And I don't think it is Cadillac's ES350. It's higher than that... I don't know, Audi A6? Volvo S80?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You know, I've been a huge detractor of this car from the moment I saw the concept. But I think that the level of dislike rose to a scream when whatever website it was that broke the story used the unfortunate term "flagship". If the headline had been " Cadillac debuts the XTS concept as its me too product for the FWD luxury crowd" , the objections might have been quieter.

    Because, in truth, that's all the XTS is: a 'me too" product that competes with other "not really luxury" cars like the ES350 and the entire Acura lineup.

    And that would be ok, except that this is GM we are talking about and that job belongs to Buick.

    This car is the wrong car, at the wrong time, wearing the wrong badge. And the absence of a true flagship is made more obvious by putting the XTS into Caddy's lineup.

    It hurts the brand.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Camino the fact is this is a car that is not targeted for you. In fact if you did like it there would be something wrong as they are now aiming this car as the enthusisast buyers. There is a mass segment of people out there that like cars that you and I do not like and their money is just as green. GM could try to force them into a car they don't like or offer them a car they will buy. It is about making money.

    Also just because some report made this out to be some kind of flaf ship in error does not make it a flag ship.

    While this may not be a luxury car in you terms it is in the view of many others. I too believe this will be like the SRX and it will sell in good numbers as there are few really good cars in this class. The money made on cars like this will help provide the income to build the flagship of your dreams.

    So it is fine to not like this car. I too am not a fan but I also understand I no longer reresent the wants and the needs of the average buyer anylonger. As long as they make money with this car more power to em.

    I think in the end you will be proven wrong that this will hurt Cadillac. While it is not the home run car it will be a solid performer in profit and not harm Cadillacs image. With the town car gone there is a lot of sales up for grabs and a lot of money on the table left to be picked up. Also I see this car being replaced in 4-5 years anyway. It is just buying time.

    Edited by hyperv6
    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't dream of Cadillacs, flagship or otherwise, but it is still easy to see that this car is misplaced at Cadillac.

    As a Buick, it might nose into Caddy's territory a bit, but that would be a good thing for both brands.

    Maybe it will sell ok, like the SRX does - we shall see.

    But both of these vehicles muddy the brand waters at GM, and that is a familiar GM pitfall.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So this XTS is not a car for me or many others here it would seem. Yet it will sell well as it does have an audience that is wanting it. My dad, 70 years old was very upset when Caddy anounced the death of the DTS. He was waiting till he retired to get his final retirement car. Since I showed him the pictures of the xts, he is very excited and this Friday when we go to our Cadillac party at Dougs NW Cadillac he is planning on talking with Brad the saleman who has sold all our cadillacs and hummers into our family about the ability to order up an XTS.

    I truly see a market for this and Cadillac does also. We cannot overlook those in their late 50's and older who like a auto like the XTS. It will offer expanded growth to the caddy family.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What would hurt Cadillac more is having a showroom with just CTS, SRX and Escalade for the next 24 months.

    Cadillac needs product now and this one will do well.

    I am ok with some here not liking this car as if every car was embraced by many here it would tell me GM has missed a segment of the market somewhere. There is no car do it all model and GM needs to address different buyers.

    While there will be some appeal to the snow tops here the car will also take a step more to where they need to be vs the old DTS and STS.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't dream of Cadillacs, flagship or otherwise, but it is still easy to see that this car is misplaced at Cadillac.

    As a Buick, it might nose into Caddy's territory a bit, but that would be a good thing for both brands.

    Maybe it will sell ok, like the SRX does - we shall see.

    But both of these vehicles muddy the brand waters at GM, and that is a familiar GM pitfall.

    One look at the options listed today Buick could never price a car out with the same features here in their range.

    Haldex AWD and the Magnetic ride are years from ever being found in a Buick under $40K.

    The other technology will trickle down to Buick but Cadillac will be on to others by then,

    I really see this car as being much more than just a Lacrosse 2.0. I am waiting for the reviews to point this out. GM has suprised many with the new cars they have come out with in the last 2 years and proved many wrong about their preconcieved ideas.

    I hope you are wrong not to make me right but to prove GM is still on the right track. I have said in the past GM will come back one model at a time ove the next 5 years, This is just one more model and step I hope in reaching their goal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Whoa, reading the actual dimensions of the car, it really IS high and narrow. And fairly long, but mostly high and narrow. It is, I guess, Cadillac's MKS, although it seems a bit nicer. High and narrow though...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Whoa, reading the actual dimensions of the car, it really IS high and narrow. And fairly long, but mostly high and narrow. It is, I guess, Cadillac's MKS, although it seems a bit nicer. High and narrow though...

    Short wheelbase also..111 inches...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2012 Chrysler 300:

    wheelbase - 120.2"

    length - 198.6"

    width - 75"

    height - 58.4"

    Ahhh... yes...

    I like the Chrysler's proportions and shape a lot better, though I suspect the XTS has more rear seat room.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What would hurt Cadillac more is having a showroom with just CTS, SRX and Escalade for the next 24 months.

    May be.

    But it would have been better if something else had been greenlighted instead of this.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Plastic cladding = off road.  Instead of killing the Sonata, they should just put plastic body cladding down the side and raise the price by $10k and call it the Sonata HD Overlander X.  Instant hit.
    • Considering a planet with 8 Billion and he sold almost 2 million cars, then he is covering .025% of the population compared to other auto companies. I think 2024 going into 2025 we will see other auto companies top Tesla. You and I are two peas in a pod as I also was up on a hill watching the implosion and thinking what a waste as it was a great building. I love the Kingdome and hate the new stadium.  Agree it was surreal to see the ship hit the support pillar and the whole building just collapse. Be interesting to see what replaces it as today bridges built like that are not allowed due to the exact nature of how it collapsed.  Yes, Tesla is a love or hate and the minimalist approach is not for everyone. I honestly have to agree with the comment @smk4565 I believe made that the touch screen only will be the future of cheap autos and switches and buttons will be the higher end autos. Interesting times we live in for sure.
    • Decent upgrade to the aging 2024 model. Nice to see they are reducing costs of the curved screen in the EVs by pushing it out across the Hyundai Family and into Kia. The one thing I do not like is all the Chrome. 🤢 🤮
    • Today at the New York International Auto Show, Hyundai unveiled an update to its little truck, the Hyundai Santa Cruz. The refresh to the exterior is relatively mild, though it features a more menacing grille with bolder verticle lines.  Updated running lights and new wheel designs add to the fresher look. Inside, there is a new steering wheel, infotainment system, and instrument panel. on upper trims, an optional panoramic curved display houses dual 12.3-inch displays for driver and entertainment. The plenty-capable powertrains carry over with either a 191-horsepower direct injected 2.5-liter 4-cylinder or a turbo-charged version of of the same engine with 281 horsepower.  The transmission for the entry-level engine is a traditional 8-speed automatic, while the turbo-charged model gets an 8-speed dual-clutch transmission. Santa Cruzes with the turbo engine gain a new tow mode for enhanced towing control.  Both powertrains are towing capable with a 3,500 lb rating for the entry engine and a stout 5,000 lb rating for the turbo models when equipped with all-wheel drive. New for 2025 is an XRT trim geared even more towards outdoor adventure. It features a trim-specific front fascia and grille, special 18-inch wheels with all-terrain tires, an increased approach angle, front tow hooks, and surround-view monitoring.    The 2025 Hyundai Santa Cruz goes on sale this summer. View full article
    • Regarding Tesla - it's either love or hate with these vehicles.  A college friend I'll be seeing when in SoCal next month has 2 of them, and I'll probably be riding in both of them - one is his sleeker S model and I forgot which the other one (that his wife drives) is.  In certain places, people have a lot of disposable income and having a Tesla goes with the landscape. Minimalist(ic) isn't necessarily bad.  We all remember the adage "less is more."  I'll vouch that the workmanship of the interior is good and I can also vouch that the overall look (including the centered everything on one display) is ugly.  I will say that EV motors are supposed to last a long time but the battery replacement is very expensive and the range is currently not that optimal. I did not like the model Y I had for less than 1 day.  Also, its exterior is mostly ugly.  That's my opinion. This isn't a discussion I want to get into.  I would much prefer a more user-friendly EV ... and not just yet. - - - - - What I was randomly going to say: I'm not sure whether I'm in shock or still feeling surreal as to what happened in Baltimore.  At first, I thought a ship just hit something on a bridge.  Then I saw the footage and that's the surreal part ... the domino-like collapse of the entire structure and the size of the ship.  I remember having to figure out the forces of either tension or compression on each member of a truss-like structure when I was in school.   A group of us sat there for about 3 or 4 hours one night - with some Mountain Dew - to work that out. I don't believe I've been on that bridge since it's on the outer beltway, but it's numbered as part of the U.S. interstate system.  From looking at the map, it is the major bridge on the entrance to/exit from Baltimore Harbor.  I hope they find the 6 individuals who were working on it fixing potholes in the middle of the night who fell down with the bridge.  The ship giving a mayday is what allowed them to shut down both approaches to the bridge just in time.   The weird thing is that it happened on March 26.  IIRC, the deliberate (domino-like) implosion of the reinforced concrete Kingdome in Seattle happened on March 26, 2000 (no rain that day) and people were sitting on slopes overlooking downtown to see that happen.  But that's how it is with planned implosions.  I went there that morning and have photos of the Kingdome's last day somewhere. https://www.seahawks.com/video/kingdome-implosion-hd It was indeed March 26, 2000.  I was one of the few who liked the Kingdome.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings